`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 108-9 Filed 01/25/19 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 4684
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT H
`EXHIBIT H
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 108-9 Filed 01/25/19 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 4685
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`HTC CORPORATION,
`
`Defendant.
`
`CASE NO. 2:17-CV-0514-JRG
`(LEAD CASE)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DEFENDANT HTC CORPORATION’S
`SECOND ELECTION OF PRIOR ART REFERENCES
`
`Pursuant to the proposed docket control order in this case (Dkt. No. 60), Defendant HTC
`
`Corporation serves this Second Election of Prior Art References, in view of Plaintiff AGIS
`
`Software Development, LLC’s (“AGIS”) Preliminary Election of Asserted Claims, and in light
`
`of AGIS’s Infringement Contentions. HTC reserves its right to assert at or before trial that the
`
`Patents-in-Suit are invalid for additional reasons, including (without limitation) under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§§ 101, 102, and/or 112. Discovery is on-going and HTC reserves its rights to assert additional
`
`prior art references that are uncovered.
`
`I. U.S. Pat. No. 8,213,9701
`
`1. U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2003/0217109 (“Ordille”)
`
`2. U.S. Pub. No. 2008/0219416 (“Roujinsky”)
`
`3. U.S. Pat. No. 7,386,589 (“Tanumihardja”)
`
`4. U.S. Pat. No. 7,609,669 (“Sweeney”)
`
`1 The prior art references listed are set forth in HTC Corporation’s invalidity contentions, and
`each identification is made in view of and incorporates the respective disclosures and any related
`documentation and evidence set forth therein, as well as any amendments thereto. Furthermore,
`combinations pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 103 with respect to these references are specifically
`identified in HTC Corporation’s Invalidity Contentions, or any amendments thereto.
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 108-9 Filed 01/25/19 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 4686
`
`5. U.S. Pat. No. 7,619,584 (“Wolf”)
`
`6. Int’l Pub. No. WO2008/118878 (“Swanburg”)
`
`7. U.S. Pat. No. 6,854,007 (“Hammond”)
`
`8. U.S. Pat. No. 5,325,310 (“Johnson”)
`
`9. U.S. Pat. No. 5,742,905 (“Pepe”)
`
`10. U.S. Pub. No. 2006/0218232 (“Kubala”)
`
`11. U.S. Pat. No. 8,369,843 (“Fux”)
`
`12. U.S. Pat. No. 8,250,155 (“Corry”)
`
`13. US Pub. No. 2010/0125636 (“Kuhlke”)
`
`14. U.S. Pat. No. 6,816,878 (“Zimmers”)
`
`15. U.S. Pat. No. 7,912,913 (“Accapadi”)
`
`II. U.S. Pat. No. 9,445,251
`
`1. U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2007/0281690 (“Altman”)
`
`2. U.S. Pat. No. 6,867,733 (“Sandhu”)
`
`3. U.S. Pat. No. 7,271,742 (“Sheha”)
`
`4. U.S. Pat. No. No. 2002/0115453 (“Poulin”)
`
`5. U.S. Pat. No. No. 7,917,866 (“Karam”)
`
`6. U.S. Pat. No. 6,204,844 (“Fumarolo”)
`
`7. U.S. Pat. No. 6,366,782 (“Fumarolo”)
`
`8. U.S. Pat. No. 7,353,034 (“Haney”)
`
`9. U.S. Pub. No. US2002/0173906 (“Muramatsu”)
`
`10. U.S. Pat. Pub. No. US2002/0027901 (“Liu”)
`
`11. The ActiveCampus System (including related documents)
`
`12. AGS LifeRing Product and its prototypes (including related documents)
`
`13. The Automatic Packet/Position Reporting System (“APRS System”) (including related
`documents and protocols)
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 108-9 Filed 01/25/19 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 4687
`
`14. The Navizon System (including related documents)
`
`15. Force XXI Battle Command, Brigade and Below (“FBCB2”) (including related
`documents)
`
`III. U.S. Pat. No. 9,467,838
`
`#1-15 from listed in Section II, above.
`
`IV. U.S. Pat. No. 9,408,055
`
`#1-5, #7, and #11-15 listed in Section II, above.
`
`In addition:
`
`12. U.S. Pat. No. 7,450,003 (“Weber”)
`
`13. U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2004/0054428 (“Sheha”)
`
`14. U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2004/0157590 (“Lazaridis”)
`
`15. U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2005/0221876 (“Van Bosch”)
`
`In addition, as HTC explained in its Invalidity Contentions, U.S. Pat. Nos. 9,408,055;
`
`9,445,251; and 9,467,838 are entitled to a priority date no earlier than October 31, 2014. HTC
`
`expressly reserves its right to assert at trial that, under that priority date, to the extent that any of
`
`the accused HTC products are determined to infringe any claim of any of those asserted patents,
`
`those accused HTC products would also render the claims invalid under at least AIA 35 U.S.C. §
`
`102(a)(1) because they were each in public use and on sale or available for download before the
`
`effective filing date of those patents. HTC further reserves the right to assert at trial that, under
`
`that priority date, earlier AGIS patents and/or applications, including (without limitation): U.S.
`
`Pat. No. 7,630,724 would also render the claims invalid under at least AIA 35 U.S.C. § 102
`
`because they were publicly available before the effective filing date of the those asserted patents.
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 108-9 Filed 01/25/19 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 4688
`
`Dated: August 29, 2018
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Miguel J. Bombach
`Matthew C. Bernstein, (Lead Attorney)
`CA State Bar No. 199240
`mbernstein@perkinscoie.com
`Miguel J. Bombach
`CA State Bar No. 274287
`mbombach@perkinscoie.com
`James Young Hurt (Pro Hac Vice)
`CA State Bar No. 312390
`jhurt@perkinscoie.com
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11988 El Camino Real, Suite 350
`San Diego, CA 92130-2594
`Tel: (858) 720-5700
`Fax: (858) 720-5799
`
`Eric Findlay
`State Bar No. 00789886
`efindlay@findlaycraft.com
`FINDLAY CRAFT, P.C.
`102 N. College Ave., Suite 900
`Tyler, TX 75702
`Tel: (903) 534-1100
`Fax: (903) 534-1137
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
`HTC CORPORATION
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00514-JRG Document 108-9 Filed 01/25/19 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 4689
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on August 29, 2018, the forgoing document was served via e-mail
`
`upon counsel for Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Miguel J. Bombach
`Miguel J. Bombach
`
`- 1 -
`
`