throbber
Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 162-5 Filed 02/13/19 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 14456
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 162-5 Filed 02/13/19 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 14456
`
`(cid:3)
`(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:59)(cid:43)(cid:44)(cid:37)(cid:44)(cid:55)(cid:3)(cid:23)(cid:3)
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 162-5 Filed 02/13/19 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 14457
`
`Docket No. : MOC-005
`(PATENT)
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`First Named Inventor:
`Malcolm K. Beyer, Jr.
`
`Application No.: 14/633,804
`
`Confirmation No.: 8573
`
`Filed : February 27, 2015
`
`Art Unit: 2646
`
`For: METHOD TO PROVIDE AD HOC AND
`PASSWORD PROTECTED DIGIT AL AND
`VOICE NETWORKS
`
`Examiner: 0. Obayanju
`
`AMENDMENT FILED WITH REQUEST FOR CONTINUED EXAMINATION {RCE)
`
`Mail Stop RCE
`Commissioner for Patents
`P .O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`INTRODUCTORY COMMENTS
`
`In response to the Final Office Action dated December 10, 2015, please amend the
`
`above-identified US patent application as follows :
`
`Amendments to the Claims are reflected in the listing of claims which begins on
`
`page 2 of this paper.
`
`Remarks/Arguments begin on page 8 of this paper.
`
`ACT!VE/84854759.1
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 162-5 Filed 02/13/19 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 14458
`
`Application No. 14/633,804
`Reply to Office Action of December 10, 2015
`
`8
`
`Docket No.: MOC--005
`
`Administrative Overview
`
`REMARKS
`
`Prior to the Office Action ofDecember 10, 2015, claims 1-2, 5, 8-14, 17, 20-24, and 31-
`
`42 were pending. In the Office Action :
`
`•
`
`claims 9, 12, 21, 24, 35, and 41 were rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112 as purportedly
`
`faili ng to comply with the written description requirement;
`
`•
`
`claims l, 2, 9, 13, 14, 21, 31, 32, 34-38, and 40-42 were rejected under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 102 as purportedly being anticipated by U.S. Pub. No. 2004/0148090 ("Melen");
`
`•
`
`claims 8, 11, 20, and 23 were rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as purportedly being
`
`obvious over Melen in view of U.S. Pub. No. 2006/0047825 ("Steenstra");
`
`•
`
`claims 5, 10, 17, and 22 were rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as purportedly being
`
`obvious over Melen in view of U.S. Patent No. 8,014,763 ("Hymes");
`
`•
`
`claims 12 and 24 were rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as purportedly being obvious
`
`over Melen in view of U.S. Pub. No. 2004/0252050 ("Tengler"); and
`
`•
`
`claims 33 and 39 were rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as purportedly being obvious
`
`over Melen in view of U.S. Pub. No. 2005/0130666 ("Levy").
`
`In the present Amendment, claims 5, 10, 17, and 22 are canceled without prejudice or
`
`disclaimer. Claims 1 and 13 are amended to recite the subject matter of previously-pending
`
`claims 10 and 22, respectively, and are further amended to recite "using an Internet Protocol to
`
`send data." Claims 43 and 44 are added.
`
`No new matter is added. Support for the claim amendments can be found
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7 630 724 e.g. in col. 10:57 - col. 11 :15 col. 12:63 - col. 13:26· and col. 16:42-
`
`59). S@ ort for the new claims can be found for exam le in the ' 724 atent (e.g. in col. 4:52-
`
`65). It is noted that the '724 patent was incorporated by reference into the present application at
`
`the time of the present application's filing.
`
`Applicability of Post-AIA Provisions of the Patent Laws to the Present Application
`
`The Office Action (p. 2) states that " [t]he present application is being examined under the
`
`pre-AIA first to invent provisions" of the patent laws. For the reasons stated in the Response
`
`ACTIVE/84854759.1
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 162-5 Filed 02/13/19 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 14459
`
`Application No. 14/633,804
`Reply to Office Action of December 10, 2015
`
`9
`
`Docket No.: MOC--005
`
`filed on November 13, 2015, it is understood that the present application will be examined under
`
`the post-AIA, first-to-file provisions of the patent laws.
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Applicant thanks Examiner Obayanju for conducting a telephonic interview on January
`
`21 , 2016. The participants included Examiner Obayanju, Applicant's undersigned representative
`
`(Daniel J. Burns), and Applicant' s attorney (Samuel S. Stone). The interview was held pursuant
`
`to a Proposed Interview Agenda that was emailed to the Examiner on January 21, 2016. Copies
`
`of the Interview Agenda and the email message are submitted herewith. A summary of the
`
`interview is provided below.
`
`During the interview, the participants discussed the rejections of claims 1 and 32 under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 102 as purportedly being anticipated by Melen. Applicant's representatives referred
`
`to the portions of Melen identified in the Proposed Interview Agenda, and pointed out that those
`
`portions of Melen do not teach or suggest the limitations of claim 1, nor the limitations of claim
`
`32. No agreement was reached with respect to claim 1. Regarding claim 32, the Examiner agreed
`
`that the claim was not anticipated by Melen.
`
`Claim Rejections Under 35 U.S.C. § 112
`Claims 9, 12, 21, 24, 35, and 41 were rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112 as purportedly
`
`failing to comply with the written description requirement. Reconsideration is respectfully
`
`requested. Since the application describes the subject matter of each of the claims in sufficient
`
`detail that one of ordinary skill in the art can reasonably conclude that the inventors had
`
`possession of the claimed subject matter at the time of the application's filing, each of the claims
`
`satisfies the written description requirement.
`
`In particular, the Office Action alleges that there is insufficient written description
`
`support for sending "a request for a second map, wherein the request specifies a map location,"
`
`as recited in claims 9 and 21 . Sugport for the sub· ect matter of claims 9 and 21 is found for
`
`example, in U.S. Patent No. 7,630 724, which was incorporated by reference into the present
`
`application at the time of the present application's filing. For example, the ' 724 patent states that
`
`"[t]he cell phone device application software, however, can also provide the user the ability to
`
`ACTIVE/84854759.1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket