throbber
Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 38-3 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 427
`
`DECLARATION OF JAMES RAY WOOD IN SUPPORT OF
`
`DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`
`
`I, James Ray Wood, declare under penalty of perjury as follows:
`
`
`1.
`
`I am over the age of eighteen years and competent to make this declaration.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2. The facts stated in this Declaration are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
`
`3.
`
`I am employed in the role of Chief Patent Counsel for ZTE (USA) Inc. (“ZTA”).
`
`4. ZTA is a New Jersey Corporation.
`
`5. ZTA’s principal place of business is located in the Northern District of Texas, at 2425 North
`Central Expressway, Suite 800, Richardson, Texas.
`
`6. ZTA has no regular and established place of business in the Eastern District of Texas.
`
`7. ZTA has no physical presence, such as a storefront, physical facility, or owned, leased, or rented
`office space, in the Eastern District of Texas.
`
`8. ZTA has no bank accounts in the Eastern District of Texas.
`
`9. ZTA does not have a registered agent within the Eastern District of Texas.
`
`10. Independent customer service representatives work on ZTA’s behalf out of a call center located
`in the Eastern District of Texas. These independent customer service representatives are not
`employees of ZTA, they are employees of iQor, an independent company which is a vendor to
`ZTA. iQor services multiple other customers out of the call center, and ZTA is not the largest
`customer iQor services out of the call center.
`
`11. ZTA does not own, lease, or rent the office space at the call center. ZTA does not own the
`equipment, computers, furniture, or office supplies for the call center. ZTA does not store
`products at the call center.
`
`12. iQor owns, operates, and controls the call center. ZTA employees may visit the call center, but
`are not stationed there full time.
`
`13. ZTA has no employee salespeople who operate out of their homes within the Eastern District of
`Texas.
`
`14. ZTA has employee(s) who live in the Eastern District of Texas, and one or more of those
`employee(s) may work from home. However, ZTA does not own, lease, or otherwise exercise
`possession or control over the homes of these employees. Furthermore, these employees are
`free to live wherever they choose, as far as ZTA is concerned. As such, ZTA has not conditioned
`the employment of any ZTA employee upon continued residence in the Eastern District of Texas
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 38-3 Filed 11/21/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 428
`
`or upon continued performance of ZTA business from his or her home in the Eastern District of
`Texas.
`
`15. ZTA does not advertise or represent, internally or externally, that it has a place of business in the
`Eastern District of Texas, or that the homes of these employees are “places of business” or
`“offices” of ZTA. ZTA does not store company products in the homes of its employees and
`customers cannot obtain products from ZTA’s employee home offices.
`
`16. ZTA does not employ a secretarial service within the Eastern District of Texas to assist
`employees working from their homes in the Eastern District of Texas.
`
`17. ZTA realizes neither significant amount of direct revenue nor significant number of direct sales
`from customers in the Eastern District of Texas.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`18. ZTA does not target the Eastern District of Texas with any non-charitable marketing or
`promotional efforts. ZTA does engage in generalized marketing and promotional efforts, but
`they are not targeted at the Eastern District.
`
` I
`
` declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on:
`
`
`
`
`Date
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: James Ray Wood
` Chief Patent Counsel, ZTE (USA) Inc.
`
`20 Nov 2017
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket