Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 98-12 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 3626
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 11
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 98-12 Filed 12/27/18 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 3627
`RESTRICTED -- ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY
`
`(cid:3)
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA INC., ET AL.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Case No. 2:17-CV-0513-JRG
`(LEAD CASE)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PLAINTIFF AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC’S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL
`OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT HTC CORPORATION’S
`FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF (NOS. 1-15)
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Rules 26 and 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure, Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS” or “Plaintiff”) hereby
`
`supplements its response to Defendant HTC Corporation’s (“HTC”) First Set of Interrogatories
`
`to Plaintiff (Nos. 1-15) in writing, under oath, and in accordance with the following definitions
`
`and instructions. These Interrogatories are continuing in nature and require supplementation in
`
`accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as follows:
`
`These responses are made solely for the purposes of this action, and are made without
`
`waiving, or intending to waive, the right at any time to revise, correct, modify, supplement or
`
`clarify any response provided herein or the right to object on any proper grounds to the use of
`
`these responses, for any purpose in whole or in part, in any subsequent proceedings or any other
`
`action. The right to raise any applicable objections at any time is expressly reserved. A response
`
`to any interrogatory herein should not be taken as an admission or acceptance of the existence of
`
`any facts set forth or assumed by such interrogatory, or that such response constitutes admissible
`
`(cid:3)
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 98-12 Filed 12/27/18 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 3628
`
`(cid:3)
`
`evidence. The responses herein reflect only the present state of AGIS’ investigation and the
`
`present state of discovery. Except as otherwise indicated, an objection and/or response to a
`
`specific interrogatory does not imply that facts responsive to the interrogatory exist.
`
`AGIS incorporates by reference the general and specific objections in AGIS’s Objections
`
`and Responses to HTC Corporation’s First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff (Nos. 1-15), dated
`
`June 18, 2018, and AGIS’s Supplemental Objections and Responses to HTC Corporation’s First
`
`Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff (Nos. 1-15), dated August 17, 2018.
`
`(cid:3)
`
`(cid:3)
`
`(cid:3)
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 98-12 Filed 12/27/18 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 3629
`
`(cid:3)
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 8
`
`If You contend that AGIS is entitled to relief for HTC’s alleged infringement of any
`Asserted Claim, state the basis for Your contention on a patent by patent basis, including but not
`limited to:
`(a) whether AGIS contends it is entitled to lost profits or a reasonable royalty;
`(b) the amount of lost profits or reasonable royalty by each Accused Instrumentality;
`(c) whether the royalty rate is an industry royalty rate, has been paid on comparable
`patents or technology, was discussed in any Document, was paid as a part of a license or
`settlement, or is based on any of AGIS’s or any of AGIS’s Companies’ established licensing
`policies or marketing programs;
`(d) the date on which AGIS contends that such relief should begin;
`(e) whether the amount is based on revenues that HTC received from the Accused
`Instrumentalities or a portion of such revenues attributable to features of the Accused
`Instrumentalities, and the extent that HTC utilized the Accused Instrumentalities; and
`(f) the basis for the amount, including but not limited to the data on which You based
`Your calculation, the method by which You calculated the amount, and all persons who have
`knowledge upon which Your calculations are based.
`
`RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 8
`
`AGIS hereby incorporates the General Objections as if fully set forth herein. AGIS
`
`further objects to this interrogatory as vague, ambiguous, overbroad, unduly burdensome, and
`
`not proportional to the needs of the case because the burden or expense of the proposed
`
`discovery outweighs its likely benefit. AGIS further objects to this interrogatory to the extent it
`
`seeks information protected by the attorney-client privilege, attorney work product doctrine,
`
`and/or any other applicable privilege. AGIS further objects to this interrogatory on the ground it
`
`seeks information publicly available. AGIS further objects to this interrogatory on the ground it
`
`seeks information not within the custody, possession, or control of AGIS. AGIS further objects
`
`to this interrogatory as it seeks information that is the topic of expert discovery.
`
`AGIS objects to this interrogatory as vague, overbroad, ambiguous and confusing. AGIS
`
`objects to the terms “basis” and “established” as vague, overbroad, ambiguous, and uncertain.
`
`AGIS objects to the phrase “any of AGIS’s or any of AGIS’s Companies” as vague, overbroad,
`
`ambiguous, overbroad, and uncertain.
`
`(cid:3)
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 98-12 Filed 12/27/18 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 3630
`
`(cid:3)
`
`AGIS objects to this interrogatory because the interrogatory is an improper compound
`
`request. AGIS objects to this interrogatory because the interrogatory contains multiple distinct
`
`sub-parts (at least six), each of which counts towards HTC’s total number of interrogatories.
`
`AGIS objects to this interrogatory because AGIS’s answer depends on information
`
`requested from HTC by AGIS and is subject to HTC’s supplemental responses to AGIS’s
`
`pending interrogatories to HTC.
`
`Notwithstanding its general and specific objections, AGIS answers as follows:
`
`Discovery in this case is still ongoing and AGIS continues to investigate this matter. AGIS
`
`reserves the right to supplement the response to this interrogatory to identify additional
`
`documents pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(d). AGIS reserves the right to supplement the answer
`
`to this interrogatory upon the resolution of the above objections and/or an appropriate narrowing
`
`of the scope of this request.
`
`(cid:3)
`
`44
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 98-12 Filed 12/27/18 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 3631
`
`(cid:3)
`
`Dated: December 7, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`As to Objections,
`
`BROWN RUDNICK LLP
`
`
`
`/s/ Vincent J. Rubino III
`Alfred R. Fabricant
`N.Y. Bar No. 2219392
`Email: afabricant@brownrudnick.com
`Peter Lambrianakos
`N.Y. Bar No. 2894392
`Email: plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`N.Y. Bar No. 4557435
`Email: vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Alessandra C. Messing
`NY Bar No. 5040019
`Email: amessing@brownrudnick.com
`John A. Rubino
`NY Bar No. 5020797
`Email: jrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Enrique W. Iturralde
`NY Bar No. 5526280
`Email: eiturralde@brownrudnick.com
`Daniel J. Shea Jr.
`NY Bar No. 5430558
`Email: dshea@brownrudnick.com
`BROWN RUDNICK LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: 212-209-4800
`Facsimile: 212-209-4801
`
`Samuel F. Baxter
`Texas Bar No. 01938000
`Email: sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com
`Jennifer L. Truelove
`Texas State Bar No. 24012906
`Email: jtruelove@mckoolsmith.com
`
`McKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`104 East Houston Street, Suite 300
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: 903-923-9000
`Facsimile: 903-923-9099
`
`(cid:3)
`
`463
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 98-12 Filed 12/27/18 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 3632
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 98-12 Filed 12/27/18 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 3632
`
`(cid:3)
`
`(cid:3)
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, AGIS
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, AGIS
`SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`464
`464
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 98-12 Filed 12/27/18 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 3633
`
`(cid:3)
`
`(cid:3)
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on December 7, 2018 a true and correct copy of the above and
`
`foregoing document has been served by email on:
`
`Miguel J. Bombach
`mbombach@perkinscoie.com
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11988 El Camino Real, Suite 350
`San Diego, CA 92130-2594
`
`Matthew C. Bernstein
`mbernstein@perkinscoie.com
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11988 El Camino Real, Suite 350
`San Diego, CA 92130-2594
`
`James Y. Hurt
`jhurt@perkinscoie.com
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11988 El Camino Real, Suite 350
`San Diego, CA 92130-2594
`
`Eric Hugh Findlay
`efindlay@findlaycraft.com
`FINDLAY CRAFT PC
`102 N College Avenue, Suite 900
`Tyler, Texas 75702
`
`Attorneys for Defendant HTC CORPORATION
`
`/s/ Vincent J. Rubino, III
` Vincent J. Rubino, III
`
`(cid:3)
`
`