Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 188 Filed 02/19/19 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 15937
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
`THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`CASE NO. 2:17-cv-514-JRG
`(Lead Case)
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`CASE NO. 2:17-CV-515-JRG
`(Member Case)
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`§§§§§§§§§
`
`§§§§§§§§§
`
`
`
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`HTC CORPORATION, et al.
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`LG ELECTRONICS INC.
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`LG ELECTRONICS INC.’S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
`
`Pursuant to the 4th Amended Docket Control Order (D.I. 141) and Joint Motion to Amend
`
`Docket Control Order (D.I. 171), Defendant LG Electronics Inc. hereby submits to the Court its
`
`Proposed Verdict Form. The parties will continue to meet and confer to attempt to reach further
`
`agreement regarding their competing versions of this filing and limit the areas of dispute for the
`
`Court. Defendant reserves the right to amend, supplement, or otherwise modify any of these
`
`materials leading up to and during trial. Defendant does not waive any objections relating to the
`
`court’s claim construction order and expressly preserves any arguments in its claim construction
`
`briefing. (See Case No. 17-cv-00513, D.I. 174, 175, 194, 205; Case No. 17-cv-00514, D.I. 93.)
`
`By providing this proposed form, Defendant does not waive any argument and reserves its rights
`
`to contend that an issue is not properly part of the case and/or should go to the jury.
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
`THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`CASE NO. 2:17-cv-514-JRG
`(Lead Case)
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`CASE NO. 2:17-CV-515-JRG
`(Member Case)
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`§§§§§§§§§
`
`§§§§§§§§§
`
`
`
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`HTC CORPORATION, et al.
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`LG ELECTRONICS INC.
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`LG ELECTRONICS INC.’S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
`
`Pursuant to the 4th Amended Docket Control Order (D.I. 141) and Joint Motion to Amend
`
`Docket Control Order (D.I. 171), Defendant LG Electronics Inc. hereby submits to the Court its
`
`Proposed Verdict Form. The parties will continue to meet and confer to attempt to reach further
`
`agreement regarding their competing versions of this filing and limit the areas of dispute for the
`
`Court. Defendant reserves the right to amend, supplement, or otherwise modify any of these
`
`materials leading up to and during trial. Defendant does not waive any objections relating to the
`
`court’s claim construction order and expressly preserves any arguments in its claim construction
`
`briefing. (See Case No. 17-cv-00513, D.I. 174, 175, 194, 205; Case No. 17-cv-00514, D.I. 93.)
`
`By providing this proposed form, Defendant does not waive any argument and reserves its rights
`
`to contend that an issue is not properly part of the case and/or should go to the jury.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 188 Filed 02/19/19 Page 2 of 21 PageID #: 15938
`
`
`Dated: February 19, 2019
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`
`
`/s/ Michael Berta
`J. Mark Mann (SBN: 12926150)
`G. Blake Thompson (SBN: 24042033)
`MANN TINDEL THOMPSON
`300 West Main Street
`Henderson, Texas 75652
`Tel: (903) 657-8540
`mark@themannfirm.com
`blake@themannfirm.com
`
`Michael A. Berta
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111-4024
`Tel: (415) 471-3277
`Michael.Berta@arnoldporter.com
`
`James S. Blackburn
`Nicholas H. Lee
`Justin J. Chi
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`777 South Figueroa Street, 44th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017-5844
`Tel: (213) 243-4156
`James.Blackburn@arnoldporter.com
`Nicholas.Lee@arnoldporter.com
`Justin.Chi@arnoldporter.com
`
`Bonnie Phan
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`3000 El Camino Real
`Five Palo Alto Square, Suite 500
`Palo Alto, CA 94306-3807
`Tel: (650) 319-4500
`Bonnie.Phan@arnoldporter.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant LG Electronics Inc.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 188 Filed 02/19/19 Page 3 of 21 PageID #: 15939
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that counsel of record who are deemed to have
`
`
`
`consented to electronic services are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s
`
`CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on February 19, 2019.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Michael Berta
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 188 Filed 02/19/19 Page 4 of 21 PageID #: 15940
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`HTC CORPORATION,
`
`Defendant.
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`§
`
`§
`
`§
`
`§
`
`§
`
`§
`
`§
`
`§
`
`§
`
`§
`
`§
`
`§
`
`§
`
`§
`
`Case No. 2:17-cv-0514-JRG
`
`(LEAD CASE)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Case No. 2:17-cv-0515-JRG
`
`(CONSOLIDATED CASE)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PROPOSED VERDICT FORM FOR THE
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC v. LG ELECTRONICS, INC. TRIAL
`
`In answering these questions, you are to follow all of the instructions I have given you in
`
`the Court’s jury instructions. Your answer to each question must be unanimous. Some of the
`
`questions contain legal terms that are defined and explained in detail in the Jury Instructions.
`
`Please refer to the Jury Instructions if you are unsure about the meaning or usage of any legal
`
`term that appears in the questions below.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 188 Filed 02/19/19 Page 5 of 21 PageID #: 15941
`
`As used herein, “AGIS” or “Plaintiff” means AGIS Software Development LLC. As
`
`used herein, “Defendant” or “LG Korea” means LG Electronics, Inc. As used herein, “Asserted
`
`Patents” means U.S. Patent Nos. 8,213,970 (the “’970 Patent”), 9,408,055 (the “’055 Patent”),
`
`9,445,251 (the “’251 Patent”), and 9,467,838 (the “’838 Patent”).
`
`We, the jury, unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions:
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 188 Filed 02/19/19 Page 6 of 21 PageID #: 15942
`
`Question No. 1: Direct Infringement
`
`Did AGIS prove by a preponderance of the evidence that LG Korea has directly infringed the
`following claims of the asserted patents in Texas?
`
`Answer YES or NO for each of the listed claims below.
`(YES is a finding for AGIS; NO is a finding for LG Korea)
`
`’970 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 __________
`
`Claim 3 __________
`
`Claim 5 __________
`
`Claim 8 __________
`
`’251 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 __________
`
`Claim 5 __________
`
`Claim 6 __________
`
`Claim 12 __________
`
`Claim 15 __________
`
`Claim 19 __________
`
`Claim 24 __________
`
`’055 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 ___________
`
`Claim 2 __________
`
`Claim 7 ___________
`
`Claim 22 __________
`
`Claim 24 __________
`
`Claim 28 __________
`
`Claim 32 __________
`
`Claim 36 __________
`
`Claim 42 __________
`
`Claim 49 __________
`
`Claim 54 __________
`
`’838 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 __________
`
`Claim 5 __________
`
`Claim 7 __________
`
`Claim 10 __________
`
`Claim 15 __________
`
`Claim 18 __________
`
`Claim 19 __________
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 188 Filed 02/19/19 Page 7 of 21 PageID #: 15943
`
`Claim 27 __________
`
`Claim 29 __________
`
`Claim 31 __________
`
`Claim 35 __________
`
`Claim 20 __________
`
`Claim 27 __________
`
`Claim 38 __________
`
`Claim 40 __________
`
`Claim 54 __________
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 188 Filed 02/19/19 Page 8 of 21 PageID #: 15944
`
`Question No. 2: Indirect Infringement
`
`Did AGIS prove by a preponderance of the evidence that LG Korea has indirectly infringed the
`following asserted claims of the Asserted Patents by contributing to or inducing infringement in
`Texas?
`
`Answer YES or NO for each of the listed claims below.
`
`(YES is a finding for AGIS; NO is a finding for LG Korea)
`
`’970 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 __________
`
`Claim 3 __________
`
`Claim 5 __________
`
`Claim 8 __________
`
`’251 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 __________
`
`Claim 5 __________
`
`Claim 6 __________
`
`Claim 12 __________
`
`Claim 15 __________
`
`Claim 19 __________
`
`’055 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 ___________
`
`Claim 2 __________
`
`Claim 7 ___________
`
`Claim 22 __________
`
`Claim 24 __________
`
`Claim 28 __________
`
`Claim 32 __________
`
`Claim 36 __________
`
`Claim 42 __________
`
`Claim 49 __________
`
`Claim 54 __________
`
`’838 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 __________
`
`Claim 5 __________
`
`Claim 7 __________
`
`Claim 10 __________
`
`Claim 15 __________
`
`Claim 18 __________
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 188 Filed 02/19/19 Page 9 of 21 PageID #: 15945
`
`Claim 24 __________
`
`Claim 27 __________
`
`Claim 29 __________
`
`Claim 31 __________
`
`Claim 35 __________
`
`Claim 19 __________
`
`Claim 20 __________
`
`Claim 27 __________
`
`Claim 38 __________
`
`Claim 40 __________
`
`Claim 54 __________
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 188 Filed 02/19/19 Page 10 of 21 PageID #: 15946
`
`NOTE: YOU MUST ANSWER EACH OF THE NEXT THREE QUESTIONS (3-6)
`REGARDLESS OF YOUR ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS 1 AND 2
`
`QUESTION 3: Invalidity - Anticipation - Prior Art
`
`Did LG Korea prove by clear and convincing evidence that any of the following asserted claims
`of the Asserted Patents are invalid as anticipated in view of prior art?
`
`Answer YES or NO for each listed asserted claim in the space provided.
`(YES is a finding for LG Korea; NO is a finding for AGIS)
`
`’970 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 __________
`
`Claim 3 __________
`
`Claim 5 __________
`
`Claim 8 __________
`
`’251 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 __________
`
`Claim 5 __________
`
`Claim 6 __________
`
`Claim 12 __________
`
`Claim 15 __________
`
`Claim 19 __________
`
`’055 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 ___________
`
`Claim 2 __________
`
`Claim 7 ___________
`
`Claim 22 __________
`
`Claim 24 __________
`
`Claim 28 __________
`
`Claim 32 __________
`
`Claim 36 __________
`
`Claim 42 __________
`
`Claim 49 __________
`
`Claim 54 __________
`
`’838 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 __________
`
`Claim 5 __________
`
`Claim 7 __________
`
`Claim 10 __________
`
`Claim 15 __________
`
`Claim 18 __________
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 188 Filed 02/19/19 Page 11 of 21 PageID #: 15947
`
`Claim 24 __________
`
`Claim 27 __________
`
`Claim 29 __________
`
`Claim 31 __________
`
`Claim 35 __________
`
`Claim 19 __________
`
`Claim 20 __________
`
`Claim 27 __________
`
`Claim 38 __________
`
`Claim 40 __________
`
`Claim 54 __________
`
`QUESTION 4: Invalidity - Obviousness - Prior Art
`
`Did LG Korea prove by clear and convincing evidence that any of the following asserted claims
`of the Asserted Patents are invalid as obvious in view of prior art?
`
`Answer YES or NO for each listed asserted claim in the space provided.
`(YES is a finding for LG Korea; NO is a finding for AGIS)
`
`’970 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 __________
`
`Claim 3 __________
`
`Claim 5 __________
`
`Claim 8 __________
`
`’251 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 __________
`
`’055 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 ___________
`
`Claim 2 __________
`
`Claim 7 ___________
`
`Claim 22 __________
`
`Claim 24 __________
`
`Claim 28 __________
`
`Claim 32 __________
`
`Claim 36 __________
`
`Claim 42 __________
`
`Claim 49 __________
`
`Claim 54 __________
`
`’838 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 __________
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 188 Filed 02/19/19 Page 12 of 21 PageID #: 15948
`
`Claim 5 __________
`
`Claim 6 __________
`
`Claim 12 __________
`
`Claim 15 __________
`
`Claim 19 __________
`
`Claim 24 __________
`
`Claim 27 __________
`
`Claim 29 __________
`
`Claim 31 __________
`
`Claim 35 __________
`
`Claim 5 __________
`
`Claim 7 __________
`
`Claim 10 __________
`
`Claim 15 __________
`
`Claim 18 __________
`
`Claim 19 __________
`
`Claim 20 __________
`
`Claim 27 __________
`
`Claim 38 __________
`
`Claim 40 __________
`
`Claim 54 __________
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 188 Filed 02/19/19 Page 13 of 21 PageID #: 15949
`
`QUESTION 5: Invalidity - Written Description
`Did LG Korea prove by clear and convincing evidence that any of the following asserted claims
`of the Asserted Patents are invalid for lack of adequate written description?
`
`Answer YES or NO for each listed asserted claim in the space provided.
`(YES is a finding for LG Korea; NO is a finding for AGIS)
`
`’970 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 __________
`
`Claim 3 __________
`
`Claim 5 __________
`
`Claim 8 __________
`
`’251 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 __________
`
`Claim 5 __________
`
`Claim 6 __________
`
`Claim 12 __________
`
`Claim 15 __________
`
`Claim 19 __________
`
`Claim 24 __________
`
`Claim 27 __________
`
`’055 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 ___________
`
`Claim 2 __________
`
`Claim 7 ___________
`
`Claim 22 __________
`
`Claim 24 __________
`
`Claim 28 __________
`
`Claim 32 __________
`
`Claim 36 __________
`
`Claim 42 __________
`
`Claim 49 __________
`
`Claim 54 __________
`
`’838 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 __________
`
`Claim 5 __________
`
`Claim 7 __________
`
`Claim 10 __________
`
`Claim 15 __________
`
`Claim 18 __________
`
`Claim 19 __________
`
`Claim 20 __________
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 188 Filed 02/19/19 Page 14 of 21 PageID #: 15950
`
`Claim 29 __________
`
`Claim 31 __________
`
`Claim 35 __________
`
`Claim 27 __________
`
`Claim 38 __________
`
`Claim 40 __________
`
`Claim 54 __________
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 188 Filed 02/19/19 Page 15 of 21 PageID #: 15951
`
`QUESTION 6: Invalidity - Enablement
`Did LG Korea prove by clear and convincing evidence that any of the following asserted claims
`of the Asserted Patents are invalid for lack of enabling disclosure?
`
`Answer YES or NO for each listed asserted claim in the space provided.
`(YES is a finding for LG Korea; NO is a finding for AGIS)
`
`’970 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 __________
`
`Claim 3 __________
`
`Claim 5 __________
`
`Claim 8 __________
`
`’251 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 __________
`
`Claim 5 __________
`
`Claim 6 __________
`
`Claim 12 __________
`
`Claim 15 __________
`
`Claim 19 __________
`
`Claim 24 __________
`
`Claim 27 __________
`
`’055 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 ___________
`
`Claim 2 __________
`
`Claim 7 ___________
`
`Claim 22 __________
`
`Claim 24 __________
`
`Claim 28 __________
`
`Claim 32 __________
`
`Claim 36 __________
`
`Claim 42 __________
`
`Claim 49 __________
`
`Claim 54 __________
`
`’838 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 __________
`
`Claim 5 __________
`
`Claim 7 __________
`
`Claim 10 __________
`
`Claim 15 __________
`
`Claim 18 __________
`
`Claim 19 __________
`
`Claim 20 __________
`
`12
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 188 Filed 02/19/19 Page 16 of 21 PageID #: 15952
`
`Claim 29 __________
`
`Claim 31 __________
`
`Claim 35 __________
`
`Claim 27 __________
`
`Claim 38 __________
`
`Claim 40 __________
`
`Claim 54 __________
`
`13
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 188 Filed 02/19/19 Page 17 of 21 PageID #: 15953
`
`NOTE: ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTION 7 ONLY IF YOU HAVE FOUND AT
`LEAST ONE CLAIM LISTED IN QUESTIONS 1 AND 2 INFRINGED AND FOUND
`THAT THE AT LEAST ONE CLAIM IS NOT INVALID IN QUESTIONS 3 THROUGH
`6. OTHERWISE, DO NOT ANSWER THIS NEXT QUESTION.
`
`QUESTION 7: Damages
`
`What sum of money has AGIS proven by a preponderance of the evidence would fairly and
`reasonably compensate AGIS for damages from August 2, 2013 through trial resulting from LG
`Korea’s infringement of the Asserted Patents in Texas?
`
`Enter the dollar amount in the form of royalty you have chosen and select the dal (Choose one):
`
`Amount: $________________
`
`Select the form of royalty (Mark one):
`
`[___] Running Royalty
`
`OR
`
`[___] One-Time Lump
`
`14
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 188 Filed 02/19/19 Page 18 of 21 PageID #: 15954
`
`NOTE: ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTION 8 ONLY IF YOU HAVE FOUND AT
`LEAST ONE CLAIM LISTED IN QUESTIONS 1 AND 2 INFRINGED AND FOUND
`THAT THE AT LEAST ONE CLAIM IS NOT INVALID IN QUESTIONS 3 THROUGH
`6. OTHERWISE, DO NOT ANSWER THIS NEXT QUESTION.
`
`QUESTION 8: Willfulness
`
`For any claims that you found were infringed, did AGIS prove that it is more likely than not that
`LG Korea’s infringement was willful?
`
`Answer YES or NO in the space provided.
`(YES is a finding for AGIS; NO is a finding for LG)
`(IF YES, please proceed to QUESTION 9 to identify the particular claim(s))
`
`____________
`
`15
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 188 Filed 02/19/19 Page 19 of 21 PageID #: 15955
`
`QUESTION 9: Willfulness
`NOTE: ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTION 9 ONLY IF YOU HAVE: (1) FOUND
`AT LEAST ONE CLAIM LISTED IN QUESTIONS 1 AND 2 INFRINGED, (2) FOUND
`THAT THE AT LEAST ONE CLAIM IS NOT INVALID IN QUESTIONS 3 THROUGH
`6, AND (3) FOUND THAT LG’S INFRINGEMENT WAS WILLFUL IN QUESTION 8.
`OTHERWISE, DO NOT ANSWER THIS NEXT QUESTION.
`
`For any claims that you found were infringed, place an X next to any claims that you found were
`willfully infringed.
`
`’970 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 __________
`
`Claim 3 __________
`
`Claim 5 __________
`
`Claim 8 __________
`
`’251 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 __________
`
`Claim 5 __________
`
`Claim 6 __________
`
`Claim 12 __________
`
`Claim 15 __________
`
`Claim 19 __________
`
`’055 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 ___________
`
`Claim 2 __________
`
`Claim 7 ___________
`
`Claim 22 __________
`
`Claim 24 __________
`
`Claim 28 __________
`
`Claim 32 __________
`
`Claim 36 __________
`
`Claim 42 __________
`
`Claim 49 __________
`
`Claim 54 __________
`
`’838 Patent Claims
`
`Claim 1 __________
`
`Claim 5 __________
`
`Claim 7 __________
`
`Claim 10 __________
`
`Claim 15 __________
`
`Claim 18 __________
`
`16
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 188 Filed 02/19/19 Page 20 of 21 PageID #: 15956
`
`Claim 24 __________
`
`Claim 27 __________
`
`Claim 29 __________
`
`Claim 31 __________
`
`Claim 35 __________
`
`Claim 19 __________
`
`Claim 20 __________
`
`Claim 27 __________
`
`Claim 38 __________
`
`Claim 40 __________
`
`Claim 54 __________
`
`17
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 188 Filed 02/19/19 Page 21 of 21 PageID #: 15957
`
`We, the jury, unanimously agree to the answers to the preceding questions and return them
`under the instructions of this Court as our verdict in this case.
`
`(The jury foreperson should sign and date the verdict form and return it to the Court Security
`Officer)
`
`____________________, 2019
`Date
`
`
`
`________________________________
`JURY FOREPERSON
`
`18
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
