`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA1274555
`
`Filing date:
`
`03/27/2023
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding no.
`
`92081622
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`address
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Defendant
`SM Beauty, LLC
`
`SM BEAUTY, LLC
`505 E GOLF ROAD SUITE H
`ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, IL 60005
`UNITED STATES
`Primary email: slee000@aol.com
`847-208-8617
`
`Answer
`
`Sang Lee
`
`slee000@aol.com, softbeeus@gmail.com
`
`/Sang Lee/
`
`03/27/2023
`
`Attachments
`
`ttabvue-92081622-CAN-Answser03282023Sixth.pdf(44623 bytes )
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE
`TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`YG ENTERTAINMENT INC,
`
`:
`
`Petitioner,
`
`:
`:
`:
`v. : Mark: BLACKPINK
`:
`
`Cancellation No. 92081622
`
`SM BEAUTY, LLC
`
`:
`:
`
`:
`:
`
`Respondent
`
`Registration No.: 5376449
`
`ANSWER TO PETITION FOR CANCELLATION
`
`
`
`COMES NOW Respondent and Registrant, SM BEAUTY, LLC
`
`(“Registrant”) in the above-captioned matter and submits this Answer to the Petition, through its
`
`attorneys, for Cancellation filed by YG Entertainment INC (“Petitioner”) with respect to the
`
`mark at Registration No.: 5376449 (the “Registrant’s Mark”) by generally denying all of the
`
`allegations in the Petition for Cancellation, except as may be specifically admitted or denied as
`
`follows, and denying that Petitioner is presently or will in the future be damaged by the
`
`continued registration of the Registrant’s Mark.
`
`1. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph No. 1 of the Petition for Cancellation, and on that basis denies
`
`the same.
`
`
`
`2. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph No. 2 of the Petition for Cancellation, and on that
`
`basis denies the same.
`
`
`
`3. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph No. 3 of the Petition for Cancellation, and on that
`
`basis denies the same.
`
`4. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph No. 4 of the Petition for Cancellation, and on that
`
`basis denies the same.
`
`5. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph No. 5 of the Petition for Cancellation, and on that
`
`basis denies the same.
`
`6. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph No. 6 of the Petition for Cancellation, and on that
`
`basis denies the same.
`
`7. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph No. 7 of the Petition for Cancellation, and on that
`
`basis denies the same.
`
`8. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph No. 8 of the Petition for Cancellation, and on that basis denies
`
`the same.
`
`2
`
`
`
`9. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph No. 9 of the Petition for Cancellation, and on that
`
`basis denies the same.
`
`10. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to
`
`the allegations contained in Paragraph No. 10 of the Petition for Cancellation, and on that
`
`basis denies the same.
`
`11. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the authenticity regarding the allegations contained in Paragraph No. 11 of
`
`the Petition for Cancellation, and on that basis denies the same.
`
`12. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the allegations contained in Paragraph No. 12 of the Petition for
`
`Cancellation, and on that basis denies the same.
`
`13. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the allegations contained in Paragraph No. 13 of the Petition for
`
`Cancellation, and on that basis denies the same.
`
`14. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
`
`to the allegations contained in Paragraph No. 14 of the Petition for Cancellation,
`
`and on that basis denies the same.
`
`15. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`allegations contained in Paragraph No. 15 of the Petition for Cancellation, and on that
`
`basis denies the same.
`
`3
`
`
`
`16. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
`
`to the allegations contained in Paragraph No. 16 of the Petition for Cancellation,
`
`and on that basis denies the same.
`
`17. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
`
`to the allegations contained in Paragraph No. 17 of the Petition for Cancellation,
`
`and on that basis denies the same.
`
`18. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
`
`to the allegations contained in Paragraph No. 18 of the Petition for Cancellation,
`
`and on that basis denies the same.
`
`19. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to
`
`the allegations contained in Paragraph No. 19 of the Petition for Cancellation, and on
`
`that basis denies the same.
`
`20. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to
`
`the allegations contained in Paragraph No. 20 of the Petition for Cancellation, and on
`
`that basis denies the same.
`
`21. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to
`
`the allegations contained in Paragraph No. 21 of the Petition for Cancellation, and on
`
`that basis denies the same.
`
`22. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to
`
`the allegations contained in Paragraph No. 22 of the Petition for Cancellation, and on
`
`that basis denies the same.
`
`4
`
`
`
`23. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to
`
`the allegations contained in Paragraph No. 23 of the Petition for Cancellation, and on
`
`that basis denies the same.
`
`24. Paragraph 24 contains no allegations but factual representations that
`
`require no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 24 contains any
`
`allegations, Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`25. Paragraph 25 contains no allegations but factual representations that require
`
`no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 25 contains any allegations,
`
`Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`26. Paragraph 26 contains no allegations but factual representations that require
`
`no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 26 contains any allegations,
`
`Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`27. Paragraph 27 contains no allegations but factual representations that require
`
`no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 27 contains any allegations,
`
`Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`28. Paragraph 28 contains no allegations but factual representations that require
`
`no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 28 contains any allegations,
`
`Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`29. Paragraph 29 contains no allegations but factual representations that require
`
`no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 29 contains any allegations,
`
`Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`30. Denied.
`
`31. Denied.
`
`5
`
`
`
`32. Denied.
`
`33. Denied.
`
`34. Denied.
`
`35. Denied.
`
`36. Denied.
`
`37. Paragraph 37 contains no allegations but factual representations that
`
`require no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 37 contains any
`
`allegations, Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`38. Denied.
`
`39. Paragraph 39 contains no allegations but factual representations that
`
`require no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 39 contains any
`
`allegations, Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`40. Paragraph 40 contains no allegations but factual representations that
`
`require no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 40 contains any
`
`allegations, Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`41. Denied.
`
`42. Denied.
`
`43. Denied.
`
`6
`
`
`
`44. Paragraph 44 contains no allegations but incorrect factual
`
`representations that require no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 44
`
`contains any allegations, Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`45. Denied.
`
`46. Paragraph 46 contains no allegations but factual representations that
`
`require no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 46 contains any
`
`allegations, Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`47. Denied.
`
`48. Paragraph 48 contains no allegations but factual representations that
`
`require no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 48 contains any
`
`allegations, Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`49. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
`
`to the allegations contained in Paragraph No. 49 of the Petition for Cancellation,
`
`and on that basis denies the same.
`
`50. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
`
`to the allegations contained in Paragraph No. 50 of the Petition for Cancellation,
`
`and on that basis denies the same.
`
`51. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
`
`to the allegations contained in Paragraph No. 51 of the Petition for Cancellation,
`
`and on that basis denies the same.
`
`7
`
`
`
`52. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
`
`to the allegations contained in Paragraph No. 52 of the Petition for Cancellation,
`
`and on that basis denies the same.
`
`53. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
`
`to the allegations contained in Paragraph No. 53 of the Petition for Cancellation,
`
`and on that basis denies the same.
`
`54. Registrant lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as
`
`to the allegations contained in Paragraph No. 54 of the Petition for Cancellation,
`
`and on that basis denies the same.
`
`55. Denied.
`
`56. Denied.
`
`57. Denied.
`
`58. Denied.
`
`59. Denied.
`
`60. Denied.
`
`61. Denied.
`
`62. Denied.
`
`63. Denied.
`
`64. Denied.
`
`65. Denied.
`
`8
`
`
`
`66. Denied.
`
`67. Denied.
`
`68. Denied.
`
`69. Admitted.
`
`70. Denied.
`
`71. Denied.
`
`72. Denied.
`
`73. Denied.
`
`74. Paragraph 74 contains no allegations but factual representations that
`
`require no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 74 contains any
`
`allegations, Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`75. Paragraph 75 contains no allegations but factual representations that
`
`require no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 75 contains any
`
`allegations, Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`76. Paragraph 76 contains no allegations but factual representations that
`
`require no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 76 contains any
`
`allegations, Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`77. Paragraph 77 contains no allegations but factual representations that
`
`require no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 77 contains any
`
`allegations, Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`GROUNDS FOR OPPOSITION
`
`COUNT I - MISREPRESENTATION OF SOURCE
`
`78. Registrant hereby incorporates and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 77
`
`above into this answer by reference.
`
`79. Denied.
`
`80. Denied.
`
`81. Denied.
`
`82. Denied.
`
`83. Denied.
`
`84. Denied.
`
`COUNT II - ABNDONEMENT
`
`
`
`85. Registrant hereby incorporates and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 84
`
`above into this answer by reference.
`
`86. Paragraph 86 contains no allegations but factual representations that
`
`require no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 86 contains any
`
`allegations, Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`87. Denied.
`
`88. Denied.
`
`89. Denied.
`90. Denied.
`
`91. Denied.
`
`10
`
`
`
`92. Denied.
`93. Denied.
`
`94. Denied.
`
`95. Denied.
`96. Denied.
`
`97. Denied.
`
`98. Denied.
`
`
`COUNT III - FRAUD
`
`
`99. Registrant hereby incorporates and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 98
`
`above into this answer by reference.
`
`100. Paragraph 100 contains no allegations but factual representations that
`
`require no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 100 contains any
`
`allegations, Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`101. Denied.
`
`102. Denied.
`
`103. Denied.
`
`104. Denied.
`
`105. Denied.
`
`106. Denied.
`
`107. Paragraph 107 contains no allegations but factual representations that
`
`require no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 107 contains any
`
`allegations, Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`11
`
`
`
`108. Paragraph 108 contains no allegations but factual representations that
`
`require no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 108 contains any
`
`allegations, Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`109. Paragraph 109 contains no allegations but factual representations that
`
`require no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 109 contains any
`
`allegations, Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`110. Paragraph 110 contains no allegations but factual representations that
`
`require no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 110 contains any
`
`allegations, Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`111. Paragraph 111 contains no allegations but factual representations that
`
`require no response. To the extent, however, that paragraph 111 contains any
`
`allegations, Registrant Denies all allegations.
`
`112. Denied.
`
`113. Denied.
`
`114. Denied.
`
`115. Denied.
`
`116. Denied.
`
`117. Denied.
`
`118. Denied.
`
`119. Denied.
`
`120. Denied.
`
`12
`
`
`
`121. Denied.
`
`122. Denied.
`
`123. Denied.
`
`124. Denied.
`
`125. Denied.
`
`
`
`
`
`AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
`
`126. As the First Affirmative Defense to the Petitioner for Cancellation,
`
`typically, a cancellation can be filed within five years of the mark’s registration date
`
`(i.e., the date the registration issued). 15 U.S.C. § 1064. The mark “BLACKPINK”
`
`was registered on January 9, 2018 and the Petitioner filed this petition on February 14,
`
`2023 after five years of abandonment. As time goes on, important evidence may be
`
`lost, and the memories of witnesses can grow foggy. Thus, Petition for Cancellation
`
`proceedings brought under these circumstances after five years may not be fair to all
`
`parties.
`
`127. As the Second Affirmative Defense to the Petitioner for Cancellation,
`
`Registrant alleges that Petition is neither the first nor exclusive user of the term
`
`“BLACKPINK” in connection with goods/services in class 03 as listed in Registrant’s
`
`Registration at issue.
`
`128. As the Third Affirmative Defense to the Petition for Cancellation, Registrant is
`
`informed and believes, and thereon alleges that Petitioner’s claims are barred, in whole or in part,
`
`by the doctrine of unclean hands. Petitioner’s filing of its’ Petition for Cancellation is merely an
`
`13
`
`
`
`attempt to threaten, harass and pressure Registrant into giving up its’ mark and/or to force
`
`Registrant into an unfavorable settlement. Petitioner’s conduct is wrongful, immoral, and illegal
`
`predatory conduct in attempting to prevent Registrant from continued use of Registrant’s Mark.
`
`WHEREFORE, Registrant prays that this Petition for Cancellation be denied and
`
`that the Registrant’s Mark be allowed to continue to be registered and maintained
`
`on the Principal Register.
`
`Date: March 28, 2023
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sang Lee
`USPTO Reg. No. 67,541
`Attorney for Registrant
`slee000@aol.com
`
`
`
`Law Offices of Sang Lee
`505 E Golf Road, Suite H
`Arlington Heights, IL 60005
`
`
`
`Tel: 1-847-208-8617
`Email: slee000@aol.com
` softbeeus@gmail.com
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on March 28, 2023, a true and correct copy of the foregoing documents
`was delivered via electronic mail to:
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner:
`
`Govinda M. Davis (govinda.davis@dinsmore.com)
`
`Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
`255 E. Fifth Street, Suite 1900
`Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
`(513) 977-8200
`
`
`By:
`
`/Sang Lee/
`
` Sang Lee
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site