Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 175-15 Filed 08/14/18 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 7493
`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 175-15 Filed 08/14/18 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 7493
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 14
`
`EXHIBIT 14
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 175-15 Filed 08/14/18 Page 2 of 21 PageID #: 7494
`
`DO NOT ENTER: IAL.!
`
`Scrial No.: 12/324,122
`Attorney Docket No.: 109633819
`PATENT
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TIRADEMAIRK OFFICE
`
`In re application of: BEYER, JR., Malcolm K.
`
`Serial No.: 12/324,122
`
`Filed: November 26, 2008
`
`Entitled: METHOD OF UTILIZING
`FORCED ALERTS FOR
`INTERACTiVE REMOTE
`COMMUNTCATIONS
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Confirmation No: 9036
`
`Group Art Unit: 2617
`
`Examiner: LEBASSI, Amanuel
`
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 223 13-1450
`
`September 9, 2011
`
`Filed Electronically
`
`RESPONSE AND AMENDMENT
`
`Dear Sir:
`
`Tu response to the Office Action dated March 1 i , 201 i , please amend the above
`
`referenced patent application as follows and consider the remarks below. This Response is filed
`
`within six months of the mailing date of the Office Action; therefore, a petition for a three-month
`
`extension of time is submitted herewith. In the event that any further extension of time is
`
`required, please consider this a request therefor. The Commissioner is authorized to charge any
`
`additional fees due or credit any overpayment to Deposit Account 13-1130.
`
`Please amend the claims as shown ou pages 2-7.
`
`Remarks begin on page 8.
`
`AGISTX_00001224
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 175-15 Filed 08/14/18 Page 3 of 21 PageID #: 7495
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TIRADEMAIRK OFFICE
`
`Scrial No.: 12/324,122
`Attorney Docket No.: 109633819
`PATENT
`
`In re application of: BEYER, JR., Malcolm K.
`
`Serial No.: 12/324,122
`
`Filed: November 26, 2008
`
`Entitled: METHOD OF UTILIZING
`FORCED ALERTS FOR
`INTERACTiVE REMOTE
`COMMUNTCATIONS
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Confirmation No: 9036
`
`Group Art Unit: 2617
`
`Examiner: LEBASSI, Amanuel
`
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 223 13-1450
`
`September 9, 2011
`
`Filed Electronically
`
`RESPONSE AND AMENDMENT
`
`Dear Sir:
`
`Tu response to the Office Action dated March 1 i , 201 i , please amend the above
`
`referenced patent application as follows and consider the remarks below. This Response is filed
`
`within six months of the mailing date of the Office Action; therefore, a petition for a three-month
`
`extension of time is submitted herewith. In the event that any further extension of time is
`
`required, please consider this a request therefor. The Commissioner is authorized to charge any
`
`additional fees due or credit any overpayment to Deposit Account 13-1130.
`
`Please amend the claims as shown ou pages 2-7.
`
`Remarks begin on page 8.
`
`AGISTX_00001 225
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 175-15 Filed 08/14/18 Page 4 of 21 PageID #: 7496
`
`Serial No.: 12/324,122
`Attorney Docket No.: 10963.3819
`IATENT
`
`CLAIM AMENDMENTS
`
`Please amend the claims (strikethrough indicating deletion and underline indicating
`
`insertion) as follows:
`
`i.
`
`2.
`
`(Cancelled)
`
`(Currently amended)
`
`A communication system for
`
`transmitting,
`
`receiving,
`
`confirming receipt, and responding to an electronic message, comprising:
`
`a predetermined network of participants, wherein each participant has a similarly
`
`equipped PC or PDA/cell phone that includes a CPU and a touch screen display a CPU and
`
`memory;
`
`a data transmission means that facilitates the transmission of electronic flies between said
`
`PCs and said PDA/cell phones in different locations;
`
`a sender PC or PDA/ceii phone and at least one recipient PC or PDA/celi phone for each
`
`electronic message;
`
`a forced message alert software application program including a list of required possible
`
`responses to be selected by a participant recipient of a forced message response loaded on each
`
`participating PC or PDA/ceii phone;
`
`means for attaching a forced message alert software packet to a voice or text message
`
`creating a forced message alert that is transmitted by said sender PC or PDA/ceil phone to the
`
`recipient PC or PDA/cell phone, said forced message alert software packet containing a list of
`
`possible required responses response list and requiring the forced message alert software on said
`
`recipient PC or PDA/cell phone to transmit an automatic acknowledgment to the sender PC or
`
`PDA/celi phone as soon as said forced message alert is received by the recipient PC or PDA/ceil
`
`phone;
`
`2
`
`AGISTX_00001 226
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 175-15 Filed 08/14/18 Page 5 of 21 PageID #: 7497
`
`Serial No.: 12/324,122
`Attorney Docket No.: 10963.3819
`IATENT
`
`means for requiring a required maiïual response from the response list by the recipient in
`
`order to clear recipient's response list from recipient's celi phone dispiay
`
`means for receiving and displaying a listing of which recipient PCs or PDA/cell phones
`
`have automatically acknowledged the forced message alert and which recipient PCs or PDA/cell
`
`phones have not automatically acknowledged the forced message alert;
`
`means for periodically resending said forced message alert to said recipient PCs or
`
`PDAJcell phones that have not automatically acknowledged the forced message alert; and
`
`means for receiving and displaying a listing of which recipient PCs or PDA/cell phones
`
`have transmitted a manual response to said forced message alert and details the response from
`
`each recipient PC or PDA/cell phone that responded.
`
`3 .
`
`(Currently amended) The system as in claim 2, wherein the forced message alert
`
`software application program on the recipient PC or PDA/cell phone includes:
`
`means for transmitting the acknowledgment of receipt to said sender PC or PDA/cell
`
`phone immediately upon receiving a forced message alert from the sender PC or PDA/cell
`
`phone;
`
`means for controlling of the recipient PC or PDA/cell phone upon transmitting said
`
`automatic acknowledgment and causing, in cases where the force message alert is a text
`
`message, the text message and a response list to be shown on the display of the recipient PC or
`
`PDAJcell phone or causes, in cases where the fe'ee forced message alert is a voice message, the
`
`voice message being periodically repeated by the speakers of the recipient PC or PDA/cell phone
`
`while said response list is shown on the display;
`
`3
`
`AGISTX_00001227
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 175-15 Filed 08/14/18 Page 6 of 21 PageID #: 7498
`
`Serial No.: 12/324,122
`Attorney Docket No.: 10963.3819
`IATENT
`
`means for allowing a maiïual response to be manually selected from the response list or
`
`manually recorded and transniitting said manual response to the sender PC or PDAIceIi phone;
`
`and
`
`means for clearing the text message and a response list from the display of the recipient
`
`PC or PDA/cell phone or stopping the repeating voice message and clearing the response list
`
`from the display of the recipient PC or PDA/ceii phone once the manual response is transmitted.
`
`4.
`
`(Previously presented)
`
`The system as in claim 2, wherein said data transmission
`
`means is TCP/IP or another communications protocol.
`
`5. (Previously presented)
`
`The system as in claim 2, wherein the response list that is
`
`transmitted within the forced message alert software packet is a default response list that is
`
`embedded in the forced message alert software application program.
`
`6.
`
`(Previously presented)
`
`The system as in claim 2, wherein the response list that is
`
`transmitted within the forced message alert software packet is a custom response list that is
`
`created at the time the specific forced message alert is created on the sender PC or PDA/ceil
`
`phone.
`
`7 .
`
`(Currently amended) A method of sending a forced message alert to one or more
`
`recipient PCs or PDA/cell phones within a predetermined communication network, wherein the
`
`receipt and response to said forced message alert by each intended recipient PC or PDA/ceil
`
`phone is tracked, said method comprising the steps of:
`
`accessing a forced message alert software application program on a sender PC or
`
`PDAJce11 phone;
`
`4
`
`AGISTX_00001228
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 175-15 Filed 08/14/18 Page 7 of 21 PageID #: 7499
`
`Serial No.: 12/324,122
`Attorney Docket No.: 10963.3819
`IATENT
`
`creating the forced message alert on said sender PC or PDA/cell phone by attaching a
`
`voice or text message to a forced message alert application software packet to said voice or text
`
`message;
`
`designating one or more recipient PCs or PDA/cell phones in the communication
`
`network;
`
`electronically transmitting the forced message alert to said recipient PCs or PDA/cell
`
`phones;
`
`receiving automatic acknowledgements from the recipient PCs or PDA/cell phones that
`
`received the message and displaying a listing of which recipient PCs or PDA/cell phones have
`
`acknowledged receipt of the forced message alert and which recipient PCs or PDA/celI phones
`
`have not acknowledged receipt of the forced message alert;
`
`periodically resending the forced message alert to the recipient PCs or PDA/cell phones
`
`that have not acknowledged receipt;
`
`receiving responses to the forced message alert from the recipient PCs or PDA/cell
`
`phones and displaying the response from each recipient PC or PDAJcell phone; and
`
`providing a manual response list on the display of the recipient PC or PDA/celi phone
`
`that can oniy be cleared by the recipient providing a required response from the list;
`
`clearing the receiver' s recipient' s display screen or causing the repeating voice alert to
`
`cease upon recipient selecting a response from the response list required that can only be cleared
`
`by manually selecting and transmitting a response to the manual response list.
`
`8.
`
`(Original) The method as in claim 7, wherein each PC or PDA/cell phone within a
`
`predetermined communication network is similarly equipped and has the forced message alert
`
`software application program loaded on it.
`
`5
`
`AGISTX_00001229
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 175-15 Filed 08/14/18 Page 8 of 21 PageID #: 7500
`
`Serial No.: 12/324,122
`Attorney Docket No.: 10963.3819
`IATENT
`
`9.
`
`(Original) The method as in claim 7, wherein said forced message alert application
`
`software packet contains a response list, wherein said response list is a default list embedded in
`
`the forced message alert software application program.
`
`io.
`
`(Original) The method as in claim 7, wherein said forced message alert application
`
`software packet contains a response list, wherein said response list is a custom response list that
`
`is created at the time the specific forced message alert is created on the sender PC or PDA/ceil
`
`phone.
`
`i i .
`
`(Currently amended) A method of receiving, acknowledging and responding to a
`
`forced message alert from a sender PC or PDAJce11 phone to a recipient PC or PDA/cell phone,
`
`wherein the receipt, acknowledgment, and response to said forced message alert is forced by a
`
`forced message alert software application program, said method comprising the steps of:
`
`receiving an electronically transmitted electronic message;
`
`identifying said electronic message as a forced message alert, wherein said forced
`
`message alert comprises of a voice or text message and a forced message alert application
`
`software packet, which triggers the activation of the forced message alert software application
`
`program within the recipient PC or PDA/celi phone;
`
`transmitting an automatic acknowledgment of receipt to the sender PC or PDA/cell
`
`phone, which triggers the forced message alert software application program to take control of
`
`the recipient PC or PDA/cell phone and show the content of the text message and a required
`
`response list on the display recipient PC or PDA/ceil phone or to repeat audibly the content of
`
`the voice message on the speakers of the recipient PC or PDA/cell phone and show the required
`
`response list on the display recipient PC or PDA/celi phone; and
`
`6
`
`AGISTX_00001230
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 175-15 Filed 08/14/18 Page 9 of 21 PageID #: 7501
`
`Serial No.: 12/324,122
`Attorney Docket No.: 10963.3819
`IATENT
`
`transmitting a selected required response from the response list in order to allow the
`
`message required response list to be cleared from the recipient's celi phone display, whether said
`
`selected response is a chosen option from the response list, causing the forced message alert
`
`software to release control of the recipient PC or PDA/ceil phone and stop showing the content
`
`of the text message and a response list on the display recipient PC or PDA/cell phone and or stop
`
`repeating the content of the voice message on the speakers of the recipient PC or PDA/ceii
`
`phone;
`
`displaying the response received from the PC or PDA cell phone that transmitted the
`
`response on the sender of the forced alert PC or PDAJce11 phone; and
`
`providing a list of the recipient PC or PDA/ceii phones have automatically acknowledged
`
`receipt of a forced alert message and their response to the forced alert message.
`
`12.
`
`(Original) The method as in claim il, wherein each PC or PDAIceli phone within a
`
`predetermined communication network is similarly equipped and has the forced message alert
`
`software application program loaded on it.
`
`i 3.
`
`(Original) The method as in claim i i , wherein said forced message alert application
`
`software packet contains a response list, wherein said response list is a default list embedded in
`
`the forced message alert software application program.
`
`14.
`
`(Original) T he method as in claim i i, wherein said forced message alert application
`
`software packet contains a response list, wherein said response list is a custom response list that
`
`is created at the time the specific forced message alert is created on the sender PC or PDA/ceil
`
`phone
`
`7
`
`AGISTX_00001231
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 175-15 Filed 08/14/18 Page 10 of 21 PageID #: 7502
`
`Serial No.: 12/324,122
`Attorney Docket No.: 10963.3819
`IATENT
`
`REMARKS
`
`The Office Action mailed March 1 1, 201 i has been received and reviewed. By the
`
`present Response and Amendment, Claims 2, 3, 7 and i i have been amended. No new matter is
`
`introduced. Claim i has been cancelled previously.
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 U.S. C. § 103
`
`The Examiner's rejection of Claims 2-10 under U.S.C. § 1103(a) as being unpatentable
`
`over Keating et al. (IJS 2004/0082352) in view of Maggenti et al. (US 2002/006i762) is
`
`respectfully traversed.
`
`The Keating (US 2004/0082352)
`
`reference describes an enhanced group call
`
`implementation having nothing to do with Applicant's claimed invention providing a forced
`
`message alert and requiring a specific response from a recipient selected from the prepared list of
`
`responses prior to the recipients display being cleared of the message and required response.
`
`Figures 2 and 4 of Keating show flowcharts delineating the essence of the
`
`communication system disclosed in Keating. The flowcharts are described in detail in paragraphs
`
`0022 and 003i of Keating. There is no discussion or disclosure that would suggest the system
`
`and method recited in amended Claims 2, 7 and i i concerning the initiation of a required
`
`response from a recipient which is automatically transmitted by the recipient' s device and the
`
`requirement in response to the forced message alert that the recipient must respond with a
`
`particular answer selected from previously provided list of potential answers especially before
`
`the recipient's display screen can be cleared. In fact, Keating is concerned with the accurate
`
`billing that reflects specific time spent by the mobile station participating in a group call. See
`
`paragraph 0030 Keating. The purpose and function of the group calling system in Keating is
`
`AGISTX_00001232
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 175-15 Filed 08/14/18 Page 11 of 21 PageID #: 7503
`
`Serial No.: 12/324,122
`Attorney Docket No.: 10963.3819
`IATENT
`
`completely different than Applicant's claimed system and methods recited in the amended
`
`Claims 2, 7 and i I . The statement of the Examiner that "Keating discloses a forced message alert
`
`software application program" Applicant respectfully submits is incorrect and has a stretched
`
`interpretation of what is actually disclosed in Keating.
`
`The Maggenti et al. (US 2002/0061762) reference discloses a method for sending a
`
`message to a communication device to determine whether the communication device wishes to
`
`be a participant and then lists the communication device as a participant if there is a response to a
`
`message within a predetermined time. See paragraphs 0010 and 0011 . There is no teaching or
`
`disclosure of Applicant' s claimed system and method in Maggenti et al.
`
`The communication system recited in amended Claims 7 and i I includes a forced
`
`message alert software system that requires a response from the recipient of a specific answer
`
`from a selected list before the recipient can clear the recipient's display. This is completely
`
`different in function and structure than a system asking whether a participant wants to stay as a
`
`participant in the net.
`
`It is Applicants position - even if a person of ordinary skill in the art were to combine
`
`the Keating reference with the Maggenti et al. reference, Applicant's claimed invention as recited
`
`in the amended Claims 2 and 7 at issue could not possibly result because of the lack of relevant
`
`disclosure in the references when combined. Therefore, the Examiner has not established aprima
`
`facie case of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103 with respect to Claims 2 - 10.
`
`9
`
`AGISTX_00001233
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 175-15 Filed 08/14/18 Page 12 of 21 PageID #: 7504
`
`Serial No.: 12/324,122
`Attorney Docket No.: 10963.3819
`IATENT
`
`The Examiner's rejection of Claims ii
`
`- 14 under 35 [J.S.C.
`
`§ 103(a) as being
`
`unpatentabie over Keating et aL (US 2004/0082352) in view of Dalton et al. (US 2004/0192365)
`
`is respectfully traversed.
`
`The Dalton (US 2004/0192365) communication system is a completely different system
`
`than Applicant's claimed communication system and method recited in Claims 1 i - 14. A key
`
`element in Dalton is a data concentrator computer with a gateway device for communicating
`
`with the data concentrator computer so that the gateway device provides communications data
`
`between a first mobile data acquisition device and a second mobile data acquisition device
`
`without communication with the data concentrator computer. Paragraphs 0010, 0014 and 0015 in
`
`Dalton describe a system to manage two or more mobile devices forming a business data
`
`collection and to communicate asynchronously in the operational needs of a business application.
`
`None of the functions described in the Dalton reference have anything to do with providing a
`
`forced message alert as required in Claims i i - 14 as amended. Applicant reiterates the
`
`comments above with respect to the Keating reference. Again, the combination of Keating and
`
`Dalton cannot result in Applicants claimed invention because the references together fail to
`
`suggest Applicant's claimed invention. It is Applicant's position that the Examiner has failed to
`
`establish a prima fade case of obviousness with respect to Claims i i - 14.
`
`As an initiai matter, the Examiner bears the initiai burden of factually supporting any
`
`primafacie conclusion of obviousness. MPEP § 2143. A claim is obvious under 35 [J.S.C. §103
`
`if and only if the references relied on teach or suggest each and every element of the claimed
`
`invention, and it would be obvious to one skilled in the art to combine the references so relied
`
`on. A rationale to support a conclusion that a claim would have been obvious is that all the
`
`claimed elements were known in the prior art and one skilled in the art could have combined the
`
`io
`
`AGISTX_00001234
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 175-15 Filed 08/14/18 Page 13 of 21 PageID #: 7505
`
`Serial No.: 12/324,122
`Attorney Docket No.: 10963.3819
`IATENT
`
`elements as claimed by known methods with no change in their respective known methods with
`
`no change in their respective functions, and the combination would have yielded nothing more
`
`than predictable results to one of ordinary skill in the art. KSR International Co KSR
`
`International Co. y. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 401 (2007); see also, KSR 550 U.S. at 415-417
`
`(2007) citing Great Atlantic & P. Tea Co. t'. Supermarket Equipment Corp., 340 U.S. 147, 152
`
`(1950), Anderson's-Black Rock, ¡nc. y. Pavement Salvage Co., 396 U.S. 57, 62-63 (1969),and
`
`Sakraida y. AG Pro,, Inc.,. 425 [15. 273, 282 (1976).
`
`In determining the differences between the prior art and the claims, the question under 35
`
`U.S.C. §103 is not whether the differences themselves would have been obvious, but whether the
`
`claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious. § MPEP 2141.02; Stratoflex, Inc. y.
`
`Aeroquip Corp., 713 F.2d 1530, 218 USPQ 871 (Fed. Cir. 1983). Additionally, an obviousness
`
`rejection cannot be based on a reference or combination of references that are non-analogous to
`
`the invention at issue. MPEP § 2141.01(a).
`
`i i
`
`AGISTX_00001235
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 175-15 Filed 08/14/18 Page 14 of 21 PageID #: 7506
`
`Serial No.: 12/324,122
`Attorney Docket No.: 10963.3819
`IATENT
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`In view of the amendments submitted herein and the above comments, it is believed that all
`
`grounds of rejection are overcome and that the application has now been placed hi full condition
`
`for allowance. Accordingly, Applicant earnestly solicits early and favorable action. Should there
`
`be any further questions or reservations, the Examiner is urged to telephone Applicant's
`
`undersigned attorney at (954) 763-3303.
`
`Respectfully submitted.
`
`IBarry L. Haley!
`Barry L. Haley, Esq. (Reg. No. 25,339)
`
`Customer No. : 22235
`MALIN HALEY DiMAGGIO
`BOWEN & LHOTA, P.A.
`i 936 South Andrews Avenue
`Fortj Lauderdale, Florida 33316
`Telephone: (954) 763-3303
`Facsimile: (954) 522-6507
`E-Mail: jJ3fQ.Ilhp.t.çqp..
`
`I:\1 0000\10963\38 19\To PTO\O6jtesp To OA Mailed 03- 1 1 -1 1 .doc
`
`12
`
`AGISTX_00001236
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 175-15 Filed 08/14/18 Page 15 of 21 PageID #: 7507
`
`PTO!SB/22 (07-09)
`Approved for use through 07/31/2012, 0MB 0651-0031
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARMENT OF COMMERCE
`Under the paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid 0MB control number.
`
`PETITION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME UNDER 37 CFR 1.136(a)
`FY2009
`(Fees pursuant to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (HR. 4818).)
`AppIcabon Number 12/324,122
`
`Docket Number (OptonaI)
`
`109633819
`
`FIed November26, 2008
`
`For METHOD OF UTILIZING FORCED ALERTS FOR INTERACTIVE REMOTE COMMUNICATIONS
`
`Art Unit 2617
`
`Examiner LEBASSI, Amanuel
`
`I
`
`This is a request under the provisions of 37 0FR I . I 36(a) to extend the period for filing a reply in the above identified
`application.
`
`The requested extension and fee are as follows (check time period desired and enter the appropriate fee below):
`Small Entity Fee
`
`E One month (37 CFR 1.17(a)(1))
`E Two months (37 CFR 117(a)(2))
`Three months (37 CFR 1.17(a)(3))
`
`$65
`
`$245
`
`$555
`
`$ _____________
`
`$
`
`$
`
`E.
`$130
`
`$490
`
`$1110
`
`$1730
`
`$2350
`
`$865
`
`$1175
`
`$ _____________
`
`$ _____________
`
`Four months (37 CFR 117(a)(4))
`E Five months (37 CFR 1.17(a)(5))
`EI Applicant claims small entity status. See 37 CFR I 27.
`D A check in the amount of the fee is enclosed.
`D Payment by credit card. Form PTO-2038 is attached.
`D The Director has already been authorized to charge fees in this application to a Deposit Account.
`EI The Director is hereby authorized to charge any fees which may be required, or credit any overpayment, to
`DepositAccountNumber 13-1130
`WARNING: Information on this form may become public. Credit card information should not be included on this form.
`Provide credit card information and authorization on PTO-2038.
`
`I am the E applicant/inventor.
`
`assignee of record of the entire interest. See 37 0FR 3.71.
`Statement under 37 0FR 3.73(b) is enclosed (Form PTO/SB/96).
`attorney or agent of record. Registration Number 25,339
`E attorney or agent under 37 0FR 1.34.
`
`Registration number if acting under 37 0FR 1.34 _______________________
`
`/barry I. haley!
`
`Signature
`
`Barry L. Haley
`
`Typed or printed name
`
`September 9, 201 1
`
`Date
`
`(954) 763-3303
`
`Telephone Number
`
`NOTE: Signatures of all the inventors or assignees of record of the entire interest or their mpresentative(s) are required . Submit multiple forms if more than one
`signature is required, see below.
`Total of
`forms are submitted.
`This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1 .1 36(a). The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the
`USPTO to process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1 .1 1 and I .14. This collection is estimated to fake 6 minutes to
`complete, including gathering. preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any
`comments on the amount of time you require to complete this fonii and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer,
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. U.S. Department of Commerce, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED
`FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box I 450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
`Ifyou ,ieed assistance ¡n completing the form, cal! 1-800-PTO-9 199 and select option 2.
`
`AGISTX_00001237
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 175-15 Filed 08/14/18 Page 16 of 21 PageID #: 7508
`
`Privacy Act Statement
`
`The Privacy Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-579) requires that you be given certain information in connection with
`your submission of the attached form related to a patent application or patent. Accordingly, pursuant to
`the requirements of the Act, please be advised that: (1 ) the general authority for the collection of this
`information is 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2); (2) furnishing of the information solicited is voluntary; and (3) the
`principal purpose for which the information is used by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is to process
`and/or examine your submission related to a patent application or patent. If you do not furnish the
`requested information, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office may not be able to process and/or examine
`your submission, which may result in termination of proceedings or abandonment of the application or
`expiration of the patent.
`
`The information provided by you in this form will be subject to the following routine uses:
`
`i . The information on this form will be treated confidentially to the extent allowed under the
`Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and the Privacy Act (5 U.S.0 552a). Records
`from this system of records may be disclosed to the Department of Justice to determine
`whether disclosure of these records is required by the Freedom of Information Act.
`2. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, in the course of
`presenting evidence to a court, magistrate, or administrative tribunal, including disclosures
`to opposing counsel in the course of settlement negotiations.
`3. A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a Member of
`Congress submitting a request involving an individual, to whom the record pertains, when
`the individual has requested assistance from the Member with respect to the subject matter
`ofthe record.
`4. A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a contractor of the
`Agency having need for the information in order to perform a contract. Recipients of
`information shall be required to comply with the requirements ofthe Privacy Act of 1974, as
`amended, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(m).
`5. A record related to an International Application filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty in
`this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the International Bureau of
`the World Intellectual Property Organization, pursuant to the Patent Cooperation Treaty.
`6. A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to another federal
`agency for purposes of National Security review (35 U.S.C. 181) and for review pursuant to
`the Atomic Energy Act (42 U.S.C. 2 18(c)).
`7. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the
`Administrator, General Services, or his/her designee, during an inspection of records
`conducted by GSA as part of that agency's responsibility to recommend improvements in
`records management practices and programs, under authority of 44 U.S.C. 2904 and 2906.
`Such disclosure shall be made in accordance with the GSA regulations governing
`inspection of records for this purpose, and any other relevant (i.e. , GSA or Commerce)
`directive. Such disclosure shall not be used to make determinations about individuals.
`8. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the public after
`either publication ofthe application pursuantto 35 U.S.C. 122(b)or issuance ofa patent
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. I 51 . Further, a record may be disclosed, subject to the limitations of
`37 CFR 1.14, as a routine use, to the public ifthe record was filed in an application which
`became abandoned or in which the proceedings were terminated and which application is
`referenced by either a published application, an application open to public inspection or an
`issued patent.
`9. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a Federal,
`State, or local law enforcement agency, if the USPTO becomes aware of a violation or
`potential violation of law or regulation.
`
`AGISTX_00001238
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 175-15 Filed 08/14/18 Page 17 of 21 PageID #: 7509
`
`Electronic Patent Application Fee Transmittal
`
`Application Number:
`
`Filing Date:
`
`12324122
`
`26-Nov-2008
`
`.
`
`Title of Invention:
`
`.
`
`METHOD OF UTILIZING FORCED ALERTS FOR INTERACTIVE REMOTE
`COMMUNICATIONS
`
`First Named Inventor/Applicant Name:
`
`Malcolm K. Beyer
`
`Filer:
`
`Barry Lee Haley/Amy Allen
`
`Attorney Docket Number:
`
`10963.3819
`
`Filed as Small Entity
`
`Utility under 35 Usc i i i (a) Filing Fees
`
`Description
`
`Fee Code
`
`Quantity
`
`Amount
`
`Sub-Total in
`
`Basic Filing:
`
`Pages:
`
`Claims:
`
`Miscellaneous-Filing:
`
`Petition:
`
`Patent-Appeals-and-Interference:
`
`Post-Allowance-and-Post-Issuance:
`
`Extension-of-Time:
`
`Extension-3 months with $0 paid
`
`2253
`
`1
`
`555
`
`555
`
`AGISTX_00001239
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 175-15 Filed 08/14/18 Page 18 of 21 PageID #: 7510
`
`Description
`
`Fee Code
`
`Quantity
`
`Amount
`
`I
`
`Sub-Total in
`USD($)
`
`Miscellaneous:
`
`Total in USD ($)
`
`555
`
`AGISTX_00001240
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 175-15 Filed 08/14/18 Page 19 of 21 PageID #: 7511
`
`Electronic Acknowledgement Receipt
`
`EFSID:
`
`Application Number:
`
`10916464
`
`12324122
`
`International Application Number:
`
`Confirmation Number:
`
`9036
`
`.
`
`Title of Invention:
`
`.
`
`METHOD OF UTILIZING FORCED ALERTS FOR INTERACTIVE REMOTE
`COMMUNICATIONS
`
`First Named Inventor/Applicant Name:
`
`Malcolm K. Beyer
`
`Customer Number:
`
`22235
`
`Filer:
`
`Barry Lee Haley/Amy Allen
`
`Filer Authorized By:
`
`Barry Lee Haley
`
`Attorney Docket Number:
`
`Receipt Date:
`
`Filing Date:
`
`TimeStamp:
`
`10963.3819
`
`09-SEP-201 1
`
`26-NOV-2008
`
`16:11:18
`
`Application Type:
`
`Utility under 35 USC 111(a)
`
`Payment information:
`
`Submitted with Payment
`
`Payment Type
`
`Payment was successfully received in RAM
`
`RAMconfirmation Number
`
`Deposit Account
`
`Authorized User
`
`yes
`
`Deposit Account
`
`$555
`
`3059
`
`131130
`
`The Director of the USPTO is hereby authorized to charge indicated fees and credit any overpayment as follows:
`
`Charge any Additional Fees required under 37 C.F.R. Section 1 .1 6 (National application filing, search, and examination fees)
`
`Charge any Additional Fees required under 37 C,F,R, Section 1,21 (Miscellaneous fees and charges)
`
`AGISTX_00001241
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 175-15 Filed 08/14/18 Page 20 of 21 PageID #: 7512
`
`File Listing:
`
`Document
`Number
`
`i
`
`Warnings:
`Information:
`
`Document Description
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.File Name
`
`File Size(Bytes)I
`Message Digest
`
`.
`
`Multi
`Pages
`Part I.zup (uf appl.)
`
`.
`
`07 RepToOAMaiIed03-1 1-11.
`-
`pdf
`
`.
`
`66770
`
`yes
`
`12
`
`i
`
`Multipart Description/PDF files in .zip description
`
`Document Description
`
`Start
`
`End
`
`Amendment/Req. Reconsideration-After Non-Final Reject
`
`Claims
`
`ApplicantArguments/Remarks Madein an Amendment
`
`1
`
`2
`
`8
`
`1
`
`7
`
`12
`
`2
`
`Extension ofTime
`
`08_3MthEOT.pdf
`
`Warnings:
`Information:
`
`3
`
`Fee Worksheet (S606)
`
`fee-info.pdf
`
`316002
`
`hedr.7rÚÚee) l7
`O3fe
`
`j7Ú IdrIr, I $78Ü1
`
`30328
`
`I I
`
`I) Il97
`
`5OO
`
`no
`
`no
`
`2
`
`2
`
`Warnings:
`Information:
`
`TotalFilesSize(inbytes)
`
`413100
`
`This Acknowledgement Receipt evidences receipt on the not