throbber
Case 2:15-cv-01274-JRG-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 12/22/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 383
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
















`
`[PROPOSED] DOCKET CONTROL ORDER
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:15-CV-1274-JRG-RSP
`LEAD CASE
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`BLITZSAFE TEXAS, LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD.;
`AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO.,
`INC.; HONDA OF AMERICA
`MANUFACTURING, INC.; HONDA
`MANUFACTURING OF ALABAMA,
`LLC; and HONDA MANUFACTURING
`OF INDIANA, LLC,
`
`
` Defendants.
`
`In accordance with the scheduling conference held in this case, it is hereby ORDERED
`
`that the following schedule of deadlines is in effect until further order of this Court:
`
`Default Date
`
`Proposed Date (if not
`the Default Date)
`
`
`
`February 6, 2017
`
`January 11, 2017
`
`January 4, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`*Jury Selection – 9:00 a.m. in Marshall, Texas
`before Judge Rodney Gilstrap
`
`*Pretrial Conference – 1:30 p.m. in Marshall,
`Texas before Judge Roy Payne
`
`*Notify Court of Agreements Reached During
`Meet and Confer
`
`The parties are ordered to meet and confer on
`any outstanding objections or motions in limine.
`The parties shall advise the Court of any
`agreements reached no later than 1:00 p.m. three
`(3) business days before the pretrial conference.
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01274-JRG-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 12/22/15 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 384
`
`
`
`January 2, 2017
`
`December 26, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`December 19, 2016
`
`
`
`December 19, 2016
`
`December 12, 2016
`
`November 28, 2016
`
`October 31, 2016
`
`October 31, 2016
`
`October 10, 2016
`
`September 19, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`*File Joint Pretrial Order, Joint Proposed Jury
`Instructions, Joint Proposed Verdict Form, and
`Responses to Motions in Limine
`
`*File Notice of Request for Daily Transcript or
`Real Time Reporting.
`
`If a daily transcript or real time reporting of
`court proceedings is requested for trial, the party
`or parties making said request shall file a notice
`with the Court and e-mail the Court Reporter,
`Shelly
`Holmes,
`at
`shelly_holmes@txed.uscourts.gov.
`
`File Motions in Limine
`
`The parties shall limit their motions in limine to
`issues that if improperly introduced at trial
`would be so prejudicial that the Court could not
`alleviate the prejudice by giving appropriate
`instructions to the jury.
`
`Serve Objections
`Disclosures
`
`to Rebuttal
`
`Pretrial
`
`Serve Objections to Pretrial Disclosures; and
`Serve Rebuttal Pretrial Disclosures
`
`(Witness List,
`Serve Pretrial Disclosures
`Deposition Designations, and Exhibit List) by
`the Party with the Burden of Proof
`
`*File Dispositive Motions or Motions to Strike
`Expert Testimony (including Daubert Motions)
`
`No dispositive motion or motion to strike expert
`testimony (including a Daubert motion) may be
`filed after this date without leave of the Court.
`
`Deadline to Complete Expert Discovery
`
`Serve Disclosures for Rebuttal Expert Witnesses
`
`Deadline to Complete Fact Discovery and File
`Motions to Compel Discovery
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01274-JRG-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 12/22/15 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 385
`
`
`
`September 19, 2016
`
`September 5, 2016
`
`July 22, 2016
`
`July 15, 2016
`
`June 24, 2016
`
`June 10, 2016
`
`June 3, 2016
`
`May 27, 2016
`
`May 13, 2016
`
`May 13, 2016
`
`April 29, 2016
`
`April 22, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Serve Disclosures for Expert Witnesses by the
`Party with the Burden of Proof
`
`to File Letter Briefs Regarding
`*Deadline
`Dispositive Motions
`
`Deadline to Complete Mediation
`
`The parties are responsible for ensuring that a
`mediation report is filed no later than 5 days
`after the conclusion of mediation.
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-7 (Opinion of Counsel
`Defenses)
`
`*Claim Construction Hearing – 9:00 a.m. in
`Marshall, Texas before Judge Roy Payne
`
`*Comply with P.R. 4-5(d)
`Construction Chart)
`
`(Joint Claim
`
`*Comply with P.R. 4-5(c)
`Construction Brief)
`
`(Reply Claim
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-5(b) (Responsive Claim
`Construction Brief)
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-5(a) (Opening Claim
`Construction Brief) and Submit Technical
`Tutorials (if any)
`
`Good cause must be shown to submit technical
`tutorials after the deadline to comply with P.R.
`4-5(a).
`
`Deadline to Substantially Complete Document
`Production and Exchange Privilege Logs
`
`Counsel are expected to make good faith efforts
`to produce all required documents as soon as
`they are available and not wait until the
`substantial completion deadline.
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-4 (Deadline to Complete
`Claim Construction Discovery)
`
`File Response to Amended Pleadings
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01274-JRG-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 12/22/15 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 386
`
`
`
`April 8, 2016
`
`April 1, 2016
`
`March 11, 2016
`
`February 19, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`January 19, 2016
`
`February 2, 2016
`
`January 19, 2016
`
`
`
`December 29, 2015
`
`January 12, 2016
`
`December 22, 2015
`
`
`
`
`*File Amended Pleadings
`
`It is not necessary to seek leave of Court to
`amend pleadings prior to this deadline unless
`the amendment seeks
`to assert additional
`patents.
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-3 (Joint Claim Construction
`Statement)
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-2 (Exchange Preliminary
`Claim Constructions)
`
`Comply with P.R. 4-1 (Exchange Proposed
`Claim Terms)
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-4 (Document Production
`Accompanying Invalidity Contentions)
`
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-3 (Invalidity Contentions)
`
`
`*File Proposed Protective Order and Comply
`with Paragraphs 1 & 3 of the Discovery Order
`(Initial and Additional Disclosures)
`
`The Proposed Protective Order shall be filed as
`a separate motion with the caption indicating
`whether or not the proposed order is opposed in
`any part.
`
`*File Proposed Docket Control Order and
`Proposed Discovery Order
`
`The Proposed Docket Control Order and
`Proposed Discovery Order shall be filed as
`separate motions with the caption indicating
`whether or not the proposed order is opposed in
`any part.
`
`December 15, 2015
`
`February 12, 2016
`
`Join Additional Parties
`
`December 11, 2015
`
`December 8, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`*File Notice of Mediator
`
`Scheduling Conference
`
`- 4 -
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01274-JRG-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 12/22/15 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 387
`
`
`
`
`
`November 24, 2015
`
`Comply with P.R. 3-1 & 3-2 (Infringement
`Contentions)
`(*) indicates a deadline that cannot be changed without showing good cause. Good cause is not
`shown merely by indicating that the parties agree that the deadline should be changed.
`
`ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
`
`Notice of Mediator: The parties are to jointly file a notice that identifies the agreed upon
`mediator or indicates that no agreement was reached. If the parties do not reach an agreement,
`the Court will appoint a mediator. The parties should not file a list of mediators to be considered
`by the Court.
`
`Summary Judgment Motions: Prior to filing any summary judgment motion, the
`parties must submit letter briefs seeking permission to file the motion. The opening letter brief
`in each of those matters shall be no longer than five (5) pages and shall be filed with the Court no
`later than the deadline for filing letter briefs. Answering letter briefs in each of those matters
`shall be no longer than five (5) pages and filed with the Court no later than fourteen (14) days
`thereafter. Reply briefs in each of those matters shall be no longer than three (3) pages and filed
`with the Court no later than five (5) days thereafter. The Court may decide the question on the
`submissions or hold a hearing or telephone conference to hear arguments and to determine
`whether the filing of any motion will be permitted. Letter briefs shall be filed without exhibits.
`Any requests to submit letter briefs after the deadlines outlined above must show good cause.
`
`Indefiniteness: In lieu of early motions for summary judgment, the parties are directed
`to include any arguments related to the issue of indefiniteness in their Markman briefing, subject
`to the local rules’ normal page limits.
`
`Motions under 35 U.S.C. § 101: Parties seeking to file dispositive motions under
`35 U.S.C. § 101 before the Court’s Claim Construction Order has issued may do so only upon a
`grant of leave from the Court after a showing of good cause, which shall be presented through
`the letter briefing process described above. Parties may file dispositive motions under 35 U.S.C.
`§ 101 without leave from the Court within two weeks of the issuance of the Court’s Claim
`Construction Order without use of the Court’s letter briefing process described above.
`
`Motions for Continuance: The following excuses will not warrant a continuance nor
`justify a failure to comply with the discovery deadline:
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`(c)
`
`The fact that there are motions for summary judgment or motions to dismiss pending;
`
`The fact that one or more of the attorneys is set for trial in another court on the same day,
`unless the other setting was made prior to the date of this order or was made as a special
`provision for the parties in the other case;
`
`The failure to complete discovery prior to trial, unless the parties can demonstrate that it
`was impossible to complete discovery despite their good faith effort to do so.
`
`- 5 -
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-01274-JRG-RSP Document 54-1 Filed 12/22/15 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 388
`
`
`
`Amendments to the Docket Control Order (“DCO”): Any motion to alter any date on
`the DCO shall take the form of a motion to amend the DCO. The motion to amend the DCO
`shall include a proposed order that lists all of the remaining dates in one column (as above) and
`the proposed changes to each date in an additional adjacent column (if there is no change for a
`date the proposed date column should remain blank or indicate that it is unchanged). In other
`words, the DCO in the proposed order should be complete such that one can clearly see all the
`remaining deadlines and the changes, if any, to those deadlines, rather than needing to also refer
`to an earlier version of the DCO.
`
`Proposed DCO: The Parties’ Proposed DCO should also follow the format described
`above under “Amendments to the Docket Control Order (‘DCO’).”
`
`
`
`- 6 -

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket