Case 2:17-cv-00516-JRG Document 51 Filed 10/26/17 Page 1 of 27 PageID #: 439
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`Civil Action No. 2:17-CV-516-JRG
`
`§ § § § § § § § § § § § §
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
`LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`WHEREAS, Plaintiff, AGIS Software Development LLC, and Defendant, Apple Inc.,
`
`hereafter referred to as “the Parties,”1 believe that certain information that is or will be
`
`encompassed by discovery demands by the Parties involves the production or disclosure of trade
`
`secrets, confidential business information, or other proprietary information;
`
`WHEREAS, the Parties seek a protective order limiting disclosure thereof in accordance with
`
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c):
`
`THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated among the Parties and ORDERED that:
`
`1.
`
`Each Party may designate as confidential for protection under this Order, in whole or in part,
`
`any document, information or material that constitutes or includes, in whole or in part,
`
`confidential or proprietary information or trade secrets of the Party or a Third Party to whom
`
`the Party reasonably believes it owes an obligation of confidentiality with respect to such
`
`1
`
`“Party” means any party to this case, including all of its officers, directors, employees,
`and outside counsel and their support staffs. “Parties” shall also include any other parties that
`are added to this Action and served with process in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil
`Procedure.
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00516-JRG Document 51 Filed 10/26/17 Page 2 of 27 PageID #: 440
`
`document, information or material (“Protected Material”). Protected Material shall be
`
`designated by the Party producing it by affixing a legend or stamp on such document,
`
`information or material as
`
`follows: “CONFIDENTIAL” or “RESTRICTED –
`
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “RESTRICTED CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE.”
`
`The words “CONFIDENTIAL” or “RESTRICTED – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or
`
`“RESTRICTED CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE” shall be placed clearly on each page
`
`of the Protected Material (except deposition and hearing transcripts) for which such
`
`protection is sought.
`
`2.
`
`For digital files being produced, the producing Party may mark each viewable page or
`
`image with the appropriate designation, and mark the medium, container, and/or
`
`communication in which the digital files were contained. In the event that original
`
`documents are produced for inspection, the original documents shall be presumed
`
`“RESTRICTED – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” during the inspection and re-
`
`designated, as appropriate during the copying process. Where electronic files and
`
`documents are produced in native electronic format, such electronic files and documents
`
`shall be designated for protection under this Order by appending to the file names or
`
`designators information indicating whether the file contains “CONFIDENTIAL,”
`
`“RESTRICTED – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “RESTRICTED CONFIDENTIAL
`
`SOURCE CODE,” material, or shall use any other reasonable method for so designating
`
`Protected Materials produced in electronic format. When electronic files or documents
`
`are printed for use at deposition, in a court proceeding, or for provision in printed form to
`
`an expert or consultant pre-approved pursuant to paragraph 12, the party printing the
`
`electronic files or documents shall affix a legend to the printed document corresponding
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00516-JRG Document 51 Filed 10/26/17 Page 3 of 27 PageID #: 441
`
`to the designation of the Designating Party and including the production number and
`
`designation associated with the native file. No one shall seek to use in this litigation a
`
`.tiff, .pdf or other image format version of a document produced in native file format
`
`without first (1) providing a copy of the image format version to the producing Party so
`
`that the producing Party can review the image to ensure that no information has been
`
`altered, and (2) obtaining the consent of the producing Party, which consent shall not be
`
`unreasonably withheld.
`
`3.
`
`For deposition and hearing transcripts, the word “CONFIDENTIAL” or “RESTRICTED
`
`– ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “RESTRICTED CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE
`
`CODE” shall be placed on the cover page of the transcript (if not already present on the
`
`cover page of the transcript when received from the court reporter) by each attorney
`
`receiving a copy of
`
`the transcript after
`
`that attorney receives notice of
`
`the
`
`designation of some or all of that transcript as “CONFIDENTIAL”, “RESTRICTED –
`
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “RESTRICTED CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE.”
`
`In the event a deposition is videotaped, the original and all copies of the videotape shall
`
`be marked by the video technician to indicate that the contents of the videotape are subject
`
`to this Protective Order, substantially along the lines of “This videotape contains
`
`confidential testimony used in this case and is not to be viewed or the contents thereof
`
`to be displayed or revealed except pursuant to the terms of the operative Protective
`
`Order in this matter or pursuant to written stipulation of the parties.” It shall be the
`
`responsibility of the Party that designates the deposition as confidential to inform the
`
`videographer of the requirements in this Paragraph.
`
`4.
`
`Any document produced under Patent Rules 2-2, 3-2, and/or 3-4 before issuance of this
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00516-JRG Document 51 Filed 10/26/17 Page 4 of 27 PageID #: 442
`
`Order with the designation “Confidential” or “Confidential - Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`
`shall receive the same treatment as if designated “RESTRICTED – ATTORNEYS’
`
`EYES ONLY” under this Order, unless and until such document is redesignated to have a
`
`different classification under this Order.
`
`5.
`
`With respect to documents, information or material designated “CONFIDENTIAL,
`
`“RESTRICTED – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “RESTRICTED CONFIDENTIAL
`
`SOURCE CODE” (“DESIGNATED MATERIAL”),2 subject to the provisions herein
`
`and unless otherwise stated, this Order governs, without limitation: (a) all documents,
`
`electronically stored information, and/or things as defined by the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure; (b) all pretrial, hearing or deposition testimony, or documents marked as exhibits
`
`or for identification in depositions and hearings; (c) pretrial pleadings, exhibits to pleadings
`
`and other court filings; (d) affidavits; and (e) stipulations. All copies, reproductions,
`
`extracts, digests and complete or partial summaries prepared from any DESIGNATED
`
`MATERIALS, as well as testimony or presentations by Parties or their counsel in court
`
`that might reveal Protected Material shall also be considered DESIGNATED
`
`MATERIAL and treated as such under this Order.
`
`6.
`
`A designation of Protected Material (i.e., “CONFIDENTIAL,” “RESTRICTED -
`
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or “RESTRICTED CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE”)
`
`may be made at any time.
`
`Inadvertent or unintentional production of documents,
`
`information or material that has not been designated as DESIGNATED MATERIAL shall
`
`2
`
`The term DESIGNATED MATERIAL is used throughout this Protective Order to refer
`to the class of materials designated as “CONFIDENTIAL,” “RESTRICTED - ATTORNEYS’
`EYES ONLY,” or “RESTRICTED CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE,” both individually and
`collectively.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00516-JRG Document 51 Filed 10/26/17 Page 5 of 27 PageID #: 443
`
`not be deemed a waiver in whole or in part of a claim for confidential treatment. Any party
`
`that inadvertently or unintentionally produces Protected Material without designating it as
`
`DESIGNATED MATERIAL may request destruction of that Protected Material by
`
`notifying the recipient(s), as soon as reasonably possible after the producing Party
`
`becomes aware of the inadvertent or unintentional disclosure, and providing replacement
`
`Protected Material that is properly designated. The recipient(s) shall then destroy all copies
`
`of the inadvertently or unintentionally produced Protected Materials and any documents,
`
`information or material derived from or based thereon.
`
`7.
`
`“CONFIDENTIAL” documents, information and material may be disclosed only to the
`
`following persons, except upon receipt of the prior written consent of the designating party,
`
`upon order of the Court, or as set forth in paragraph 15 herein:
`
`(a)
`
`outside counsel of record in this Action for the Parties;
`
`(b)
`
`(c)
`
`(d)
`
`employees of such counsel assigned to and reasonably necessary to assist such
`counsel in the litigation of this Action;
`
`in-house counsel (“in-house counsel” includes attorneys or members of the legal
`staff or the intellectual property department of a party”) for the Parties who either
`have responsibility for making decisions dealing directly with the litigation of this
`Action, or who are assisting outside counsel in the litigation of this Action;
`
`up to and including three (3) designated representatives of each of the Parties, as
`well as their immediate staff, to the extent reasonably necessary for the litigation
`of this Action, provided that: before access is given, the representative has
`completed the Undertaking attached as Appendix A hereto and the same is served
`upon the producing Party at least seven (7) days before access to the Protected
`Material is to be given to that representative to object to and notify the receiving
`Party in writing that it objects to disclosure of Protected Material
`to the
`representative. The Parties agree to promptly confer and use good faith to resolve
`any such objection within seven (7) days following the objection. If the Parties
`are unable to resolve any objection, the objecting Party may file a motion with
`the Court within ten (10) days of the notice, or within such other time as the Parties
`may agree, seeking a protective order with respect to the proposed disclosure. If
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00516-JRG Document 51 Filed 10/26/17 Page 6 of 27 PageID #: 444
`
`relief is not sought from the Court within that time, the objection shall be deemed
`withdrawn. If relief is sought, designated materials shall not be disclosed to the
`representative in question until the Court resolves the objection; except that either
`party may in good faith request the other party’s consent to designate one
`or more additional representatives, the other party shall not unreasonably
`withhold such consent, and the requesting party may seek leave of Court to
`designate such additional representative(s) if the requesting party believes the
`other party has unreasonably withheld such consent;
`
`(e)
`
`2.
`
`i.
`ii.
`
`outside consultants or experts (i.e., not existing employees or affiliates of a Party or
`an affiliate of a Party) retained for the purpose of this litigation, provided that:
`1.
`Such consultants or experts are not presently employed by the Parties
`hereto for purposes other than this Action, or of a competitor of a
`Party, nor anticipated at the time of retention to become an officer,
`director or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party;
`Before access is given, the consultant or expert has completed the
`Undertaking attached as Appendix A hereto and the same is served
`upon the producing Party with:
`a current curriculum vitae of the consultant or expert;
`an identification of all pending patent applications on which the
`consultant or expert is named as an inventor, in which the
`consultant or expert has any ownership interest, or as to which the
`consultant or expert has had or anticipates in the future any
`involvement in advising on, consulting on, preparing, prosecuting,
`drafting, editing, amending, or otherwise affecting the scope of the
`claims; and
`a list of the cases in which the consultant or expert has testified at
`deposition or trial within the last five (5) years;
`Such expert or consultant accesses the materials in the United States
`only, and does not transport them to or access them from any foreign
`jurisdiction.
`Within seven (7) days of the disclosure described in subparagraph (e)(iii) above,
`the producing Party may notify the receiving Party in writing that it objects to
`disclosure of Protected Material to the consultant or expert. The Parties agree to
`promptly confer and use good faith to resolve any such objection within seven (7)
`days following the objection. If the Parties are unable to resolve any objection,
`the objecting Party may file a motion with the Court within ten (10) days of the
`notice, or within such other time as the Parties may agree, seeking a protective order
`with respect to the proposed disclosure. The objecting Party shall have the burden of
`proving the need for a protective order. No disclosure shall occur until all such
`objections are resolved by agreement or Court order. An initial failure to object
`to an expert or consultant under this Paragraph shall not preclude the nonobjecting
`Party from later objecting to continued access by that expert or consultant for
`good cause. The Parties agree that, for good cause to exist, facts or circumstances
`must have become known to the objecting party regarding the expert or consultant
`
`iii.
`
`3.
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00516-JRG Document 51 Filed 10/26/17 Page 7 of 27 PageID #: 445
`
`that could not have been known before or during the initial failure to object to the
`expert or consultant. If an objection is made, the Parties shall meet and confer via
`telephone or in person within seven (7) days following the objection and attempt
`in good faith to resolve the dispute informally. The designated expert or
`consultant may continue to have access to information that was provided to such
`expert or consultant prior to the date of the objection. If a later objection is made,
`no further DESIGNATED MATERIAL shall be disclosed to the expert or
`consultant until the Court resolves the matter or the producing Party withdraws its
`objection. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the producing Party fails to move for
`a protective order within ten (10) days of the notice, further DESIGNATED
`MATERIAL may thereafter be provided to the expert or consultant;
`
`independent litigation support services, including persons working for or as
`court reporters, stenographers and videographers, and photocopy, document
`imaging, and database services retained by counsel and reasonably necessary to
`assist counsel with the litigation of this Action;
`
`translation, graphics or design services, jury or trial consulting services, provided
`such persons have first agreed to be bound by the provisions of the Protective
`Order by signing a copy of Appendix A, however, such signed copies of
`Appendix A shall not be disclosed to or served upon any other Party;
`
`mock jurors who have signed an undertaking or agreement agreeing not to
`publicly disclose Protected Material and to keep any information concerning
`Protected Material confidential;
`
`the Court (including any Court-appointed mediators or advisors) and its
`personnel; and
`
`(f)
`
`(g)
`
`(h)
`
`(i)
`
`(j)
`
`any other person with the prior written consent of the producing Party.
`
`8.
`
`A Party shall designate documents, information or material as “CONFIDENTIAL” only
`
`upon a good faith belief that the documents, information or material contains confidential
`
`or proprietary information or trade secrets of the Party or a Third Party to whom the Party
`
`reasonably believes it owes an obligation of confidentiality with respect to such documents,
`
`information or material.
`
`9.
`
`Documents, information or material produced pursuant to any discovery request in this
`
`Action, including but not limited to Protected Material designated as DESIGNATED
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00516-JRG Document 51 Filed 10/26/17 Page 8 of 27 PageID #: 446
`
`MATERIAL, shall be used by the Parties only in the litigation of this Action and shall not
`
`be used for any other purpose. Any person or entity who obtains access to DESIGNATED
`
`MATERIAL or the contents thereof pursuant to this Order shall not make any copies,
`
`duplicates, extracts, summaries or descriptions of such DESIGNATED MATERIAL or any
`
`portion thereof except as may be reasonably necessary in the litigation of this Action. Any
`
`such copies, duplicates, extracts, summaries or descriptions shall be classified
`
`DESIGNATED MATERIALS and subject to all of the terms and conditions of this Order.
`
`10.
`
`To the extent a producing Party believes that certain Protected Material qualifying to be
`
`designated CONFIDENTIAL is so sensitive that its dissemination deserves even further
`
`limitation, the producing Party may designate such Protected Material “RESTRICTED –
`
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY,” or to the extent such Protected Material includes computer
`
`source code (meaning computer code, scripts, assembly, binaries, object code, source
`
`code listings and descriptions of source code, object code listings and descriptions of
`
`object code, and/or live data3 (that is, data as it exists residing in a database or databases)
`
`(“Source Code Material”), the producing Party may designate such Protected Material as
`
`“RESTRICTED CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE.”
`
`11.
`
`For Protected Material designated RESTRICTED – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, access
`
`to, and disclosure of, such Protected Material shall be limited to: individuals listed in
`
`paragraphs 7(a-b), 7(e-g) and 7(i-j), provided, however, that access by individuals pursuant
`
`3 Neither party anticipates that files describing the hardware design of any component, including
`Hardware Description Language (HDL) or Register Transfer Level (RTL) files that describe the
`hardware design of any ASIC or other chip, and Computer Aided Design (CAD) files that
`describe the hardware design of any component, will be produced in this case. To the extent that
`any party believes that the production of such files becomes necessary, the parties agree to meet
`and confer regarding the appropriate confidentiality designation for any such files at that time.
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00516-JRG Document 51 Filed 10/26/17 Page 9 of 27 PageID #: 447
`
`to paragraph 7(a-b, e) be limited to individuals who exercise no competitive decision-
`
`making authority on behalf of the client, and, with respect to material produced by the
`
`Plaintiff, not more than two (2) in-house counsel of the receiving Party, provided that
`
`access by in-house counsel pursuant to this paragraph be limited to in-house counsel who
`
`exercise no competitive decision-making authority on behalf of the client and that before
`
`access is given,
`
`the in-house counsel has completed the Undertaking attached as
`
`Appendix A hereto and the same is served upon the producing Party at least seven (7)
`
`days before access to the Protected Material is to be given to that in-house counsel to
`
`object to and notify the receiving Party in writing that it objects to disclosure of Protected
`
`Material to the in-house counsel. The Parties agree to promptly confer and use good faith
`
`to resolve any such objection within seven (7) days following the objection. If the Parties
`
`are unable to resolve any objection, the objecting Party may file a motion with the Court
`
`within ten (10) days of the notice, or within such other time as the Parties may agree,
`
`seeking a protective order with respect to the proposed disclosure. If relief is not sought
`
`from the Court within that time, the objection shall be deemed withdrawn. If relief is
`
`sought, designated materials shall not be disclosed to the in-house counsel in question
`
`until the Court resolves the objection. With respect to material that is produced by the
`
`Defendant, no in-house counsel of the receiving party may have access to Protected
`
`Material designated RESTRICTED – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.
`
`12.
`
`For Protected Material designated RESTRICTED CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE,
`
`the following additional restrictions apply:
`
`(a)
`
`Access to a Party’s Source Code Material shall be provided only on “stand-
`alone” computer(s) (that is, the computer may not be linked to any network,
`including a local area network (“LAN”), an intranet or the Internet) in a secure
`room (“Source Code Review Room”). The stand-alone computer(s) shall be
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00516-JRG Document 51 Filed 10/26/17 Page 10 of 27 PageID #: 448
`
`connected to (i) a printer, or (ii) a device capable of temporarily storing electronic
`copies solely for the limited purposes expressly permitted herein. Additionally,
`the stand-alone computer(s) may only be located at the offices of the producing
`Party’s outside counsel or a location mutually agreed upon by the receiving Party
`and the producing Party (the “Review Facility”). No recordable media or
`recordable devices, including without limitation sound recorders, computers,
`cellular telephones, peripheral equipment, cameras, CDs, DVDs, or drives of any
`kind, shall be permitted into the Source Code Review Room;
`
`The receiving Party shall make reasonable efforts to restrict its requests for
`such access to the stand-along computer(s) to normal business hours, which for
`purposes of this paragraph shall be 8:00 a.m. through 6:00 p.m. on business days
`(i.e., weekdays that are not Federal holidays). However, upon reasonable notice
`from the receiving party, the producing Party shall make reasonable efforts to
`accommodate the receiving Party’s request
`for access to the stand-alone
`computer(s) outside of normal business hours. Prior to the first inspection of any
`requested Source Code, the receiving Party shall provide twenty-one (21) days’
`notice of the Source Code that it wishes to inspect. The receiving Party shall
`provide seven (7) days’ notice prior to any additional inspections. The Parties
`agree to cooperate in good faith such that maintaining the producing Party’s
`Source Code Material at the offices of its outside counsel shall not unreasonably
`hinder the receiving Party’s ability to efficiently and effectively conduct the
`prosecution or defense of this Action;
`
`The producing Party shall provide the receiving Party with information
`explaining how to start, log on to, and operate the stand-alone computer(s) in order
`to access the produced Source Code Material on the stand-alone computer(s).
`The producing Party may visually monitor the activities of the receiving Party’s
`representatives during any Source Code review, but only to ensure that no
`unauthorized electronic records of the Source Code and no information
`concerning the Source Code are being created or transmitted in any way;
`
`in computer
`The producing Party will produce Source Code Material
`searchable format on the stand-alone computer(s) as described above and will
`install freely available software tools on the stand-alone computer for purposes of
`the review (including but not limited to software to perform searches of the
`Source Code Material), if such tools exist and are in possession of the producing
`Party at the time the first request to review Source Code is received, upon request
`by the reviewing Party;
`
`The receiving Party may, at its own expense, request that the producing Party
`install software on Source Code Review computer(s) to perform searches of the
`Source Code Material, provided that such other software is necessary for the
`receiving Party to perform its review of the Source Code Material consistent with
`all of the protections herein. The receiving Party must provide the producing
`
`(b)
`
`(c)
`
`(d)
`
`(e)
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00516-JRG Document 51 Filed 10/26/17 Page 11 of 27 PageID #: 449
`
`Party with the CD or DVD containing such software tools(s) at least fourteen
`(14) days in advance of the date upon which the receiving Party wishes to have
`the additional software available for use on the Source Code Review computer(s).
`Timely requests for the installation of such search software will not be
`unreasonably denied so long as the receiving Party possesses an appropriate
`license to such software tools, and the requested search software is compatible
`with the operating system, and other software necessary to make the Source
`Code available for inspection, installed on a Source Code Review computer(s),
`does not prevent or impede the receiving Party's access to the Source Code
`Material produced for inspection on Source Code Review computer(s) and does
`not side-step any of the security features enabled on a Source Code Review
`computer(s) (e.g., enable connection and use of USB thumb drives). The
`receiving Party shall not erase, load, install, compile, or otherwise modify any
`program (or request that any other program be erased, loaded, installed, or
`otherwise modified by the producing Party) on the Source Code Review
`computer(s) without first submitting a written request and obtaining the
`producing Party's agreement to the request;
`
`(f)
`
`(g)
`
`Access to Protected Material designated RESTRICTED CONFIDENTIAL
`- SOURCE CODE shall be limited to (i) outside counsel provided that such
`Outside Counsel be limited to outside counsel who exercise no competitive
`decision-making authority on behalf of the client; (ii) up to three (3) outside
`consultants or experts4 (i.e., not existing employees or affiliates of a Party or an
`affiliate of a Party) retained for the purpose of this litigation and approved to
`access such Protected Materials pursuant to Paragraph 7 above; (iii) Court
`reporters, stenographers and videographers retained to record testimony taken in
`this action; (iv) the Court (including any Court-appointed mediators or advisors)
`and its personnel; and (v) any other person with the prior written consent of the
`producing Party.
`
`A receiving party may include excerpts of Source Code Material in a pleading,
`exhibit, expert report, discovery document, deposition transcript, or other Court
`document, provided that the Source Code Documents are appropriately marked
`under this Order, restricted to those who are entitled to have access to them as
`specified herein, and, if filed with the Court, filed under seal in accordance with
`the Court’s rules, procedures and orders;
`
`4 For the purposes of this paragraph, an outside consultant or expert is defined to include the
`outside consultant’s or expert’s direct reports and other support personnel, such that the
`disclosure to a consultant or expert who employs others within his or her firm to help in his or
`her analysis shall count as a disclosure to a single consultant or expert, provided that any
`individual employed by an outside consultant or expert be approved to access Protected
`Materials pursuant to Paragraph 7 above prior to receiving any Protected Material designated
`RESTRICTED CONFIDENTIAL - SOURCE CODE.
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00516-JRG Document 51 Filed 10/26/17 Page 12 of 27 PageID #: 450
`
`(h)
`
`(i)
`
`(j)
`
`To the extent portions of Source Code Material are quoted in a Source
`Code Document, either (1) the entire Source Code Document will be stamped and
`treated as RESTRICTED CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE or (2) those pages
`containing quoted Source Code Material will be separately stamped and
`treated as RESTRICTED CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE;
`
`Except as set forth in paragraph 12(p) below, no electronic copies of Source
`Code Material shall be made without prior written consent of the producing
`Party, except as necessary to create documents which, pursuant to the Court’s
`rules, procedures and order, must be filed or served electronically. Images or
`copies of Source Code shall not be included in correspondence between the
`Parties (references to production numbers shall be used instead). The receiving
`Party shall maintain a log of all such electronic copies of any portion of Source
`Code in its possession or in the possession of its retained consultants, including
`the names of the reviewers and/or recipients of any such electronic copies, and
`the locations and manner in which the electronic copies are stored. If a Party
`reasonably believes that it needs to submit a portion of Source Code as part of a
`filing with the Court, the Party shall excerpt the Source Code Material to include
`only the portions of Source Code necessary to that filing;
`
`The receiving Party shall be permitted to have printed by the producing Party
`portions of Source Code Material reasonably anticipated by the receiving Party
`to be necessary for use in, and preparation for, court filings and proceedings,
`infringement or invalidity contentions, expert reports, and depositions of persons
`or entities permitted access to “RESTRICTED CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE
`CODE” information of the producing Party, and such other uses to which the
`parties may agree or that the Court may order. The receiving Party shall not print
`Source Code Material in order to review blocks of Source Code Material
`elsewhere in the first instance, i.e., as an alternative to reviewing that Source
`Code Material electronically on the Source Code Review computer(s), as the
`parties acknowledge and agree that the purpose of the protections herein would
`be frustrated by printing portions of code for review and analysis elsewhere, and
`that printing is permitted solely to enable use of Source Code Materials in
`filings, depositions, proceedings, contentions, expert reports, and related drafts
`and correspondence. The receiving Party’s outside counsel and/or experts shall
`be entitled to take notes relating to the Source Code but may not copy the Source
`Code into the notes and may not take such notes electronically on the Source
`Code Computer itself or any other computer;
`
`(k)
`
`The receiving Party shall be permitted to make a reasonable number of printouts
`and photocopies of Source Code Material, all of which shall be designated and
`clearly labeled “RESTRICTED CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE,” and the
`receiving Party shall maintain a log of all such files that are printed or
`photocopied that includes the names of the reviewers and/or recipients of the
`copies and locations where the paper copies are stored. Upon two (2) day’s
`advance notice to the receiving Party by the producing Party, the receiving Party
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00516-JRG Document 51 Filed 10/26/17 Page 13 of 27 PageID #: 451
`
`shall provide a copy of this log to the producing Party.5
`In considering what is
`reasonable, the receiving Party shall not, in general, ask that more than 1000
`total pages—with a page being one that has at least 35 lines of code—of Source
`Code Material be printed. After the receiving Party has asked that 1000 total
`pages of Source Code Material be printed, the Parties shall meet and confer
`regarding the printing of additional pages, if any, in view of the needs of the
`case and the amount of Source Code Material that has been made available.
`Any printed portion that consists of more than ten (10) pages of a continuous
`block of Source Code shall be presumed to be excessive, and the burden shall be
`on the receiving Party to demonstrate the need for such a printed copy.
`In the
`event that a producing Party believes that a particular printing request is
`unreasonable, the producing Party and receiving Party shall meet and confer in
`good faith to attempt to resolve this dispute without the Court’s involvement. If
`they cannot resolve the issue, either Party may seek an order from the Court;
`
`The receiving Party shall maintain a record of any individual who has inspected
`any portion of the Source Code Material in electronic or paper form. Each page
`of any printed copies of Source Code Material shall be printed on nonwhite,
`colored paper. After printing, the producing Party shall clearly label each page
`of any printed copies “RESTRICTED CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE CODE” and
`give each page a unique identification number;
`
`All paper copies shall be securely destroyed if they are no longer necessary in
`the litigation (e.g., extra copies at the conclusion of a deposition).
`
`For depositions, outside counsel for the receiving Party may bring one printed copy
`of Source Code. Except for the receiving Party’s outside counsel’s copy of Source
`Code, the receiving Party shall not bring copies of any printed Source Code.
`Rather, the producing Party will provide a Source Code computer at the
`deposition containing all source code, in computer-searchable format, previously
`produced by the producing Party. Copies of Source Code Material that are
`marked as deposition exhibits shall not be provided to the court reporter or
`attached to deposition transcripts, rather, the deposition record will identify the
`exhibit by its production numbers;
`
`For Court proceedings, outside counsel for the receiving Party may bring one
`printed copy of Source Code. Except for the receiving Party’s outside counsel’s
`copy o