To:
`Subject:
`Sent:
`Sent As:
`
`MARK A. WATKINS(iplaw@vorys.com)
`U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 97276442 - SUR-FLEX - - 075096-10
`February 27, 2024 03:04:11 PM EST
`tmng.notices@uspto.gov
`
`Attachments
`
`screencapture-www-emcoplastics-com-foam-17090632871951
`screencapture-www-emcoplastics-com-abs-17090633694141
`screencapture-www-emcoplastics-com-uhmw-tapes-17090633984791
`screencapture-www-rogerscorp-com-elastomeric-material-solutions-bisco-silicones-bisco-rs-
`700-industrial-grade-silicone-sponge-17090634857961
`screencapture-www-rogerscorp-com-elastomeric-material-solutions-dewal-products-eptfe-
`membrane-17090635031101
`screencapture-www-rogerscorp-com-elastomeric-material-solutions-dewal-products-dewal-
`uhmw-tapes-17090635236201
`screencapture-www-andrewroberts-com-silicone-sponge-rubber-17090635689171
`screencapture-www-andrewroberts-com-pfa-film-17090635878411
`screencapture-www-andrewroberts-com-uhmw-tape-17090636020911
`screencapture-www-3m-com-3M-en_US-p-d-v000093622-17090636310601
`screencapture-www-3m-com-3M-en_US-p-d-b40071779-17090636591741
`screencapture-www-3m-com-3M-en_US-p-d-b5005037046-17090636797271
`screencapture-www-tapesolutions-saint-gobain-com-na-products-gasketing-foams-silicone-
`17090637356701
`screencapture-www-tapesolutions-saint-gobain-com-na-products-specialty-films-
`fluoropolymers-extruded-films-etfe-films-etfe-matte-17090637721531
`screencapture-www-tapesolutions-saint-gobain-com-na-products-adhesive-tapes-
`17090638069641
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
`Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
`
`U.S. Application Serial No.  97276442
`
`Mark:   SUR-FLEX
`
`Correspondence Address:  
`MARK A. WATKINS
`VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE LLP
`P.O. BOX 2255
`COLUMBUS OH 43216-2255
`UNITED STATES
`
`Applicant:   Sur-Seal, LLC
`
`Reference/Docket No.  075096-10
`
`Correspondence Email Address:   iplaw@vorys.com
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION AFTER FINAL ACTION DENIED
`
`Issue date:   February 27, 2024
`
`Applicant’s request for reconsideration is denied.   See 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(3).  The trademark
`examining attorney has carefully reviewed applicant’s request and determined the request did not:  (1)
`raise a new issue, (2) resolve all the outstanding issue(s), (3) provide any new or compelling evidence
`with regard to the outstanding issue(s), or (4) present analysis and arguments that were persuasive or
`shed new light on the outstanding issue(s).  TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(B), 715.04(a).  
`
`Accordingly, the following requirement(s) and/or refusal(s) made final in the Office action dated
`August 1, 2023 are maintained and continued: 
`
`
`•
`
`Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion Refusals
`
`
`See TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(B), 715.04(a).  
`
`If applicant has already filed an appeal with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, the Board will
`be notified to resume the appeal.   See TMEP §715.04(a).  
`
`If applicant has not filed an appeal and time remains in the response period for the final Office
`action, applicant has the remainder of that time to (1) file another request for reconsideration that
`complies with and/or overcomes any outstanding final requirement(s) and/or refusal(s), and/or (2) file a
`notice of appeal to the Board.  TMEP §715.03(a)(ii)(B).
`
`Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion Refusals
`
`Registration of the applied-for mark is refused because of a likelihood of confusion with the marks in
`U.S. Registration Nos. 0854401 and 2310146 . Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see
`TMEP §§1207.01 et seq. See the previously attached registrations.
`
`Trademark Act Section 2(d) bars registration of an applied-for mark that is so similar to a registered
`mark that it is likely consumers would be confused, mistaken, or deceived as to the commercial source
`of the goods and/or services of the parties. See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). Likelihood of confusion is
`determined on a case-by-case basis by applying the factors set forth in In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours
`& Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361, 177 USPQ 563, 567 (C.C.P.A. 1973) (called the “du Pont factors”). In re
`i.am.symbolic, llc, 866 F.3d 1315, 1322, 123 USPQ2d 1744, 1747 (Fed. Cir. 2017). Any evidence of
`record related to those factors need be considered; however, “not all of the DuPont factors are relevant
`or of similar weight in every case.” In re Guild Mortg. Co., 912 F.3d 1376, 1379, 129 USPQ2d 1160,
`1162 (Fed. Cir. 2019) (quoting In re Dixie Rests., Inc., 105 F.3d 1405, 1406, 41 USPQ2d 1531, 1533
`(Fed. Cir. 1997)).
`
`Although not all du Pont factors may be relevant, there are generally two key considerations in any
`likelihood of confusion analysis: (1) the similarities between the compared marks and (2) the
`relatedness of the compared goods and/or services. See In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 866 F.3d at 1322, 123
`USPQ2d at 1747 (quoting Herbko Int’l, Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc., 308 F.3d 1156, 1164-65, 64
`
`

`

`USPQ2d 1375, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2002)); Federated Foods, Inc. v. Fort Howard Paper Co., 544 F.2d
`1098, 1103, 192 USPQ 24, 29 (C.C.P.A. 1976) (“The fundamental inquiry mandated by [Section] 2(d)
`goes to the cumulative effect of differences in the essential characteristics of the goods [or services] and
`differences in the marks.”); TMEP §1207.01.
`
`Applicant has applied to register the mark "SUR-FLEX" in standard characters for “Thermal interface
`materials, namely, seals made of silicon and foam material for use in household equipment and
`appliances, lighting products, and medical products and devices” in International Class 017.
`
`Registrant’s mark is "SUR-FLEX" (Reg. No.  0854401)  in standard characters for, in relevant part,
`“HOMOGENEOUS AND REINFORCED PLASTIC SHEETING ...” in International Class 017.
`
`Registrant’s mark is "SHURFLEX" (Reg. No.  2310146) in standard characters for, in relevant part,
`“pressure sensitive tape directed primarily for ... general industrial use ” in International Class 017.
`
`Similarity of the Marks
`
`
`"SUR-FLEX" (Reg. No.  0854401)
`
`
`Here, applicant’s mark, "SUR-FLEX", is confusingly similar to the registered mark, "SUR-FLEX".
`
`In a likelihood of confusion determination, the marks in their entireties are compared for similarities in
`appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression. In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 866 F.3d 1315,
`1323, 123 USPQ2d 1744, 1748 (Fed. Cir. 2017); Stone Lion Capital Partners, LP v. Lion Capital LLP,
`746 F.3d 1317, 1321, 110 USPQ2d 1157, 1160 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (quoting Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. Veuve
`Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee En 1772, 396 F.3d 1369, 1371, 73 USPQ2d 1689, 1691 (Fed. Cir.
`2005)); In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361, 177 USPQ 563, 567 (C.C.P.A.
`1973); TMEP §1207.01(b)-(b)(v).
`
`In the present case, applicant’s mark is "SUR-FLEX" and registrant’s mark is "SUR-FLEX" (Reg. No.
`0854401). These marks are identical in appearance, sound, and meaning, “and have the potential to be
`used . . . in exactly the same manner.” In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 116 USPQ2d 1406, 1411 (TTAB 2015),
`aff’d, 866 F.3d 1315, 123 USPQ2d 1744 (Fed. Cir. 2017). Additionally, because they are identical,
`these marks are likely to engender the same connotation and overall commercial impression when
`considered in connection with applicant’s and registrant’s respective goods and/or services. Id.
`
`Therefore, the marks are confusingly similar.
`
`
`"SHURFLEX" (Reg. No.  2310146)
`
`
`Applicant’s mark, "SUR-FLEX", is also confusingly similar to the registered mark, "SHURFLEX".
`Specifically, the marks are phonetic equivalents. 
`
`Marks are compared in their entireties for similarities in appearance, sound, connotation, and
`commercial impression. Stone Lion Capital Partners, LP v. Lion Capital LLP, 746 F.3d 1317, 1321,
`110 USPQ2d 1157, 1160 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (quoting Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin
`Maison Fondee En 1772, 396 F.3d 1369, 1371, 73 USPQ2d 1689, 1691 (Fed. Cir. 2005)); TMEP
`§1207.01(b)-(b)(v). “Similarity in any one of these elements may be sufficient to find the marks
`confusingly similar.” In re Inn at St. John’s, LLC, 126 USPQ2d 1742, 1746 (TTAB 2018) (citing In re
`
`

`

`Davia, 110 USPQ2d 1810, 1812 (TTAB 2014)), aff’d per curiam, 777 F. App’x 516, 2019 BL 343921
`(Fed. Cir. 2019); TMEP §1207.01(b).
`
`There is no correct pronunciation of a mark; thus, consumers may pronounce a mark differently than
`intended by the mark owner. See In re Viterra, Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1367, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1912
`(Fed. Cir. 2012) (citing Interlego AG v. Abrams/Gentile Entm’t, Inc., 63 USPQ2d 1862, 1863 (TTAB
`2002)); TMEP §1207.01(b)(iv). In the present case, the compared marks could clearly be pronounced
`the same. Such similarity in sound alone may be sufficient to support a finding that the compared marks
`are confusingly similar. In re 1st USA Realty Prof’ls, Inc., 84 USPQ2d 1581, 1586 (TTAB 2007)
`(citing Krim-Ko Corp. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 390 F.2d 728, 732, 156 USPQ 523, 526 (C.C.P.A.
`1968)); TMEP §1207.01(b)(iv).  Specifically, the first syllable "SUR" can be pronounced identically to
`the first syllable of the registered mark, "SHUR". Both marks' second syllable "FLEX" is identical in
`terms of sound and appearance.
`
`
`Applicant's
`
`Response
`
`The applicant did not submit arguments against the similarity of the marks in response to the Final
`Office Action. 
`
`In the February 1, 2024 request for reconsideration, the applicant argued that the cited registrations co-
`existed with the applicant's prior registered mark and that "there has been no evidence of actual
`confusion between the parties' respective marks and plastic goods. The applicant's prior owned
`registration under U.S. Reg. No. 4734105 was cancelled on April; 16, 2022 and is therefore not
`probative to the current likelihood of confusion determination. Even if the applicant's argument is
`considered,  “‘a showing of actual confusion is not necessary to establish a likelihood of confusion.’” In
`re i.am.symbolic, llc, 866 F.3d 1315, 1322, 123 USPQ2d 1744, 1747 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (quoting Herbko
`Int’l, Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc., 308 F.3d 1156, 1164-65, 64 USPQ2d 1375, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2002));
`TMEP §1207.01(d)(ii). “[T]he relevant test is likelihood of confusion, not actual confusion.” In re
`Detroit Athletic Co., 903 F.3d 1297, 1309, 128 USPQ2d 1047, 1053 (Fed. Cir. 2018) (emphasis in
`original). “Uncorroborated statements of no known instances of actual confusion . . . are of little
`evidentiary value,” especially in ex parte examination. In re Majestic Distilling Co., 315 F.3d 1311,
`1317, 65 USPQ2d 1201, 1205 (Fed. Cir. 2003).  Therefore, the applicant's claim that no prior instances
`of confusion existing between the marks is given little weight in the present likelihood of confusion
`determination.
`
`The applicant also states that the registration are only entitled to a narrow scope of protection due to the
`number of other registered marks ... using the wording "SUR" and/or "FLEX". In general,  third-party
`registrations are entitled to little weight on the issue of confusing similarity because the registrations
`are “not evidence that the registered marks are actually in use or that the public is familiar with them.”
`In re Midwest Gaming & Entm’t LLC, 106 USPQ2d 1163, 1167 n.5 (TTAB 2013) (citing In re Mighty
`Leaf Tea, 601 F.3d 1342, 1346, 94 USPQ2d 1257, 1259 (Fed. Cir. 2010)); see TMEP §1207.01(d)(iii).
`Moreover, the existence on the register of other seemingly similar marks does not provide a basis for
`registrability of the applied-for mark. See Sock It To Me, Inc. v. Aiping Fan, 2020 USPQ2d 10611, at
`*9 (TTAB 2020) (quoting AMF Inc. v. Am. Leisure Prods., Inc., 474 F.2d 1403, 1406, 177 USPQ 268,
`269 (C.C.P.A. 1973)). 
`
`Applicant submitted nine third-party registrations for marks including the component "SUR" or
`"FLEX" to show that this portion of the mark in the cited registration is inherently or conceptually
`
`                                                                                                                                           
`

`

`weak and should not be afforded a broad scope of protection.  See Jack Wolfskin Ausrustung Fur
`Draussen Gmbh v. New Millennium Sports, SLU, 797 F.3d 1363, 1374, 116 USPQ2d 1129, 1136 (Fed.
`Cir. 2015); Juice Generation, Inc. v. GS Enters. LLC, 794 F.3d 1334, 1339, 115 USPQ2d 1671, 1675
`(Fed. Cir. 2015); Sabhnani v. Mirage Brands, LLC, 2021 USPQ2d 1241, at *22 (TTAB 2021) (quoting
`Tao Licensing, LLC v. Bender Consulting Ltd., 125 USPQ2d 1043, 1057 (TTAB 2017)); TMEP
`§1207.01(d)(iii).   The applicant claims that its submitted registrations contain the components "SUR"
`and/or "FLEX". However, the submitted registrations only include the wording "SUR" or "FLEX".
`Significantly, the only marks using the related wording "SUR" or "SHUR"  and  "FLEX" in Class 017
`for related goods are the cited registrations and the applicant's mark. 
`
`Because the marks look and sound similar, the marks are considered similar for likelihood of confusion
`purposes.
`
`Relatedness of the Goods and/or Services
`
`The goods and/or services are compared to determine whether they are similar, commercially related,
`or travel in the same trade channels. See Coach Servs., Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLC, 668 F.3d 1356,
`1369-71, 101 USPQ2d 1713, 1722-23 (Fed. Cir. 2012); Herbko Int’l, Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc., 308
`F.3d 1156, 1165, 64 USPQ2d 1375, 1381 (Fed. Cir. 2002); TMEP §§1207.01, 1207.01(a)(vi).
`
`The compared goods and/or services need not be identical or even competitive to find a likelihood of
`confusion.  See On-line Careline Inc. v. Am. Online Inc., 229 F.3d 1080, 1086, 56 USPQ2d 1471, 1475
`(Fed. Cir. 2000); Recot, Inc. v. Becton, 214 F.3d 1322, 1329, 54 USPQ2d 1894, 1898 (Fed. Cir. 2000);
`TMEP §1207.01(a)(i).  They need only be “related in some manner and/or if the circumstances
`surrounding their marketing are such that they could give rise to the mistaken belief that [the goods
`and/or services] emanate from the same source.”  Coach Servs., Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLC, 668
`F.3d 1356, 1369, 101 USPQ2d 1713, 1722 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (quoting 7-Eleven Inc. v. Wechsler, 83
`USPQ2d 1715, 1724 (TTAB 2007)); TMEP §1207.01(a)(i); see Made in Nature, LLC v. Pharmavite
`LLC, 2022 USPQ2d 557, at *44 (TTAB 2022) (quoting In re Jump Designs LLC, 80 USPQ2d 1370,
`1374 (TTAB 2006)).
`
`Generally, the greater the degree of similarity between the applied-for mark and the registered mark,
`the lesser the degree of similarity between the goods and/or services of the parties is required to support
`a finding of likelihood of confusion.   Made in Nature, LLC v. Pharmavite LLC, 2022 USPQ2d 557, at
`*44 (TTAB 2022) (quoting L’Oreal S.A. v. Marcon, 102 USPQ2d 1434, 1440 (TTAB 2012)); In re
`C.H. Hanson Co., 116 USPQ2d 1351, 1353 (TTAB 2015) (citing In re Opus One Inc., 60 USPQ2d
`1812, 1815 (TTAB 2001)); In re House Beer, LLC, 114 USPQ2d 1073, 1077 (TTAB 2015); TMEP
`§1207.01(a).  As stated above, the compared marks are identical or nearly identical in terms of sound
`and appearance. Therefore, the degree of similarity between the the goods in the compared mark to
`support a likelihood of confusion is lessened. 
`
`In response, the applicant argues that the goods are distinct, specific goods in separate fields.  However,
`the fact that purchasers are sophisticated or knowledgeable in a particular field does not necessarily
`mean that they are sophisticated or knowledgeable in the field of trademarks or immune from source
`confusion. TMEP §1207.01(d)(vii); see, e.g., Stone Lion Capital Partners, LP v. Lion Capital LLP, 746
`F.3d. 1317, 1325, 110 USPQ2d 1157, 1163-64 (Fed. Cir. 2014); Top Tobacco LP v. N. Atl. Operating
`Co., 101 USPQ2d 1163, 1170 (TTAB 2011). Further, where the purchasers consist of both
`professionals and the public, the standard of care for purchasing the goods is that of the least
`sophisticated potential purchaser. In re FCA US LLC, 126 USPQ2d 1214, 1222 (TTAB 2018) (citing
`
`

