throbber
Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 38-2 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 425
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00517—JRG Document 38-2 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 2 PagelD #: 425
`
`DECLARATION OF EDWARD RAYESKI IN SUPPORT OF
`
`DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`l, Edward Rayeski, declare under penalty of perjury as follows:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`I am over the age of eighteen years and competent to make this declaration.
`
`The facts stated in this Declaration are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
`
`I am employed in the role of Director, Handset 8: Device Support Customer Service at ZTE (USA)
`
`Inc. (”ZTA”). My job responsibilities have included oversight of customer service for ZTA since
`late 2011.
`
`Prior to 2015, ZTA's telephonic customer support for U.S. customers was handled by a call
`
`center located in India. Toll-free calls from the U.S. were answered by call center
`
`representatives located in India.
`
`By 2015, ZTA had decided to provide customer service support with representatives based in the
`
`United States. ZTA further concluded domestic customer service would best be provided
`
`through the use of a third-party call center company. Outsourcing customer support is a
`
`common practice among electronic device manufacturers and carriers.
`
`In 2015, ZTA sent an RFP ("Request For Proposal“) to a number of third-party call center
`
`companies with service representatives located within the United States. ZTA did not require
`
`that the bidding companies have a presence in any particular location. ZTA entertained
`
`proposals from companies with facilities located within the Dallas-Fort Worth ("DFW“) Metro
`
`area, throughout Texas, and throughout the United States. The contract was awarded to iQor, a
`
`global customer service company with call center facilities all over the world.
`
`At the time iQor was awarded the contract, ZTA understood that iQor had a single call-center in
`
`the DFW Metro area, in Richardson, Texas. Subsequent to being awarded the ZTA contract, iQor
`
`decided to open a second facility in the DFW Metro area that would handle calls for ZTE USA, as
`
`well as other companies. iQor independently chose Plano, Texas as the location for its new iQor
`
`facility. ZTA did not dictate, request or influence iQor's selection of the location for its call-
`
`center facility. From ZTA's perspective, it did not matter whether the customer support
`
`representatives were located in iQor's Richardson facility or another convenient location within
`the DFW Metro area.
`
`ZTA began to use the iQor call center in 2015 and has also continued to make use of its
`
`longstanding call center in India. Both call centers handle calls from consumers who have
`
`questions about ZTA products.
`
`Two toll—free numbers are provided on ZTA website for customer support. Customers that dial
`
`ZTA‘s general toll-free customer support number are asked by an automated voice recording to
`
`select a number corresponding to his or her carrier le.g., "for AT&T, press 4"}. Depending on the
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 38-2 Filed 11/21/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 426
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00517—JRG Document 38-2 Filed 11/21/17 Page 2 of 2 PagelD #: 426
`
`selections made in the automated menu, the customer support call is routed to the customer
`
`support facility in India or to iQor's call center in Plano, Texas. The other toll-free number is for
`
`calls related to the Axon product, unlocked devices he, not purchased in connection with a
`
`specific carrier), and for online purchase and sales support. This second number always routes
`customers to the iQor call center.
`
`There are at least five different iClor customers serviced at the Piano call center, including
`
`Capital One (credit cards), Asurion (warranties for electronics), TytoCare (medical), AliveCor
`
`(medical), and ZTA. Capital One is by far the largest iQor customer serviced in Plano.
`
`There is no ZTA signage at the iQor call center. The building housing the call center displays the
`
`iQor logo.
`
`iQor is responsible for hiring all customer service representatives that work in its Plano call
`
`center. iClor advertises for job applicants, receives and reviews their application forms,
`
`interviews them, and makes the hiring decisions. ZTA has no role in the hiring of customer
`
`service representatives that work in the Plano call center.
`
`iCtor decides how much to pay the customer service representatives that work in its Piano call
`
`center, sets their work schedules, determines their Specific assignments, reviews their
`
`performance, and determines their benefits, raises and promotions. iQor issues their paychecks.
`
`ZTA has no role in any of these activities.
`
`iQor trains the customer service representatives for the Plano call center. ZTA provides iQor
`
`with materials that explain the operation of, or changes to, ZTA products. iQor uses this
`
`information to create its own training materials, and trains its customer service representatives.
`
`ZTA has no role in determining a dress code for customer service representatives in its Plano call
`
`center. No customer service representative is required to wear any clothing or accessory bearing
`
`ZTA's name or logo. It is not typical for call center representatives to wear apparel with the ZTE
`
`logo.
`
`No ZTA employee maintains an office at the iQor facility in Plano. ZTA employees may visit the
`call center at times, but work from a cubicle set aside for visitors.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the
`
`I i - ”2. o — I 7
`
`Date
`
`
`xecuted on: r going is true and c
`
`
`‘
`
`
`By:
`Edward Rayeski
`Director, Handset 8: Device upport Customer Service
`
`ZTE (USA) Inc.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket