throbber
Case 2:12-cv-02767-JPM-tmp Document 41 Filed 02/06/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID 323
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
`WESTERN DIVISION
`______________________________________________________________________________
`
`B. E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:12-cv-02767-JPM-tmp
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`AMAZON DIGITAL
`SERVICES, INC.,
`
`
`Defendant.
`______________________________________________________________________________
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
`RESPOND TO AMAZON DIGITAL SERVICES, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS
`______________________________________________________________________________
`
`
`Comes now Plaintiff B.E. Technology, LLC (“B.E. Technology”), by and through the
`
`undersigned counsel, and files its Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the
`
`Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Amazon Digital Services, Inc. (“Amazon”) at D.E. 32. In
`
`support of its Unopposed Motion, B.E. Technology requests an additional seven (7) days, up to
`
`and including Thursday, February 14, 2013, in which time to respond in opposition to Amazon’s
`
`Motion to Dismiss. B.E. Technology requests this additional seven days in order to give it time
`
`to adequately respond to Amazon’s Motion to Dismiss. Because Amazon has consented to the
`
`requested extension and because good cause exists for the extension, B.E. Technology requests
`
`that the Court allow it an additional seven days, up to and including Thursday, February 14,
`
`2013, in which time to respond in opposition to Amazon’s motion.
`
`LOCAL RULE 7.2 CERTIFICATE OF CONSULTATION
`
`
`
`On February 5, 2013, Qudus Olaniran, Esq., counsel for B.E. Technology, contacted
`
`Mark Vorder-Bruegge, Esq., counsel for Amazon, via telephone and electronic mail regarding
`
`

`
`Case 2:12-cv-02767-JPM-tmp Document 41 Filed 02/06/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID 324
`
`the requested extension. Mr. Vorder-Bruegge, by return telephone call to Mr. Olaniran,
`
`indicated that Amazon would consent to the extension.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`s/ Adam C. Simpson
`Richard M. Carter (TN B.P.R. #7285)
`Adam C. Simpson (TN B.P.R. #24705)
`MARTIN, TATE, MORROW & MARSTON, P.C.
`6410 Poplar Avenue, Suite 1000
`Memphis, TN 38119-4839
`Telephone: (901) 522-9000
`Facsimile: (901) 527-3746
`rcarter@martintate.com
`
`Robert E. Freitas (CA Bar No. 80948)
`Craig R. Kaufman (CA Bar No. 15945)
`James Lin (CA Bar No. 241472)
`Qudus B. Olaniran (CA Bar No. 267838)
`Daniel J. Weinberg (CA Bar No. 227159)
`FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP
`100 Marine Parkway, Suite 200
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`Telephone: (650) 593-6300
`Facsimile: (650) 593-6301
`rfreitas@ftklaw.com
`ckaufman@ftklaw.com
`jlin@ftklaw.com
`qolaniran@ftklaw.com
`dweinberg@ftklaw.com
`
`Attorneys for B. E. Technology, L.L.C.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Case 2:12-cv-02767-JPM-tmp Document 41 Filed 02/06/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID 325
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that on February 6, 2013, a true and correct copy of the foregoing
`document was electronically filed with the United States District Court for the Western District
`of Tennessee, and was served on all counsel by the Court's electronic filing notification or via
`email.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/ Adam C. Simpson
`
`
`
`3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket