throbber
Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 46-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1044
`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 46-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1044
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPIVIENT, LLC
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`CASE NO. 2:17—cv—515-JRG
`
`V.
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DECLARATION OF JUSEONG RYU IN SUPPORT OF
`
`DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION
`
`AND/OR TRANSFER VENUE TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`I, JuSeong Ryu, state and declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am a Senior Manager at LG Electronics, Inc. (“LGEKR”) and work in LGEKR’s
`
`IP Center. As a Senior Manager at LGEKR, my job responsibilities include patent licensing and
`
`patent litigation support.
`
`2.
`
`I provide this declaration in support of LGEKR’S motion to dismiss for lack of
`
`personal jurisdiction or, in the alternative, to transfer venue to the United States District Court
`
`for the Northern District of California. I submit this declaration based upon my knowledge of
`
`the corporate structure of LGEKR and its subsidiary companies, and my investigation of the
`
`location of witnesses and evidence related to the mobile devices that I understand plaintiff AGIS
`
`Software Development, LLC (“AGIS”) has accused of patent infringement. If called as a
`
`witness, I would and could testify competently as to the same.
`
`3.
`
`Based on AGIS’S complaint, I understand the following LG—branded mobile
`
`phones have been accused: G Stylo, G6, X venture, V20, Phoenix, G5, K10, Phoenix 2, V10,
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 46-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 1045
`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 46-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 1045
`
`Vista 2, and Escape 2 (“Accused LG Devices”).
`
`I also understand that, based on AGIS’S
`
`complaint, certain applications for the Android Operating System (“Android OS”), on which the
`
`Accused LG Devices operate, have been accused, and that some of these applications are alleged
`
`to be provided by Google LLC (“Google”).
`
`4.
`
`LGEKR is a South Korean company headquartered in Seoul, South Korea, with
`
`its principal place of business located at LG Twin Tower 128, Yeoui-daero, yeongdeungpogu,
`
`Seoul, Korea. LGEKR is responsible for designing, engineering, sourcing components, and
`
`manufacturing the Accused LG Devices. All of this work is done outside the United States,
`
`mostly in South Korea.
`
`5.
`
`LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. (“LGEMU”) is a California company
`
`with large offices in California, including in Santa Clara, California. LG Electronics
`
`MobileResearch U.S.A., LLC (“LGEMR”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of LGEMU. Like
`
`LGEMU, LGEMR is also a California company. LGEMU (including its Wholly-owned
`
`subsidiary LGEMR), and not LGEKR, is the only LG entity that imports, tests (including
`
`through LGEMR), performs quality management on, markets, offers for sale, and sells the
`
`Accused LG Devices in the United States. LGEMU sells products to national mobile device
`
`carriers, retailers, and distributors, who in turn sell those products to end users throughout the
`
`country, including the Northern District of California.
`
`6.
`
`LGEKR does not have any ownership of or title to the Accused LG Devices at
`
`any point within the United States. Indeed, LGEMU, not LGEKR, independently controls and is
`
`responsible for the distribution throughout the United States of the Accused LG Devices
`
`acquired from LGEKR. Any distribution agreements with US. distributors related to the
`
`Accused LG Devices is entered into by LGEMU, not LGEKR.
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 46-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 1046
`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 46-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 1046
`
`7.
`
`The Android OS installed on the Accused LG Devices is an open-source
`
`operating system for communication devices that was developed and is provided by Google, who
`
`also provides certain Android OS applications, including for example, but not limited to, Google
`
`Maps. As noted above, LGEKR manufactures the Accused LG Devices running the Android OS
`
`outside the United States, meaning that the devices’ installation of the Android OS also occurs
`
`outside the United States, including any pre—installation of the accused Google applications that
`
`occurs during the manufacturing process. During the manufacturing process, LGEKR obtains
`
`the Android OS from the Android Open Source Project (“AOSP”), which is led by Google. Any
`
`modification made to the standard operating procedure set out by Google for the Android OS is
`
`performed in South Korea. All technical information retained by LGEKR is located outside the
`
`United States, and primarily in South Korea.
`
`8.
`
`LGEMR employees in LGEMU’s Northern California office are responsible for
`
`the Android OS certification for the Accused LG Devices sold by LGEMU. Android OS
`
`certification is a process by which Google and LGEMR ensure that LG-branded Android
`
`products, including the Accused LG Devices, manufactured by LGEKR and imported and sold
`
`by LGEMU adhere to Google’s Android OS compatibility requirements. The team of employees
`
`in Northern California responsible for this certification is called the Partner Engineering team.
`
`The Partner Engineering team, which is led by Cecilia Son, communicates and interacts with
`
`Google personnel located in Google’s Mountain View, California headquarters.
`
`9.
`
`LGEMU employees working in California are responsible for testing and quality
`
`management of the Accused LG Devices. For example, Michael Henson, who is the Senior
`
`Director of Quality Management for LGEMU, is responsible for testing and quality management
`
`of the Accused LG Devices, and he and his team are responsible for ensuring pre—launch and
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 46-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 1047
`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 46-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 1047
`
`post-launch quality assurance for those devices. Pre—launch quality assurance includes, for
`
`instance, user-level testing, such as messaging, call feature testing, and browsing.
`
`10.
`
`There are no LGEKR, LGEMU, and LGEMR employees in Texas who are
`
`involved in the designing, developing, or certification related to the Accused LG Devices.
`
`11.
`
`Documents and records relating to LGEMU products, such as testing, quality
`
`management, and other similar types of documentation related to the Accused LG Devices, are
`
`maintained in its California offices, including in Northern California. Documents and records
`
`relating to Android OS certification of LGEMU products are also maintained in Northern
`
`California. Sales agreements, marketing and market strategy documents and records are located
`
`in California and/or New Jersey. Many of the documents described above exist on local
`
`computers and servers that are not accessible outside of their respective offices.
`
`12.
`
`Documents and records relating to LGEKR’S activities described above are
`
`located outside of the United States, and primarily in Korea.
`
`13.
`
`LGEKR does not manufacture, use, test, advertise, market, sell, offer to sell, trade,
`
`import, package, or distribute any products or services in Texas, or anywhere else in the United
`
`States. LGEKR does not have any employees or sales representatives, distributors, brokers,
`
`Wholesalers or agents in Texas, and does not own or lease any real or personal property in Texas.
`
`LGEKR does not maintain any inventory of products in Texas. LGEKR does not maintain any
`
`bank accounts in Texas, and has not borrowed any money from any financial institution in Texas.
`
`LGEKR does not pay taxes or franchise fees in Texas. LGEKR does not have any office or
`
`telephone services or listings in Texas. LGEKR does not issue invoices, purchase orders, or
`
`other sale—related documents to customers in Texas. LGEKR has not negotiated any business
`
`contracts with any individuals or entities in Texas with respect to the sale or distribution of the
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 46-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 1048
`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 46-1 Filed 11/27/17 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 1048
`
`Accused LG Devices or any other LG-branded products. LGEKR is not qualified, authorized, or
`
`otherwise chartered, registered, or licensed to conduct business in Texas.
`
`14.
`
`LGEKR maintains corporate separateness with its US. subsidiaries, including
`
`LGEMU and LGEMR. LGEKR’s headquarters is separate from and different than LGEMU’s
`
`and LGEMR’s headquarters. LGEKR’s assets and bank accounts are maintained separately from
`
`any assets and bank accounts of LGEMU and LGEMR. LGEKR does not direct or have the
`
`authority over the day-to-day operations of LGEMU or LGEMR. Indeed, LGEMU and LGEMR
`
`have their own board of directors and observe their own corporate formalities.
`
`15.
`
`LGEKR is not responsible for maintaining the website for LG—branded products
`
`that are Viewable from the United States (including http://www.lgeom/us/support—product). The
`
`URL resolves to a different IP address depending upon the location from which one accesses the
`
`site. For web users in Texas, or elsewhere in the United States, LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. is
`
`the entity that maintains the IP address associated with the website. The website is passive and
`
`does not provide for the sale or offer for sale any of the Accused LG Devices.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed in
`
`Seoul, South Korea on November 27, 2017.
`
`le/l Kenn; Rf a
`
`JuSeong Ryu
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket