Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 1 of 946 PageID #: 1716
`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 1 of 946 PageID #: 1716
`
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 2 of 946 PageID #: 1717
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
`LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA INC., HUAWEI
`DEVICE CO., LTD. AND HUAWEI
`DEVICE (DONGGUAN) CO., LTD.,
`
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:17-CV-513-JRG
`(Lead Case)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Defendants.
`
`§
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS”) hereby makes the following
`
`infringement disclosures under the Patent Local Rules with respect to United States Patent Nos.
`
`9,467,838 (the “’838 Patent”), 9,445,251 (the “’251 Patent”), 9,408,055 (the “’055 Patent”), and
`
`8,213,970 (the “’970 Patent”) (collectively, “patents-in-suit”). AGIS’s investigation is ongoing and
`
`discovery has not yet commenced. Accordingly, these disclosures are based on information
`
`available to AGIS at this time. AGIS reserves the right to supplement this disclosure after further
`
`discovery from the defendants and non-parties, particularly documents and other discovery
`
`regarding the Huawei Accused Products set forth below. AGIS also reserves the right to assert
`
`additional claims of the patents-in-suit, accuse different products, or find alternative literal and/or
`
`equivalent infringing elements in the Huawei Accused Products.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 3 of 946 PageID #: 1718
`
`
`
`I.
`
`DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`PURSUANT TO PATENT LOCAL RULE 3-1
`
`A.
`
`ASSERTED CLAIMS
`
`Defendants Huawei Device USA, Inc., Huawei Device Co., Ltd., and Huawei Device
`
`(Dongguan) Co., Ltd. (“Defendants” or “Huawei”) have infringed and continue to infringe at least
`
`the following claims of the patents-in-suit in connection with the Huawei Accused Products set
`
`forth below:
`
` Claims 1-54 of the ’838 Patent;
`
` Claims 1-35 of the ’251 Patent;
`
` Claims 1-54 of the ’055 Patent; and
`
` Claims 1 and 3-9 of the ’970 Patent.
`
`AGIS reserves the right to seek leave of court to add, delete, substitute, or otherwise
`
`amend this list of asserted claims should further discovery, the Court’s claim construction, or
`
`other circumstances so merit.
`
`B.
`
`ACCUSED INSTRUMENTALITIES
`
`AGIS is currently aware that the following Huawei Accused Products infringe each of the
`
`patents-in-suit either alone or in concert with one or more other Huawei Accused Products:
`
` Activa 4G
`
` Ascend
`
` Ascend D1
`
` Ascend D1 Quad
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 4 of 946 PageID #: 1719
`
`
`
` Ascend D1 Quad XL
`
` Ascend D2
`
` Ascend G300
`
` Ascend G350
`
` Ascend G510
`
` Ascend G525
`
` Ascend G526
`
` Ascend G6
`
` Ascend G600
`
` Ascend G610
`
` Ascend G615
`
` Ascend G620
`
` Ascend G620S
`
` Ascend G630
`
` Ascend G7
`
` Ascend G700
`
` Ascend II
`
` Ascend Mate
`
` Ascend Mate 2 4G
`
` Ascend Mate7
`
` Ascend P1 LTE
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 5 of 946 PageID #: 1720
`
`
`
` Ascend P1 LTE
`
` Ascend P1 S
`
` Ascend P2
`
` Ascend P6
`
` Ascend P7
`
` Ascend P7 Mini
`
` Ascend Q
`
` Ascend W1
`
` Ascend W2
`
` Ascend Y
`
` Ascend Y200
`
` Ascend Y210
`
` Ascend Y220
`
` Ascend Y221
`
` Ascend Y300
`
` Ascend Y300II
`
` Ascend Y320
`
` Ascend Y330
`
` Ascend Y511
`
` Ascend Y520
`
` Ascend Y530
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 6 of 946 PageID #: 1721
`
`
`
` Ascend Y540
`
` Ascend Y550
`
` Ascend Y600
`
` 4Afrika
`
` Boulder
`
` G535
`
` G6
`
` G610
`
` G630
`
` G6600
`
` G6620
`
` G7010
`
` G740
`
` G8
`
` GR3
`
` GR5
`
` GR5
`
` GR5 2017
`
` GT3
`
` Honor
`
` Honor 3C
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 7 of 946 PageID #: 1722
`
`
`
` Honor 3X
`
` Honor 4 Play
`
` Honor 4C
`
` Honor 4X
`
` Honor 5C
`
` Honor 5X
`
` Honor 6
`
` Honor 6 Plus
`
` Honor 6C
`
` Honor 6X (64GB and 32GB)
`
` Honor 7
`
` Honor 7i
`
` Honor 7X
`
` Honor 8
`
` Honor 8 Lite (64GB and 32 GB)
`
` Honor 9
`
` Honor 9i
`
` Honor Note 8
`
` Honor V8
`
` Honor V9
`
`
`
`Ideaos X5
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 8 of 946 PageID #: 1723
`
`
`
`
`
`IDEOS S7
`
`
`
`IDEOS X1
`
`
`
`IDEOS X2
`
`
`
`IDEOS X3
`
`
`
`IDEOS X6
`
` M228
`
` M328
`
` M735
`
` M750
`
` M835
`
` Mate
`
` Mate 10
`
` Mate 10 Lite
`
` Mate 10 Porsche Design
`
` Mate 10 Pro
`
` Mate 8
`
` Mate 9
`
` Mate 9 Porsche Design
`
` Mate 9 Pro
`
` Mate S
`
` Mercury
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 9 of 946 PageID #: 1724
`
`
`
` Nova
`
` Nova 2
`
` Nova 2 Plus
`
` Nova 2i
`
` Nova Plus
`
` P10
`
` P10 Lite
`
` P10 Plus
`
` P6
`
` P8
`
` P8 Lite
`
` P8 Lite 2017
`
` P8MAX
`
` P9
`
` P9 Lite
`
` P9 Lite Mini
`
` P9 Plus
`
` PAL
`
` Pillar
`
` Pinnacle
`
` Pinnacle 2
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 10 of 946 PageID #: 1725
`
`
`
` Premia 4G
`
` SNAPTO
`
` Sonic
`
` Summit
`
` U120
`
` U1280
`
` U3200
`
` U7520
`
` U8100
`
` U8110
`
` U8150 IDEOS
`
` U8230
`
` U8300
`
` U9200-1
`
` U9500-1
`
` U9510E
`
` Union
`
` Valiant
`
` Verge
`
` Vision
`
` Vitria
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 11 of 946 PageID #: 1726
`
`
`
` W2
`
` Y210-0010
`
` Y3
`
` Y3 2017
`
` Y320
`
` Y330
`
` Y3II
`
` Y5
`
` Y530
`
` Y550
`
` Y560
`
` Y5II
`
` Y6
`
` Y6 2017
`
` Y6 Pro
`
` Y625
`
` Y635
`
` Y6II
`
` Y7
`
` Y7 2017
`
` Y7 Prime
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 12 of 946 PageID #: 1727
`
`
`
` dtab d-01H
`
` Honor X1
`
` Honor X2
`
`
`
`IDEOS S7
`
` Matebook
`
` Matebook D
`
` Matebook E
`
` Matebook X
`
` MediaPad
`
` MediaPad 10 FHD
`
` MediaPad 10 Link
`
` MediaPad 10 Link
`
` MediaPad 10 Link LTE
`
` MediaPad 10 Link Plus
`
` MediaPad 7 Lite
`
` MediaPad 7 Vogue
`
` MediaPad 7 Vogue
`
` MediaPad 7 Youth
`
` MediaPad 7 Youth2
`
` MediaPad M1
`
` MediaPad M2
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 13 of 946 PageID #: 1728
`
`
`
` MediaPad M2 10-inch
`
` MediaPad M2 8.0
`
` MediaPad M3
`
` MediaPad M3 lite 10
`
` MediaPad S7 Slim
`
` MediaPad T1 10
`
` MediaPad T1 7.0
`
` MediaPad T1 8.0
`
` MediaPad T1 8.0 WIFI
`
` MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro
`
` MediaPad T2 7.0
`
` MediaPad T3
`
` MediaPad T3 7
`
` MediaPad X1
`
` MediaPad X2
`
`AGIS reserves the right to amend this list of accused instrumentalities, as well as other
`
`information contained in this document and the exhibits hereto, to incorporate new information
`
`learned during the course of discovery, including, but not limited to, the inclusion of newly-
`
`released products or any other equivalent devices ascertained through discovery.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 14 of 946 PageID #: 1729
`
`
`
`C.
`
`CLAIM CHARTS
`
`Claim charts identifying a location of every element of every asserted claim of the patents-
`
`in-suit within Huawei Accused Products are attached hereto as Exhibits A–D. AGIS believes that
`
`the citations in the claim charts are representative of all Huawei Accused Products. For example,
`
`where AGIS cites reference material or images representing a phone or tablet, that citation is
`
`representative for all other such phones or tablets including all prior and future versions unless
`
`otherwise noted. AGIS reserves the right to amend these claim charts as well as other information
`
`contained in this document and the exhibits hereto, to incorporate new information learned during
`
`the course of discovery, including, but not limited to, information that is not publically available
`
`or readily discernible without discovery. AGIS further reserves the right to amend these claim
`
`charts, as well as other information contained in this document and the exhibits attached hereto,
`
`pursuant to Patent Local Rules 3-1(g) and 3-6.
`
`D.
`
`LITERAL INFRINGEMENT AND DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS
`
`AGIS asserts that, under the proper construction of the asserted claims and their claim
`
`terms, the limitations of the asserted claims of the patents-in-suit are literally present in the
`
`Huawei Accused Products as set forth in the claim charts attached hereto as Exhibits A–D. AGIS
`
`contends that any and all elements found not to be literally infringed are infringed under the
`
`doctrine of equivalents because the differences between the claimed inventions and the accused
`
`instrumentalities, if any, are insubstantial.
`
`AGIS contends that Huawei directly infringes the asserted claims by making, using,
`
`offering for sale, selling, and importing in to the United States the accused instrumentalities as
`
`well as indirectly infringe by contributing to and/or inducing others (e.g., Huawei customers or its
`
`13
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 15 of 946 PageID #: 1730
`
`
`
`Huawei customers’ customers) to directly infringe those claims by making, using, offering for
`
`sale or selling the Huawei Accused Products. AGIS contends that Huawei directly infringes the
`
`asserted claims by testing the Huawei Accused Products in the United States. AGIS contends that
`
`Huawei infringes the asserted claims by contributing to and/or inducing Mobile Network
`
`Operators (MNOs) and/or jointly-and-directly infringing the asserted claims with MNOs by
`
`making, using, offering for sale, selling, and importing in to the United States the accused
`
`instrumentalities.
`
`Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-6(a)(1), AGIS reserves the right to amend its Infringement
`
`Contentions as to literal infringement or infringement under the doctrine of equivalents, e.g., in
`
`light of the Court’s claim construction.
`
`E.
`
`PRIORITY DATES
`
`Under P.R. 3-1(e), each of the asserted claims of the patents-in-suit are entitled to a
`
`priority date of at least as early as September 21, 2004. AGIS reserves the right to establish an
`
`earlier date of invention based upon actions related to conception and reduction to practice of the
`
`claimed inventions.
`
`F.
`
`AGIS’S OWN PRODUCTS
`
`At the present time, AGIS does not intend to rely on the assertion that its own apparatuses,
`
`products, devices, processes, methods, acts, or other instrumentalities practice the claimed
`
`inventions. AGIS reserves the right to amend this statement to identify covered products as
`
`discovery progresses.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 16 of 946 PageID #: 1731
`
`
`
`II.
`
`PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO PATENT LOCAL RULE 3-2
`
`AGIS is producing or making available for inspection documents that are in AGIS’S
`
`possession, custody or control as set forth in Patent Local Rule 3-2. An AGIS 3-2 Production
`
`Index identifying these documents is attached hereto.
`
`This preliminary identification of documents is for convenience and is not an admission
`
`that each document falls within any exemplary categories in the Patent Local Rules, or that any
`
`document qualifies as prior art. AGIS is continuing with its investigation, particularly with
`
`respect to ESI. Thus, AGIS reserves its right to add to, delete from, or otherwise modify its
`
`disclosures in this section as its investigation proceeds.
`
`Production of these documents is governed by Patent Local Rule 2-2, and, with the
`
`exception of documents produced pursuant to P.R. 3.2(c) and public documents listed in the
`
`infringement charts, are considered “Confidential – Outside Attorneys Eyes Only” and disclosure
`
`of the confidential document or information shall be limited to each party’s outside attorney(s) of
`
`record and the employees of such outside attorney(s).
`
`Dated: November 28, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`BROWN RUDNICK LLP
`
` /s/ Vincent J. Rubino
`Alfred R. Fabricant
`NY Bar No. 2219392
`Email: afabricant@brownrudnick.com
`Peter Lambrianakos
`NY Bar No. 2894392
`Email:plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`NY Bar No. 4557435
`Email: vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Alessandra C. Messing
`
`15
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 17 of 946 PageID #: 1732
`
`
`
`NY Bar No. 5040019
`Email: amessing@brownrudnick.com
`John A. Rubino
`NY Bar No. 5020797
`Email: jrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Enrique W. Iturralde
`NY Bar No. 5526280
`eiturralde@brownrudnick.com
`
`BROWN RUDNICK LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: (212) 209-4800
`Facsimile: (212) 209-4801
`
`Samuel F. Baxter
`Texas State Bar No. 01938000
`sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com
`Jennifer L. Truelove
`Texas State Bar No. 24012906
`jtruelove@mckoolsmith.com
`
`MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`104 e. Houston Street, Suite 300
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone : (903) 923-9000
`Facsimile (903) 923-9099
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF,
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`16
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 18 of 946 PageID #: 1733
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
` I
`
` hereby certify that on November 28, 2017 a true and correct copy of the above and
`
`foregoing document has been served by email on:
`
`G. Blake Thompson
`Mann Tindel Thompson
`300 West Main Street
`Henderson, TX 75652
`blake@themannfirm.com
`
`Michael A. Berta
`Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
`Three Embarcadero Center
`San Francisco, CA 94111-4024
`michael.berta@apks.com
`
`
`
`J. Mark Mann
`Mann Tindel Thompson
`300 West Main Street
`Henderson, TX 75652
`mark@themannfirm.com
`
`James Blackburn
`Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
`777 South Figueroa Street, 44th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`james.blackburn@apks.com
`
`Nicholas Lee
`Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
`777 South Figueroa Street, 44th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017
`nicholas.lee@apks.com
`
`
`
`Attorneys of Record for Huawei Device USA, Inc., Huawei Device Co., Ltd., and Huawei
`Device (Dongguan) Co., Ltd.
`
`
`
`/s/ Vincent J. Rubino, III
`
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`17
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 19 of 946 PageID #: 1734
`
`
`
`
`
`3-2(a)
`
`
`
`
`3-2(b)
`
`
`
`3-2(c)
`
`
`AGIS 3-2 PRODUCTION INDEX
`
`Bates Start
`AGISTX_00007059
`
`Bates End
`AGISTX_00007071
`
`Bates Start
`AGISTX_00006047
`AGISTX_00007035
`
`Bates End
`AGISTX_00006191
`AGISTX_00007058
`
`Bates Start
`AGISTX_00000001_
`
`Bates End
`AGISTX_00006046
`
`
`Public Documents Listed in Infringement Charts1
`
`
`Bates End
`Bates Start
`AGISTX_00007788
`AGISTX_00007106
`AGISTX_00008277
`AGISTX_00007789
`AGISTX_Huawei00000001 AGISTX_Huawei00001068
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Exemplary Source Code excerpts were taken from the Android 7 Nougat Release 1.0 at
`
`https://android.googlesource.com/ as set forth in Exhibits A–D. AGIS expects that Defendant will produce this
`
`release for the Accused Products in its entirety.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`18
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 20 of 946 PageID #: 1735
`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 20 of 946 PageID #: 1735
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 21 of 946 PageID #: 1736
`
`Exhibit A for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Huawei Accused Products
`
`
`
`In these Infringement Contentions, AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS”) contends that at least the following claims of
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,213,970 (the “’970 Patent”) identified below are infringed by the Accused Products (e.g., phones and tablets) which
`are manufactured, sold, offered for sale, and/or used by Huawei Device USA, Inc., Huawei Device Co., Ltd., and Huawei Device
`(Dongguan) Co., Ltd. (“Defendants” or “Huawei”).
`
`The Accused Products comprise Huawei products running the Android mobile operating system and manufactured, used, or
`sold during and after 2011. For example, the Accused Products comprise the following Android-based phones: Activa 4G, Ascend,
`Ascend D1, Ascend D1 Quad, Ascend D1 Quad XL, Ascend D2, Ascend G300, Ascend G350, Ascend G510, Ascend G525, Ascend
`G526, Ascend G6, Ascend G600, Ascend G610, Ascend G615, Ascend G620, Ascend G620S, Ascend G630, Ascend G7, Ascend
`G700, Ascend II, Ascend Mate, Ascend Mate 2 4G, Ascend Mate7, Ascend P1 LTE, Ascend P1 S, Ascend P2, Ascend P6, Ascend P7,
`Ascend P7 Mini, Ascend Q, Ascend W1, Ascend W2, Ascend Y, Ascend Y200, Ascend Y210, Ascend Y220, Ascend Y221, Ascend
`Y300, Ascend Y300II, Ascend Y320, Ascend Y330, Ascend Y511, Ascend Y520. Ascend Y530, Ascend Y540, Ascend Y550,
`Ascend Y600, Boulder, Discovery Expendition, G535, G6, G610, G630, G6600, G6620, G7010, G740, G8, GR3, GR5, GR5 2017,
`GT3, Honor, Honor 6, Honor 6 Plus, Honor 7, Honor 8, Honor V8, Honor Note 8, Honor V9, Honor 8 Lite (32 GB and 64GB), Honor
`9, Honor 9i, Honor 7i, Honor 3X, Honor 4Play, Honor 4X, Honor 5X, Honor 6X (32GB and 64GB), Honor 7X, Honoro 3C, Honor
`4C, Honor 5C, Honor 6C, Ideaos X5, IDEOS S7, IDEOS X1, IDEOS X2, IDEOS X3, IDEOS X6, M228, M328, M735, M750, M835,
`Mate, Mate 10, Mate 10 Lite, Mate 10 Porsche Design, Mate 10 Pro, Mate 8, Mate 9 , Mate 9 Porsche Design, Mate 9 Pro, Mate S,
`Mercury, Nova, Nova 2, Nova 2 Plus, Nova 2i, Nova Plus, P10, P10 Lite, P10 Plus, P6, P8, P8 Lite, P8 Lite 2017, P8MAX, P9, P9
`Lite, P9 Lite Mini, P9 Plus, PAL, Pillar, Pinnacle, Pinnacle 2, Premia 4G, SNAPTO, Sonic , Summit, U120, U1280, U3200, U7520,
`U8100, U8110, U8150 IDEOS, U8230, U8300, U9200-1, U9500-1, U9510E, Union, Valiant, Verge, Vision, Vitria, W2, Y210-0010,
`Y3, Y3 2017, Y320, Y330, Y3II, Y5, Y530, Y550, Y560, Y5II, Y6, Y6 2017, Y6 Pro, Y625, Y635, Y6II, Y7, Y7 2017, Y7 Prime,
`and any variants of the listed models thereof. AGIS reserves the right to amend this list of accused phones as discovery progresses.
`For example, the Accused Products comprise the following Android-based tablets: dtab d-01H, Honor X1, Honor X2, IDEOS S7,
`Matebook, Matebook D, Matebook E, Matebook X, MediaPad, MediaPad 10 FHD, MediaPad 10 Link, MediaPad 10 Link, MediaPad
`10 Link LTE, MediaPad 10 Link Plus, MediaPad 7 Lite, MediaPad 7 Vogue, MediaPad 7 Youth, MediaPad 7 Youth2, MediaPad M1,
`MediaPad M2, MediaPad M2 10-inch, MediaPad M2 8.0, MediaPad M3, MediaPad M3 lite 10, MediaPad S7 Slim, MediaPad T1 10,
`MediaPad T1 7.0, MediaPad T1 8.0, MediaPad T1 8.0 WIFI, MediaPad T2 10.0 Pro, MediaPad T2 7.0, MediaPad T3, MediaPad T3 7,
`MediaPad X1, MediaPad X2, and any variants of the listed models thereof. AGIS reserves the right to amend this list of accused
`tablets as discovery progresses. For example, the Accused Products comprise Huawei products, including but not limited to the
`phones and tablets as described herein, running the following versions (and all intervening updates and sub-versions) of the Android
`mobile operating system: Android 2.3, 4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 5.0, 5.1, 6.0, 7.0, 7.1, 8.0, and 8.1. For example, the Accused Products
`
`
`
`A-1
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 22 of 946 PageID #: 1737
`
`Exhibit A for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Huawei Accused Products
`
`
`
`comprise Huawei products, including but not limited to the phones and tablets as described herein, running any versions of the
`following Android-based applications and/or software: Android Device Manager, Find My Phone, Find My Device, Google Latitude,
`Google Plus, Google Hangouts, Google Maps, Google Assistant, Google Search, Google Messages, Android Messenger, Google Allo,
`Google Duo, GMail, and Google Chrome. For example, the Accused Products comprise Huawei products, including but not limited to
`the phones and tablets described herein, participating in any networks and/or services related to the execution and/or use of the
`Android mobile operating system versions and Android-based applications and/or software described herein.
`
`AGIS does not concede that any claims of the ’970 Patent that are not listed below are not infringed by the identified products.
`
`Moreover, the citations to certain documents and other information below are intended to be exemplary only and in no way foreclose
`AGIS from citing or relying on additional documents, information, source code, and/or testimony at a later time. These contentions
`are preliminary in nature, and an analysis of Huawei’s products, internal documentation, source code, and/or testimony from relevant
`witnesses may more fully and accurately describe the infringing features of its accused products. Accordingly, AGIS reserves the
`right to supplement, correct, modify, and/or amend these contentions once such additional information is made available to AGIS.
`Furthermore, AGIS reserves the right to supplement, correct, modify, and/or amend these contentions as discovery in this case
`progresses; in view of the Court’s claim construction order(s); in view of any positions taken by Huawei, including but not limited to
`positions on claim construction, invalidity, and/or non-infringement; and in connection with the preparation and exchange of expert
`reports.
`
`Claim
`1[P]. A communication system for
`transmitting, receiving, confirming
`receipt, and responding to an
`electronic message, comprising: a
`predetermined network of
`participants, wherein each participant
`has a similarly equipped PDA/cell
`phone that includes a CPU and a
`touch screen display a CPU and
`memory;
`
`Accused Products
`The Accused Products together constitute a “communication system” for transmitting,
`receiving, confirming receipt, and responding to an electronic message, comprising: a
`predetermined network of participants, wherein each participant has a similarly equipped
`PDA/cell phone that includes a CPU and a touch screen display, a CPU, and memory.
`
`HUAWEI makes, uses, sells, and otherwise provides this communication system by making,
`using, selling, and importing Android OS devices such as Accused Products.
`
`The Accused Products meet the claim limitations by providing device-location tracking
`features such as those features described below. For example, the Accused Products meet the
`claim limitations because they are pre-installed with Android mobile operating systems
`containing code for providing device-location tracking features as provided in the claims
`limitations herein. For example, the Accused Products run applications and/or software that
`run within the Android mobile operating system and that use components of the Android
`
`
`
`A-2
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 23 of 946 PageID #: 1738
`
`Exhibit A for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Huawei Accused Products
`
`mobile operating system to provide device-location tracking features. Upon information and
`belief, in addition to the components and features of the Android mobile operating system
`itself, the following applications and/or software run within the Android mobile operating
`system and use components of the Android mobile operating system to provide device-
`location tracking features: Android Device Manager, Find My Device.
`
`Android Device Manager is the predecessor to Find My Device and has been available as a
`standard, pre-installed feature since 2013 and downloadable as a software application. The
`current iteration, Find My Device, often called the “new and improved Android Device
`Manager” or “rebranded Android Device Manager” is now part of the standard Google Play
`Protect suite which is “built in and enabled on all devices,” i.e., the Accused Products running
`Android OS. AGIS sets forth the Find My Device feature of the Accused Products as
`representative of this method. AGIS reserves the right to supplement these contentions to the
`extent that HUAWEI requires additional information in accordance with P.R. 3-1 and for any
`other reason for which it may deem necessary.
`
`See, e.g., https://www.androidcentral.com/find-my-device;
`https://support.google.com/android/answer/6160491?hl=en;
`https://android.googleblog.com/2013/08/find-your-lost-phone-with-android.html;
`https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.android.apps.adm&hl=en;
`https://www.blog.google/products/android/google-play-protect/
`Each “Google Account” is associated with a pre-determined number of devices, which include
`a CPU and a touchscreen, and which are registered when a customer acquires an Accused
`Product, such as a Huawei Android OS based device.
`
`A-3
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 24 of 946 PageID #: 1739
`
`Exhibit A for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Huawei Accused Products
`
`
`
`A-4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 25 of 946 PageID #: 1740
`
`Exhibit A for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Huawei Accused Products
`
`
`
`
`
`
`https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/6128427
`
`A-5
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 26 of 946 PageID #: 1741
`
`Exhibit A for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Huawei Accused Products
`
`https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/6128427
`
`
`
`
`A-6
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 27 of 946 PageID #: 1742
`
`Exhibit A for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Huawei Accused Products
`
`
`
`[1A] a data transmission means that
`facilitates the transmission of
`electronic files between said
`PDA/cell phones in different
`locations;
`
`[1B] a sender PDA/cell phone and at
`least one recipient PDA/cell phone
`for each electronic message;
`
`[1C] a forced message alert software
`application program including a list
`of required possible responses to be
`selected by a participant recipient of
`a forced message response loaded on
`each participating PDA/cell phone;
`
`This claim term is governed by 35 U.S.C. 112(6).
`
`Function: facilitating the transmission of electronic files between said PDA/cell phones in
`different locations.
`
`Structure: Communications network server; Communication network interfaces ’970 Patent at
`1:39-43; 2:36-43; Figs. 2, 3A, 3B, and 4.
`
`The Accused Products meet this limitation. Huawei provides access to one or more
`communication network servers via a modem interface such as a 3G or LTE modem.
`Huawei makes, uses, imports, sells or otherwise provides Android devices, such as the
`Accused Products, to its customers. These devices include PDA/cell phones, i.e. smartphones,
`tablets, and other devices with cellular connections. Each claimed electronic message is sent
`from at least one Accused Product to another Accused Product, which share a common
`“Google Account.”
`
`See claim 1[P]
`Huawei makes, uses, imports, sells, or otherwise provides a forced message alert software
`application program including a list of required possible responses to be selected by a
`participant recipient of a forced message response loaded on each participating PDA/cell
`phone.
`
`For example, Huawei’s Find My Device software application, which Huawei provides as a
`pre-installed feature and a downloadable as a software application allows Android OS users to
`track other Huawei devices, such as PDA/cell phones and tablets, linked to the same Google
`Account. Find My Devices provides a list of the status for each device within the same
`Google Account” that tracks location status, responses to location requests / time since last
`update, and actual locations.
`
`
`
`A-7
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 28 of 946 PageID #: 1743
`
`Exhibit A for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Huawei Accused Products
`
`https://support.google.com/android/answer/6160491?hl=en
`
`The forced message alert software includes with it a list of required possible responses to be
`selected by a particular recipient, such as “call owner,” “emergency call,” or entering the
`recipients password, pushing or swiping the unlock button, or fingerprint recognition to unlock
`the phone.
`
`
`
`
`A-8
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 29 of 946 PageID #: 1744
`
`Exhibit A for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Huawei Accused Products
`
`
`
`[1D] means for attaching a forced
`message alert software packet to a
`voice or text message creating a
`forced message alert that is
`transmitted by said sender PDA/cell
`phone to the recipient PDA/cell
`
`
`
`
`Each of the Accused Products includes or provides support for a means for attaching a forced
`message alert software packet to a voice or text message creating a forced message alert that is
`transmitted by said sender PDA/cell phone to the recipient PDA/cell phone.
`
`This claim term is governed by 35 U.S.C. 112(6).
`
`
`
`
`A-9
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 75-1 Filed 01/05/18 Page 30 of 946 PageID #: 1745
`
`Exhibit A for US Patent No. 8,213,970 Against Huawei Accused Products
`
`
`
`phone,
`
`[1E]said forced message alert
`software packet containing a list of
`possible required responses and
`requiring the forced message alert
`software on said recipient PDA/cell
`phone to transmit an automatic
`acknowledgment to the sender
`
`Function: attaching a forced message alert software packet to a voice or text message creating
`a forced message alert that is transmitted by said sender PDA/cell phone to the recipient
`PDA/cell phone.
`
`Structure: Algorithm set forth in Fig 2, 3A, 3B. 7:8-63.
`
`Huawei’s Find My Device feature allows Android OS users to track other phones, tablets, and
`computers linked to the same Google Account. Find My Device provides a list of the status for
`each device that tracks location status, response to location requests / time since last update,
`and actual locations.
`
`The Sender electronically transmits the message to the Receiver through the use of the
`Accused Products. Because this is a security feature, the recipient phones have no control over
`the receipt of the message and thus the message is “forced.”
`
`The forced message alert causes automatic responses as shown in the response list in 1[C]
`above.
`
`This claim is literally met by one or more TCP/IP or other protocol packets (including
`Huawei’s specific protocols via one or more communication network servers via a modem
`interface such as a 3G or LTE modem.. To the extent that the claims literally cover only a
`single packet, the limitation would still be met under the doctrine of equivalents. One of
`ordinary skill in the art would readily appreciate that packetized communications can be
`subdivided into multiple packet-sizes. These packets may be further subdivided in order to
`pass over different network layers. Thus, this limitation is equivalently met by packetized
`communication transmitting a forced message.
`Each of the Accused Products includes or provides support for the Find My Device capability,
`which includes forced message alert packets as set forth above in 1[D]. Furthermore, these
`packets contain a list of possible required responses and requiring the forced message alert
`software on said recipient PDA/cell phone to transmit an automatic acknowledge to the sender
`PDA/cell phone as soon as said forced message alert is received by the recipient PDA/cell
`phone.
`
`
`
`
`A-10
`