`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`General Contact Number: 571-272-8500
`General Email: TTABInfo@uspto.gov
`
`June 1, 2023
`
`In re Panasonic i-PRO Sensing Solutions
`Corporation of America
`
`Ex Parte Appeal No. 97038982
`
`Appeal received: 06/01/2023
`
`Brief due: N/A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ESTTA1288769
`
`Appellant filed a notice of appeal, with the required fee, on the date indicated
`
`above. The appeal was filed under the provisions of Trademark Rule 2.141(a) from a
`
`final refusal in above-identified application and is hereby instituted.
`
`Appellant checked the box on the ESTTA form indicating that it has filed a
`
`request for reconsideration which is still pending before the Trademark Examining
`
`Attorney, or it is filing a request for reconsideration today. Appellant should notify
`
`the Board immediately if it has not filed a timely request for reconsideration and
`
`does not intend to do so.
`
`In view of the filing of the request for reconsideration, the appeal is suspended
`
`and the application is remanded to the Examining Attorney to consider the request
`
`for reconsideration.
`
`
`
`If registrability is found on the basis of the request for reconsideration, the
`
`appeal will be moot. In the event the refusal of registration is maintained, and
`
`assuming that the request for reconsideration does not raise a new issue, the
`
`application will be returned to the Board, proceedings in the appeal will be
`
`resumed, and Appellant will be allowed time in which to file an appeal brief. If the
`
`request for reconsideration raises a new issue, the Examining Attorney may not
`
`issue a final refusal until the Appellant has been given an opportunity to respond.
`
`Upon issuance of a final refusal, proceedings in the appeal will be resumed, and
`
`Appellant will be allowed time in which to file an appeal brief.
`
`Request to Divide
`
`If, in addition to filing a notice of appeal and request for reconsideration,
`
`Appellant has also filed a request to divide the application, then the Examining
`
`Attorney should forward the application to the ITU/Divisional Unit of the Office to
`
`act on the request to divide. After the request to divide is processed, the Examining
`
`Attorney should consider the request for reconsideration. If registrability is found
`
`on the basis of the request for reconsideration, the appeal will be moot. If the
`
`refusal of registration is maintained, the divided file containing classes for which an
`
`appeal has been filed should be returned to the Board, and the Board will then
`
`resume proceedings in the appeal and allow Appellant time to file an appeal brief.
`
`The file for which no appeal has been taken should be treated by the Examining
`
`Attorney in the same manner as any request for reconsideration where there has
`
`been no appeal.
`
`
`
`Appeal Briefs
`
`Upon resumption of the appeal, Appellant will be allowed time to file an appeal
`
`brief, with the required fee. Failure to file the brief may result in dismissal of the
`
`appeal. Trademark Rules 2.142(b)(1) and 2.6(a)(18).
`
`The Trademark Rules of Practice provide that the Examining Attorney shall file
`
`a written brief answering Appellant’s brief and shall send a copy of the brief to
`
`Appellant within sixty days after Appellant’s brief is sent to the Examining
`
`Attorney. Appellant may file a reply brief within twenty days from the mailing date
`
`of the Examining Attorney’s brief. If an oral hearing is desired, Appellant must file
`
`a separate request accompanied by the required fee not later than ten days after the
`
`due date for Appellant’s reply brief. Trademark Rules 2.142, 2.6(a)(18) and
`
`2.6(a)(24).
`
`Briefs must meet each of the requirements prescribed in Trademark Rule 2.126,
`
`which states that submissions must be made to the Board via ESTTA. See
`
`Trademark Rule 2.142(b)(2). ESTTA forms for electronic filings are available at
`
`https://estta.uspto.gov. Board proceeding files can be viewed using TTABVUE at
`
`https://ttabvue.uspto.gov.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
