`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 126-4 Filed 01/28/19 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 8793
`
`(cid:3)
`(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:59)(cid:43)(cid:44)(cid:37)(cid:44)(cid:55)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:3)
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 126-4 Filed 01/28/19 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 8794
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`Case No. 2:17-CV-0513-JRG
`(LEAD CASE)
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA INC., ET AL.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`PLAINTIFF AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC’S OBJECTIONS
`AND RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT HTC CORPORATION’S
`FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF (NOS. 1-15)
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Rules 26 and 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure, Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS” or “Plaintiff”) hereby responds
`
`to Defendant HTC Corporation’s (“HTC”) First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff (Nos. 1-15) in
`
`writing, under oath, and in accordance with the following definitions and instructions, within
`
`thirty (30) days of the date of service thereof. These Interrogatories are continuing in nature and
`
`require supplementation in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as follows:
`
`These responses are made solely for the purposes of this action, and are made without
`
`waiving, or intending to waive, the right at any time to revise, correct, modify, supplement or
`
`clarify any response provided herein or the right to object on any proper grounds to the use of
`
`these responses, for any purpose in whole or in part, in any subsequent proceedings or any other
`
`action. The right to raise any applicable objections at any time is expressly reserved. A response
`
`to any interrogatory herein should not be taken as an admission or acceptance of the existence of
`
`any facts set forth or assumed by such interrogatory, or that such response constitutes admissible
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 126-4 Filed 01/28/19 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 8795
`
`
`
`Discovery in this case is still ongoing and AGIS continues to investigate this matter. AGIS
`
`directs HTC to the factual and legal bases of HTC’s infringement of the above-quoted claim
`
`limitation as shown in AGIS’s P.R. 3-1 Disclosures, i.e., infringement contentions, which were
`
`served on January 19, 2018.
`
`
`
`35
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 126-4 Filed 01/28/19 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 8796
`
`
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 15
`
`If You contend that HTC Corp. has previously willfully infringed or currently willfully
`infringes any of the Asserted Claims, identify the behavior You allege is egregious and culpable
`and provide the basis for Your contention. .
`
`
`RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 15
`
`AGIS hereby incorporates the General Objections as if fully set forth herein. AGIS
`
`further objects to this interrogatory as vague, ambiguous, overbroad, unduly burdensome, and
`
`not proportional to the needs of the case because the burden or expense of the proposed
`
`discovery outweighs its likely benefit. AGIS further objects to this interrogatory to the extent it
`
`seeks information protected by the attorney-client privilege, attorney work product doctrine,
`
`and/or any other applicable privilege. AGIS further objects to this interrogatory on the ground it
`
`seeks information publicly available. AGIS further objects to this interrogatory on the ground it
`
`seeks information not within the custody, possession, or control of AGIS.
`
`AGIS objects to this interrogatory because AGIS’s answer depends on information
`
`requested from HTC by AGIS and is subject to HTC’s supplemental responses to AGIS’s
`
`pending interrogatories to HTC.
`
`AGIS objects to this interrogatory as vague, overbroad, ambiguous and confusing. AGIS
`
`objects to the term “basis” as vague, overbroad, ambiguous, overbroad, undefined, and uncertain.
`
`Notwithstanding its general and specific objections, AGIS answers as follows:
`
`Discovery in this case is still ongoing and AGIS continues to investigate this matter.
`
`AGIS directs HTC to documents within its own possession.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 126-4 Filed 01/28/19 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 8797
`
`
`
`Dated: June 18, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`As to Objections,
`
`BROWN RUDNICK LLP
`
`
` /s/ Vincent J. Rubino III
`
`
`
`Alfred R. Fabricant
`N.Y. Bar No. 2219392
`Email: afabricant@brownrudnick.com
`Peter Lambrianakos
`N.Y. Bar No. 2894392
`Email: plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`N.Y. Bar No. 4557435
`Email: vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Alessandra C. Messing
`NY Bar No. 5040019
`Email: amessing@brownrudnick.com
`John A. Rubino
`NY Bar No. 5020797
`Email: jrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Enrique W. Iturralde
`NY Bar No. 5526280
`Email: eiturralde@brownrudnick.com
`Daniel J. Shea Jr.
`NY Bar No. 5430558
`Email: dshea@brownrudnick.com
`BROWN RUDNICK LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: 212-209-4800
`Facsimile: 212-209-4801
`
`Samuel F. Baxter
`Texas Bar No. 01938000
`Email: sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com
`Jennifer L. Truelove
`Texas State Bar No. 24012906
`Email: jtruelove@mckoolsmith.com
`
`McKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`104 East Houston Street, Suite 300
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: 903-923-9000
`Facsimile: 903-923-9099
`
`
`
`
`37
`
`