Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 275-2 Filed 01/09/19 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 18529
`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 275-2 Filed 01/09/19 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 18529
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 275-2 Filed 01/09/19 Page 2 of 10 PageID #: 18530
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:17-CV-513-JRG (Lead
`Case)
`
`Civil Action No. 2:17-CV-514-JRG
`Civil Action No. 2:17-CV-515-JRG
`Civil Action No. 2:17-CV-516-JRG
`Civil Action No. 2:17-CV-517-JRG
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA INC., HUAWEI
`DEVICE CO., LTD. AND HUAWEI DEVICE
`(DONGGUAN) CO., LTD.,
`HTC CORPORATION,
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`APPLE INC.,
`ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA), INC.,
`AND ZTE (TX), INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`DEFENDANT APPLE’S SECOND AMENDED INITIAL AND ADDITIONAL
`DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPHS 1 AND 3 OF THE COURT’S
`DISCOVERY ORDER
`
`Pursuant to Paragraphs 1 and 3 of the Discovery Order (D.I. 118, hereinafter “Discovery
`
`Order”), Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) hereby makes the following initial and additional
`
`disclosures to Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS”).
`
`These disclosures are based upon information reasonably and presently available to Apple,
`
`without the benefit of formal discovery, any significant production of documents, or any
`
`meaningful disclosures from AGIS. Accordingly, Apple reserves the right, consistent with its
`
`obligations under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(e) and Paragraph 8 of the Discovery Order,
`
`to modify, amend, retract, and/or supplement the disclosures made herein as additional evidence
`
`and information becomes available. Apple further reserves the right to call any witness or present
`
`1
` 
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 275-2 Filed 01/09/19 Page 3 of 10 PageID #: 18531
`
`the extent any claims of the Patents-in-Suit are invalid, AGIS is barred from recovering costs under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 288.
`
`8.
`
`No Willful Infringement
`
`Apple did not have notice of any of the Patents-in-Suit prior to service of the Complaint.
`
`For at least this reason, Apple could not have, and did not, willfully infringe any of the Patents-in-
`
`Suit prior to service of the Complaint. Nor has Apple engaged in any egregious misconduct, as
`
`required for a finding of willful infringement.
`
`9.
`
`Exceptional Case
`
`Apple should receive its fees and costs pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285, as this is an exceptional
`
`case. For example, AGIS’s assertion of 250 patent claims against more than a dozen accused
`
`products is unreasonable and renders this case exceptional. Apple is presently unable to compute
`
`these costs, as the majority of them have not yet accrued, but Apple will provide computations of
`
`such costs at an appropriate time.
`
`d)
`
`Names, Addresses, and Telephone Numbers of Persons Having Knowledge of
`Relevant Facts
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(A)(i) and the Discovery Order, and
`
`subject to and without waiving the limitations and objections set forth above, Apple identifies the
`
`following individuals who are believed likely to have knowledge of the relevant facts based on
`
`currently available information. Apple provides the following brief statement of each identified
`
`person’s connection with the case and a brief summary of the substance of the information believed
`
`to be known by each person. Apple further reserves the right to supplement and/or amend this list
`
`based on further investigation, analysis, and discovery, to the extent additional disclosures are not
`
`mooted or made redundant by future discovery requests. This disclosure list shall not, in any way,
`
`5
` 
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 275-2 Filed 01/09/19 Page 4 of 10 PageID #: 18532
`
`be deemed a representation that additional witnesses do not exist and Apple reserves the right to
`
`amend and/or supplement this list as discovery proceeds in this action.
`
`Name
`
`Contact Information
`(to the extent known)
`
`Raghu Pai
`Director of
`Engineering for
`iCloud
`Apple Inc.
`
`Rahul Zingde
`Senior Program
`Manager - iCloud
`Apple Inc.
`
`Scott Lopatin
`Software
`Engineering
`Manager
`Apple Inc.
`
`Navin Suparna
`Software
`Engineering
`Manager
`Apple Inc.
`
`Roberto Garcia
`Engineering
`Manager
`Apple Inc.
`
`Evan Krasts
`Product Marketing
`Manager - iCloud
`Apple Inc.
`
`Michael Jaynes
`Finance Manager
`Apple Inc.
`
`Contact only through counsel
`for Defendant:
`Desmarais LLP
`230 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10169
`Tel: 212-351-34000
`Contact only through counsel
`for Defendant:
`Desmarais LLP
`230 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10169
`Tel: 212-351-34000
`Contact only through counsel
`for Defendant:
`Desmarais LLP
`230 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10169
`Tel: 212-351-34000
`Contact only through counsel
`for Defendant:
`Desmarais LLP
`230 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10169
`Tel: 212-351-34000
`Contact only through counsel
`for Defendant:
`Desmarais LLP
`230 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10169
`Tel: 212-351-34000
`Contact only through counsel
`for Defendant:
`Desmarais LLP
`230 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10169
`Tel: 212-351-34000
`Contact only through counsel
`for Defendant:
`Desmarais LLP
`
`6
` 
`
`Relation to the case and substance
`of information believed to be
`known
`Believed to be knowledgeable about
`the development and operation of the
`Find My Friends and Find My iPhone
`applications accused of infringement.
`
`Believed to be knowledgeable about
`the development and operation of the
`Find My Friends and Find My iPhone
`applications accused of infringement.
`
`Believed to be knowledgeable about
`the development and operation of the
`Find My Friends and Find My iPhone
`applications accused of infringement.
`
`Believed to be knowledgeable about
`the development and operation of the
`Find My Friends and Find My iPhone
`applications accused of infringement.
`
`Believed to be knowledgeable about
`the design and development of the
`location sharing features of the
`Messages application accused of
`infringement.
`
`Believed to be knowledgeable about
`Apple’s marketing of the applications
`and features accused of infringement.
`
`Believed to be knowledgeable about
`the sales and financial information
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 275-2 Filed 01/09/19 Page 5 of 10 PageID #: 18533
`
`Name
`
`Contact Information
`(to the extent known)
`
`Brian Ankenbrandt
`Senior Legal
`Counsel
`Apple Inc.
`
`AGIS Software
`Development LLC
`
`230 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10169
`Tel: 212-351-34000
`Contact only through counsel
`for Defendant:
`Desmarais LLP
`230 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10169
`Tel: 212-351-34000
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`92 Lighthouse Dr.,
`Jupiter, FL 33469
`
`AGIS Holdings Inc. Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`92 Lighthouse Dr.,
`Jupiter, FL 33469
`
`Advanced Ground
`Information
`Systems, Inc.
`
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`92 Lighthouse Dr.,
`Jupiter, FL 33469
`
`Malcolm K. Beyer,
`Jr.
`
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`92 Lighthouse Dr.,
`Jupiter, FL 33469
`
`Relation to the case and substance
`of information believed to be
`known
`regarding the products accused of
`infringement.
`
`Believed to be knowledgeable
`regarding agreements, licenses, or
`contracts, and attachments or exhibits
`to those documents, relating to the
`technology accused of infringement
`in this case.
`Plaintiff and purported assignee of
`the Patents-in-Suit believed to be
`knowledgeable regarding the
`ownership, assignment, and control
`of the Patents-in-Suit; and business,
`valuation, and efforts to enforce
`and/or license the Patents-in-Suit.
`Purported former assignee of the
`Patents-in-Suit believed to be
`knowledgeable regarding the
`ownership, assignment, and control
`of the Patents-in-Suit; and business,
`valuation, and efforts to enforce
`and/or license the Patents-in-Suit.
`Purported former assignee of the
`Patents-in-Suit believed to be
`knowledgeable regarding the
`ownership, assignment, and control
`of the Patents-in-Suit; business,
`valuation, and efforts to enforce
`and/or license the Patents-in-Suit; and
`the conception, reduction to practice,
`prosecution, technology, and scope of
`the alleged inventions claimed in the
`Patents-in-Suit.
`Named inventor on all of the Patents-
`in-Suit, alleged founder of Advanced
`Ground Information Systems, Inc.
`and alleged current CEO of AGIS
`Software Development LLC,
`believed to be knowledgeable about
`the conception, reduction to practice,
`prosecution, ownership, technology,
`
`7
` 
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 275-2 Filed 01/09/19 Page 6 of 10 PageID #: 18534
`
`Name
`
`Contact Information
`(to the extent known)
`
`Christopher R. Rice Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`P.O. Box 3583
`Redmond, WA 9873
`
`Ronald Wisneski
`
`
`Daniel J. Burns
`
`
`Christopher W.
`Stamos
`
`
`Barry Haley
`
`
`Sandel Blackwell
`
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`Wisneski, Sears & Associates,
`PA
`810 Saturn Street, Suite 30
`Jupiter, FL 33477
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`Futurewei Technologies, Inc.
`2330 Central Expy,
`Santa Clara, CA 95050
`
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`Goodwin Procter LLP
`100 Northern Ave.
`Boston, Massachusetts 02210
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`Malin Haley DiMaggio &
`Bowen P.A.
`4901 NW 17th Way Ste 308
`Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`Lenexa, Kansas
`
`8
` 
`
`Relation to the case and substance
`of information believed to be
`known
`and scope of the alleged inventions
`claimed in the Patents-in-Suit.
`Named inventor on the ’251 patent,
`the ’838 patent, and the ’829 patent,
`believed to be knowledgeable about
`the conception, reduction to practice,
`prosecution, ownership, technology,
`and scope of the alleged inventions
`claimed in those patents.
`Former Chief Financial Officer for
`Advanced Ground Information
`Systems, Inc.’s believed to have
`knowledge regarding business,
`valuation, and efforts to enforce
`and/or license the Patents-in-Suit.
`
`Prosecuting attorney believed to be
`knowledgeable about the conception,
`reduction to practice, prosecution,
`ownership, technology, and scope of
`the alleged inventions claimed in the
`’055 patent, the ’251 patent, and the
`’838 patent.
`Prosecuting attorney believed to be
`knowledgeable about the conception,
`reduction to practice, prosecution,
`ownership, technology, and scope of
`the alleged inventions claimed in the
`’829 patent.
`Prosecuting attorney believed to be
`knowledgeable about the conception,
`reduction to practice, prosecution,
`ownership, technology, and scope of
`the alleged inventions claimed in the
`Patents-in-Suit.
`
`Alleged Director of AGIS Software
`Development LLC and alleged
`President and Director of Advanced
`Ground Information Systems, Inc.,
`believed to be knowledgeable about
`the conception, reduction to practice,
`prosecution, ownership, technology,
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 275-2 Filed 01/09/19 Page 7 of 10 PageID #: 18535
`
`Name
`
`Contact Information
`(to the extent known)
`
`Joann J. Ordille
`
`
`South Orange, New Jersey
`
`Thomas A. Petsche
`
`
`Neshanic Station, New Jersy
`
`John Roujinsky
`
`
`Netanya, Israel
`
`Lawrence R.
`Sweeney
`James D. Maloy
`
`Claudine Astorri
`
`Linda Boyle
`
`Marcellino
`Tanumihardja
`Gregory A. Brown
`
`Steven L. Zimmers
`
`Daniel W. Davis
`
`Samuel H. Altman
`
`Nicholas T. Sivo
`
`Richard D. Haney
`
`
`Bethel Park, Pennsylvania
`
`Greensburg, Pennsylvania
`
`Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
`
`Wilmerding, Pennsylvania
`
`Lynnwood, Washington
`
`Renton, Washington
`
`710 Clinton Springs Ave.,
`Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229
`
`45229 1602 Berry Farm Rd.,
`Lithia, Florida, 33547
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`Menlo Park, California
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`Palo Alto, California
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`
`9
` 
`
`Relation to the case and substance
`of information believed to be
`known
`and scope of the alleged inventions
`claimed in the Patents-in-Suit and the
`business, valuation, and efforts to
`enforce and/or license the Patents-in-
`Suit.
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent Publication No.
`2003/0217109.
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent Publication No.
`2003/0217109.
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent Publication No.
`2008/0219416.
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 7,609,669.
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 7,609,669.
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 7,609,669.
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 7,609,669.
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 7,386,589.
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 7,386,589.
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 6,816,878.
`
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 6,816,878.
`
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent Publication No.
`2007/0281690.
`
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent Publication No.
`2007/0281690.
`
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 8,798,593.
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 275-2 Filed 01/09/19 Page 8 of 10 PageID #: 18536
`
`Name
`
`Contact Information
`(to the extent known)
`
`Joseph F. Karam
`
`Ronald Leon Poulin
`
`Union City, California
`
`Mountain View, CA
`
`Victoria, Canada
`
`Kevin Thomas
`Buckham
`
`Anthony Luigi Melli
`
`
`Victoria, Canada
`
`
`Victoria, Canada
`
`Karon A. Weber
`
`Jonathan Trevor
`
`Edward Ho
`
`Samantha Tripodi
`
`Kulbir S. Sandhu
`
`Roderic C. Fan
`
`David Mleczko
`
`Kenny Nguyen
`
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`Seattle, Washington
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`Santa Clara, California
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`San Jose, California
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`San Francisco, California
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`Fremont, California
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`Fremont, California
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`San Jose, California
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`
`10
` 
`
`Relation to the case and substance
`of information believed to be
`known
`
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 7,917,866.
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent Publication No.
`2002/0115453.
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent Publication No.
`2002/0115453.
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent Publication No.
`2002/0115453.
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 7,450,003.
`
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 7,450,003.
`
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 7,450,003.
`
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 7,450,003.
`
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 6,867,733.
`
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 6,867,733.
`
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 6,867,733.
`
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 6,867,733.
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 275-2 Filed 01/09/19 Page 9 of 10 PageID #: 18537
`
`Name
`
`Contact Information
`(to the extent known)
`
`Carey Fan
`
`Michael A. Sheha
`
`Angie Sheha
`
`Stephen Petilli
`
`Aaron T. Emigh
`
`James A. Roskind
`
`William Griswold
`
`Neil Gilbert Siegel
`
`
`
`Mountain View, California
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`Fremont, California
`
`Laguna Niguel, California
`
`Laguna Niguel, California
`
`Laguna Niguel, California
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`San Francisco, California
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`Redwood City, California
`Contact information believed
`to be:
`
`Department of Science and
`Engineering
`University of California, San
`Diego
`La Jolla, California 92093
`The USC Viterbi School of
`Engineering
`3650 McClintock Avenue
`OHE310D
`Los Angeles, California 90089
`
`Relation to the case and substance
`of information believed to be
`known
`
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 6,867,733.
`
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 7,271,742.
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 7,271,742.
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 7,271,742.
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 7,330,112.
`
`Named inventor of prior art reference
`United States Patent No. 7,330,112.
`
`Believed to be knowledgeable
`regarding the functionality and public
`availability of the ActiveCampus
`prior art system.
`
`Believed to be knowledgeable
`regarding the functionality and public
`availability of the FBCB2 prior art
`system and its predecessor systems.
`
`Apple further identifies the individuals listed on AGIS’s initial disclosures as persons
`
`potentially having knowledge of facts relevant to this action, and reserves the right to rely upon
`
`any such individuals to support its claims and defenses in this action.
`
`In addition to the individuals identified above, the following individuals not specifically
`
`known to Apple are likely to knowledge of facts relevant to this action: other authors of prior art
`
`11
` 
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 275-2 Filed 01/09/19 Page 10 of 10 PageID #: 18538
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Kerri-Ann Limbeek
`
`Melissa Richards Smith
`State Bar No. 24001351
`GILLAM & SMITH, LLP
`303 South Washington Ave.
`Marshall, TX 75670
`Tel: (903) 934-8450
`Fax: (903) 934-9257
`melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`
`John M. Desmarais
`Michael P. Stadnick
`Ameet A. Modi
`Kerri-Ann Limbeek
`Brian Matty
`DESMARAIS LLP
`230 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10169
`Telephone: (212) 351-3400
`Facsimile: (212) 351-3401
`Email: jdesmarais@desmaraisllp.com
`Email: mstadnick@desmaraisllp.com
`Email: amodi@desmaraisllp.com
`Email: klimbeek@desmaraisllp.com
`Email: bmatty@desmaraisllp.com
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc.
`
`Dated: April 16, 2018
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`14
` 
`
`