`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
`WESTERN DIVISION
`______________________________________________________________________________
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`
`Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No. 2:12-cv-02781-JPM-cgc
`
`JURY DEMAND
`
`
`v.
`
`GROUPON, INC.,
`
`Defendant/Counterclaimant.
`
`
`______________________________________________________________________________
`
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION OF PLAINTIFF B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC
`FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT GROUPON’S
`MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)
`______________________________________________________________________________
`
`
`
`Comes now Plaintiff B.E. Technology, LLC (“B.E. Technology”), by and through the
`
`undersigned counsel, and files its Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the
`
`Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) filed by Defendant Groupon, Inc.
`
`(“Groupon”) at D.E. 21. In support of its Unopposed Motion, B.E. Technology requests an
`
`additional three (3) days, through and including Thursday, January 31, 2013, in which time to
`
`respond in opposition to Groupon’s Motion to Transfer Venue. B.E. Technology requests this
`
`additional three days in order to give it and its counsel time to adequately finalize its response to
`
`Groupon’s Motion. As B.E. Technology’s Motion for Extension is unopposed by Groupon and
`
`good cause exists for the extension, B.E. Technology requests that the Court allow it an
`
`additional three days, through and including Thursday, January 31, 2013, in which time to
`
`respond in opposition to Groupon’s motion.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02781-JPM-cgc Document 25 Filed 01/28/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID 178
`
`LOCAL RULE 7.2 CERTIFICATE OF CONSULTATION
`
`
`
`On January 28, 2013, Richard M. Carter, Esq., counsel for B.E. Technology, contacted
`
`John Golwen, Esq., counsel for Groupon, via electronic mail regarding the requested extension.
`
`Mr. Golwen responded by electronic mail that Groupon would not oppose the request.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`s/ Adam C. Simpson
`Richard M. Carter (TN B.P.R. #7285)
`Adam C. Simpson (TN B.P.R. #24705)
`MARTIN, TATE, MORROW & MARSTON, P.C.
`6410 Poplar Avenue, Suite 1000
`Memphis, TN 38119-4839
`Telephone: (901) 522-9000
`Facsimile: (901) 527-3746
`rcarter@martintate.com
`
`Robert E. Freitas (CA Bar No. 80948)
`Craig R. Kaufman (CA Bar No. 15945)
`James Lin (CA Bar No. 241472)
`Qudus B. Olaniran (CA Bar No. 267838)
`Daniel J. Weinberg (CA Bar No. 227159)
`FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP
`100 Marine Parkway, Suite 200
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Telephone: (650) 593-6300
`Facsimile: (650) 593-6301
`rfreitas@ftklaw.com
`ckaufman@ftklaw.com
`jlin@ftklaw.com
`qolaniran@ftklaw.com
`dweinberg@ftklaw.com
`
`Attorneys for B. E. Technology, L.L.C.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02781-JPM-cgc Document 25 Filed 01/28/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID 179
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that on January 28, 2013, a true and correct copy of the foregoing
`document was electronically filed with the United States District Court for the Western District
`of Tennessee, and was served on all counsel by the Court's electronic filing notification or via
`email.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/ Adam C. Simpson
`
`
`
`
`
`3