throbber
Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 257-15 Filed 01/04/19 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 16432
`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 257-15 Filed 01/04/19 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 16432
`
`EXHIBIT 15
`
`EXHIBIT 15
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 257-15 Filed 01/04/19 Page 2 of 10 PageID #: 16433
`
`
`
`DR. NEIL G. SIEGEL - 11/14/2018DR. NEIL G. SIEGEL - 11/14/2018
`

`
`·1· · · · · · · ·UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`·2· · · · · · · CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`·3
`
`·4· ·AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,· · )
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·) Civil Action No.
`·5· · · · · · · · · · ·Plaintiff,· · · ) 2:17-cv-513-JRG
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·) (LEAD CASE)
`·6· · · · · · · vs.· · · · · · · · · · ) Civil Action No.
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·) 2:17-cv-516-JRG
`·7· ·APPLE, INC.,· · · · · · · · · · · ) Pages 1 to 237
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·)
`·8· · · · · · · · · · ·Defendant.· · · )
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·)
`·9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14· · · · · · ·DEPOSITION OF DR. NEIL G. SIEGEL
`
`15· · · · · · · · · · · · ·TAKEN ON
`
`16· · · · · · · ·WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2018
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24· ·Reported by:· PHILIP D. NORRIS
`
`25· · · · · · · · ·CSR NO. 4980
`
`
`Epiq Court Reporting Solutions - New YorkEpiq Court Reporting Solutions - New York
`
`1-800-325-33761-800-325-3376
`
`www.deposition.comwww.deposition.com
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 257-15 Filed 01/04/19 Page 3 of 10 PageID #: 16434
`
`
`DR. NEIL G. SIEGEL - 11/14/2018DR. NEIL G. SIEGEL - 11/14/2018
`Page 90
`
`·1· ·computer, the device.
`·2· · · · · · But when we talk about designating a unit,
`·3· ·what we are -- you don't designate a computer, you
`·4· ·designate a military role.· That's how people are
`·5· ·identified in FBCB2.
`·6· · · · Q.· So what you're --
`·7· · · · A.· So that was the distinction I was trying to
`·8· ·get to by this terminology.· I apologize if it
`·9· ·confused you.
`10· · · · Q.· Okay.· So you say the unit receives
`11· ·information from FBCB2 devices and forwards it to
`12· ·other FBCB2 devices, so --
`13· · · · A.· No, that's not what it says, sir.
`14· · · · Q.· It says:
`15· · · · · · "Individual FBCB2 units were designated to
`16· · · · receive information from FBCB2 devices and
`17· · · · forward it to other FBCB2 devices."
`18· · · · · · Am I reading that correctly?
`19· · · · A.· Yes, sir.
`20· · · · Q.· And so was there an FBCB2 device that
`20· · · · Q.· And so was there an FBCB2 device that
`21· ·received information from FBCB2 devices or was it
`21· ·received information from FBCB2 devices or was it
`22· ·something else in the unit that received the
`22· ·something else in the unit that received the
`23· ·information from FBCB2 devices?
`23· ·information from FBCB2 devices?
`24· · · · A.· There is an FBCB2 device in that unit, but24· · · · A.· There is an FBCB2 device in that unit, but
`
`25· ·it was designated by the role name that is the
`25· ·it was designated by the role name that is the
`
`Pages 90..93
`Page 91
`
`
`·1· ·military term for the unit.·1· ·military term for the unit.
`·2· · · · Q.· And so when you talk about servers in this
`·2· · · · Q.· And so when you talk about servers in this
`·3· ·paragraph, "servers consist of computers mounted on
`·3· ·paragraph, "servers consist of computers mounted on
`·4· ·Army vehicles," those are just the FBCB2 devices;
`·4· ·Army vehicles," those are just the FBCB2 devices;
`·5· ·right?
`·5· ·right?
`·6· · · · A.· Yes, sir.
`·6· · · · A.· Yes, sir.
`·7· · · · Q.· And so an FBCB2 device, that same hardware,
`·7· · · · Q.· And so an FBCB2 device, that same hardware,
`·8· ·could either be a server or not a server; right?
`·8· ·could either be a server or not a server; right?
`·9· · · · A.· Correct.· It services the FBCB2 mission for
`·9· · · · A.· Correct.· It services the FBCB2 mission for
`10· ·the user on that military platform, whether it is a
`10· ·the user on that military platform, whether it is a
`11· ·server or not.· But it may serve, as you indicated,
`11· ·server or not.· But it may serve, as you indicated,
`12· ·the additional role of being a server.
`12· ·the additional role of being a server.
`13· · · · Q.· And so is it fair to say that any FBCB2
`13· · · · Q.· And so is it fair to say that any FBCB2
`14· ·device could have been a server?
`14· ·device could have been a server?
`15· · · · A.· There is some technical limitations that
`15· · · · A.· There is some technical limitations that
`16· ·prevented some FBCB2 devices being considered
`16· ·prevented some FBCB2 devices being considered
`17· ·servers.
`17· ·servers.
`18· · · · Q.· So let's talk about these FBCB2 computers
`18· · · · Q.· So let's talk about these FBCB2 computers
`19· ·you're talking about mounted on Army vehicles.· Is
`19· ·you're talking about mounted on Army vehicles.· Is
`20· ·it fair to say that any of those FBCB2 computers
`20· ·it fair to say that any of those FBCB2 computers
`21· ·could have been a server?
`21· ·could have been a server?
`22· · · · A.· Subject to the technical limitations I just
`22· · · · A.· Subject to the technical limitations I just
`23· ·mentioned, yes.
`23· ·mentioned, yes.
`24· · · · Q.· And I'm not going to ask you specifically24· · · · Q.· And I'm not going to ask you specifically
`
`25· ·about those technical limitations, but I'm going to
`25· ·about those technical limitations, but I'm going to
`
`Page 92
`
`·1· ·ask you:· Did you mention those in your report?· Let·1· ·ask you:· Did you mention those in your report?· Let
`·2· ·me ask you a different way.
`·2· ·me ask you a different way.
`·3· · · · · · Can you point to a paragraph in your report
`·3· · · · · · Can you point to a paragraph in your report
`·4· ·where you describe those technical limitations of
`·4· ·where you describe those technical limitations of
`·5· ·the devices that would prevent them from being a
`·5· ·the devices that would prevent them from being a
`·6· ·server?
`·6· ·server?
`·7· · · · A.· It was not relevant to the argument.
`·7· · · · A.· It was not relevant to the argument.
`·8· · · · Q.· So to confirm, you didn't put that in your
`·8· · · · Q.· So to confirm, you didn't put that in your
`·9· ·report; right?
`·9· ·report; right?
`10· · · · A.· It might be discussed in the '559 patent,
`10· · · · A.· It might be discussed in the '559 patent,
`11· ·which is referenced in several of these paragraphs,
`11· ·which is referenced in several of these paragraphs,
`12· ·but the -- the fact that only some portion of the
`12· ·but the -- the fact that only some portion of the
`13· ·FBCB2 devices in a given unit were eligible to be
`13· ·FBCB2 devices in a given unit were eligible to be
`14· ·elected as servers was not relevant to the argument
`14· ·elected as servers was not relevant to the argument
`15· ·I was making.
`15· ·I was making.
`16· · · · Q.· So to confirm, you didn't discuss that in
`16· · · · Q.· So to confirm, you didn't discuss that in
`17· ·your report; right?
`17· ·your report; right?
`18· · · · A.· I did not discuss the specific technical
`18· · · · A.· I did not discuss the specific technical
`19· ·limitation that would allow some FBCB2 devices to
`19· ·limitation that would allow some FBCB2 devices to
`20· ·become servers and others not eligible to become
`20· ·become servers and others not eligible to become
`21· ·servers, no, sir.
`21· ·servers, no, sir.
`22· · · · Q.· Have you ever heard the term "mesh
`22· · · · Q.· Have you ever heard the term "mesh
`23· ·network"?
`23· ·network"?
`24· · · · A.· I have, sir.
`24· · · · A.· I have, sir.
`25· · · · · · MR. RUBINO:· I think we're being told that25· · · · · · MR. RUBINO:· I think we're being told that
`
`
`
`Page 93Page 93
`
`·1· ·we have to take some time to change the tape, if you·1· ·we have to take some time to change the tape, if you
`·2· ·want to go off the record, if that's okay.
`·2· ·want to go off the record, if that's okay.
`·3· · · · · · THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· This marks the end of
`·3· · · · · · THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· This marks the end of
`·4· ·Media No. 1.· Going off the record.· The time is
`·4· ·Media No. 1.· Going off the record.· The time is
`·5· ·11:38 a.m.
`·5· ·11:38 a.m.
`·6· · · · · · (Brief recess.)
`·6· · · · · · (Brief recess.)
`·7· · · · · · THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· Back on the record.
`·7· · · · · · THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· Back on the record.
`·8· ·Here marks the beginning of Volume 1, Tape No. 2, in
`·8· ·Here marks the beginning of Volume 1, Tape No. 2, in
`·9· ·the deposition of Dr. Neil Siegel.· The time is
`·9· ·the deposition of Dr. Neil Siegel.· The time is
`10· ·11:50 a.m.
`10· ·11:50 a.m.
`11· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`11· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`12· · · · Q.· Good afternoon again, Dr. Siegel.· So
`12· · · · Q.· Good afternoon again, Dr. Siegel.· So
`13· ·before the break we were discussing FBCB2 devices
`13· ·before the break we were discussing FBCB2 devices
`14· ·and whether or not they could be servers; do you
`14· ·and whether or not they could be servers; do you
`15· ·recall that discussion?
`15· ·recall that discussion?
`16· · · · A.· I do, sir.
`16· · · · A.· I do, sir.
`17· · · · Q.· And so I want to direct your attention to
`17· · · · Q.· And so I want to direct your attention to
`18· ·your report, at paragraph 103.
`18· ·your report, at paragraph 103.
`19· · · · A.· Okay.· Yes, sir.
`19· · · · A.· Okay.· Yes, sir.
`20· · · · Q.· So in this paragraph you discuss the
`20· · · · Q.· So in this paragraph you discuss the
`21· ·limitation sending to a second server a request for
`21· ·limitation sending to a second server a request for
`22· ·a second georeferenced map data different from the
`22· ·a second georeferenced map data different from the
`23· ·first georeferenced map data receiving from the23· ·first georeferenced map data receiving from the
`
`24· ·second server of the second georeference map data.
`24· ·second server of the second georeference map data.
`25· ·Do you see that limitation?
`25· ·Do you see that limitation?
`
`
`Epiq Court Reporting Solutions - New YorkEpiq Court Reporting Solutions - New York
`
`1-800-325-33761-800-325-3376
`
`www.deposition.comwww.deposition.comYVer1f
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 257-15 Filed 01/04/19 Page 4 of 10 PageID #: 16435
`
`
`DR. NEIL G. SIEGEL - 11/14/2018DR. NEIL G. SIEGEL - 11/14/2018
`Page 94
`
`
`·1· · · · A.· I see that, uh-huh.·1· · · · A.· I see that, uh-huh.
`·2· · · · Q.· And so you have a discussion here where you
`·2· · · · Q.· And so you have a discussion here where you
`·3· ·say:· "FBCB2 users could toggle among different maps
`·3· ·say:· "FBCB2 users could toggle among different maps
`·4· ·while in the field"; you see that?· It's in the
`·4· ·while in the field"; you see that?· It's in the
`·5· ·middle of the paragraph.
`·5· ·middle of the paragraph.
`·6· · · · A.· Yes, I do see that, uh-huh.
`·6· · · · A.· Yes, I do see that, uh-huh.
`·7· · · · Q.· And then you say:· "Many maps were
`·7· · · · Q.· And then you say:· "Many maps were
`·8· ·preloaded on FBCB2 devices prior to each mission" --
`·8· ·preloaded on FBCB2 devices prior to each mission" --
`·9· · · · A.· Right.
`·9· · · · A.· Right.
`10· · · · Q.· -- "but users could also receive new maps."
`10· · · · Q.· -- "but users could also receive new maps."
`11· · · · A.· Uh-huh.
`11· · · · A.· Uh-huh.
`12· · · · Q.· And so when you say they could receive maps
`12· · · · Q.· And so when you say they could receive maps
`13· ·from FBCB2 servers, were you talking about from
`13· ·from FBCB2 servers, were you talking about from
`14· ·other FBCB2 devices?
`14· ·other FBCB2 devices?
`15· · · · · · MS. BI:· Objection to form.
`15· · · · · · MS. BI:· Objection to form.
`16· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· From FBCB2 that were acting
`16· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· From FBCB2 that were acting
`17· ·in the role as a server.
`17· ·in the role as a server.
`18· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`18· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`19· · · · Q.· So for all purposes, other than the
`19· · · · Q.· So for all purposes, other than the
`20· ·technical limitations you had described earlier, any
`20· ·technical limitations you had described earlier, any
`21· ·device could be a server; right?
`21· ·device could be a server; right?
`22· · · · · · MS. BI:· Objection to form.22· · · · · · MS. BI:· Objection to form.
`
`23· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Let me be a little more
`23· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Let me be a little more
`24· ·precise.· In a typical brigade there are about 1,000
`24· ·precise.· In a typical brigade there are about 1,000
`25· ·FBCB2 devices, 1,000 military units, probably
`25· ·FBCB2 devices, 1,000 military units, probably
`
`Pages 94..97
`
`Page 95Page 95
`
`·1· ·between three and 400 were eligible to act as·1· ·between three and 400 were eligible to act as
`·2· ·servers, so there were a large number of FBCB2
`·2· ·servers, so there were a large number of FBCB2
`·3· ·devices on the military units that could be
`·3· ·devices on the military units that could be
`·4· ·elected -- were eligible to be elected as servers.
`·4· ·elected -- were eligible to be elected as servers.
`·5· ·At any given point in time there would be some
`·5· ·At any given point in time there would be some
`·6· ·number of servers that had actually been elected.
`·6· ·number of servers that had actually been elected.
`·7· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`·7· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`·8· · · · Q.· And so those three or 400 units would have
`·8· · · · Q.· And so those three or 400 units would have
`·9· ·maps preloaded on them?
`·9· ·maps preloaded on them?
`10· · · · A.· 1,000 units would have maps preloaded on
`10· · · · A.· 1,000 units would have maps preloaded on
`11· ·them.
`11· ·them.
`12· · · · Q.· Can you take a look at paragraph 104,
`13· ·please?
`14· · · · A.· Yes, sir.
`15· · · · Q.· Actually, no, I'm sorry, take -- go back to
`16· ·103.
`17· · · · A.· Yes, sir.
`18· · · · Q.· Do you see the last two sentences where you
`19· ·discuss a figure depicting an aerial photograph?
`20· · · · A.· Starting with "for example"?
`21· · · · Q.· Yes.
`22· · · · A.· Yes, I see that.
`23· · · · Q.· And so this map was taken from an unmanned
`24· ·aircraft; right?
`25· · · · A.· The picture was taken by the unmanned
`
`Page 96
`·1· ·aircraft, and the unmanned aircraft provided the
`·2· ·georeferencing information as well, and then that
`·3· ·was sent down to the ground and eventually made its
`·4· ·way to an FBCB2 server, which then upon request
`·5· ·provided to one or more FBCB2 units and devices.
`·6· · · · Q.· So the, just to confirm, the unmanned
`·7· ·device that -- unmanned aircraft that took this
`·8· ·picture was not an FBCB2 unit; right?
`·9· · · · A.· No, sir.· We could use pictures taken from
`10· ·all sorts of devices.
`11· · · · Q.· So we may get into it, but I'm just going
`12· ·to ask you about whether you know something and not
`13· ·what you know about it.· Okay?
`14· · · · A.· Okay.
`15· · · · Q.· So do you know the actual mechanism as
`16· ·implemented by FBCB2 for requesting or receiving
`17· ·maps?
`18· · · · · · MS. BI:· Objection to form.
`19· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· I do.
`20· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`21· · · · Q.· And to confirm, what you know about that
`22· ·method you've provided in your report; right?
`23· · · · · · MS. BI:· Objection to form.
`24· · · · · · MR. RUBINO:· Let me ask it a different way.
`25· ·Well, I'll ask you a different question.
`
`Page 97
`
`·1· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Okay.
`·2· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`·3· · · · Q.· And so you would know whether FBCB2 units
`·4· ·could receive maps upon request; right?· I'm not
`·5· ·asking you whether they did, I'm just asking if you
`·6· ·know.
`·7· · · · A.· I personally, I know?
`·8· · · · Q.· Yes.
`·9· · · · A.· Yes, I know, I know that.
`10· · · · Q.· Do you know whether FBCB2 units could
`11· ·receive maps as a push of data instead of as a -- in
`12· ·response to a request?
`13· · · · · · MS. BI:· Objection to form.
`14· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Define "push" in this
`15· ·context, please.
`16· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`17· · · · Q.· Do you understand the difference between a
`18· ·push and a pull?
`19· · · · · · MS. BI:· Objection to form.
`20· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· I understand the way I have
`21· ·heard technical people discuss it, but honestly, the
`22· ·terms are used very haphazardly and many things are
`23· ·described as a pull and many things are described as
`24· ·a data push, so I ask you to tell me exactly a
`25· ·little more detail so I can answer your question
`
`
`Epiq Court Reporting Solutions - New YorkEpiq Court Reporting Solutions - New York
`
`1-800-325-33761-800-325-3376
`
`www.deposition.comwww.deposition.comYVer1f
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 257-15 Filed 01/04/19 Page 5 of 10 PageID #: 16436
`
`
`DR. NEIL G. SIEGEL - 11/14/2018DR. NEIL G. SIEGEL - 11/14/2018
`Page 98
`
`·1· ·appropriately.
`·2· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`·3· · · · Q.· You've at least heard the two terms before;
`·4· ·right?
`·5· · · · A.· Absolutely.
`·6· · · · Q.· And you have a basic understanding of what
`·7· ·you think they mean in the industry; right?
`·8· · · · · · MS. BI:· Objection to form.
`·9· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· As I said, my experience is
`10· ·that there's not a consistent use and many things
`11· ·are meant by both of those terms in the industry.
`12· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`13· · · · Q.· So I'm going to ask you about the FBCB2
`14· ·device as it's designated as a server, at the
`15· ·instant it is designated as a server.· Okay?
`16· · · · A.· Uh-huh.
`17· · · · Q.· So when an FBCB2 device is designated as a
`18· ·server, can it receive maps from another source?
`19· · · · A.· Yes, sir.
`20· · · · Q.· So --
`21· · · · A.· After, after it is designated as a server.
`22· · · · Q.· So when it is designated as a server and
`23· ·after it is designated as a server, that FBCB2
`24· ·device can request maps from another source; right?
`25· · · · A.· It can receive maps from another source.
`
`Pages 98..101
`Page 99
`·1· · · · Q.· So is there a difference, in your mind,
`·2· ·between requesting maps and receiving maps?
`·3· · · · A.· Requesting gets into details of the process
`·4· ·by which the map gets there and the control of that
`·5· ·process.· Receiving maps, in my mind, is independent
`·6· ·of that.· It just means that a process has taken
`·7· ·place that allowed a new map to arrive at the
`·8· ·server.
`·9· · · · Q.· So with regard to the process by which the
`10· ·new map arrives at the server, do you understand how
`11· ·that process worked?
`12· · · · A.· Only partially, in some cases, but maybe
`13· ·not in all instances, because there's many types of
`14· ·maps.
`15· · · · Q.· So do you know whether the map would have
`16· ·arrived at the server by a request issued by the
`17· ·server or whether the map would have arrived by some
`18· ·other mechanism?
`19· · · · · · MS. BI:· Objection to form.
`20· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Both of those are possible.
`21· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`22· · · · Q.· So sitting here today, you can't tell me
`23· ·which one would have been the method employed by an
`24· ·FBCB2 server?
`25· · · · · · MS. BI:· Objection to form.
`
`Page 100
`·1· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· No, no, that's not what I
`·2· ·meant by my answer.· Both methods are possible in
`·3· ·FBCB2.
`·4· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`·5· · · · Q.· So in the context of a server receiving a
`·6· ·map without having requested it, how does that map
`·7· ·arrive at the server?· What is the process?
`·8· · · · A.· The end result is that it ends up on a list
`·9· ·of additional maps, and that list is forwarded to
`10· ·the units, FBCB2 units, that are serviced by this
`11· ·server and therefore the person at those FBCB2 units
`12· ·and devices can look at this list and say oh, that's
`13· ·a map I would want.· That is one mechanism.
`14· · · · · · Another mechanism is that any FBCB2 user
`15· ·can send a message saying I really need a map of
`16· ·this type or photograph of this type, of this area,
`17· ·and that will be sent off to see if we can get the
`18· ·Air Force or somebody to go take that picture and
`19· ·send it back to us.
`20· · · · · · So both -- both of what I think you might
`21· ·mean by push and pull are possible.
`22· · · · Q.· So in that second scenario where you're
`23· ·talking about let's see if the Air Force can go get
`24· ·that picture for us, that's a case where the map
`25· ·doesn't exist; right?
`
`Page 101
`·1· · · · A.· Right.· So in some cases the map in the --
`·2· ·in the first instance I talked about, the map
`·3· ·exists, and it's provided to FBCB2 and it shows up
`·4· ·on a list, and then people say oh, I want to use
`·5· ·that one.
`·6· · · · · · But, we also have the possibility to say I
`·7· ·really need to see behind this hill.· Can an Army
`·8· ·UAV or an Army helicopter or the Air Force, can
`·9· ·somebody go out and collect that photograph for me?
`10· · · · Q.· So after the photograph is collected, is it
`11· ·then automatically sent to everyone?
`12· · · · A.· It would be -- it would be sent to the
`13· ·servers and it would then appear on the list, and
`14· ·there would also -- to the person who made the
`15· ·request he would get a note saying the picture you
`16· ·requested is now available.· But other people would
`17· ·have access to use that picture, too.
`18· · · · Q.· And so is it always the case that -- let me
`18· · · · Q.· And so is it always the case that -- let me
`19· ·ask you a different question.
`19· ·ask you a different question.
`20· · · · · · So you testified earlier about how the
`20· · · · · · So you testified earlier about how the
`21· ·servers were fluid in this environment; right?
`21· ·servers were fluid in this environment; right?
`22· · · · · · MS. BI:· Objection to form.
`22· · · · · · MS. BI:· Objection to form.
`23· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Yeah, I used the term
`23· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Yeah, I used the term
`24· ·"elected."
`24· ·"elected."
`25· ·///
`
`
`Epiq Court Reporting Solutions - New YorkEpiq Court Reporting Solutions - New York
`
`1-800-325-33761-800-325-3376
`
`www.deposition.comwww.deposition.comYVer1f
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 257-15 Filed 01/04/19 Page 6 of 10 PageID #: 16437
`
`
`DR. NEIL G. SIEGEL - 11/14/2018DR. NEIL G. SIEGEL - 11/14/2018
`Page 102
`
`
`·1· ·BY MR. RUBINO:·1· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`·2· · · · Q.· And you used the word "dynamic" throughout
`·2· · · · Q.· And you used the word "dynamic" throughout
`·3· ·your report; right?
`·3· ·your report; right?
`·4· · · · A.· I did, correct.
`·4· · · · A.· I did, correct.
`·5· · · · Q.· So the server could change frequently;
`·5· · · · Q.· So the server could change frequently;
`·6· ·right?
`·6· ·right?
`·7· · · · A.· Let me try and say it a little more
`·7· · · · A.· Let me try and say it a little more
`·8· ·precisely.· The FBCB2 units that are serving the
`·8· ·precisely.· The FBCB2 units that are serving the
`·9· ·role of -- acting in the role of a server will
`·9· ·role of -- acting in the role of a server will
`10· ·change over time.
`10· ·change over time.
`11· · · · Q.· And so it's possible that an FBCB2 unit
`11· · · · Q.· And so it's possible that an FBCB2 unit
`12· ·could send out a message saying they want another
`12· ·could send out a message saying they want another
`13· ·map like a picture behind a hill to a server; right?
`13· ·map like a picture behind a hill to a server; right?
`14· · · · A.· (Witness nods head.)
`14· · · · A.· (Witness nods head.)
`15· · · · Q.· And then when they ultimately get the
`15· · · · Q.· And then when they ultimately get the
`16· ·picture, the picture doesn't necessarily have to
`16· ·picture, the picture doesn't necessarily have to
`17· ·come through that same server; right?
`17· ·come through that same server; right?
`18· · · · · · MS. BI:· Objection to form.
`18· · · · · · MS. BI:· Objection to form.
`19· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· The system will accommodate
`19· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· The system will accommodate
`20· ·the battlefield dynamic.· So if it's this
`20· ·the battlefield dynamic.· So if it's this
`21· ·gentleman's unit that made the original request and
`21· ·gentleman's unit that made the original request and
`22· ·it's this lady's unit that is acting as the server
`22· ·it's this lady's unit that is acting as the server
`23· ·at the time of the request, it goes off, the picture
`23· ·at the time of the request, it goes off, the picture
`24· ·gets taken, but it might be because of the dynamics24· ·gets taken, but it might be because of the dynamics
`
`25· ·of the battlefield that this lady unit is no longer
`25· ·of the battlefield that this lady unit is no longer
`
`Pages 102..105
`
`Page 103Page 103
`
`·1· ·the server, it's this other lady's unit is acting as·1· ·the server, it's this other lady's unit is acting as
`·2· ·the unit for this gentleman, but it would find its
`·2· ·the unit for this gentleman, but it would find its
`·3· ·way back.
`·3· ·way back.
`·4· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`·4· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`·5· · · · Q.· But it doesn't have to be the same server
`·5· · · · Q.· But it doesn't have to be the same server
`·6· ·that it actually passes through; right?
`·6· ·that it actually passes through; right?
`·7· · · · A.· It doesn't have to be the same server.
`·7· · · · A.· It doesn't have to be the same server.
`·8· · · · Q.· So with regard to this picture you've shown
`·8· · · · Q.· So with regard to this picture you've shown
`·9· ·after paragraph 103 in your report --
`·9· ·after paragraph 103 in your report --
`10· · · · A.· Uh-huh, I see it, at the top of page 50.
`10· · · · A.· Uh-huh, I see it, at the top of page 50.
`11· · · · Q.· -- do you have any way to know one way or
`11· · · · Q.· -- do you have any way to know one way or
`12· ·the other whether that request for the image and the
`12· ·the other whether that request for the image and the
`13· ·image itself being transmitted back passed through
`13· ·image itself being transmitted back passed through
`14· ·that same server, passed through a single server?
`14· ·that same server, passed through a single server?
`15· · · · · · MS. BI:· Objection to form.
`15· · · · · · MS. BI:· Objection to form.
`16· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· No, the FBCB2 user probably
`16· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· No, the FBCB2 user probably
`17· ·would not have any way of knowing that.
`17· ·would not have any way of knowing that.
`18· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`18· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`19· · · · Q.· And do you know that?· Do you have any
`19· · · · Q.· And do you know that?· Do you have any
`20· ·idea?
`20· ·idea?
`21· · · · A.· Me technically?· Yes, I mean, there's
`21· · · · A.· Me technically?· Yes, I mean, there's
`22· ·technical information that would -- that would be
`22· ·technical information that would -- that would be
`23· ·available to an expert that would tell us the state
`23· ·available to an expert that would tell us the state
`24· ·of the system at any time and at every time in the24· ·of the system at any time and at every time in the
`
`25· ·past, and we would know which FBCB2 -- we would know
`25· ·past, and we would know which FBCB2 -- we would know
`
`Page 104
`
`·1· ·that she was FBCB2 for this person at eleven·1· ·that she was FBCB2 for this person at eleven
`·2· ·o'clock, but she was the FBCB2 server for this
`·2· ·o'clock, but she was the FBCB2 server for this
`·3· ·person starting at twelve o'clock.· That information
`·3· ·person starting at twelve o'clock.· That information
`·4· ·would be available to an expert.
`·4· ·would be available to an expert.
`·5· · · · Q.· I'm just asking you:· Sitting here today,
`·6· ·based on the evidence you've collected and what
`·7· ·you've put into your report, can you tell one way or
`·8· ·the other whether this picture was requested and
`·9· ·received by the same FBCB2 server device?
`10· · · · · · MS. BI:· Objection to form.
`11· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· No, sir.· I'll point out, if
`12· ·I can complete the answer, I'm sorry, there's the
`13· ·other possibility that your question kind of
`14· ·excluded, but it's possible that this was not a
`15· ·requested image but it was an image that was taken
`16· ·and was made available on a list.· So remember, I
`17· ·said that not all of them have to be requested.
`18· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`19· · · · Q.· So it may be that this image was not even a
`20· ·requested image, is what you're saying?
`21· · · · A.· Right, that's possible.
`22· · · · Q.· So with regard to -- I'm going to ask you a
`23· ·question about some documents, but I need to have a
`24· ·copy of them.· Just one second while we pull up the
`25· ·document.
`
`Page 105
`·1· · · · · · I'd like to mark as Siegel 2 a document
`·2· ·bearing production label APL-AGIS_00012804 through
`·3· ·12876.
`·4· · · · · · (The document referred to was marked by the
`·5· ·reporter as Exhibit 2 for identification and is
`·6· ·attached hereto.)
`·7· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`·8· · · · Q.· Have you seen this document before?
`·9· · · · A.· Yes, sir.
`10· · · · Q.· Is this one of the documents you rely on in
`11· ·your report?
`12· · · · A.· I believe it is one of the documents that
`13· ·is cited in my report, yeah.
`14· · · · Q.· May not be in your Materials Considered,
`15· ·but I think you refer to it at least in paragraph,
`16· ·for example, 110 of your report, towards the bottom
`17· ·of the page.
`18· · · · · · MS. BI:· Objection to form.
`19· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`20· · · · Q.· Is that correct?
`21· · · · A.· Paragraph 110 or page 110?
`22· · · · Q.· Paragraph 110.
`23· · · · A.· I'm not seeing 12804.· Help me.
`24· · · · Q.· Isn't 12847 through 48 a portion of this
`25· ·document?
`
`
`Epiq Court Reporting Solutions - New YorkEpiq Court Reporting Solutions - New York
`
`1-800-325-33761-800-325-3376
`
`www.deposition.comwww.deposition.comYVer1f
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 257-15 Filed 01/04/19 Page 7 of 10 PageID #: 16438
`
`
`DR. NEIL G. SIEGEL - 11/14/2018DR. NEIL G. SIEGEL - 11/14/2018
`Page 190
`
`·1· ·field than the handheld version"?
`·2· · · · A.· I see that sentence, yes.
`·3· · · · Q.· And do you see the paragraph after that
`·4· ·where it says:· "Given the physical constraints of
`·5· ·the handheld platform and how it is used, there are
`·6· ·some capabilities available on the tablet that are
`·7· ·not implemented on the handheld"?
`·8· · · · A.· I see the sentence, yeah.
`·9· · · · Q.· Is that consistent with your understanding
`10· ·of handheld platforms verse tablets?
`11· · · · · · MS. BI:· Objection to form.
`12· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· There's not enough
`13· ·information there to -- to tell, nor does it even
`14· ·say is the handheld platform a General Dynamics
`15· ·product or somebody else's product.· I can't tell
`16· ·from the sentence.· I can't tell what's being
`17· ·compared.
`18· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`19· · · · Q.· Take a look at the next page, page 3, and
`20· ·it's the fourth paragraph from the bottom, it says:
`21· · · · · · "The primary shortfalls in CDA, in his view,
`22· · · · are the limited memory and data processing
`23· · · · capability.· The software does not allow for
`24· · · · selective downloading, he said, and the
`25· · · · onslaught of information clogs up the
`
`Pages 190..193
`Page 191
`
`·1· · · · computer."
`·2· · · · · · Do you see that?
`·3· · · · A.· I see that, yeah, yeah.
`·4· · · · Q.· Are those some of the concerns that existed
`·5· ·in the field in 2004 regarding processing
`·6· ·capabilities of handheld devices?
`·7· · · · · · MS. BI:· Objection to form.
`·8· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· I can't speak to all handheld
`·9· ·devices.· It was not a concern that I ever heard
`10· ·expressed about an FBCB2 device in the field in
`11· ·2004.· The CDA, as I believe it states earlier, is
`12· ·not a Northrop Grumman device and was not a FBCB2
`13· ·device.
`14· ·BY MR. RUBINO:
`15· · · · Q.· So in the -- in the mobile device, in the
`16· ·handheld device that you make reference to in your
`17· ·report, what kind of processor was in there?· Was it
`18· ·an ARM processor?
`19· · · · A.· There were different versions of a handheld
`20· ·device.· I believe the original one had an Intel
`21· ·processor, and either 2003, 2004 time frame there
`22· ·was a version with an ARM...
`23· · · · · · It was not an Intel processor, but I can't
`24· ·remember if it was an ARM processor or not.· But
`25· ·there was some other processor that was designed to
`
`Page 192
`·1· ·be more parsimonious of battery life than an Intel
`·2· ·processor would be.
`·3· · · · Q.· So just to confirm, you're not relying on
`·4· ·anything about the CDA product in the context of
`·5· ·your report; right?
`·6· · · · A.· The CDA product, as you defined it here,
`·7· ·clearly says that it was built by General Dynamics
`·8· ·Decision Systems.· General Dynamics Decision Systems
`·9· ·makes the CDA.· That's not our product.
`10· · · · Q.· So I'd like to ask you about -- going back
`10· · · · Q.· So I'd like to ask you about -- going back
`11· ·to how you implemented this distributed environment
`11· ·to how you implemented this distributed environment
`12· ·for FBCB2 where you had different devices that could
`12· ·for FBCB2 where you had different devices that could
`13· ·fill the role of what you call the server.· Okay?
`13· ·fill the role of what you call the server.· Okay?
`14· · · · A.· Uh-huh, okay.
`14· · · · A.· Uh-huh, okay.
`15· · · · Q.· And so is it fair to say that any device
`15· · · · Q.· And so is it fair to say that any device
`16· ·running FBCB2 that was communicating with the server
`16· ·running FBCB2 that was communicating with the s

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket