`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
`WESTERN DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02767 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02769 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02772 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02781 – JPM-tmp
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`AMAZON DIGITAL SERVICES, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`FACEBOOK, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`LINKEDIN CORP.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`GROUPON, INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02833-JPM-tmp Document 68 Filed 04/15/14 Page 2 of 8 PageID 636
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02782 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02783 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02823 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02824 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`PANDORA MEDIA, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`TWITTER, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`BARNES & NOBLE, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
`AMERICA, LLC,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02833-JPM-tmp Document 68 Filed 04/15/14 Page 3 of 8 PageID 637
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02825 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02826 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02827 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02828 – JPM-tmp
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT
`AMERICA LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SONY MOBILE
`COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SONY ELECTRONICS INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02833-JPM-tmp Document 68 Filed 04/15/14 Page 4 of 8 PageID 638
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02829 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02830 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02831 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02833 – JPM-tmp
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`MICROSOFT CORP.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`PEOPLE MEDIA, INC.
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02833-JPM-tmp Document 68 Filed 04/15/14 Page 5 of 8 PageID 639
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02834 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02866 – JPM-tmp
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`MATCH.COM, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY
`HOLDINGS LLC,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT NOTICE OF INSTITUTION OF INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`Pursuant to the Order Granting Motions to Stay (Dkt. 64, Dkt. 72, Civ. A. No. 2:12-cv-
`
`02769), entered December 6, 2013, the parties jointly file this Notice of the PTO’s decision on
`
`April 9, 2014 to grant the petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”). For efficiency, the decisions
`
`instituting each IPR are attached as exhibits to the filing of the Notice (Dkt. 76) in B.E.
`
`Technology, L.L.C. v. Facebook, Inc., Civil Action No. 12-cv-02769. For the Court’s
`
`convenience, the chart below identifies each IPR by number, the associated exhibit number for
`
`the decision, the patent associated with the IPR, which patent claims are subject to the notice of
`
`institution in each IPR, and the party that filed the IPR.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02833-JPM-tmp Document 68 Filed 04/15/14 Page 6 of 8 PageID 640
`
`
`Patent
`
`Claims
`
`Filer
`
`6,771,290 2 – 3
`
`Sony Mobile
`Communications
`(USA) Inc.
`Google Inc.
`6,771,290 2 – 3
`Google Inc.
`6,771,290 2 – 3
`6,628,314 11 – 13, 15, 18, 20 Google Inc.
`6,628,314 11 – 22
`Microsoft Corp.
`6,771,290 1 – 3
`Microsoft Corp.
`Samsung
`Electronics
`America, Inc.
`6,628,314 11 – 13, 15, 18, 20 Facebook, Inc.
`6,628,314 11 – 13, 15, 18, 20 Facebook, Inc.
`
`6,771,290 2 – 3
`
`Respectfully submitted:
`
`/s/_Daniel J. Weinberg_____________
`Robert E. Freitas (CA Bar No. 80948)
`Daniel J. Weinberg (CA Bar No. 227159)
`FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP
`100 Marine Parkway, Suite 200
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Telephone: (650) 593-6300
`Facsimile: (650) 593-6301
`rfreitas@ftklaw.com
`dweinberg@ftklaw.com
`
`Richard M. Carter (TN B.P.R. #7285)
`MARTIN, TATE,MORROW &MARSTON, P.C.
`6410 Poplar Avenue, Suite 1000
`Memphis, TN 38119-4839
`Telephone: (901) 522-9000
`Facsimile: (901) 527-3746
`rcarter@martintate.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff B.E. Technology, L.L.C.
`
`
`IPR Number
`
`Exhibit # in
`Case No. 12-cv-02769,
`ECF No. 76
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00029 Exhibit A
`
`IPR2014-00031 Exhibit B
`IPR2014-00033 Exhibit C
`IPR2014-00038 Exhibit D
`IPR2014-00039 Exhibit E
`IPR2014-00040 Exhibit F
`
`IPR2014-00044 Exhibit G
`
`IPR2014-00052 Exhibit H
`IPR2014-00053 Exhibit I
`
`
`
`Dated: April 15, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02833-JPM-tmp Document 68 Filed 04/15/14 Page 7 of 8 PageID 641
`
`
`Respectfully submitted:
`
`/s/ Jennifer Klein Ayers _____
`Steven G. Schortgen, pro hac vice
`Texas Bar No. 00794603
`steve.schortgen@klgates.com
`Jennifer Klein Ayers, pro hac vice
`Texas Bar No. 24069322
`jennifer.ayers@klgates.com
`K&L Gates LLP
`1717 Main Street, Suite 2800
`Dallas, TX 75201
`(214) 939-5500
`(214) 939-5849 Facsimile
`
`Sanjay K. Murthy, pro hac vice
`Illinois Bar No. 6279314
`sanjay.murthy@klgates.com
`Christopher E. Hanba, pro hac vice
`Illinois Bar No. 6298424
`christopher.hanba@klgates.com
`K&L Gates LLP
`70 W. Madison Street
`Suite 3100
`Chicago, Illinois 60602-4207
`(312) 372-1121
`(312) 827-8000 Facsimile
`
`H. Frederick Humbracht, Jr. (No. 2993)
`rhumbracht@babc.com
`BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP
`1600 Division Street, Suite 700
`Nashville, Tennessee 37203
`(615) 252-2308
`(615) 252-6308 Facsimile
`
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
`PEOPLE MEDIA, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02833-JPM-tmp Document 68 Filed 04/15/14 Page 8 of 8 PageID 642
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONSULTATION
`
`
`
`Consultation among all parties in the above-captioned actions was conducted and resulted
`
`in all parties’ agreement to file this notice jointly.
`
`Respectfully submitted:
`
`/s/ Jennifer Klein Ayers _________
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The foregoing notice having been filed via the Court’s CM/ECF system, a copy is being
`
`
`
`
`
`automatically served upon all counsel of record for both parties in each of the above-captioned
`
`actions.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jennifer Klein Ayers _________