throbber
Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 337 Filed 02/01/19 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 20584
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA INC. ET AL.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`Case No. 2:17-CV-0513-JRG
`(LEAD CASE)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`










`
`APPLE, INC.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`




`
`
`PLAINTIFF AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC’S RESPONSE IN
`OPPOSITION TO APPLE INC.’S OPPOSED MOTION
`FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION TO STRIKE
`DECLARATION OF JOSEPH MCALEXANDER SUBMITTED WITH
`SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING (DKT. 310)
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:17-CV-0516-JRG
`(CONSOLIDATED CASE)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 337 Filed 02/01/19 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 20585
`
`Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS”) hereby submits its Response in
`
`Opposition to Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) Opposed Motion for Leave to File Motion to Strike Expert
`
`Declaration of Joseph McAlexander Submitted with Summary Judgment Briefing (Dkt. 310).
`
`Apple’s motion for leave to file this motion to strike Mr. McAlexander’s declaration
`
`should be denied because the declaration properly addresses points made and inaccuracies of
`
`Apple’s motion for summary judgment and because any additional information contained in that
`
`declaration is harmless and causes no prejudice to Apple. Mr. McAlexander’s declaration is not
`
`an untimely expert report; it does not contain any new materials, test methodologies, opinions or
`
`changed conclusions. Moreover, Apple has already had an opportunity to respond to that
`
`declaration in its reply papers in support of its motion for summary judgment, and will have an
`
`opportunity to question Mr. McAlexander at trial. Regardless of how the McAlexander
`
`declaration is ultimately characterized, Apple has suffered no prejudice and cannot articulate any
`
`beyond mere conclusory assertions of prejudice.
`
`Even if Mr. McAlexander’s declaration is found to contain statements that are considered
`
`to be rebuttal to the opinions of Apple’s infringement expert, Paul Clark, because
`
`Mr. McAlexander reaches no new conclusions and provides no new substantive opinions, such
`
`statements are harmless to Apple and Apple has suffered no prejudice.
`
`Accordingly, AGIS respectfully requests that the Court deny Apple’s motion for leave to
`
`file a motion to strike the declaration of Mr. Joseph McAlexander.
`
`Dated: February 1, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BROWN RUDNICK LLP
`
` /s/ Alfred R. Fabricant
`Alfred R. Fabricant
`NY Bar No. 2219392
`Email: afabricant@brownrudnick.com
`Lawrence C. Drucker
`NY Bar No. 2303089
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 337 Filed 02/01/19 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 20586
`
`Email: ldrucker@brownrudnick.com
`Peter Lambrianakos
`NY Bar No. 2894392
`Email: plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`Vincent J. Rubino, III
`NY Bar No. 4557435
`Email: vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Alessandra C. Messing
`NY Bar No. 5040019
`Email: amessing@brownrudnick.com
`Shahar Harel
`NY Bar No. 4573192
`Email: sharel@brownrudnick.com
`John A. Rubino
`NY Bar No. 5020797
`Email: jrubino@brownrudnick.com
`Enrique W. Iturralde
`NY Bar No. 5526280
`Email: eiturralde@brownrudnick.com
`Daniel J. Shea, Jr.
`NY Bar No. 5430558
`Email: dshea@brownrudnick.com
`Justine Minseon Park
`NY Bar No. 5604483
`Email: apark@brownrudnick.com
`BROWN RUDNICK LLP
`7 Times Square
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: 212-209-4800
`Facsimile: 212-209-4801
`
`Samuel F. Baxter
`Texas State Bar No. 01938000
`Email: sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com
`Jennifer L. Truelove
`Texas State Bar No. 24012906
`Email: jtruelove@mckoolsmith.com
`McKOOL SMITH, P.C.
`104 East Houston Street, Suite 300
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: 903-923-9000
`Facsimile: 903-923-9099
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, AGIS
`SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 337 Filed 02/01/19 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 20587
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that, on February 1, 2019, all counsel of record who are
`
`deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via
`
`the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Alfred R. Fabricant
` Alfred R. Fabricant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket