`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
`WESTERN DIVISION
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`AMAZON DIGITAL SERVICES,
`INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`No. 2:12-cv-02767-JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`
`No. 2:12-cv-02769-JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`No. 2:12-cv-02772-JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`FACEBOOK, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`LINKEDIN CORP.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02767-JPM-tmp Document 72 Filed 12/09/13 Page 2 of 6 PageID 815
`
`
`
`No. 2:12-cv-02781-JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`No. 2:12-cv-02782-JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`No. 2:12-cv-02783-JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`No. 2:12-cv-02823-JPM-tmp
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`GROUPON, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`PANDORA MEDIA, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`TWITTER, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`BARNES & NOBLE, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02767-JPM-tmp Document 72 Filed 12/09/13 Page 3 of 6 PageID 816
`
`
`
`
`No. 2:12-cv-02824-JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`No. 2:12-cv-02825-JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`No. 2:12-cv-02826-JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`3
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
`AMERICA, LLC,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
`INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT
`AMERICA LLC,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02767-JPM-tmp Document 72 Filed 12/09/13 Page 4 of 6 PageID 817
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS
`(USA) INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`SONY ELECTRONICS INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`No. 2:12-cv-02827-JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`No. 2:12-cv-02828-JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`No. 2:12-cv-02829-JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`No. 2:12-cv-02830-JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`4
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`MICROSOFT CORP.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`GOOGLE INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02767-JPM-tmp Document 72 Filed 12/09/13 Page 5 of 6 PageID 818
`
`
`
`No. 2:12-cv-02831-JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`No. 2:12-cv-02833-JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`No. 2:12-cv-02834-JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`No. 2:12-cv-02866-JPM-tmp
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`PEOPLE MEDIA, INC.,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`MATCH.COM, LLC,
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`B.E. TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY HOLDINGS,
`LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:12-cv-02767-JPM-tmp Document 72 Filed 12/09/13 Page 6 of 6 PageID 819
`
`
` ORDER
`
`
`
`Pursuant to this Court’s Order Granting Motions to Stay
`filed on December 6, 2013, all pending motions in the related
`cases are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pending the petitions for
`Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) by the Patent and Trademark Office.
`The parties may re-file the motions following the results of the
`pending petitions for IPR.
`IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of December, 2013.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Jon P. McCalla________
`JON P. McCALLA
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
`
`
`
`
`
`6