`Case 2:17-cv-00517—JRG Document 52-2 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 654
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 11
`EXHIBIT 11
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 52-2 Filed 01/26/18 Page 2 of 19 PageID #: 655
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
`LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA INC., HUAWEI
`DEVICE CO., LTD. AND HUAWEI
`DEVICE (DONGGUAN) CO., LTD.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:17-CV-513-JRG
`(Lead Case)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS”) hereby makes the following
`
`infringement disclosures under the Patent Local Rules with respect to United States Patent Nos.
`
`9,467,838 (the “’838 Patent”), 9,445,251 (the “’251 Patent”), 9,408,055 (the “’055 Patent”), and
`
`8,213,970 (the “’970 Patent”) (collectively, “patents-in-suit”). AGIS’s investigation is ongoing and
`
`discovery has not yet commenced. Accordingly, these disclosures are based on information
`
`available to AGIS at this time. AGIS reserves the right to supplement this disclosure after further
`
`discovery from the defendants and non-parties, particularly documents and other discovery
`
`regarding the Huawei Accused Products set forth below. AGIS also reserves the right to assert
`
`additional claims of the patents-in-suit, accuse different products, or find alternative literal and/or
`
`equivalent infringing elements in the Huawei Accused Products.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 52-2 Filed 01/26/18 Page 3 of 19 PageID #: 656
`
`
`
`I.
`
`DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`PURSUANT TO PATENT LOCAL RULE 3-1
`
`A.
`
`ASSERTED CLAIMS
`
`Defendants Huawei Device USA, Inc., Huawei Device Co., Ltd., and Huawei Device
`
`(Dongguan) Co., Ltd. (“Defendants” or “Huawei”) have infringed and continue to infringe at least
`
`the following claims of the patents-in-suit in connection with the Huawei Accused Products set
`
`forth below:
`
`• Claims 1-54 of the ’838 Patent;
`
`• Claims 1-35 of the ’251 Patent;
`
`• Claims 1-54 of the ’055 Patent; and
`
`• Claims 1 and 3-9 of the ’970 Patent.
`
`AGIS reserves the right to seek leave of court to add, delete, substitute, or otherwise
`
`amend this list of asserted claims should further discovery, the Court’s claim construction, or
`
`other circumstances so merit.
`
`B.
`
`ACCUSED INSTRUMENTALITIES
`
`AGIS is currently aware that the following Huawei Accused Products infringe each of the
`
`patents-in-suit either alone or in concert with one or more other Huawei Accused Products:
`
`• Activa 4G
`
`• Ascend
`
`• Ascend D1
`
`• Ascend D1 Quad
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 52-2 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 19 PageID #: 657
`
`
`
`• Ascend D1 Quad XL
`
`• Ascend D2
`
`• Ascend G300
`
`• Ascend G350
`
`• Ascend G510
`
`• Ascend G525
`
`• Ascend G526
`
`• Ascend G6
`
`• Ascend G600
`
`• Ascend G610
`
`• Ascend G615
`
`• Ascend G620
`
`• Ascend G620S
`
`• Ascend G630
`
`• Ascend G7
`
`• Ascend G700
`
`• Ascend II
`
`• Ascend Mate
`
`• Ascend Mate 2 4G
`
`• Ascend Mate7
`
`• Ascend P1 LTE
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 52-2 Filed 01/26/18 Page 5 of 19 PageID #: 658
`
`
`
`• Ascend P1 LTE
`
`• Ascend P1 S
`
`• Ascend P2
`
`• Ascend P6
`
`• Ascend P7
`
`• Ascend P7 Mini
`
`• Ascend Q
`
`• Ascend W1
`
`• Ascend W2
`
`• Ascend Y
`
`• Ascend Y200
`
`• Ascend Y210
`
`• Ascend Y220
`
`• Ascend Y221
`
`• Ascend Y300
`
`• Ascend Y300II
`
`• Ascend Y320
`
`• Ascend Y330
`
`• Ascend Y511
`
`• Ascend Y520
`
`• Ascend Y530
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 52-2 Filed 01/26/18 Page 6 of 19 PageID #: 659
`
`
`
`• Ascend Y540
`
`• Ascend Y550
`
`• Ascend Y600
`
`• 4Afrika
`
`• Boulder
`
`• G535
`
`• G6
`
`• G610
`
`• G630
`
`• G6600
`
`• G6620
`
`• G7010
`
`• G740
`
`• G8
`
`• GR3
`
`• GR5
`
`• GR5
`
`• GR5 2017
`
`• GT3
`
`• Honor
`
`• Honor 3C
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 52-2 Filed 01/26/18 Page 7 of 19 PageID #: 660
`
`
`
`• Honor 3X
`
`• Honor 4 Play
`
`• Honor 4C
`
`• Honor 4X
`
`• Honor 5C
`
`• Honor 5X
`
`• Honor 6
`
`• Honor 6 Plus
`
`• Honor 6C
`
`• Honor 6X (64GB and 32GB)
`
`• Honor 7
`
`• Honor 7i
`
`• Honor 7X
`
`• Honor 8
`
`• Honor 8 Lite (64GB and 32 GB)
`
`• Honor 9
`
`• Honor 9i
`
`• Honor Note 8
`
`• Honor V8
`
`• Honor V9
`
`•
`
`Ideaos X5
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 52-2 Filed 01/26/18 Page 8 of 19 PageID #: 661
`
`
`
`•
`
`IDEOS S7
`
`•
`
`IDEOS X1
`
`•
`
`IDEOS X2
`
`•
`
`IDEOS X3
`
`•
`
`IDEOS X6
`
`• M228
`
`• M328
`
`• M735
`
`• M750
`
`• M835
`
`• Mate
`
`• Mate 10
`
`• Mate 10 Lite
`
`• Mate 10 Porsche Design
`
`• Mate 10 Pro
`
`• Mate 8
`
`• Mate 9
`
`• Mate 9 Porsche Design
`
`• Mate 9 Pro
`
`• Mate S
`
`• Mercury
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 52-2 Filed 01/26/18 Page 9 of 19 PageID #: 662
`
`
`
`• Nova
`
`• Nova 2
`
`• Nova 2 Plus
`
`• Nova 2i
`
`• Nova Plus
`
`• P10
`
`• P10 Lite
`
`• P10 Plus
`
`• P6
`
`• P8
`
`• P8 Lite
`
`• P8 Lite 2017
`
`• P8MAX
`
`• P9
`
`• P9 Lite
`
`• P9 Lite Mini
`
`• P9 Plus
`
`• PAL
`
`• Pillar
`
`• Pinnacle
`
`• Pinnacle 2
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 52-2 Filed 01/26/18 Page 10 of 19 PageID #: 663
`
`
`
`• Premia 4G
`
`• SNAPTO
`
`• Sonic
`
`• Summit
`
`• U120
`
`• U1280
`
`• U3200
`
`• U7520
`
`• U8100
`
`• U8110
`
`• U8150 IDEOS
`
`• U8230
`
`• U8300
`
`• U9200-1
`
`• U9500-1
`
`• U9510E
`
`• Union
`
`• Valiant
`
`• Verge
`
`• Vision
`
`• Vitria
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 52-2 Filed 01/26/18 Page 11 of 19 PageID #: 664
`
`
`
`• W2
`
`• Y210-0010
`
`• Y3
`
`• Y3 2017
`
`• Y320
`
`• Y330
`
`• Y3II
`
`• Y5
`
`• Y530
`
`• Y550
`
`• Y560
`
`• Y5II
`
`• Y6
`
`• Y6 2017
`
`• Y6 Pro
`
`• Y625
`
`• Y635
`
`• Y6II
`
`• Y7
`
`• Y7 2017
`
`• Y7 Prime
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 52-2 Filed 01/26/18 Page 12 of 19 PageID #: 665
`
`
`
`• dtab d-01H
`
`• Honor X1
`
`• Honor X2
`
`•
`
`IDEOS S7
`
`• Matebook
`
`• Matebook D
`
`• Matebook E
`
`• Matebook X
`
`• MediaPad
`
`• MediaPad 10 FHD
`
`• MediaPad 10 Link
`
`• MediaPad 10 Link
`
`• MediaPad 10 Link LTE
`
`• MediaPad 10 Link Plus
`
`• MediaPad 7 Lite
`
`• MediaPad 7 Vogue
`
`• MediaPad 7 Vogue
`
`• MediaPad 7 Youth
`
`• MediaPad 7 Youth2
`
`• MediaPad M1
`
`• MediaPad M2
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 52-2 Filed 01/26/18 Page 13 of 19 PageID #: 666
`
`
`
`• MediaPad M2 10-inch
`
`• MediaPad M2 8.0
`
`• MediaPad M3
`
`• MediaPad M3 lite 10
`
`• MediaPad S7 Slim
`
`• MediaPad T1 10
`
`• MediaPad T1 7.0
`
`• MediaPad T1 8.0
`
`• MediaPad T1 8.0 WIFI
`
`• MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
`
`• MediaPad T2 7.0
`
`• MediaPad T3
`
`• MediaPad T3 7
`
`• MediaPad X1
`
`• MediaPad X2
`
`AGIS reserves the right to amend this list of accused instrumentalities, as well as other
`
`information contained in this document and the exhibits hereto, to incorporate new information
`
`learned during the course of discovery, including, but not limited to, the inclusion of newly-
`
`released products or any other equivalent devices ascertained through discovery.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`12
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 52-2 Filed 01/26/18 Page 14 of 19 PageID #: 667
`
`
`
`C.
`
`CLAIM CHARTS
`
`Claim charts identifying a location of every element of every asserted claim of the patents-
`
`in-suit within Huawei Accused Products are attached hereto as Exhibits A–D. AGIS believes that
`
`the citations in the claim charts are representative of all Huawei Accused Products. For example,
`
`where AGIS cites reference material or images representing a phone or tablet, that citation is
`
`representative for all other such phones or tablets including all prior and future versions unless
`
`otherwise noted. AGIS reserves the right to amend these claim charts as well as other information
`
`contained in this document and the exhibits hereto, to incorporate new information learned during
`
`the course of discovery, including, but not limited to, information that is not publically available
`
`or readily discernible without discovery. AGIS further reserves the right to amend these claim
`
`charts, as well as other information contained in this document and the exhibits attached hereto,
`
`pursuant to Patent Local Rules 3-1(g) and 3-6.
`
`D.
`
`LITERAL INFRINGEMENT AND DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS
`
`AGIS asserts that, under the proper construction of the asserted claims and their claim
`
`terms, the limitations of the asserted claims of the patents-in-suit are literally present in the
`
`Huawei Accused Products as set forth in the claim charts attached hereto as Exhibits A–D. AGIS
`
`contends that any and all elements found not to be literally infringed are infringed under the
`
`doctrine of equivalents because the differences between the claimed inventions and the accused
`
`instrumentalities, if any, are insubstantial.
`
`AGIS contends that Huawei directly infringes the asserted claims by making, using,
`
`offering for sale, selling, and importing in to the United States the accused instrumentalities as
`
`well as indirectly infringe by contributing to and/or inducing others (e.g., Huawei customers or its
`
`13
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 52-2 Filed 01/26/18 Page 15 of 19 PageID #: 668
`
`
`
`Huawei customers’ customers) to directly infringe those claims by making, using, offering for
`
`sale or selling the Huawei Accused Products. AGIS contends that Huawei directly infringes the
`
`asserted claims by testing the Huawei Accused Products in the United States. AGIS contends that
`
`Huawei infringes the asserted claims by contributing to and/or inducing Mobile Network
`
`Operators (MNOs) and/or jointly-and-directly infringing the asserted claims with MNOs by
`
`making, using, offering for sale, selling, and importing in to the United States the accused
`
`instrumentalities.
`
`Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-6(a)(1), AGIS reserves the right to amend its Infringement
`
`Contentions as to literal infringement or infringement under the doctrine of equivalents, e.g., in
`
`light of the Court’s claim construction.
`
`E.
`
`PRIORITY DATES
`
`Under P.R. 3-1(e), each of the asserted claims of the patents-in-suit are entitled to a
`
`priority date of at least as early as September 21, 2004. AGIS reserves the right to establish an
`
`earlier date of invention based upon actions related to conception and reduction to practice of the
`
`claimed inventions.
`
`F.
`
`AGIS’S OWN PRODUCTS
`
`At the present time, AGIS does not intend to rely on the assertion that its own apparatuses,
`
`products, devices, processes, methods, acts, or other instrumentalities practice the claimed
`
`inventions. AGIS reserves the right to amend this statement to identify covered products as
`
`discovery progresses.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`14
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 52-2 Filed 01/26/18 Page 16 of 19 PageID #: 669
`
`
`
`II.
`
`PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO PATENT LOCAL RULE 3-2
`
`AGIS is producing or making available for inspection documents that are in AGIS’S
`
`possession, custody or control as set forth in Patent Local Rule 3-2. An AGIS 3-2 Production
`
`Index identifying these documents is attached hereto.
`
`This preliminary identification of documents is for convenience and is not an admission
`
`that each document falls within any exemplary categories in the Patent Local Rules, or that any
`
`document qualifies as prior art. AGIS is continuing with its investigation, particularly with
`
`respect to ESI. Thus, AGIS reserves its right to add to, delete from, or otherwise modify its
`
`disclosures in this section as its investigation proceeds.
`
`Production of these documents is governed by Patent Local Rule 2-2, and, with the
`
`exception of documents produced pursuant to P.R. 3.2(c) and public documents listed in the
`
`infringement charts, are considered “Confidential – Outside Attorneys Eyes Only” and disclosure
`
`of the confidential document or information shall be limited to each party’s outside attorney(s) of
`
`record and the employees of such outside attorney(s).
`
`Dated: November 28, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`BROWN RUDNICK LLP
`
` /s/ Vincent J. Rubino
`Alfred R. Fabricant
`NY Bar No. 2219392
`Email: afabricant@brownrudnick.com
`Peter Lambrianakos
`NY Bar No. 2894392
`Email:plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`NY Bar No. 4557435
`Email: vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Alessandra C. Messing
`
`15
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 52-2 Filed 01/26/18 Page 17 of 19 PageID #: 670
`
`
`
`NY Bar No. 5040019
`Email: amessing@brownrudnick.com
`John A. Rubino
`NY Bar No. 5020797
`Email: jrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Enrique W. Iturralde
`NY Bar No. 5526280
`eiturralde@brownrudnick.com
`
`BROWN RUDNICK LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: (212) 209-4800
`Facsimile: (212) 209-4801
`
`Samuel F. Baxter
`Texas State Bar No. 01938000
`sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com
`Jennifer L. Truelove
`Texas State Bar No. 24012906
`jtruelove@mckoolsmith.com
`
`MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`104 e. Houston Street, Suite 300
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone : (903) 923-9000
`Facsimile (903) 923-9099
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF,
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`16
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 52-2 Filed 01/26/18 Page 18 of 19 PageID #: 671
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
` I
`
` hereby certify that on November 28, 2017 a true and correct copy of the above and
`
`foregoing document has been served by email on:
`
`G. Blake Thompson
`Mann Tindel Thompson
`300 West Main Street
`Henderson, TX 75652
`blake@themannfirm.com
`
`Michael A. Berta
`Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
`Three Embarcadero Center
`San Francisco, CA 94111-4024
`michael.berta@apks.com
`
`
`
`J. Mark Mann
`Mann Tindel Thompson
`300 West Main Street
`Henderson, TX 75652
`mark@themannfirm.com
`
`James Blackburn
`Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
`777 South Figueroa Street, 44th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`james.blackburn@apks.com
`
`Nicholas Lee
`Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
`777 South Figueroa Street, 44th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`nicholas.lee@apks.com
`
`
`
`Attorneys of Record for Huawei Device USA, Inc., Huawei Device Co., Ltd., and Huawei
`Device (Dongguan) Co., Ltd.
`
`
`
`/s/ Vincent J. Rubino, III
`
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`17
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 52-2 Filed 01/26/18 Page 19 of 19 PageID #: 672
`
`
`
`
`
`3-2(a)
`
`
`
`
`3-2(b)
`
`
`
`3-2(c)
`
`
`AGIS 3-2 PRODUCTION INDEX
`
`Bates Start
`AGISTX_00007059
`
`Bates End
`AGISTX_00007071
`
`Bates Start
`AGISTX_00006047
`AGISTX_00007035
`
`Bates End
`AGISTX_00006191
`AGISTX_00007058
`
`Bates Start
`AGISTX_00000001_
`
`Bates End
`AGISTX_00006046
`
`
`Public Documents Listed in Infringement Charts1
`
`
`Bates End
`Bates Start
`AGISTX_00007788
`AGISTX_00007106
`AGISTX_00008277
`AGISTX_00007789
`AGISTX_Huawei00000001 AGISTX_Huawei00001068
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Exemplary Source Code excerpts were taken from the Android 7 Nougat Release 1.0 at
`
`https://android.googlesource.com/ as set forth in Exhibits A–D. AGIS expects that Defendant will produce this
`
`release for the Accused Products in its entirety.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`18
`
`