`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA INC. ET AL.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`Case No. 2:17-CV-0513-JRG
`(LEAD CASE)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`FILED UNDER SEAL
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`APPLE, INC.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 2:17-CV-0516-JRG
`(CONSOLIDATED CASE)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`ORDER GRANTING CHANGE TO BRIEFING SCHEDULE WITH
`RESPECT TO APPLE INC.’S DAUBERT MOTION (DKT. 231),
`APPLE INC.’S MOTION TO STRIKE (DKT. 232), AND
`AGIS’S MOTIONS TO STRIKE (DKTS. 233 AND 234)
`
`
`Before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Motions to Change Briefing Schedule with respect
`
`to Defendant Apple Inc.’s Daubert Motion to Exclude the Opinions of Mr. Alan Ratliff Relating
`
`to Damages (Dkt. 231) and Apple’s Motion to Strike Portions of the Opening Expert Report of
`
`Mr. Joseph McAlexander that Rely on Untimely Disclosed Infringement Theories (Dkt. 232).
`
`Also before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Motion to Change Briefing Schedule with respect to
`
`Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC’s Opposed Motion to Strike Portions of the Expert
`
`Report of Neil Siegel Relating to the Undisclosed Invalidity Theory Based on “Dynamically
`
`Electing Servers” (Dkt. 233) and Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC’s Opposed Motion
`
`to Strike the Expert Report of Neil Siegel for Failure to Disclose Obviousness Combinations
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 248-1 Filed 12/26/18 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 15508
`
`Based on the Siegel Patents (Dkt. 234). Having considered the Joint Motion, the Court finds that
`
`the Motion should be and is hereby GRANTED.
`
`Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the deadline for Plaintiff AGIS Software
`
`Development LLC to file its oppositions to Defendant Apple Inc.’s Daubert Motion to Exclude
`
`the Opinions of Mr. Alan Ratliff Relating to Damages (Dkt. 231) and Apple’s Motion to Strike
`
`Portions of the Opening Expert Report of Mr. Joseph McAlexander that Rely on Untimely
`
`Disclosed Infringement Theories (Dkt. 232) referenced herein shall be EXTENDED from
`
`December 28, 2018 to JANUARY 4, 2019.
`
`It is further ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant Apple Inc. to file its oppositions
`
`to Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC’s Opposed Motion to Strike Portions of the Expert
`
`Report of Neil Siegel Relating to the Undisclosed Invalidity Theory Based on “Dynamically
`
`Electing Servers” (Dkt. 233) and Plaintiff AGIS Software Development LLC’s Opposed Motion
`
`to Strike the Expert Report of Neil Siegel for Failure to Disclose Obviousness Combinations
`
`Based on the Siegel Patents (Dkt. 234) referenced herein shall be EXTENDED from December
`
`31, 2018 to JANUARY 7, 2019.
`
`All other deadlines remain subject to the local rules.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
