`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 126-3 Filed 01/28/19 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 8788
`
`
` EXHIBIT 1
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 126-3 Filed 01/28/19 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 8789
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA INC., HUAWEI
`DEVICE CO., LTD. AND HUAWEI
`DEVICE (DONGGUAN) CO., LTD.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`CASE NO. 2:17-CV-0513-JRG
`LEAD CASE
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`HTC CORPORATION,
`
`Defendant.
`
`CASE NO. 2:17-CV-0514-JRG
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DEFENDANT HTC CORPORATION’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO
`PLAINTIFF AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, LLC (NOS. 1-15)
`
`Pursuant to Rules 26 and 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant HTC
`
`Corporation, (“HTC”) through its counsel, hereby requests that Plaintiff AGIS Software
`
`Development, LLC (“AGIS”) fully answer the following interrogatories within thirty (30) days
`
`in writing, under oath, and in conformity with the Definitions and Instructions set forth below,
`
`and afterwards supplement such interrogatory answers as may become necessary to comply with
`
`the requirements of Rule 26(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`The following definitions shall apply throughout these interrogatories, regardless of
`
`whether upper or lower-case letters are used:
`
`
`138763851.4
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 126-3 Filed 01/28/19 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 8790
`
`custody, or control of the trial exhibit, deposition transcript, or trial transcript;
`
`(f) if the trial exhibit, deposition transcript, or trial transcript is not in the possession,
`
`custody, or control of AGIS, AGIS FL, AGIS Holdings, what party has possession, custody, or
`
`control of that trial exhibit, deposition transcript, or trial transcript;
`
`(g) if the trial exhibit, deposition transcript, or trial transcript is not in the possession,
`
`custody, or control of AGIS, AGIS FL, AGIS Holdings, the date of its destruction and the party
`
`that destroyed it; and
`
`(h) whether the trial exhibit, deposition transcript, or trial transcript is under an obligation
`
`of confidentiality between any of AGIS, AGIS FL, AGIS Holdings and any third party, including
`
`the identification of the third party.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 12:
`
`For each LifeRing Instrumentality sold or licensed by AGIS FL, on a version by version
`
`basis, identify: (a) the date of its first disclosure to a third party and whether said disclosure was
`
`under a non-disclosure agreement; (b) the date of its first disclosure to the public; (c) the date of
`
`its first sale or the issuance of the first software license; (d) number of sales or software licenses
`
`issued on a year by year basis; (e) revenue on a year by year basis; (f) costs on a year by year
`
`basis; (g) profit on a year by year basis; (h) usage statistics on a year by year basis; and (i) all
`
`persons most knowledgeable about each identified instrumentality.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 13:
`
`“joining a communication network corresponding to a group,
`wherein joining the communication network comprises
`transmitting a message including an identifier corresponding to the
`group”
`
`If You contend that any Instrumentality made by HTC Corp. practices the above quoted
`
`claim limitation of claims 1 and 54 of the ’838 patent, either directly or indirectly, explain the
`
`
`138763851.4
`
`- 16 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 126-3 Filed 01/28/19 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 8791
`
`basis for Your contention including a specific element-by-element identification of the specific
`
`functionality of the HTC Corp. Instrumentality that corresponds to the following elements:
`
`(a) communication network;
`
`(b) group;
`
`(c) message; and
`
`(d) identifier.
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 14:
`
`“wherein the first device does not have access to respective
`Internet Protocol addresses of the second devices”
`
`If You contend that any Instrumentality made by HTC Corp. practices the above quoted
`
`claim limitation of claims 1 and 24 of the ’251 patent, either directly or indirectly, provide the
`
`basis for Your contention including a specific identification of the specific functionality of the
`
`HTC Corp. Instrumentality that You allege practices the phrase “does not have access.”
`
`INTERROGATORY NO. 15:
`
`If You contend that HTC Corp. has previously willfully infringed or currently willfully
`
`infringes any of the Asserted Claims, identify the behavior You allege is egregious and culpable
`
`and provide the basis for Your contention.
`
`
`138763851.4
`
`- 17 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 126-3 Filed 01/28/19 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 8792
`
`
`
`Dated: May 18, 2018
`
`
`
`/s/ Miguel Bombach
`Matthew C. Bernstein, (Lead Attorney)
`CA State Bar No. 199240
`mbernstein@perkinscoie.com
`Miguel J. Bombach
`CA State Bar No. 274287
`mbombach@perkinscoie.com
`James Young Hurt (Pro Hac Vice)
`CA State Bar No. 312390
`jhurt@perkinscoie.com
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11988 El Camino Real, Suite 350
`San Diego, CA 92130-2594
`Tel: (858) 720-5700
`Fax: (858) 720-5799
`
`Eric Findlay
`State Bar No. 00789886
`efindlay@findlaycraft.com
`Brian Craft
`State Bar No. 04972020
`bcraft@findlaycraft.com
`FINDLAY CRAFT, P.C.
`102 N. College Ave., Suite 900
`Tyler, TX 75702
`Tel: (903) 534-1100
`Fax: (903) 534-1137
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
`HTC CORPORATION
`
`
`
`138763851.4
`
`- 18 -
`
`