throbber
Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 27 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 363
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`AGIS Software Development, LLC
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA INC., HUAWEI
`DEVICE CO., LTD. AND HUAWEI DEVICE
`(DONGGUAN) CO., LTD.
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-cv-513-JRG
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`UNOPPOSED SECOND MOTION FOR FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME
`FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND
`TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
`
`Defendants Huawei Device USA, Inc., Huawei Device Co., Ltd., and Huawei Device
`
`(Dongguan) Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Defendants” or “Huawei”) hereby file this unopposed
`
`second motion for a further extension of time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff
`
`AGIS Software Development, LLC’s (“AGIS”) First Amended Complaint. Huawei Device
`
`USA, Inc. was first served with the original complaint on July 17, 2017. (D.I. 6.) Then, on
`
`August 17, 2017, AGIS filed the First Amended Complaint to replace the foreign Huawei
`
`defendants identified in the original complaint with Huawei Device Co., Ltd. and Huawei Device
`
`(Dongguan) Co., Ltd. (D.I. 20.) On August 24, 2017, Huawei Device Co., Ltd. and Huawei
`
`Device (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. both agreed to waive service of the First Amended Complaint.
`
`(D.I. 22, 23.) On August 23, 2017, Defendants filed their unopposed first Motion for Extension
`
`of time (D.I. 21), which the Court granted on September 11, 2017 (D.I. 24), extending the time to
`
`answer to September 28, 2017. Defendants, therefore, request the court further extend the
`
`deadline an additional two weeks’ time to October 12, 2017, in order to provide Defendants’
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 27 Filed 09/25/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 364
`
`counsel the additional opportunity to investigate the relevant facts and evaluate the precedential
`
`law in a manner that allows Defendants to narrow the issues in dispute, to the extent possible,
`
`and to prepare a response that will focus the issues and arguments necessary to be addressed in
`
`this proceeding. This Motion is made for good cause, and not for delay or tactical advantage.
`
`Counsel for Huawei have conferred with counsel for AGIS, and AGIS does not oppose the
`
`requested extension.
`
`Dated: September 25, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted by:
`
`/s/ J. Mark Mann
`J. Mark Mann
`SBN: 12926150
`mark@themannfirm.com
`G. Blake Thompson
`SBN: 24042033
`blake@themannfirm.com
`MANN TINDEL THOMPSON
`300 West Main Street
`Henderson, Texas 75652
`Tel: 903-657-8540
`Fax: 903-657-6003
`
`COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA INC., HUAWEI
`DEVICE CO., LTD. AND HUAWEI
`DEVICE (DONGGUAN) CO., LTD.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on September 25, 2017, a true and correct copy of
`
`the foregoing was served to the parties counsel of record via electronic mail pursuant to Local
`
`Rule CV-5(d).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ J. Mark Mann
`J. Mark Mann
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket