`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
`LLC,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`Lead Case No. 2:17-cv-00513-JRG
`
`Consolidated Case No. 2:17-cv-515-
`JRG
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA INC., ET AL.
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Defendants.,
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION
`TO AMEND THE SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`is Plaintiff’s UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND THE
`
`Before
`
`the Court
`
`SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court finds that the Unopposed Motion is GRANTED.
`
`The following schedule of deadlines is in effect until further order of this Court:
`
`Date
`
`8 Weeks after
`Scheduling
`Conference
`
`Amended
`Date
`January 30, 2018
`
`January 3, 2018
`
`3 Weeks After
`Scheduling
`Conference
`
`Event
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-3 & 3-4 (Invalidity Contentions)
`
`* File Proposed Protective Order and Comply with
`Paragraphs 1 & 3 of the Discovery Order (Initial and
`Additional Disclosures)
`
`
`
`The Proposed Protective Order shall be filed as a
`separate motion with the caption indicating whether
`or not the proposed order is opposed in any part.
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 35-1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 405
`
`Date
`
`Amended
`Date
`December 29, 2017
`
`Event
`
`* File Proposed Docket Control Order and Proposed
`Discovery Order
`
`
`
`The Proposed Docket Control Order and Proposed
`Discovery Order shall be filed as separate motions
`with the caption indicating whether or not the
`proposed order is opposed in any part.
`
`2 Weeks After
`Scheduling
`Conference
`
`3 Days After
`Scheduling
`Conference
`
`2 Weeks
`Before
`Scheduling
`Conference
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`December 15, 2017
`
`November 28, 2017
`
`* File Notice of Mediator
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-1 & 3-2 (Infringement
`Contentions)
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
