throbber
Case 2:12-cv-02825-JPM-tmp Document 42 Filed 02/21/13 Page 1 of 2 PageID 417
`Case 2:12—cv—O2825—JPM—tmp Document 42 Filed 02/21/13 Page 1 of 2 Page|D 417
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
`
`WESTERN DIVISION
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO.
`
`2: 12-CV-02824-JPM-tmp
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
`
`AMERICA LLC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO.
`
`2:12—CV-02825-JPM—trnp
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`DECLARATION OF JUSTIN A. MACLEAN IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S REPLY
`
`MEMORANDUM SUPPORTING ITS MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE
`
`1, Justin A. MacLean, hereby declare and state as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am an associate in the New York office of Greenberg Traurig, LLP (“GT”),
`
`located at 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166.
`
`I submit this declaration in support of
`
`Defendants Samsung Telecommunications America LLC (“STA”) and Samsung Electronics
`
`America, Inc.’s (“SEA”) (collectively, “Samsung”) Motion to Transfer Venue to the District of
`
`New Jersey (“Motion”).
`
`This declaration is based upon facts of which I have personal
`
`knowledge.
`
`

`
`Case 2:12-cv-02825-JPM-tmp Document 42 Filed 02/21/13 Page 2 of 2 PageID 418
`Case 2:12—cv—O2825—JPM—tmp Document 42 Filed 02/21/13 Page 2 of 2 Page|D 418
`
`2.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of B.E. Technology,
`
`L.L.C.’s (“B.E.”) Application for Certificate of Authority received by the Tennessee Secretary of
`
`State, dated September 6, 2012.
`
`3.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of B.E.’s 2013 Annual
`
`Statement
`
`filed with the Michigan Secretary of State and retrieved from the Michigan
`
`Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs website.
`
`4.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the file
`
`history for U.S. Patent Publication No. 2012-0158512.
`
`5.
`
`On January 7, 2013, counsel for B.E. Technology, LLC (“B.E.”) produced
`
`documents pursuant to Local Patent Rule 3.2(b) along with its initial infringement contentions.
`
`That production was comprised of 222 documents. Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and
`
`correct copy of the cover letter to that production sent by B.E.’s counsel in the Northern District
`
`of California.
`
`6.
`
`Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of an excerpt from Exhibit
`
`A to Plaintiffs Infringement Contentions, served on Samsung on January 7, 2013, which is an
`
`exemplar chart of one of the 177 Samsung products accused of infringement purportedly under
`
`Local Patent Rule 3.1(c). The complete Appendix A totaled 10,363 pages.
`
`I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the
`
`foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed in New York, New York on February 21, 2013.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket