throbber
Case 2:12-cv-02767-JPM-tmp Document 97 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 1 PageID 971
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
`WESTERN DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
` Case No. 2:12-cv-2767-JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHONOLOGY, LLC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`AMAZON DIGITAL SERVICES, INC.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER OF DISMISSAL
`
`
`
`
`
`Before the Court is Defendant’s Response to a letter from Martin David Hoyle,
`
`President/CEO of B.E. Technology, LLC filed October 11, 2018. (ECF No. 96.) Defendant
`
`asks the Court to dismiss all claims in the case under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Plaintiff has been
`
`without counsel since August 30, 2018 when the Court granted two Motions to Withdraw as
`
`Attorneys. (ECF No. 92.) In that order, Plaintiff had 28 days to obtain new counsel. (Id.)
`
`Defendant was allowed to move for dismissal under Fed R. Civ. P. 41(b) if, after 28 days,
`
`Plaintiff did not obtain new counsel. (Id.) Mr. Hoyle’s letter asks the Court to dismiss the case
`
`without prejudice. (ECF No. 95.) A dismissal under Rule 41(b) operates as an adjudication on
`
`the merits. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).) This case is, therefore, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED, this 15th day of October, 2018.
`
`
`
`/s/ Jon P. McCalla
` JON P. McCALLA
` UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket