throbber
Case 2:12-cv-02825-JPM-tmp Document 50-1 Filed 07/23/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID 506
`Case 2:l2—cv—O2825—JPM—tmp Document 50-1 Filed 07/23/13 Page 1 of 2 Page|D 506
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
`
`WESTERN DIVISION
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02824-JPM—tmp
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02825-JPM-tmp
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
`
`AMERICA, LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA
`
`INC.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`DECLARATION OF RICHARD C. PETTUS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS
`
`SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC AND SAMSUNG
`ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC.’S MOTION TO (A) COMPEL SUPPLEMENTAL
`INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS THAT COMPLY VVITH LOCAL PATENT RULE
`
`3.1, AND (B) RELIEVE DEFENDANTS OF CERTAIN RESPONSIVE DISCOVERY
`OBLIGATIONS PENDING SERVICE OF COMPLIANT CONTENTIONS
`
`1, Richard C. Pettus, declare as follows:
`
`I am an attorney duly licensed to practice in the state of New York and admitted pro hac
`
`Vice before this Court. I am an attorney at Greenberg Traurig LLP, counsel of record for
`
`Defendant Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`
`(collectively, “Samsung”). I have personal knowledge of the facts stated in this declaration, and
`
`

`
`Case 2:12-cv-02825-JPM-tmp Document 50-1 Filed 07/23/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID 507
`Case 2:l2—cv—O2825—JPM—tmp Document 50-1 Filed 07/23/13 Page 2 of 2 Page|D 507
`
`if called upon to do so, could and would competently testify thereto. I make this declaration in
`
`support of Samsung’s Motion to (a) Compel Supplemental Infringement Contentions that
`
`Comply with Local Patent Rule 3.1 and (b) Relieve Defendants of Certain Responsive Discovery
`
`Obligations Pending Service of Compliant Contentions (“Motion”).
`
`Attached hereto are true and correct copies of material referenced in Samsung’s Motion:
`
`1.
`
`Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from of Plaintiffs Preliminary
`
`Infringement Contentions (“ICS”) relating to the Samsung “Acclaim” product
`
`(dated January 7, 2013). The complete ICs accused 177 products and comprised
`
`10,363 pages.
`
`2.
`
`Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of Samsung’s correspondence to B.E.
`
`Technology
`
`(“Plaintiff”)
`
`regarding Plaintiffs
`
`Preliminary
`
`Infringement
`
`Contentions (“ICS”) (sent January 18, 2013).
`
`3.
`
`Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of Plaintiffs correspondence to Samsung in
`
`response to Samsung’s January 18, 2013 correspondence regarding Plaintiffs ICs
`
`(received January 30, 2013).
`
`4.
`
`Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of Samsung’s correspondence with Plaintiff
`
`regarding supplementing Plaintiffs ICs (dated July 17, 2013 through July 23,
`
`2013).
`
`I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`DATE:
`
`July 23, 2013
`
`Richard C. Pettus

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket