`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
`WESTERN DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02767 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02769 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02772 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02781 – JPM-tmp
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`AMAZON DIGITAL SERVICES, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`FACEBOOK, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`LINKEDIN CORP.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`GROUPON, INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02829-JPM-tmp Document 73 Filed 04/14/14 Page 2 of 8 PageID 776
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02782 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02783 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02823 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02824 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`PANDORA MEDIA, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`TWITTER, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`BARNES & NOBLE, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
`AMERICA, LLC,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02829-JPM-tmp Document 73 Filed 04/14/14 Page 3 of 8 PageID 777
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02825 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02826 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02827 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02828 – JPM-tmp
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT
`AMERICA LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SONY MOBILE
`COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SONY ELECTRONICS INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02829-JPM-tmp Document 73 Filed 04/14/14 Page 4 of 8 PageID 778
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02829 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02830 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02831 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02833 – JPM-tmp
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`MICROSOFT CORP.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`PEOPLE MEDIA, INC.
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02829-JPM-tmp Document 73 Filed 04/14/14 Page 5 of 8 PageID 779
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02834 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02866 – JPM-tmp
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`JOINT NOTICE OF INSTITUTION OF INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`Pursuant to the Order granting Defendants’ Motions to Stay (D.I. 69), entered December
`
`6, 2013, the parties jointly file this Notice of the PTO’s decision on April 9, 2014 to grant the
`
`petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”). For efficiency, the decisions instituting each IPR are
`
`attached as exhibits to the filing of the Notice (D.I. 76) in B.E. Technology, L.L.C. v. Facebook,
`
`Inc., Civil Action No. 12-cv-02769. For the Court’s convenience, the chart below identifies each
`
`IPR by number, the associated exhibit number for the decision, the patent associated with the
`
`IPR, which patent claims are subject to the notice of institution in each IPR, and the party that
`
`filed the IPR.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`MATCH.COM, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY
`HOLDINGS LLC,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02829-JPM-tmp Document 73 Filed 04/14/14 Page 6 of 8 PageID 780
`
`IPR Number
`
`Exhibit # in
`Case No. 12-cv-02769,
`ECF No. 76
`
`Patent
`
`Claims
`
`Filer
`
`IPR2014-00029 Exhibit A
`
`6,771,290 2 – 3
`
`IPR2014-00031 Exhibit B
`
`IPR2014-00033 Exhibit C
`
`6,771,290 2 – 3
`
`6,771,290 2 – 3
`
`Sony Mobile
`Communications
`(USA) Inc.
`Google Inc.
`
`Google Inc.
`
`IPR2014-00038 Exhibit D
`
`6,628,314 11 – 13, 15, 18, 20 Google Inc.
`
`IPR2014-00039 Exhibit E
`
`6,628,314 11 – 22
`
`Microsoft Corp.
`
`IPR2014-00040 Exhibit F
`
`IPR2014-00044 Exhibit G
`
`IPR2014-00052 Exhibit H
`
`6,771,290 1 – 3
`
`6,771,290 2 – 3
`
`Microsoft Corp.
`Samsung
`Electronics
`America, Inc.
`6,628,314 11 – 13, 15, 18, 20 Facebook, Inc.
`
`IPR2014-00053 Exhibit I
`
`6,628,314 11 – 13, 15, 18, 20 Facebook, Inc.
`
`_
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`s/Daniel J. Weinberg
`Robert E. Freitas (CA Bar No. 80948)
`Daniel J. Weinberg (CA Bar No. 227159)
`FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP
`100 Marine Parkway, Suite 200
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Telephone: (650) 593-6300
`Facsimile: (650) 593-6301
`rfreitas@ftklaw.com
`dweinberg@ftklaw.com
`
`Richard M. Carter (TN B.P.R. #7285)
`MARTIN, TATE,MORROW &MARSTON, P.C.
`6410 Poplar Avenue, Suite 1000
`Memphis, TN 38119-4839
`Telephone: (901) 522-9000
`Facsimile: (901) 527-3746
`rcarter@martintate.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff B.E. Technology, L.L.C.
`
`
`
`
`Dated: April 14, 2014
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02829-JPM-tmp Document 73 Filed 04/14/14 Page 7 of 8 PageID 781
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
` s/ Adam S. Baldridge
`Bradley E. Trammell (TN #13980)
`Adam Baldridge (TN #023488)
`Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell &
`Berkowitz, P.C.
`165 Madison Avenue, Suite 2000
`Memphis, TN 38103
`Telephone: 901.577.2121
`Email: btrammell@bakerdonelson.com
`Email: abaldrige@bakerdonelson.com
`
`Of Counsel:
`Ruffin B. Cordell (TX #4820550)
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`1425 K Street, N.W., 11th Floor
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`Telephone: (202) 783-5070
`Cordell@fr.com
`
`Kelly C. Hunsaker (CA Bar No. 168307)
`Leeron G. Kalay (CA Bar No. 23359)
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`500 Arguello Street, Suite 500
`Redwood City, CA 94063
`Telephone: (650) 839-5070
`hunsaker@fr.com
`kalay@fr.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02829-JPM-tmp Document 73 Filed 04/14/14 Page 8 of 8 PageID 782
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONSULTATION
`
`
`
`Consultation among all parties in the above-captioned actions was conducted and resulted
`
`in all parties’ agreement to file this notice jointly.
`
`
`s/ Adam S. Baldridge_______________
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The foregoing notice having been filed via the Court’s CM/ECF system, a copy is being
`
`
`
`
`
`automatically served upon all counsel of record for both parties in each of the above-captioned
`
`actions.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/ Adam S. Baldridge