Case 2:12-cv-02834-JPM-tmp Document 46 Filed 07/17/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID 472
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
`WESTERN DIVISION
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MATCH.COM L.L.C.,
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-02834-JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
` v.
`
`)))))))))))
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION (INCLUDING MEMORANDUM) OF
`PLAINTIFF B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC and DEFENDANT MATCH.COM L.L.C.
`TO MODIFY CERTAIN LOCAL PATENT RULE DEADLINES
`AND RESTORE UNIFORMITY TO RELATED CASE SCHEDULES
`(WITH CERTIFICATE OF CONSULTATION)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff B.E. Technology, LLC (“plaintiff”) and defendant Match.com L.L.C.
`
`(“defendant”) jointly move the Court to enter the accompanying proposed Order, modifying the
`
`deadlines for four events under the Local Patent Rules (LPR’s) in this action.
`
`The proposed Order is the same as submitted by plaintiff and defendant Google Inc. with
`
`their similar joint motion recently filed on June 19, 2013, as ECF No. 47 in the action B.E.
`
`Technology, LLC v. Google Inc., Case Number 2:12-cv-02830-JPM-tmp in this Court (the
`
`“Google Action Motion”). Plaintiff and the defendant in this instant action respectfully
`
`incorporate by reference and adopt the points and legal authorities cited in the Google Action
`
`Motion in support of the same relief herein.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
`WESTERN DIVISION
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MATCH.COM L.L.C.,
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-02834-JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
` v.
`
`)))))))))))
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION (INCLUDING MEMORANDUM) OF
`PLAINTIFF B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC and DEFENDANT MATCH.COM L.L.C.
`TO MODIFY CERTAIN LOCAL PATENT RULE DEADLINES
`AND RESTORE UNIFORMITY TO RELATED CASE SCHEDULES
`(WITH CERTIFICATE OF CONSULTATION)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff B.E. Technology, LLC (“plaintiff”) and defendant Match.com L.L.C.
`
`(“defendant”) jointly move the Court to enter the accompanying proposed Order, modifying the
`
`deadlines for four events under the Local Patent Rules (LPR’s) in this action.
`
`The proposed Order is the same as submitted by plaintiff and defendant Google Inc. with
`
`their similar joint motion recently filed on June 19, 2013, as ECF No. 47 in the action B.E.
`
`Technology, LLC v. Google Inc., Case Number 2:12-cv-02830-JPM-tmp in this Court (the
`
`“Google Action Motion”). Plaintiff and the defendant in this instant action respectfully
`
`incorporate by reference and adopt the points and legal authorities cited in the Google Action
`
`Motion in support of the same relief herein.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02834-JPM-tmp Document 46 Filed 07/17/13 Page 2 of 5 PageID 473
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONSULTATION
`
`
`
`The foregoing motion is presented by plaintiff and defendant jointly, based on successful
`
`consultation compliant with the Court’s Local Rule 7.
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/Richard M. Carter (per consent JDR)
`Richard M. Carter (TN B.P.R. #7285)
`Adam C. Simpson (TN B.P.R. #24705)
`MARTIN, TATE, MORROW & MARSTON, P.C.
`6401 Poplar Avenue, Suite 1000
`Memphis, TN 38119-4839
`Telephone: (901) 522-9000
`Facsimile: (901) 527-3746
`rcarter@martintate.com
`asimpson@martintate.com
`
`Robert E. Freitas (CA Bar No. 80948)
`Craig R. Kaufman (CA Bar No. 159458)
`Daniel J. Weinberg (CA Bar No. 227159)
`Qudus B. Olaniran (CA Bar No. 267838)
`FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP
`100 Marine Parkway, Suite 200
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Telephone: (650) 593-6300
`Facsimile: (650) 593-6301
`rfreitas@ftklaw.com
`ckaufman@ftklaw.com
`dweinberg@ftklaw.com
`qolaniran@ftklaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02834-JPM-tmp Document 46 Filed 07/17/13 Page 3 of 5 PageID 474
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/Jonathan D. Rose
`Jonathan D. Rose (No. 20967)
`jrose@babc.com
`BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP
`1600 Division Street, Suite 700
`Nashville, Tennessee 37203
`(615) 252-2308
`(615) 252-6308 Facsimile
`
`Steven G. Schortgen, pro hac vice
`Texas Bar No. 00794603
`steve.schortgen@klgates.com
`Jennifer Klein Ayers, pro hac vice
`Texas Bar No. 24069322
`jennifer.ayers@klgates.com
`K&L Gates LLP
`1717 Main Street, Suite 2800
`Dallas, TX 75201
`(214) 939-5500
`(214) 939-5849 Facsimile
`
`Sanjay K. Murthy, pro hac vice
`Illinois Bar No. 6279314
`sanjay.murthy@klgates.com
`Christopher E. Hanba, pro hac vice
`Illinois Bar No. 6298424
`christopher.hanba@klgates.com
`K&L Gates LLP
`70 W. Madison Street, Suite 3100
`Chicago, Illinois 60602-4207
`(312) 372-1121
`(312) 827-8000 Facsimile
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`The foregoing document is being filed using the Court’s CM/ECF system, thereby
`
`automatically effecting electronic mail service upon all parties through their counsel of record.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/Jonathan D. Rose
`Jonathan D. Rose
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02834-JPM-tmp Document 46 Filed 07/17/13 Page 4 of 5 PageID 475
`
`
`
`
`ATTACHMENT TO JOINT MOTION (INCLUDING MEMORANDUM) OF
`PLAINTIFF B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC and DEFENDANT MATCH.COM L.L.C.
`TO AMEND CERTAIN LOCAL PATENT RULE DEADLINES
`AND RESTORE UNIFORMITY TO RELATED CASE SCHEDULES
`
`
`U.S. Patent Names:
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,141,010, “Computer Interface Method and Apparatus with Targeted
`Advertising”
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,628,314, “Computer Interface Method and Apparatus with Targeted
`Advertising”
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,771,290, “Computer Interface Method and Apparatus with Portable Network
`Organization System and Targeted Advertising”
`
`Docket No.
`
`Defendant Name
`
`Filing Date
`
`Patent(s)
`Asserted
`
`
`2:12-cv-02767
`
`
`Amazon
`
`2:12-cv-02769
`2:12-cv-02772
`
`2:12-cv-02781
`2:12-cv-02782
`2:12-cv-02783
`2:12-cv-02823
`
`2:12-cv-02824
`
`2:12-cv-02825
`
`2:12-cv-02826
`
`2:12-cv-02827
`
`2:12-cv-02828
`
`Facebook, Inc.
`Corporation
`Groupon, Inc.
`Pandora Media, Inc.
`Twitter, Inc.
`Barnes & Noble,
`Inc.
`Samsung
`Telecommunications
`America, LLC
`Samsung
`Electronics
`America, Inc.
`Sony Computer
`Entertainment
`America LLC
`Sony Mobile
`Communications
`(USA) Inc.
`Sony Electronics
`Inc.
`2:12-cv-02829 Microsoft
`Corporation
`Google Inc.
`
`2:12-cv-02830
`
`2:12-cv-02831
`
`Apple Inc.
`
`
`09/07/12
`
`09/07/12
`09/07/12
`
`09/10/12
`09/10/12
`09/10/12
`09/21/12
`
`09/21/12
`
`
`6,771,290
`6,141,010
`6,628,314
`6,628,314
`
`6,628,314
`6,628,314
`6,628,314
`6,771,290
`
`6,771,290
`
`09/21/12
`
`6,771,290
`
`09/21/12
`
`6,771,290
`
`09/21/12
`
`6,771,290
`
`09/21/12
`
`09/21/12
`
`09/21/12
`
`09/22/12
`
`6,771,290
`
`6,628,314
`6,771,290
`6,628,314
`6,771,290
`6,628,314
`6,771,290
`
`
`
`4
`
`Patent
`Scheduling
`Conference
`Notice ECF No.
`
`39
`
`31
`28
`
`22
`24 and 25
`27
`29
`
`24
`
`28
`
`22
`
`26
`
`21
`
`29
`
`30
`
`31
`
`Stay Entered
`
`
`02/12/13
`
`02/08/13
`02/12/13
`
`02/11/13
`02/08/13
`02/11/13
`02/14/13
`
`02/08/13
`
`02/08/13
`
`02/11/13
`
`02/11/13
`
`02/11/13
`
`02/11/13
`
`02/11/13
`
`02/11/13
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02834-JPM-tmp Document 46 Filed 07/17/13 Page 5 of 5 PageID 476
`
`
`09/22/12
`
`09/22/12
`09/22/12
`10/02/12
`
`6,628,314
`
`6,628,314
`6,628,314
`6,771,290
`
`27
`
`25
`22
`27
`
`02/14/13
`
`02/12/13
`02/12/13
`02/11/13
`
`2:12-cv-02832
`
`Spark Networks,
`Inc.
`People Media, Inc.
`2:12-cv-02833
`2:12-cv-02834 Match.com L.L.C.
`2:12-cv-02866 Motorola Mobility
`Holdings LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`5
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