`

`Stone Lion Capital Partners, LP v. Lion Capital LLP, 746 F.3d. at 1325, 110 USPQ2d at 1163), aff’d
`per curiam, 777 F. App’x 516, 2019 BL 375518 (Fed. Cir. 2019).  Moreover, the previously attached
`and attached evidence cited below shows various examples of companies that market goods similar to
`the those of the applicant's, as well as, both registrants. 
`
`
`
`"SUR-FLEX" (Reg. No.  0854401)
`
`
`Here, applicant’s goods and/or services, “ Thermal interface materials, namely, seals made of silicon
`and foam material for use in household equipment and appliances, lighting products, and medical
`products and devices” are closely related to registrant’s goods and/or services, “HOMOGENEOUS
`AND REINFORCED PLASTIC SHEETING ...”.
`
`The previously attached Internet evidence, consisting of screenshots of goods marketed by McMaster-
`Carr, Silicone Technologies, Stockwell Elastomerics Industrial Spec, Monmouth Rubber & Plastics,
`Parafix, Scapa, and Pres-On, as well as the additional third-party evidence from    EMCO Industrial
`Plastics, Rogers Corp, ANROB, 3M,  and Saint-Gobain,  establishes that the same entity commonly
`manufactures, produces, or provides the relevant goods and/or services and markets the goods and/or
`services under the same mark.  Thus, applicant’s and registrant’s goods and/or services are considered
`related for likelihood of confusion purposes.  See, e.g., In re Davey Prods. Pty Ltd., 92 USPQ2d 1198,
`1202-04 (TTAB 2009); In re Toshiba Med. Sys. Corp., 91 USPQ2d 1266, 1268-69, 1271-72 (TTAB
`2009).
`
`Accordingly, the goods and/or services are considered related for purposes of the likelihood of
`confusion analysis.
`
`
`"SHURFLEX" (Reg. No. 2310146)
`
`
`Here, applicant’s goods and/or services, “ Thermal interface materials, namely, seals made of silicon
`and foam material for use in household equipment and appliances, lighting products, and medical
`products and devices” are closely related to registrant’s goods and/or services, “pressure sensitive tape
`directed primarily for ... general industrial use.”
`
`The previously attached Internet evidence, consisting of goods marketed by McMaster-Carr, Silicone
`Technologies, and Stockwell Elastomerics,  Monmouth Rubber & Plastics, Scapa, Rubber Sheet
`Warehouse, Pres-On, and Electro Tape Specialties,  as well as the additional third-party evidence
`from    EMCO Industrial Plastics, Rogers Corp, ANROB, 3M,  and Saint-Gobain,establishes that the
`same entity commonly manufactures, produces, or provides the relevant goods and/or services and
`markets the goods and/or services under the same mark.  Specifically, this evidence shows examples of
`business that market silicon and foam insulating materials, as well as, industrial tapes.  Thus, applicant’s
`and registrant’s goods and/or services are considered related for likelihood of confusion purposes.  See,
`e.g., In re Davey Prods. Pty Ltd., 92 USPQ2d 1198, 1202-04 (TTAB 2009); In re Toshiba Med. Sys.
`Corp., 91 USPQ2d 1266, 1268-69, 1271-72 (TTAB 2009).
`
`Accordingly, the goods and/or services are considered related for purposes of the likelihood of
`confusion analysis.
`
`Conclusion
`
`
`                                                                                
`                                                                            
`

`

`Because the marks are identical and otherwise identical and the goods are related, there is a likelihood
`of confusion as to the source of applicant's goods, and registration is refused pursuant to Section 2(d) of
`the Trademark Act.  
`
`
`
`
`/Brian J. Collis/
`Examining Attorney
`LO129--LAW OFFICE 129
`(571) 270-1232
`Brian.Collis@uspto.gov
`
`
`
` 
`

`

`Displays
`
`Resources
`
`‘COVID-19 SUPPLIES
`
`Gallery
`
`Get a Qi
`
`
`ZeBZ=
`
`
`EMCO INDUSTRIALPLASTICS,LLC.
`
`/OTs")SSS OWE saine) [cisi
`
`aU
`
`ble)
`
`FOAM
`
`EMCOIndustrial carries both foam and sponge rubber materials used in endless appplications suck as shock absoprtion, cushioning, and sealing & gasketing. With over 20
`different materials and grades available, end products can be custom tailored to the mostcritical specifications. Our foam sheetsare available in lenghts of up to 225 feet, with
`sheet thicknessfrom 1/32"to 4". All materials are offered with pre-applied adhesive, and can be cut to any custom size or shape with superb accuracy andtight tolerances.
`Belowis a fulllisting of our foam material offering, as well as all specialty grades, sizes, and commonapplicationsfor each of the respective materials.
`
`MATERIALS
`—
`eons
`
`Fluorosilicone
`
`
`REDEEERE FOAM MATERIAL GRADES
`rine ee Sed ae ae due : ‘ good — of
`strength, oil, water, and weather resistance. Commonapplications include
`industrial gaskets to seal water, air, dust, and other environmentalitems,
`automotive gaskets, and athletic equipment. Available in open and closed cell
`styles, with pre-applied single or doulbe sided Acrylic Adhesive backing options,
`
`Fabric
`Reinforced
`
`Nylon and Polyester inserts help
`withstandhigh stress and
`frequentflexing. Commonly used
`for flange gaskets, diaphragm
`packing,or in heavy-compression
`
`

`

`Silicone
`
`Buna-N
`
`Buna-N/PVC
`
`EPDM
`
`Viton
`
`Polyurethane
`
`Polyethylene
`EVA
`
`Epichlorohydrin
`
`Natural Sponge
`
`and smooth ortextured finishes. Neoprene's operating temperature range is
`-70°F to 200°F. For detailed material specifications and details on Neoprene,
`click here.
`
`Thickness
`Color
`Grades
`Available
`
`.
`Firmness
`
`| 1/32" to 2"
`| Black
`
`| Standard, Flame Retardant
`
`| Extra Soft, Soft, Medium,
`Firm
`
`FLUOROSILICONE FOAM
`Flurosilicone is a combination of fluoroelastomerand silicone which results in
`an excellent materialfor fuels, chemicals, and oils with a broad temperature
`range. Fluorosilicone foamis often used in applications containing oil andfluids
`that would normally degrade standard elastomers. Available in open and closed
`cell styles, with pre-applied High Temperature Adhesive backing options, and a
`texturedfinish. Its operating temperature range is -80°F to 400°F. Fordetailed
`material specifications and details on Fluorosilicone,click here.
`
`Thickness
`Color
`Grades Available
`Firmness
`
`| 1/32"to 1/8"
`| Blue
`| Standard
`| Firm
`
`Flame
`Retardant
`
`Food
`
`applications.
`Meets UL94 VO standard for
`flammability, smoke, and toxicity.
`Meets FDA CFR 117.2600 food
`grade standard. Commonly used
`in food, beverage, and
`pharmaceutical processing
`applications.
`Withstands repetitive and
`extended periods of compression
`longer than standard foam
`materials.
`
`
`Low
`Compression
`Set
`
`CELL TYPES
`
`Closed Cell
`
`mi-
`on
`:
`Closed Cell
`
`Preventsliquids and gasses from
`passing through.
`Highly conformable like an open-
`cell foam, but formsa tight seal
`and prevents air, water, & fluids
`.
`co
`from passingthroughitlike a
`closed-cell foam.
`
`Allowsliquids and gassesto pass
`OpenCelL
`through.
`
`
`SILICONE FOAM
`Siliconedisplays excellent resistance to high and low temperatures,
`compression set, chemicals and weather. Applications include gaskets, heat
`shields,fire stops, cushions, andinsulation for a wide variety of applications.
`Available in closed cell, with pre-applied singe or double sided High
`Temperature Adhesive backing options, and ultra-smooth, smooth,or textured
`finishes.Silicion’es operating temperature range is -100°F to 500°F. For detailed
`material specifications and details on Silicone,click here.
`
`Thickness
`
`| 1/32" to 1"
`
`FIRMNESS
`
`Extra Soft
`Soft
`Medium
`Firm
`
`Oto 4 psi
`5 to 8 psi
`9 to 13 psi
`14+ psi
`
`

`

`Color
`Grades
`.
`Available
`
`Firmness
`
`| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Red
`| Standard, Fabric Reinforced,
`Flame Retardant, Food, Low
`“
`Compression Set
`| Medium,Firm
`
`BUNA-N FOAM
`
`Buna-N displays excellent strength andis the standard choice when oil
`resistance is required. This material also resists water and mild chemicals.
`Commonly foundin applications related to automotive, engines, fuel systems,
`marine, and oil and gas. Available in closed cell, with pre-applied singe or
`doublesided Acrylic Adhesive backing options, and a smoothfinish. Buna-N's
`operating temperature rangeis -40°F to 200°F. For detailed material
`specifications and details on Buna-N,click here.
`
`Thickness
`Color
`Grades Available
`Firmness
`
`| 1/16" to 1"
`| Black
`| Standard
`| Smooth
`
`BUNA-N/PVC FOAM
`
`Buna-N/PVC foam exhibits excellent impact absorption and good chemical
`resistance properties. Available in a semi-closed cell tyle, also known as
`crushed-cell foam, with pre-applied Acrylic Adhesive backing options, and a
`texturedfinish. The operating temperature rangeis -40°F to 200°F. For detailed
`material specifications and details on Buna-N/PVC,click here.
`
`Thickness
`Color
`Grades Available
`Firmness
`
`| 116"to 1"
`| Black
`| Standard
`| Extra Soft
`
`EPDM FOAM
`
`

`

`EPDMis the most weatherresistant foam, with a wide range of chemical
`compatibility, steam resistance, and good temperature range. Applications
`include anti-rattle and anti-skid applications, seals, flotation devices, and
`insulation. Available in semi-closed and closedcell types, with pre-applied
`single or double sided Acrylic Adhesive backing options, and smooth ortextured
`finishes. EPDM's operating temperature rangeis -90°F to 275°F. For detailed
`material specifications and details on EPDM, click here.
`
`Thickness
`Color
`Grades Available
`Firmness
`
`| 1/16" to 1"
`| Black
`| Standard
`| Extra Soft, Medium
`
`VITON FOAM
`Viton is the most chemicalresistant foam and can withstand extreme
`temperatures.It is the go to choice for the most extremeof applications.
`Available in closed cell type, with pre-applied High Temperature Adhesive
`backing options, and a smooth finish. The operating temperature rangeis -15°F
`to 400°F. For detailed material specifications and details on Viton,click here.
`
`Thickness
`Color
`Grades Available
`Firmness
`
`| 1/8" to 1/2"
`| Black
`| Standard
`| Soft
`
`POLYURETHANE FOAM
`
`Polyurethane foam is a versatile material used for shock absorption and
`cushioning.It is a common choice for packaging and insulation applications.
`Available in opencell type, with pre-applied single or double sided Acrylic
`Adhesive backing options, and a smoothfinish. The operating temperature
`range is -5°F to 180°F. For detailed material specifications and details on
`Polyurethane,click here.
`
`Thickness
`Pala
`
`| 1/8" to 4"
`PDIS-L VAs
`
`

`

`uw
`Grades
`Available
`
`Firmness
`
`Petar; vere
`| Standard, Low Compression
`Set
`
`| Extra Soft, Soft
`
`POLYETHYLENE FOAM
`Polyethylene foam is a versatile material with good chemical resistance that is
`used for shock absorption and cushioning. These sheets are madeof cross-
`linked polyethylene which enhancesstrength and chemical resistance. Available
`in closed cell type, with Acrylic Adhesive backing options, and a smoothfinish.
`The operating temperature rangeis -20°F to 160°F. For detailed material
`specifications and details on Polyethylene,click here.
`
`Thickness
`Color
`
`Grades
`.
`Available
`
`Firmness
`
`| 1/8" to 2"
`| Black, Blue, Gray, Red, White,
`Yellow
`
`| Standard
`
`| Soft, Medium, Firm
`
`EVA FOAM
`
`EVA foam resists tearing better than other types of foam and is used for shock
`absorption and cushioning. EVAis often fabricated into straps and padding.
`Available in closed cell type, with pre-applied Acrylic Adhesive backing options,
`and a smoothfinish. The operating temperature range is -70°F to 160°F. For
`detailed material specifications and details on EVA, click here.
`
`Thickness
`Color
`Grades
`Available
`
`.
`Firmness
`
`| 1/32" to 2"
`| Black
`
`| Standard, Flame Retardant
`
`| Extra Soft, Soft, Medium,
`Firm
`
`cnirulannuvnnin CcoAM
`
`

`

`CriuNMLUAUNTIUNIN TUAM
`
`
`Epichlorohydrin exhibits excellent chemical andoil resistance, making it an ideal
`choice for gasketing material. Available in closed cell type, with pre-applied
`Acrylic Adhesive backing options, and a smoothfinish. The operating
`temperature rangeis -40°F to 300°F. For detailed material specifications and
`details on Epichlorohydrin, click here.
`
`
`| 116" to 1/2"
`| Black
`
`| Standard | Extra Soft
`
`NATURAL SPONGE FOAM
`
`
`Natural sponge exhibits excellent abrasion resistance andis often used in
`applications with repetitive sealing. Available in an opencell type, with pre-
`applied Acrylic Adhesive backing options, and a texturedfinish. The operating
`temperature rangeis -40°F to 300°F. For detailed material specifications and
`details on Natural Sponge,click here.
`
`| 1/16"to"
`| Black
`
`| Standard, Flame Retardant | Extra Soft, Soft, Medium
`
`Resources
`
`Blog
`Gallery
`aNraeleleaale
`
`Eh)
`Etat
`Etethdce) a)
`Acton
`
`Frequently Asked Questions
`Custom Plastic Fabrication + CNC
`Machining & Cutting Services at
`EmcoPlastics!
`
`Plastic Cut to Size
`DYETENE
`Machine Guard Covers
`Laser Cutting
`
`

`

`ENaaOc
`emia}
`Pave latch)
`Ardel Polyarylate
`Aaa ey
`
`INFOGRAPHIC:The Benefits of
`
`ONmale]pmialtomaay
`WUELa ealem PLACclaKet scha(1210)
`Acetal Plastic and Delrin?
`Line Card
`
`Military Specifications
`LEEdakem Ue)seaE-1a(elity
`Plastic Definitions
`VIEW ALL »
`
`Terms and Conditions
`VIEW ALL »
`
`|C Machining
`Custom Fabrication
`LS adetelm Ucece lire)
`Edge Finishing, Forming &
`Polishing
`iia eee)
`
`Contact Us
`
`ntact Us Tod
`
`Fax: (973) 239-1595
`
`feela OP. ePUPL ered eaeeens
`
`LsColaat
`
`

`

`
`
` =
`ero]cae)
`COVID-19 SUPPLIES
`Gallery
`Le
`
`
`
`EMCO INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS, LLC.
`
`rar
`
`hEFai
`// MATERIALS
`e«//
`.PUASTICS
`
`HOME
`
`//
`
`AB
`
`Back to Materials
`ABS
`
`>
`
`LENGTH
`
`GENERIC NAME
`
`STOCK SHEET OPTIONS
`
`
`
`If you require a customsize thatis notlisted above, please Call or Request a Quote
`
`Asashapeless, impact-resistant, and opaque thermoplastic,
`manufacturingsectorforavarietyofpurposes.ABSplasticoffers w Sendusamessage:
`acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)is regularly used across the
`START YOU R q UOTE
`a4
`.
`5
`excellent dimensional stability, making it easy to machine,
`fabricate, paint, and glue. Used to manufacture some of the most
`RequiredFields
`durable and widely used plastic products on the market today,
`
`Machine Grade ABS 1/32"-1/4" THFabrication & Machining Standard 48" x 96"; CTS. White, Black AVAILABLE IN
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ABSFlame Retardant
`Sheet, Rod, Tube, Film
`Static Control ABS
`
`€
`

`

`AbD IS 2a premier CNOICE TOF PLASTIC PrOQUCTS and palTs across
`myriad applications and industries.
`
`EmcoPlastics provides ABSplastic sheets in a variety of sizes and thicknessesfor use as a
`base material in numerous types of fabrication projects.
`
`WHATIS ABS PLASTIC?
`
`ABS thermoplastic is created from a mixture of three monomerunits:
`
`* Acrylonitrile imparts high thermal and chemicalresistances
`« Butadiene adds durability and strength
`¢ Styreneprovides an aesthetically pleasing lusterto finished goods
`
`As a thermoplastic, ABS may be melted to makeit more pliable and easier to mold. Once
`cooled, it becomes solid and keeps the molded shape. ABS won't degrade when re-melted
`andre-used, which means that processes involving this material generate almost no
`waste. As such, ABSis a preferred materialfor injection molding.
`
`Email*
`
`Phone*
`
`Company*
`
`Question / Comment*
`
`Other properties of ABS include:
`
`¢ Hardness andrigidity
`Highresistances to abrasion, impacts, chemicals, and heat
`Very durable with good compressive andtensile strengths
`¢ High dimensionalstability
`Electrically insulating
`« High machinability
`Excellent aesthetics
`Compatible with most paints and adhesives
`Lightweight
`
`There are several advantages of using ABSplastic, including:
`
`¢ Morecost-effective than many comparable materials
`+ Low waste dueto easy reuse or recycling
`« Color and surface texture versatility provides a very high-quality finish
`¢ Low heat andelectricity conductivity
`*
`Impactresistance to help effectively absorb shock
`
`

`

`APPLIUAIIUNS
`
`The ease of machinability, a longlist of beneficial properties and advantages, and inherent
`cost-efficiency make ABSplastic ideal for numerous applications. Commonapplications
`include:
`
`« Automotive. ABS thermoplastic is often used in place of metal to makevehicleslighter.
`Common ABSvehicle components may include dashboards, wheel covers, body parts,
`instrument panels, and trimmings.
`¢ Aerospace andaircraft. Parts manufactured with ABS can befoundin various aircraft
`as overhead luggage storagebins,internal and external signage, seat parts, cargo
`containers, and more.
`¢ Food and beverage. FDA-compliant for applications requiring contact with food, ABS
`plastic is frequently selected for use in kitchen appliances and food packaging.
`¢ Homeappliances.In addition to kitchen appliances, other consumer goods make use
`of ABS,including control panels and housings for vacuum cleaners.
`* Electronics. ABS plastic is used in various electronic components, including computer
`keyboards, electronic enclosures, and more.
`* Construction. Since ABS offers high impact strength and resistance to rust and
`corrosion,it is frequently selected for pipes andfittings. ABS componentsare also
`commonly found in powertools.
`* Medical and pharmaceutical. The biocompatibility of ABS plastic