throbber
Case 2:13-cv-01016-JRG-RSP Document 223 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 2156
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`PI-NET INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`STAPLES, INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`ORDER
`
`NO. 2:13-CV-01016-JRG-RSP
`
`Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 220) filed by Mag-
`
`istrate Judge Payne on June 5, 2017, recommending Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam’s Motion
`
`to Vacate (Dkt. No. 216) be denied. Dr. Arunachalam appears pro se and her pleadings will
`
`be liberally construed. Accordingly, the Court will construe Dr. Arunachalam’s Motion for
`
`Reconsideration (Dkt. No. 221) as objections to the recommended rulings in the Report.
`
`Having considered those objections and finding them to be without sufficient merit,
`
`and after a de novo review, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore
`
`ORDERED that the Motion to Vacate (Dkt. No. 216) is DENIED.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the District Clerk will mail a copy of this Order
`
`by United States Postal Service, return receipt requested, to:
`
`Lakshmi Arunachalam, Ph. D.
`222 Stanford Avenue
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:13-cv-01016-JRG-RSP Document 223 Filed 07/06/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 2157
`
`The District Clerk is further directed to email a copy of this Order to
`
`laks22002@yahoo.com.
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket