`
`Exhibit A
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00140-RWS-RSP Document 55-2 Filed 01/09/18 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 1403
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Christopher Evans <cevans@ShoreChan.com>
`Tuesday, January 2, 2018 3:09 PM
`Brann, Elizabeth L.
`Team Samsung CyWee; Melissa R. Smith; Ari Rafilson; Alfonso G Chan; Paul Beeler;
`Rhonda Polvado; Andrew Huffstetler; Caroline Johnson; Will Ellerman
`[EXT] RE: CyWee v. Samsung: CyWee's reply in support of its motion to compel
`
`Liza,
`
`We’ve explained our position on this in our opposition to our motion to strike. We are happy to have a hotline call with
`the Court about it, as we offered before.
`
`Best,
`
`Chris Evans
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Christopher L. Evans
`Shore Chan DePumpo LLP
`901 Main Street, Suite 3300
`Dallas, Texas 75202
`214-593-9118 (Direct)
`214-593-9110 (Firm)
`214-593-9111 (Fax)
`
`NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
`The information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail may be subject to the Attorney-Client and Attorney Work Product privileges, and is
`Confidential. It is intended only for the individuals or entities designated as recipients above. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
`copying, use or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail by or to anyone other than the addressee designated above by the
`sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply immediately. Any e-mail erroneously
`transmitted to you should be immediately destroyed.
`
`From: Brann, Elizabeth L. [mailto:elizabethbrann@paulhastings.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2018 4:47 PM
`To: Christopher Evans <cevans@ShoreChan.com>
`Cc: Team Samsung <TeamSamsungCywee@paulhastings.com>; Melissa R. Smith <melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com>; Ari
`Rafilson <arafilson@ShoreChan.com>; Alfonso G Chan <achan@ShoreChan.com>; Paul Beeler
`<pbeeler@ShoreChan.com>; Rhonda Polvado <rpolvado@ShoreChan.com>; Andrew Huffstetler
`<ahuffstetler@ShoreChan.com>; Caroline Johnson <cjohnson@ShoreChan.com>
`Subject: CyWee v. Samsung: CyWee's reply in support of its motion to compel
`
`Chris,
`
`Under the Court’s Standing Order Regarding "Meet and Confer" Obligations Relating to Discovery Disputes, a party may
`not file a reply brief in support of a discovery motion without an order from the Court. Accordingly, CyWee's reply in
`support of its motion to compel interrogatory responses, which was filed on December 20, 2017, is improper.
`1
`
`
`
`Case 2:17-cv-00140-RWS-RSP Document 55-2 Filed 01/09/18 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 1404
`Please confirm that CyWee will withdraw its reply.
`
`Best regards,
`
`Liza
`
`____________________________________________________________________________
`Elizabeth L. Brann | Partner, Litigation Department
`Paul Hastings LLP | 4747 Executive Drive, Twelfth Floor, San Diego, CA
`92121 | Direct: +1.858.458.3014 | Main: +1.858.458.3000 | Fax:
`+1.858.458.3005 | elizabethbrann@paulhastings.com |
`www.paulhastings.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`******************************************************************************************
`This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you received
`this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments.
`
`For additional information, please visit our website at
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
