`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
`WESTERN DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02767 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02769 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02772 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02781 – JPM-tmp
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`1
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`AMAZON DIGITAL SERVICES, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`FACEBOOK, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`LINKEDIN CORP.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`GROUPON, INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02824-JPM-tmp Document 72 Filed 04/14/14 Page 2 of 8 PageID 1331
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02782 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02783 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02823 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02824 – JPM-tmp
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`PANDORA MEDIA, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`TWITTER, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`BARNES & NOBLE, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
`AMERICA, LLC,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02824-JPM-tmp Document 72 Filed 04/14/14 Page 3 of 8 PageID 1332
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02825 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02826 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02827 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02828 – JPM-tmp
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`3
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT
`AMERICA LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SONY MOBILE
`COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SONY ELECTRONICS INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02824-JPM-tmp Document 72 Filed 04/14/14 Page 4 of 8 PageID 1333
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02829 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02830 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02831 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02833 – JPM-tmp
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`4
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`MICROSOFT CORP.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`PEOPLE MEDIA, INC.
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02824-JPM-tmp Document 72 Filed 04/14/14 Page 5 of 8 PageID 1334
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02834 – JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 12-cv-02866 – JPM-tmp
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`JOINT NOTICE OF INSTITUTION OF INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`Pursuant to the Order granting Defendants’ Motions to Stay (No. 12-cv-2824 (D.E. 68);
`
`No. 12-cv-2825 (D.E. 72)), entered December 6, 2013, the parties jointly file this Notice of the
`
`PTO’s decision on April 9, 2014 to grant the petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”). For
`
`efficiency, the decisions instituting each IPR are attached as exhibits to the filing of this Notice
`
`in B.E. Technology, L.L.C. v. Facebook, Inc., Civil Action No. 12-cv-02769 (D.E. 76). For the
`
`Court’s convenience, the chart below identifies each IPR by number, the associated exhibit
`
`number for the decision, the patent associated with the IPR, which patent claims are subject to
`
`the notice of institution in each IPR, and the party that filed the IPR.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`MATCH.COM, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY
`HOLDINGS LLC,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02824-JPM-tmp Document 72 Filed 04/14/14 Page 6 of 8 PageID 1335
`
`IPR Number
`
`Exhibit # in
`Case No. 12-cv-02769,
`ECF No. 76
`
`Patent
`
`Claims
`
`Filer
`
`6,771,290 2 – 3
`
`Sony Mobile
`Communications
`(USA) Inc.
`Google Inc.
`6,771,290 2 – 3
`Google Inc.
`6,771,290 2 – 3
`6,628,314 11 – 13, 15, 18, 20 Google Inc.
`6,628,314 11 – 22
`Microsoft Corp.
`6,771,290 1 – 3
`Microsoft Corp.
`Samsung
`Electronics
`America, Inc.
`6,628,314 11 – 13, 15, 18, 20 Facebook, Inc.
`6,628,314 11 – 13, 15, 18, 20 Facebook, Inc.
`
`6,771,290 2 – 3
`
`
`
`IPR2014-00029 Exhibit A
`
`IPR2014-00031 Exhibit B
`IPR2014-00033 Exhibit C
`IPR2014-00038 Exhibit D
`IPR2014-00039 Exhibit E
`IPR2014-00040 Exhibit F
`
`IPR2014-00044 Exhibit G
`
`IPR2014-00052 Exhibit H
`IPR2014-00053 Exhibit I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: April 14, 2014
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Jonathan E. Nelson
`Shepherd D. Tate (TN BPR #05638)
`Jonathan E. Nelson (TN BPR #028029)
`BASS, BERRY & SIMS, PLC
`100 Peabody Place, Suite 900
`Memphis, Tennessee 38103
`Telephone:
`(901) 543-5900
`Facsimile:
`(901) 543-5999
`Email: state@bassberry.com
`
`Jenelson@bassberry.com
`
`Richard C. Pettus (admitted pro hac vice)
`Joshua Raskin (admitted pro hac vice)
`Justin A. MacLean (admitted pro hac vice)
`GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
`200 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10166
`Telephone:
`(212) 801-9200
`Facsimile:
`(212) 801-6400
`pettusr@gtlaw.com
`Email:
`
`
`raskinj@gtlaw.com
`
`
`macleanj@gtlaw.com
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02824-JPM-tmp Document 72 Filed 04/14/14 Page 7 of 8 PageID 1336
`
`
`Nicholas A. Brown (admitted pro hac vice)
`GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
`4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3000
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone:
`(415) 655-1300
`Facsimile:
`(415) 707-2010
`Email:
`brownn@gtlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants, Samsung Electronics
`America, Inc. and Samsung
`Telecommunications America, LLC
`
`
`
`/s/ Daniel J. Weinberg
`Richard M. Carter (TN B.P.R. #7285)
`Adam J. Eckstein (TN B.P.R. #27200)
`MARTIN, TATE, MORROW & MARSTON,
`P.C.
`6410 Poplar Avenue, Suite 1000
`Memphis, TN 38119-4839
`Telephone: (901) 522-9000
`Facsimile: (901) 527-3746
`AEckstein@martintate.com
`
`
`Robert E. Freitas (CA Bar No. 80948)
`Daniel J. Weinberg (CA Bar No. 227159)
`FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP
`100 Marine Parkway, Suite 200
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Telephone: (650) 593-6300
`Facsimile: (650) 593-6301
`rfreitas@ftklaw.com
`dweinberg@ftklaw.com
`
`
`Attorneys for B. E. Technology, L.L.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02824-JPM-tmp Document 72 Filed 04/14/14 Page 8 of 8 PageID 1337
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CONSULTATION
`
`
`
`Consultation among all parties in the above-captioned actions was conducted and resulted
`
`in all parties’ agreement to file this notice jointly.
`
`
`/s/_Jonathan E. Nelson______________________
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The foregoing notice having been filed via the Court’s CM/ECF system, a copy is being
`
`
`
`
`
`automatically served upon all counsel of record for both parties in each of the above-captioned
`
`actions.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ _Jonathan E. Nelson______________________
`
`
`8