throbber
Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 173 Filed 08/08/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 6639
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT,
`LLC.
`
`v.
`
`HUAWEI DEVICE USA INC., ET AL
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:17-cv-513- JRG
`
`MINUTES FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING
`HELD BEFORE U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE RODNEY GILSTRAP
`August 8, 2018
` ADJOURN: 11:01 a.m.
`OPEN: 9:04 a.m.
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF:
`See attached.
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS:
`
`See attached.
`
`Patrick Holvey
`Chris Ratway
`
`Shelly Holmes, CSR-TCRR
`
`LAW CLERKS:
`
`
`COURT REPORTER:
`
`COURTROOM DEPUTY:
`
`TIME
`9:04 a.m.
`
`
`Jan Lockhart
`
`
`MINUTES
`Court opened. Counsel announced ready for hearing.
`The Court held the evidentiary hearing on the Defendant LG Electronics, Inc.’s
`Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, to
`Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California (Dkt. No. 46). Mr. Baxter,
`counsel for Plaintiff, and Mr. Wolf, counsel for LG, addressed the Court re the
`procedure for submitting evidence pertaining to the Motion to Dismiss. The
`Court accepted the declaration of Todd Parish along with all other record
`evidence submitted by the parties to complete the evidentiary record. Counsel for
`all parties represented that these submissions represented the totality of the
`evidence which the Court should consider. The Court also agreed to, without
`objection, to take judicial notice of certain matters on a U.S. Government
`website. The Court indicated that the evidence submitted would be reviewed
`after the hearing. The Court then heard argument as to the Motion to Dismiss.
`9:13 a.m. Mr. Fabricant argued on behalf of Plaintiff.
`9:35 a.m. Mr. Wolf argued on behalf of Defendant LG.
`9:52 a.m.
`Rebuttal argument by Mr. Fabricant.
`9:57 a.m. Mr. Wolf responded to Court’s questions.
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00513-JRG Document 173 Filed 08/08/18 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 6640
`
`10:02 a.m.
`
`
`MINUTES
`TIME
`10:01 a.m. The Court Ordered the parties to submit, within seven days, proposed Findings of
`Fact and Conclusions of Law.
`For the Court’s consideration, Mr. Fabricant requested that the deposition
`exhibits from the depositions be received by the Court for consideration which
`Mr. Wolf agreed to. Recess.
`10:28 a.m. Court reconvened.
`
`The Court heard argument on the Motion to Transfer portion of the Motion filed
`by LG. Mr. Berta argued on behalf of LG. Mr. Fabricant argued on behalf of
`Plaintiff.
`11:01 a.m. The Court took the matters under submission. Court adjourned.
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket