throbber
Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 24 Filed 09/07/17 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 158
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT,
`LLC,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ZTE CORPORATION AND
`ZTE (TX), INC.,
`
` Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:17-cv-517
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
`DEFENDANT ZTE (TX), INC.
`TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO AGIS’ COMPLAINT
`
`Defendant ZTE (TX), Inc. (“ZTX”) respectfully files this unopposed motion for an
`
`extension of time to respond to Plaintiff Agis Software Development, LLC’s (“Agis”)
`
`Complaint. Currently, ZTX has until September 12, 2017, to respond to Agis’ Complaint. See
`
`Dkt. No. 23. On August 23, 2017, new counsel for ZTX entered an appearance, See Dkt. No. 22,
`
`and prior counsel for ZTX is now expected to withdraw. To allow for this change of counsel,
`
`and for new counsel to review and prepare a response to Agis’ claims against ZTX in the
`
`Complaint, ZTX seeks a fourteen (14) days extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to
`
`the complaint. Accordingly, this Motion is made for good cause, and not for delay or tactical
`
`advantage. As indicated in the above caption, Plaintiff does not oppose this Motion.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 24 Filed 09/07/17 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 159
`
`Respectfully submitted this 7th day of September, 2017
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Lionel M. Lavenue
`
`Lionel M. Lavenue - Lead Counsel
`Virginia Bar No. 49005
`lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &
`Dunner, L.L.P.
`Two Freedom Square
`11955 Freedom Dr.
`Reston, VA 20105
`(571) 203-2700 (telephone)
`(202) 408-4400 (facsimile)
`
`COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT
`ZTE (TX), INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 24 Filed 09/07/17 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 160
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
`
`The Parties have complied with Local Rule CV-7(h). Communications were exchanged
`
`between Lionel M. Lavenue for ZTE (TX), Inc. and Vincent Rubino for Agis on
`
`September 7, 2017. Agis’ counsel confirmed that it does not oppose this motion.
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Lionel M. Lavenue
`Lionel M. Lavenue
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00517-JRG Document 24 Filed 09/07/17 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 161
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that, on September 7, 2017, the foregoing document was served upon
`
`counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service via the Court’s
`
`CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).
`
`
`
` /s/ Lionel M. Lavenue
`Lionel M. Lavenue
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket