`
`
`
`Ca/CH
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
`P.O. Box 1451
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
`General Contact Number: 571-272-8500
`General Email: TTABInfo@uspto.gov
`
`November 1, 2024
`
`Cancellation No. 92085222
`
`Digilock Asia Ltd.
`
`v.
`
`Roser Co., Ltd.
`
`
`
`Charles H. Hiser IV, Interlocutory Attorney:
`
`On October 15, 2024, Respondent filed a proposed amendment to its Registration
`
`No. 3524558, with Petitioner’s written consent, and Petitioner’s withdrawal of the
`
`petition to cancel without prejudice, contingent upon entry of the amendment.
`
`By the proposed amendment, Respondent seeks to amend the goods in
`
`International Class 6 (strike-through wording is deleted) as follows:
`
`From:
`
`Metal building materials, namely, metal building panels, metal roofing
`panels, metal roofing flashing, metal building flashing boards; metal
`building fittings, namely, metal locks; metal chimney pots; metal
`hardware, namely, metal tension links; metal stoppers for industrial
`packaging containers; metal window frames; and steel sheets for
`building construction
`
`Metal building materials, namely, metal building panels, metal roofing
`panels, metal roofing flashing, metal building flashing boards; metal
`chimney pots; metal hardware, namely, metal tension links; metal
`stoppers for industrial packaging containers; metal window frames; and
`steel sheets for building construction
`
`
`To:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cancellation No. 92085222
`
`
`Although the amendment is otherwise acceptable, it was not accompanied by the
`
`proper fee under Trademark Rule 2.6. See Trademark Rules 2.6(a)(11), 2.133(a) and
`
`2.173(b). Petitioner states that pursuant to Trademark Rule 2.6(a)(11)(iii) that no fee
`
`is due because the amendment solely deletes goods from the registration, this is
`
`incorrect. The rule states that no fee is required when an amendment is filed
`
`consisting only of deletions “prior to submission of an affidavit under section 8 or
`
`section 71 of the Act.” Id. Registrant has filed two affidavits under Section 8, the first
`
`on August 20, 2014 and the second on July 29, 2018. As such Petitioner does not meet
`
`the requirements of Rule 2.6(a)(11)(iii) and must pay the fee as required in Rule
`
`2.6(a)(11)(ii).
`
`Accordingly, Respondent is allowed thirty (30) days from the date of this
`
`order to submit the required fee in support of the amendment, failing which said
`
`amendment will be given no further consideration.
`
`The parties’ consented motion, filed October 23, 2024, to extend time is granted;
`
`however, proceedings are otherwise suspended and dates will be reset if necessary.
`
`
`
`2
`
`