throbber
Case 2:12-cv-02831-JPM-tmp Document 69 Filed 04/14/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID 955
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
`WESTERN DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02767 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02769 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02772 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02781 – JPM-tmp
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`AMAZON DIGITAL SERVICES, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`FACEBOOK, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`LINKEDIN CORP.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`GROUPON, INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 2:12-cv-02831-JPM-tmp Document 69 Filed 04/14/14 Page 2 of 8 PageID 956
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02782 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02783 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02823 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02824 – JPM-tmp
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`PANDORA MEDIA, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`TWITTER, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`BARNES & NOBLE, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
`AMERICA, LLC,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 2:12-cv-02831-JPM-tmp Document 69 Filed 04/14/14 Page 3 of 8 PageID 957
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02825 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02826 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02827 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02828 – JPM-tmp
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT
`AMERICA LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SONY MOBILE
`COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SONY ELECTRONICS INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 2:12-cv-02831-JPM-tmp Document 69 Filed 04/14/14 Page 4 of 8 PageID 958
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02829 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02830 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02831 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02833 – JPM-tmp
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`MICROSOFT CORP.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`PEOPLE MEDIA, INC.
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 2:12-cv-02831-JPM-tmp Document 69 Filed 04/14/14 Page 5 of 8 PageID 959
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`MATCH.COM, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY
`HOLDINGS LLC,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02834 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02866 – JPM-tmp
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`JOINT NOTICE OF INSTITUTION OF INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`Pursuant to the Order granting Defendants’ Motions to Stay (D.I. 72), entered December
`
`6, 2013, the parties jointly file this Notice of the PTO’s decision on April 9, 2014 to grant the
`
`petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”). For efficiency, the decisions instituting each IPR are
`
`attached as exhibits to the filing of this Notice (D.I. 76) in B.E. Technology, L.L.C. v. Facebook,
`
`Inc., Civil Action No. 12-cv-02769. For the Court’s convenience, the chart below identifies each
`
`IPR by number, the associated exhibit number for the decision, the patent associated with the
`
`IPR, which patent claims are subject to the notice of institution in each IPR, and the party that
`
`filed the IPR.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 2:12-cv-02831-JPM-tmp Document 69 Filed 04/14/14 Page 6 of 8 PageID 960
`
`
`
`IPR Number
`
`Exhibit # in
`Case No. 12-cv-02769,
`ECF No. 76
`
`Patent
`
`Claims
`
`Filer
`
`6,771,290 2 – 3
`
`Sony Mobile
`Communications
`(USA) Inc.
`Google Inc.
`6,771,290 2 – 3
`Google Inc.
`6,771,290 2 – 3
`6,628,314 11 – 13, 15, 18, 20 Google Inc.
`6,628,314 11 – 22
`Microsoft Corp.
`6,771,290 1 – 3
`Microsoft Corp.
`Samsung
`Electronics
`America, Inc.
`6,628,314 11 – 13, 15, 18, 20 Facebook, Inc.
`6,628,314 11 – 13, 15, 18, 20 Facebook, Inc.
`
`6,771,290 2 – 3
`
`Respectfully submitted:
`
`/s/__Daniel J. Weinberg______________
`Robert E. Freitas (CA Bar No. 80948)
`Daniel J. Weinberg (CA Bar No. 227159)
`FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP
`100 Marine Parkway, Suite 200
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Telephone: (650) 593-6300
`Facsimile: (650) 593-6301
`rfreitas@ftklaw.com
`dweinberg@ftklaw.com
`
`Richard M. Carter (TN B.P.R. #7285)
`MARTIN, TATE,MORROW &MARSTON, P.C.
`6410 Poplar Avenue, Suite 1000
`Memphis, TN 38119-4839
`Telephone: (901) 522-9000
`Facsimile: (901) 527-3746
`rcarter@martintate.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff B.E. Technology, L.L.C.
`
`
`IPR2014-00029 Exhibit A
`
`IPR2014-00031 Exhibit B
`IPR2014-00033 Exhibit C
`IPR2014-00038 Exhibit D
`IPR2014-00039 Exhibit E
`IPR2014-00040 Exhibit F
`
`IPR2014-00044 Exhibit G
`
`IPR2014-00052 Exhibit H
`IPR2014-00053 Exhibit I
`
`
`
`Dated: April 14, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 2:12-cv-02831-JPM-tmp Document 69 Filed 04/14/14 Page 7 of 8 PageID 961
`
`Respectfully submitted:
`
`/s/_C. Matthew Rozier_______
`Clay C. James
`Lucky Vidmar
`C. Matthew Rozier
`1200 Seventeenth Street, Suite 1500
`Denver, CO 80202
`Telephone: (303) 899-7300
`Facsimile: (303) 899-7333
`clay.james@hoganlovells.com
`lucky.vidmar@hoganlovells.com
`matt.rozier@hoganlovells.com
`
`Counsel for Defendant for Apple Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 2:12-cv-02831-JPM-tmp Document 69 Filed 04/14/14 Page 8 of 8 PageID 962
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONSULTATION
`
`Consultation among all parties in the above-captioned actions was conducted and resulted
`
`in all parties’ agreement to file this notice jointly.
`
`Respectfully submitted:
`
`/s/__C. Matthew Rozier________________
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The foregoing notice having been filed via the Court’s CM/ECF system, a copy is being
`
`
`
`
`
`automatically served upon all counsel of record for both parties in each of the above-captioned
`
`actions.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ _C. Matthew Rozier___________________

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket