throbber
Case 2:17-cv-00140-RWS-RSP Document 41-2 Filed 10/12/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 774
`
`Exhibit A
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00140-RWS-RSP Document 41-2 Filed 10/12/17 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 775
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`CYWEE GROUP LTD.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
`AND
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
` CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00140-RWS-RSP
`
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S P.R. 3-1 & 3-2 DISCLOSURES
`
`Plaintiff CyWee Group Ltd. (“CyWee”) serves its Preliminary Infringement
`
`Contentions on Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`
`(collectively “Samsung”) regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 8,441,438 and 8,552,978.
`
`No discovery or claim construction has taken place yet in this case. As a result, CyWee
`
`reserves the right to amend its contentions after claim construction and discovery has taken
`
`place as allowed by the patent local rules.
`
`I. P.R. 3-1 DISCLOSURES
`
`A.
`Each claim of each patent in suit that is allegedly infringed by each
`opposing party.
`
`Samsung infringes claims 1, 3, 4, 5, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19 of U.S. Patent No. 8,441,438
`
`(the “’438 patent”).
`
`Samsung infringes claims 10 and 12 of U.S. Patent No. 8,552,978 (the “’978
`
`patent”).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00140-RWS-RSP Document 41-2 Filed 10/12/17 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 776
`
`B. Separately for each asserted claim, each accused apparatus, product, device,
`process, method, act, or other instrumentality (“Accused Instrumentality”) of each
`opposing party of which the party is aware. This identification shall be as specific as
`possible. Each product, device, and apparatus must be identified by name or model
`number, if known. Each method or process must be identified by name, if known, or by
`any product, device, or apparatus which, when used, allegedly results in the practice of
`the claimed method or process.
`
`1. The ’438 Patent
`
`Each of the following accused products infringes each asserted claim of the ’438
`
`patent: Samsung phones and tablets, which run a version of the Android operating system
`
`and include a 3-axis accelerometer and 3-axis gyroscope and/or a 6-axis
`
`accelerometer/gyroscope sensor module, released in the United States concurrently with or
`
`after the release of the Galaxy S6 including the Galaxy S6, Galaxy S6 Edge, Galaxy S6
`
`Edge+, Galaxy S6 Active, Galaxy S7, Galaxy S7 Edge, Galaxy S7 Active, Galaxy Note5,
`
`Galaxy Tab S2 8.0, Galaxy Tab S2 9.7, Galaxy Note 7, Galaxy Tab S3 9.7, Galaxy J3
`
`Emerge, Galaxy S8, and Galaxy S8+.
`
`2. The ’978 Patent
`
`Each of the following accused products infringes each asserted claim of the ’978
`
`patent: Samsung phones and tablets, which run a version of the Android operating system
`
`and include a 3-axis accelerometer, 3-axis gyroscope, and 3-axis magnetometer and/or a
`
`combination of any of the previous elements (such as a 6-axis or 9-axis sensor module) such
`
`that the device is operable to detect 3-axis acceleration, 3-axis rotation, and 3-axis
`
`magnetism, released in the United States concurrently with or after the release of the Galaxy
`
`S6 including the Galaxy S6, Galaxy S6 Edge, Galaxy S6 Edge+, Galaxy S6 Active, Galaxy S7,
`
`Galaxy S7 Edge, Galaxy S7 Active, Galaxy Note5, Galaxy Tab S2 8.0, Galaxy Tab S2 9.7,
`
`Galaxy Note 7, Galaxy Tab S3 9.7, Galaxy J3 Emerge, Galaxy S8, and Galaxy S8+.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00140-RWS-RSP Document 41-2 Filed 10/12/17 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 777
`
`C. A chart identifying specifically where each element of each asserted claim is
`found within each Accused Instrumentality, including for each element that such party
`contends is governed by 35 U.S.C. 112(6), the identity of the structure(s), act(s), or
`material(s) in the Accused Instrumentality that performs the claimed function.
`
`Claim charts are provided as Exhibits 1 through 28. Each claim chart is an exemplar
`
`of how all Samsung devices manufactured using the same or similar technology infringes
`
`each asserted claim. Nothing in these claim charts is intended to prevent CyWee from
`
`presenting additional evidence of infringement at trial.
`
`D. Whether each element of each asserted claim is claimed to be literally present
`or present under the doctrine of equivalents in the Accused Instrumentality.
`
`CyWee contends that each asserted claim is literally infringed by Samsung’s accused
`
`products, as indicated by the claim charts referenced above. In the alternative, CyWee
`
`contends that any asserted claim not found to be literally infringed is infringed under the
`
`doctrine of equivalents.
`
`E. For any patent that claims priority to an earlier application, the priority date to
`which each asserted claim allegedly is entitled.
`
`CyWee alleges that all asserted claims of the ’438 patent and claims 10 and 12 of the
`
`’978 patent are entitled to a priority date as of January 6, 2010, based on the date of
`
`provisional application no. 61/292,558. But CyWee further alleges that those claims are
`
`entitled to an earlier priority date based on work related to the JIL Phone prototype. More
`
`specifically, CyWee alleges that all asserted claims of the ’438 patent are entitled to a
`
`priority date of July 29, 2009. CyWee further alleges that claims 10 and 12 of the ’978 patent
`
`are entitled to a priority date of September 25, 2009.
`
`F. If a party claiming patent infringement wishes to preserve the right to rely, for
`any purpose, on the assertion that its own apparatus, product, device, process, method,
`act, or other instrumentality practices the claimed invention, the party must identify,
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00140-RWS-RSP Document 41-2 Filed 10/12/17 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 778
`
`separately for each asserted claim, each such apparatus, product, device, process,
`method, act, or other instrumentality that incorporates or reflects that particular claim.
`
`CyWee alleges that the JIL Phone prototype practices all asserted claims of the
`
`patents-in-suit.
`
`II.
`
`P.R. 3-2 DISCLOSURES
`
`A. Documents (e.g., contracts, purchase orders, invoices, advertisements,
`marketing materials, offer letters, beta site testing agreements, and third party or joint
`development agreements) sufficient to evidence each discussion with, disclosure to, or
`other manner of providing to a third party, or sale of or offer to sell, the claimed
`invention prior to the date of application for the patent in suit. A party’s production of a
`document as required herein shall not constitute an admission that such document
`evidences or is prior art under 35 U.S.C.§ 102.
`
`Documents that may be responsive to 3-2(a) are located at document numbers
`
`CyWee_Samsung 000608-626.
`
`B. All documents evidencing the conception, reduction to practice, design, and
`development of each claimed invention, which were created on or before the date of
`application for the patent in suit or the priority date identified pursuant to P. R. 3-1(e),
`whichever is earlier.
`
`Documents that may be responsive to 3-2(b) are located at document numbers
`
`CyWee_Samsung 000001-167 and CyWee Samsung 000606-607.
`
`C. A copy of the file history for each patent in suit.
`
`Documents that may be responsive to 3-2(b) are located at document numbers
`
`CyWee_Samsung 000168-605.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-00140-RWS-RSP Document 41-2 Filed 10/12/17 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 779
`
`DATED: July 12, 2017
`
`
`
`/s/ Ari B. Rafilson
`
`Michael W. Shore, Texas Bar No. 18294915
`Lead Attorney
`mshore@shorechan.com
`Alfonso Garcia Chan, Texas Bar No. 24012408
`achan@shorechan.com
`Christopher L. Evans, Texas Bar No.24058901
`cevans@shorechan.com
`Ari B. Rafilson, Texas Bar No. 24060465
`arafilson@shorechan.com
`Paul T. Beeler, Texas Bar No. 24095432
`pbeeler@shorechan.com
`
`SHORE CHAN DePUMPO LLP
`901 Main Street, Suite 3300
`Dallas, Texas 75202
`Telephone: 214-593-9110
`Facsimile: 214-593-9111
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`CYWEE GROUP, LTD.
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented
`
`to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via email.
`
`/s/ Ari B. Rafilson
`Ari B. Rafilson
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket