throbber
Case 2:12-cv-02830-JPM-tmp Document 37-3 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID 303
`Case 2:l2—cv—O2830—JPM—tmp Document 37-3 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 3 Page|D 303
`
`EXHIBIT G
`
`EXHIBIT G
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 2:12-cv-02830-JPM-tmp Document 37-3 Filed 01/29/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID 304
`
`Mayer Brown LLP
`1999 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20006-1101
`
`Main Tel +1 202 263 3000
`Main Fax +1 202 263 3300
`www.mayerbrown.com
`
`Brian A. Rosenthal
`Direct Tel +1 202 263 3446
`Direct Fax 202 263 5318
`brosenthal@mayerbrown.com
`
`November 12, 2012
`
`VIA EMAIL
`
`Craig Robert Kaufman
`Freitas Tseng & Kaufman, LLP
`100 Marine Parkway
`Suite 200
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`
`Re:
`
`B.E. Technology, Inc. v. Google Inc., Case No.
`2:12-cv-02830-JPM-cgc
`
` B.E. Technology, Inc. v. Motorola Mobility
`Holdings LLC, Case. No. 2:12-cv-02866
`
`Dear Mr. Kaufman:
`
`I write regarding the complaints recently filed against our clients Google Inc. and
`Motorola Mobility Holdings LLC (“Motorola”) in the Western District of Tennessee by your
`client B.E. Technology, Inc. While B.E. Technology accuses Google of infringing both U.S.
`Patent Nos. 6,628,314 (“the ‘314 Patent) and 6,771,290 (“the ‘290 Patent”) and accuses
`Motorola of infringing the ‘290 Patent, B.E. Technology has failed to identify the specific
`products or services that are accused of infringing those patents as well as the accused
`functionalities and features for those products and services.
`
`Specifically, B.E. Technology’s complaint against Google only states that “Google has
`infringed the ’314 patent by using a method of providing demographically targeted advertising
`that directly infringes at least Claim 11 of the ’314 patent either literally or under the doctrine of
`equivalents.” This statement is too vague and provides no identification of the products or
`services B.E. Technology contends infringe the ‘314 Patent. Google requests that B.E.
`Technology immediately identify any and all Google products or services, specifically, by
`product/service name, number or other identifying information, accused of infringing claim 11 of
`the ‘314 Patent along with the accused functionalities and features for those products and/or
`services.
`
`In addition, B.E. Technology states only that “Google has infringed at least Claim 2 of
`the ’290 patent by using, selling, and offering to sell in the United States tablet computer
`products that directly infringe at least Claim 2 of the ’290 patent either literally or under the
`doctrine of equivalents. The accused products include Google Nexus products.” Again, B.E.
`Technology’s statement is too vague and provides insufficient identification of the products
`accused of infringing claim 2 of the ‘290 Patent. It is unclear what Nexus products B.E.
`
`Mayer Brown LLP operates in combination with other Mayer Brown entities with offices in Europe and Asia
`and is associated with Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership.
`
`

`
`Mayer Brown LLP
`Case 2:12-cv-02830-JPM-tmp Document 37-3 Filed 01/29/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID 305
`
`Craig Robert Kaufman
`November 6, 2012
`Page 2
`
`Technology is accusing of infringement or whether there are additional Google products B.E.
`Technology also accuses. Moreover, B.E. Technology has failed to identify the accused features
`or functionalities of the Nexus products. Google requests that B.E. Technology immediately
`identify any and all Google products, specifically, by product name, number or other identifying
`information, accused of infringing claim 2 of the ‘290 Patent along with the accused
`functionalities and features for these products.
`
`B.E. Technology’s complaint against Motorola identifies “Motorola tablets: Xyboard and
`Xoom tablets; [and] Motorola smartphones: Atrix, Electrify 2, Defy XT, Photon Q 4G LTE” as
`infringing the ‘290 Patent, but fails to identify the accused functionalities and features of these
`products. Motorola requests that B.E. Technology immediately identify all accused
`functionalities and features of the tablets and smartphones identified in its complaint.
`
`We request this information no later than November 16, 2012. Please advise whether
`such information will be forthcoming.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`Brian A. Rosenthal
`
`cc:
`
`John A. Mancini
`Ann Marie Duffy

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket