throbber
Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 67 Filed 09/11/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 2991
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HTC CORPORATION,
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA), INC.,
`AND ZTE (TX), INC.,
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:17-CV-514-JRG
`(Lead Case)
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:17-CV-515-JRG
`Civil Action No. 2:17-CV-517-JRG
`

















`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`PLAINTIFF AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC’S OPPOSITION TO
`DEFENDANT LG ELECTRONIC, INC’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION
`TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO TRANSFER
`VENUE TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 67 Filed 09/11/18 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 2992
`
`Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS”), by and through its undersigned
`
`counsel, hereby submits this response in opposition to LG Electronics, Inc.’s (“LG”) Motion for
`
`Leave to Supplement the Record in Support of its Pending Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal
`
`Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California (Dkt.
`
`No. 46).
`
`LG’s motion fails to address statements made by AGIS at the Evidentiary Hearing held on
`
`August 8, 2018, and that AGIS raised during the meet and confer on this motion. At the
`
`Evidentiary Hearing held on August 8, 2018. AGIS represented that it “may take discovery of
`
`Google with respect to any proprietary Google application material that’s not in . . . the public
`
`information.” Dkt. 176 at 70:19-22. LG maintained its position at the hearing that its products are
`
`based on confidential Google code and LG served an updated Initial Disclosure on August 31,
`
`2018 that continues to list Google as a potential trial witness. As it indicated that it may, AGIS
`
`served a subpoena on Google, LLC, consistent with its statements at the hearing. Because the
`
`record already indicated that AGIS may seek such information from Google, no supplementation
`
`is necessary or appropriate.
`
`Further, in correspondence with LGEKR on August 31, 2018, AGIS represented that it
`
`would be willing to meet and confer regarding supplementation, and provided not only the
`
`relevant portion of the testimony from the Evidentiary Hearing cited above, but additionally,
`
`indicated that LGEKR continues to list a “Witness from Google LLC who may have knowledge
`
`related to the functionality implicated in the accused applications” in its initial disclosures.
`
`LGEKR cannot represent that it would provide a witness from Google while also feigning surprise
`
`when AGIS seeks to depose that witness. AGIS is entitled to seek discovery from witnesses listed
`
`in LGEKR’s initial disclosures.
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 67 Filed 09/11/18 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 2993
`
`LGEKR also cites to AGIS’s Response in Opposition of LGEKR’s Motion to Change
`
`Venue to the Northern District of California, stating that “AGIS has chosen not to pursue claims
`
`related to methods performed by a server against Huawei.” Dkt. 56 at 9. This statement is
`
`irrelevant to the issue at hand as AGIS’s position has not changed. AGIS has not asserted those
`
`server claims against either Huawei or LG in this case.1 See Dkt. 1; see also Dkt. 194.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, AGIS respectfully requests that the Court deny LGEKR’s leave
`
`to file the opposed Motion to Supplement the Record in Support of its Motion to Transfer Venue
`
`to the Northern District of California.
`
`
`
`Dated: September 11, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted
`
`
`
`BROWN RUDNICK LLP
`
` /s/ Vincent J. Rubino, III
`Alfred R. Fabricant
`NY Bar No. 2219392
`Email: afabricant@brownrudnick.com
`Peter Lambrianakos
`NY Bar No. 2894392
`Email: plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`NY Bar No. 4557435
`Email: vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Joseph Mercadante
`NY Bar No. 4784930
`Email: jmercadante@brownrudnick.com
`Alessandra C. Messing
`NY Bar No. 5040019
`Email: amessing@brownrudnick.com
`John A. Rubino
`NY Bar No. 5020797
`
`
`1 AGIS has not asserted claims related to methods performed by a server, such as claims 1, 10,
`12, 24, and 31 of U.S. Patent 9,445,251; and claims 1, 2, 19, 39, 51, 54, 55, 58, 65, 71, 72, 78,
`and 79 of U.S. Patent 9,467,838.
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 67 Filed 09/11/18 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 2994
`
`Email: jrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Enrique W. Iturralde
`NY Bar No. 5526280
`Email: eiturralde@brownrudnick.com
`Daniel J. Shea Jr.
`NY Bar No. 5430558
`dshea@brownrudnick.com
`BROWN RUDNICK LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: 212-209-4800
`Facsimile: 212-209-4801
`
`Samuel F. Baxter
`Texas State Bar No. 01938000
`sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com
`Jennifer L. Truelove
`Texas State Bar No. 24012906
`jtruelove@mckoolsmith.com
`MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`104 E. Houston Street, Suite 300
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: (903) 923-9000
`Facsimile: (903) 923-9099
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, AGIS
`SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 67 Filed 09/11/18 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 2995
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that, on September 11, 2018, all counsel of record who
`
`are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document
`
`via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).
`
`
`
`/s/ Vincent J. Rubino, III
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket