Case 2:12-cv-02866-JPM-tmp Document 31-1 Filed 01/23/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID 210
`Case 2:12—cv—O2866—JPM—tmp Document 31-1 Filed 01/23/13 Page 1 of 3
`PagelD 210
`
`Richard Carter
`
`From:
`
`Sent:
`To:
`
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Mark:
`
`Richard Carter
`
`Wednesday, January 16, 2013 4:34 PM
`’Vorder~Bruegge, Mark‘; Qudus Olaniran
`
`Adam Simpson; Dan Weinberg (DWeinberg@ftklaw.com)
`RE: B.E. Technology v. Amazon Digital — service
`
`l will first address your request to file replies and to extend the page limitation from 5 pages to 10 pages. B.E.
`Technology will not oppose motions by Google, Motorola, Apple, Spark, Pandora, Linkedln and Barnes & Noble to file
`
`reply briefs and will not oppose their requests of an extension of the page limits to a maximum of 10 pages (5 above the
`5 page limit) provided that they do not introduce new arguments that could reasonably have been anticipated before
`they filed their original motions and further provided that they do not seek to offer new eyidentiary matter. B.E.
`
`Technology is not willing to allow additional evldentiary matter even if your clients would not oppose allowing B.E.
`Technology to file a sur—reply, because doing so would unduly prolong the briefing process and create a precedent of
`
`serial filings that we want to avoid.
`
`it your clients file reply briefs that incorporate arguments not previously raised or
`
`introduce new evidentiary matter, B.E. Technology reserves the right to seek to file a sur-reply.
`a reasonable position by B.E. Technology, please give me a call and we can discuss it further.
`
`if you believe this is not
`
`On the issue of when we filed our response, I believe the responses were all filed on January 7. The response to
`
`Spark was filed with as an ”affidavit” rather than as a ”response". The same document was refilled on January
`
`correcting the designation Let me know if that is an issue but we will not quibble over one day on this one way or
`another.
`
`Richard M. Carter
`
`Internatiorizil Plat:e. "l‘\:m~’er El
`
`6410 Poplar Aycnuts, Suite i000
`Memphis. ”l"ennessee 381 i9~4839
`Phone (901) 52“-9()i)()
`
`Fax (901) 5276746
`
`Marttn Tate
`§’%r§r::rr=<f;w
`?"v“§;if°E3{'<L)%‘t
`
`i3“’,{f:.
`
`§$€I’§=%.§'¥“
`
`’?§«{E ?‘§%§v§ M? 31%?
`
`
`
`<;f€_))’\li“ii}l'iNil\i.=\lsl'i"‘{
`
`:\E{}l‘li
`
`this ::«n2a:ii arid Zinf; &lli;}iJilmlCli?.S are coniidentiiil and may he pz‘<>t,cctcd by legal. privilege. lfyou ere not the intended recipient, be ewaro that zsny
`t/,,iiI'9C¥G.\\§H~if. copying‘ oistrihiriior: or use oiithis email or any attaeiinierit is prohibited liyou haw received this e~mail in error. please notify
`ininwdietcl) by i‘eliii“iiing it to the srsndcr and delete this copy from your systein,
`lihiinlr wt: for your c<>opei‘;::§on.
`
`iiifs Cii'{{71,ll,.»*sR 23lil)iS('1.()Sl,lRli
`
`;‘m}' §‘<:d<:rel tats 2i(.l’vlt‘C ocilitziiiictl h<:rr:in is not xwitten to he used rm: and the recipient and ’<ti“s}’ subsequent i‘C2l(iL‘i“(:21llI'l<li§ use such advice rm. the
`
`poi’po.se olizivoitliiig any perizsltics ;
`”'§C(i lzntlez‘ the internal Rexicnoe Code. lithe iixregriiiig contziins l’<:s:i<5rztl tax zitixico and is distributed to 2:
`
`person <>tl'sci‘ EH81} the zldtirc
`h edditionei nod stibseqtioiit rezider hereof‘
`notiiicti that such atixiicc shoolol be c<:>n:~;idcrcd to liayc hem twitter:
`
`to vapour“: the prrsnmtioii or
`g of the ti':r:2.sz:<;ti<i22 or inatosr etdtiressod herein.
`this? ctcnt. each such rs:zr<;io:' she:>oi<l
`advice ‘train on
`
`
`
`
`tzix adviser with respect to the irzsrrszzistion or zzietter 2:82-;3re. _
`hizrein haiseai on the re;rti::r‘s p;rrt§eoi2ir eirctzinstzinces.
`
`From: Vorder-Bruegge, Mark Ernailto:rny*order—bruegge@wyattfirm,com]
`Sent: Monday, Eenuery 14, 2313 1:32 PM
`
`

`
`Case 2:12-cv-02866-JPM-tmp Document 31-1 Filed 01/23/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID 211
`Case 2:12—cv—O2866—JPM—tmp Document 31-1 Filed 01/23/13 Page 2 of 3
`PagelD 211
`
`To: Qudus Olaniran
`Cc: Richard Carter; Adam Simpson
`Subject: RE: B.E. Technology v. Amazon Digital - service
`
`That will be just fine with the proviso to please send the physical portion fedex rather than u.s. mail. Please send to the attention of
`saina sharnilov.
`
`Please cc me on the electronic portion.
`
`lf there is a password for the documents on either the electronic site or the tangible cds, please include that.
`
`Mark \/order-Bruegge, Jr.
`Intellectual Property Service Leader l Firm Technology Partner
`Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs, LLP
`1715 Aaron Brenner Dr., Suite 800 [ Memphis, TN 38120 5 USA
`Direct 901-537-1069 l Receptionist 901-537-1000 Fax 901-537-1010
`mv'oi‘dei‘—bi‘tregges€?;wvattfirrncom [ www.wVattfirm.com
`Sent via WEBMAIL
`
`-—---Original Message-—---
`From: Qudus Olaniran [mailto:§ 10laniran(iDftklaw.coin]
`Sent: Mon 01/14/2013 12:00 PM
`
`To: Vorder—Bruegge, Mark
`Cc: Richard Carter; Adam Simpson
`Subject: B.E. Technology V. Amazon Digital - service
`
`Hi Mark,
`
`Regarding the service ofB.E.'s infringement contentions later today, we plan to serve the LPR 3.1 initial infringement contentions and
`the LPR 3.2 document productions via YouSendlt. Please confirm that Amazon consents to this form of electronic service. Also, we
`plan to send a CD of the document production to Amazon's lead counsel at Fenwick and West in Mountain View, CA; please confirm
`if this is proper address for the CD.
`
`Thanks,
`
`Qudus Olaniran
`
`Attorney
`
`Freitas Tseng & Kaufman LLP
`
`100 Marine Parkway, # 200 § Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Direct: 650 730 5525 § Main: 650 593 6300 l Fax: 650 593 6301
`
`CON"F1DENTlAi,,l'l‘Y §\?Q"£“lCE: The information in this email may be confidential and.-‘or privileged. This email is intended to be
`2
`
`

`
`Case 2:12-cv-02866-JPM-tmp Document 31-1 Filed 01/23/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID 212
`Case 2:12—cv—O2866—JPM—tmp Document 31-1 Filed 01/23/13 Page 3 of 3 Page|D 212
`
`reviewed by only the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient,
`you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, or the information
`contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete
`finsennnlfioniyoursymenr
`
`This message is a confidential communication and may be protected by attorney~c1ient
`privilege.
`to you in error, do not read it.
`If you believe that it has been sent
`Please reply to the sender that you received the message in error,
`then delete it.
`you.
`
`Thank