throbber
Case 2:17-cv-00140-RWS-RSP Document 53-2 Filed 12/27/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1388
`Case 2:17-cv—00140-RWS—RSP Document 53-2 Filed 12/27/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1388
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00140-RWS-RSP Document 53-2 Filed 12/27/17 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 1389
`
`Alicia Cary-Howell
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Will Ellerman
`Tuesday, December 12, 2017 7:54 PM
`Moseley, Steven
`Team Samsung; Melissa R. Smith; Christopher Evans; Ari Rafilson; Alfonso G Chan; Paul Beeler;
`Rhonda Polvado; Andrew Huffstetler; Caroline Johnson
`Re: CyWee v. Samsung: CyWee's Motion to Compel
`
`Yes. I will send dial‐in information in the morning.  
`


`On Dec 12, 2017, at 7:21 PM, Moseley, Steven <stevenmoseley@paulhastings.com> wrote: 
`
`Will, 
`
`  
`Given the simplicity of the disputed issue and CyWee’s failure to provide a basis for its position, a hotline 
`call is not yet warranted. Instead of prematurely involving the Court, we suggest that the parties first 
`meet and confer so CyWee can provide its grounds for refusing to withdraw its motion. If the parties 
`cannot resolve this dispute after meaningfully meeting and conferring, we will agree to follow the 
`procedures set forth in Section 9(c) of the Discovery Order regarding “hot‐line” disputes. 
`
`  
`Thank you for providing your availability. Does 10am PT work for you? 
`
`  
`Best regards, 
`
`  
`Steve 
`

`
`
`<image001.gif> 
`
`Steven P. Moseley | Associate, Litigation Department
`Paul Hastings LLP | 4747 Executive Drive, Twelfth Floor, San Diego, CA 92121 | Direct:
`+1.858.458.3012 | Main: +1.858.458.3000 | Fax: +1.858.458.3112 |
`stevenmoseley@paulhastings.com | www.paulhastings.com  
`From: Will Ellerman [mailto:wellerman@ShoreChan.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 4:56 PM
`To: Moseley, Steven
`Cc: Team Samsung CyWee; Melissa R. Smith; Christopher Evans; Ari Rafilson; Alfonso G Chan; Paul
`Beeler; Rhonda Polvado; Andrew Huffstetler; Caroline Johnson
`Subject: [EXT] Re: CyWee v. Samsung: CyWee's Motion to Compel 
`
`  
`Steven,  
`
` I
`
` am available tomorrow morning. As Chris suggested, a hotline call seems appropriate.   
`  
`
`Will 

`On Dec 12, 2017, at 6:27 PM, Moseley, Steven <stevenmoseley@paulhastings.com> wrote: 
`
`Will, 
`  
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00140-RWS-RSP Document 53-2 Filed 12/27/17 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 1390
`Please let me know your availability this evening and tomorrow morning  to meet and 
`confer regarding CyWee’s refusal to abide by the Court’s Standing Order. I am free 
`whenever works best for you until 8:00pm PT tonight or between 9:00am‐12:00pm PT 
`tomorrow.  
`
`  
`Best regards, 
`
`  
`Steve 
`

`
`
`<image001.gif> 
`
`Steven P. Moseley | Associate, Litigation Department
`Paul Hastings LLP | 4747 Executive Drive, Twelfth Floor, San Diego, CA 92121 | Dire
`+1.858.458.3012 | Main: +1.858.458.3000 | Fax: +1.858.458.3112 |
`stevenmoseley@paulhastings.com | www.paulhastings.com  
`From: Will Ellerman [mailto:wellerman@ShoreChan.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 3:38 PM
`To: Brann, Elizabeth L.
`Cc: Team Samsung CyWee; Melissa R. Smith; Christopher Evans; Ari Rafilson; Alfonso G
`Chan; Paul Beeler; Rhonda Polvado; Andrew Huffstetler; Caroline Johnson
`Subject: [EXT] FW: CyWee v. Samsung: CyWee's Motion to Compel 
`
`  
`Liza, 
`  
`I am responding to your email to Chris below. We do not believe the Motion to Compel 
`exceeds the applicable page limits, or that it should be re‐filed. Of course, the motion 
`could be shortened (or perhaps even obviated) if Samsung would answer the 
`interrogatories instead of requiring CyWee to seek Court intervention. 
`
`  
`Regards, 
`
`  
`Will 
`
`  
`<image002.gif> 

`
`Will Ellerman 
`Shore Chan DePumpo LLP 
`901 Main Street, Suite 3300 
`Dallas, Texas 75202 
`214-593-9121 (Direct) 
`214-593-9110 (Firm) 
`214-593-9111 (Fax) 

`
`NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY:  
`The information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail may be subject to the Attorney-Client and Attorney
`Work Product privileges, and is Confidential. It is intended only for the individuals or entities designated as
`recipients above. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, use or reliance upon the
`information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail by or to anyone other than the addressee designated above
`by the sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
`sender by reply immediately. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately destroyed. 
`  
`  
`  
`  
`  
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00140-RWS-RSP Document 53-2 Filed 12/27/17 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 1391
`
`  
`From: Brann, Elizabeth L. [mailto:elizabethbrann@paulhastings.com]  
`Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 3:51 PM 
`To: Christopher Evans <cevans@ShoreChan.com> 
`Cc: Team Samsung <TeamSamsungCywee@paulhastings.com>; Melissa R. Smith 
`<melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com>; Ari Rafilson <arafilson@ShoreChan.com>; Alfonso G 
`Chan <achan@ShoreChan.com>; Paul Beeler <pbeeler@ShoreChan.com>; Rhonda 
`Polvado <rpolvado@ShoreChan.com>; Andrew Huffstetler 
`<ahuffstetler@ShoreChan.com>; Caroline Johnson <cjohnson@ShoreChan.com> 
`Subject: CyWee v. Samsung: CyWee's Motion to Compel 
`
`  
`Chris, 
`
`  
`CyWee’s Motion to Compel Interrogatory Responses (Dkt. No. 49) violates the page 
`limits prescribed in the Court’s June 3, 2016 Standing Order Regarding “Meet and 
`Confer” Obligations Relating To Discovery Disputes. The Standing Order states that “[an] 
`opposed discovery related motion, or any response thereto, shall not exceed 7 pages” 
`and attachments “shall not exceed 5 pages.” CyWee’s motion is almost 9 pages long and 
`contains more than 80 pages of attachments.   
`
`  
`Please confirm by tomorrow morning that CyWee will withdraw its motion and seek 
`leave of the Court to re‐file in compliance with the Standing Order. If CyWee refuses, 
`Defendants intend to file a motion to strike CyWee’s motion to compel. 
`
`  
`Best regards, 
`
`  
`Liza 
`
`_______________________________________________________________________
`Elizabeth L. Brann | Partner, Litigation Department
`Paul Hastings LLP | 4747 Executive Drive, Twelfth Floor, San Diego, CA 92121 | Dire
`+1.858.458.3014 | Main: +1.858.458.3000 | Fax: +1.858.458.3005 |
`elizabethbrann@paulhastings.com | www.paulhastings.com  
`
`<image001.gif> 
`
`  
`  
`  
`  
`
`
`
`  
`
`***********************************************************************************
`*******
`This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
`received
`this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any
`attachments.
`
`For additional information, please visit our website at
`
`***********************************************************************************
`*******
`This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you
`received
`this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any
`attachments.
`
`For additional information, please visit our website at
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00140-RWS-RSP Document 53-2 Filed 12/27/17 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 1392
`
`******************************************************************************************
`This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you received
`this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments.
`
`For additional information, please visit our website at
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket