throbber
Case 2:12-cv-02823-JPM-tmp Document 32-1 Filed 01/25/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID 150
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
`WESTERN DIVISION
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
`
`v.
`
`BARNES & NOBLE, INC.,
`
`Defendant/Counterclaimant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:12-CV-2823 JPM tmp
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`
`DECLARATION OF DAVID HOYLE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S
`MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO TRANSFER
`VENUE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)
`
`I, Martin David Hoyle, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am the Chief Executive Officer of Plaintiff B.E. Technology, L.L.C. (“B.E.”). I
`
`make this Declaration in support of B.E.’s Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant Barnes &
`
`Noble Inc.’s Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). I have personal
`
`knowledge of the facts stated herein and could testify competently to them if asked to do so.
`
`2.
`
`In April 2006, I moved with my son from our home in Mandeville, Louisiana to
`
`Eads, Tennessee. My wife and daughter joined us one month later when my daughter’s school
`
`year ended. We left Louisiana following Hurricane Katrina and chose the Memphis area because
`
`I obtained a consulting contract with Hilton Hotels and considered Memphis a good location for
`
`other work I thought would be available to me.
`
`3.
`
`My wife and I lived in Eads from April 2006 until May 2012. Our address during
`
`that time was 1888 North Reid-Hooker Cove, Eads, Tennessee 38028.
`
`

`
`Case 2:12-cv-02823-JPM-tmp Document 32-1 Filed 01/25/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID 151
`
`4.
`
`Over time, I have considered a return to Louisiana. During part of the time I was
`
`living in Eads, I planned to return to Louisiana and took steps to establish residence there while
`
`my non-B.E. work required my presence in the Memphis area. Ultimately, my wife and I chose
`
`to remain in Tennessee. In February 2012, my wife and I made an offer to purchase a home in
`
`Cordova, part of the City of Memphis. The offer was accepted. In May 2012, we closed on the
`
`home and moved from Eads to Cordova. Our current address is 116 West Viking Drive,
`
`Cordova, Tennessee 38018. The decision my wife and I made to buy a home in Cordova and
`
`stay in Tennessee was not designed to create venue in this District.
`
`5.
`
`I founded B.E. in August 1997 to develop Internet-related technologies on which I
`
`had been working. I received strategic advice and investments from individuals in Michigan.
`
`B.E. incorporated in Delaware and maintained a registered office in Michigan where its
`
`accountant resides.
`
`6.
`
`I served as B.E.’s President from 1997 to 2001. From 2006 to 2008, I co-
`
`managed the company with Mark McKinley. I was appointed Chief Executive Officer of B.E. in
`
`2008 and remain in that position today.
`
`7.
`
`B.E. is the assignee of several United States patents, including Patent No.
`
`6,771,290 (the “’290 patent”). I am the named inventor of the ’290 patent. B.E.’s documents,
`
`including those relating to the conception and reduction to practice of the inventions disclosed in
`
`those patents are physically located in Cordova, Tennessee, and have been located in the Western
`
`District of Tennessee since I moved here in 2006.
`
`8.
`
`B.E. is registered to conduct business in Tennessee. In July 2012, while we were
`
`preparing to file suit to enforce B.E.’s patents, I was advised by B.E.’s accountant that B.E. had
`
`not registered to conduct business in Tennessee. B.E. began the process of registering in August
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`
`2013-01-25 14:33
`David Hoyle
`9014149012 :1:
`550-593-5301
`Case 2:12-cv-02823-JPM-tmp Document 32-1 Filed 01/25/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID 152
`Case 2:12—cv—O2823—JPM—tmp Document 32-1 Filed 01/25/13 Page 3 of 3
`PagelD 152
`
`Pziz
`
`2012. The process was delayed because B.E. had not made payments necessary to maintain
`
`good standing in Delaware. Our Delaware agent failed to send required information to the
`
`correct address, and the payments were not made. The Tennessee registration process was
`
`completed in September after BE. corrected the situation in Delaware.
`
`9.
`
`It‘ this lawsuit is transferred from the Western District of Tennessee to the
`
`Northern District of California, it will impose a significant financial burden on B.E. If I am
`
`required to travel to California for litigation, B.I3. will incur expenses it will not incur if the case
`
`remains in Memphis.
`
`In addition, I will personally suffer a financial harm if this case is
`
`transferred to California.
`
`In addition to my duties and responsibilities as the Chief Executive
`
`Officer of B.E.. I maintain a technology consulting firm in Tennessee known as Wcbnet Media
`
`L.L.C. As a consultant. I am typically paid only for the hours I work. If I am required to take
`
`the time to travel across the country to serve as a witness or company representative for B.E. in
`
`California. I will lose consulting opportunities and hours that I otherwise could work here in
`
`Tennessee.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
`
`true and correct.
`
`Executed this day of January, 2013, in Cordova, Tennessee.
`
`
`
`
`Martin David Hoyle

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket