`Case 2:15-cv-00037-RWS Document 483 Filed 08/08/17 Page 1 of 7 PagelD#: 25825
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALLDIVISION
`
`ELBIT SYSTEMS LAND AND C4I LTD.,
`ELBIT SYSTEMS OF AMERICA,LLC,
`
`§
`.
`‘
`§
`§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-CV-00037-RWS
`
`§§
`
`§
`§
`
`§ §
`
`§
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Ve
`|
`:
`HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC,
`
`|
`
`Defendant.
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`Tn answering these questions, you are to follow all of the instructions I have given you in
`
`‘the Final Jury Instructions. Your answers to each question must be unanimous. In this verdict
`
`form, “Elbit” and “Plaintiffs” refer collectively to Elbit Systems Land and C41 Ltd and Elbit
`
`Systems of America. “Hughes”or “Defendant”refers to Hughes Network Systems, LLC. In this
`
`verdict form, “the °073 Patent” refers to U.S. Patent Number6,240,073. “The 874 Patent”refers
`
`to U.S. Patent Number 7,245,874.
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-00037-RWS Document 483 Filed 08/08/17 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 25826
`Case 2:15-cv-00037-RWS Document 483 Filed 08/08/17 Page 2 of 7 PagelD #: 25826
`
`UESTION 1 -- INFRINGEMENT;
`
`Did Elbit prove by a preponderanceofthe evidence that Defendant Hughesinfringes the following
`
`claims of the following patents:
`
`|
`
`Write “Yes” or “No” for each claim.
`
`A “Yes” is a finding for Elbit, and a “No”is a finding for Hughes.
`
`073 Patent
`
`Claim 2
`Claim 3
`Claim 4
`
`°874 Patent
`
`|
`
`Claim |
`
`Claim 8
`
`Claim 9
`
`y és
`Y 29
`Y ES
`
`Mio
`
`Aig
`
`Ata
`
`Page 2 of 7
`
`
`
`“|
`
`A
`
`Case 2:15-cv-00037-RWS Document 483 Filed 08/08/17 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 25827
`Case 2:15-cv-00037-RWS Document 483 Filed 08/08/17 Page 3 of 7 PagelD #: 25827
`
`QUESTION2 -- INVALIDITY:
`
`ANSWER THIS QUESTION ONLY AS TO THOSE CLAIMS YOU ANSWERED “YES” TO ~
`
`_
`
`IN QUESTION 1. OTHERWISE, DO NOT ANSWER THIS QUESTION.
`
`Did Defendant Hughes prove by clear and convincing evidence that any of the following claims
`
`of the following patents are invalid:
`
`Write “Yes” or “No”for each claim.
`
`A “Yes”is a finding for Hughes, and a “No”is a finding for Elbit.
`
`'
`
`°073 Patent
`
`Claim 2
`
`Claim 3
`
`Claim 4
`
`Ata
`
`AO
`
`AO
`
`Page 3 of 7
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-00037-RWS Document 483 Filed 08/08/17 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 25828
`Case 2:15-cv-00037-RWS Document 483 Filed 08/08/17 Page 4 of 7 PagelD #: 25828
`
`QUESTION 3 — DAMAGES FOR THE 073 PATENT:
`
`ANSWERTHIS QUESTION ONLY IF YOU FOUND ONE OR MORE OF THE ASSERTED
`CLAIMS OF THE °073 PATENT TO BE INFRINGED IN QUESTION 1, AND YOU DID NOT"
`
`FIND THE INFRINGED CLAIM(S) TO BE INVALID IN QUESTION2.
`
`_ What sum of money, if any, if paid now in cash, do you find by a preponderance of the evidence
`
`would fairly and reasonably compensate Elbit for any past infringement by Hughes of the
`
`073 Patent?
`
`Answerin Dollars and Cents:
`
`‘
`
`s
`
`2/6975, 780, ©
`
`Page 4 of 7
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-00037-RWS Document 483 Filed 08/08/17 Page 5 of 7 PagelD #: 25829
`Case 2:15-cv-00037-RWS Document 483 Filed 08/08/17 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 25829
`
`QUESTION 4 — DAMAGES FOR THE 7874 PATENT;
`
`ANSWER THIS QUESTION ONLY IF YOU FOUND ONE OR MORE OF THE ASSERTED
`
`CLAIMS OF ’874 PATENT TO BE INFRINGEDIN QUESTION1.
`
`What sum of money, if any, if paid now in cash, do you find by a preponderance of the evidence
`
`would fairly and reasonably compensate Elbit for any past infringement by Hughes of the
`
`°874 Patent?
`
`Answerin Dollars and Cents:
`
`$
`
`Loo
`
`Page 5 of 7
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-00037-RWS Document 483 Filed 08/08/17 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 25830
`Case 2:15-cv-00037-RWS Document 483 Filed 08/08/17 Page 6 of 7 PagelD #: 25830
`
`QUESTION 5 — WILLFULNESS:
`
`ANSWER THIS QUESTION ONLY IF YOU PROVIDED AN ANSWER TO QUESTIONS 3
`AND 4, OTHERWISE, DO NOT ANSWERTHIS QUESTION,
`
`A, Did Elbit prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Hughes’ infringement of the
`
`°073 Patent was willful?
`
`Write “Yes” or “No.”
`
`|
`
`A “Yes”is a finding for Elbit, and a “No”is a finding for Hughes.
`
`Vo
`
`B. Did Elbit prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Hughes’ infringement of the
`°874 Patent was willful?
`|
`
`Write “Yes” or “No.”
`
`A “Yes”is a finding for Elbit, and a “No”is a finding for Hughes.
`
`Vo
`
`Page 6 of 7
`
`
`
`Case 2:15-cv-00037-RWS Document 483 Filed 08/08/17 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 25831
`Case 2:15-cv-00037-RWS Document 483 Filed 08/08/17 Page 7 of 7 PagelD #: 25831
`
`You have now reached the end of the verdict form and should review it to ensure it
`accurately reflects your unanimous determinations. The jury foreperson should then sign and date
`the verdict form in the spaces below andnotify the Court Security Officer that you have reached a
`verdict. The jury foreperson should retain possession of the verdict form and bring it when the
`jury is brought back into the courtroom.
`
`Signedthis
`
`| day of Augist
`
`, 2017,
`
`- Jury Foreperson
`
`| Page 7 of 7
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
