`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA1264933
`
`Filing date:
`
`02/08/2023
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding no.
`
`92081010
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`address
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Attachments
`
`Defendant
`Community Initiatives
`
`REBECCAH GAN
`MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.
`125 S. ROYAL ST.
`ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314
`UNITED STATES
`Primary email: rgan@mg-ip.com
`Secondary email(s): maryfran@mg-ip.com, swr@mg-ip.com,
`cemond@mg-ip.com
`703-621-7140
`
`Other Motions/Submissions
`
`Rebeccah Gan
`
`maryfran@mg-ip.com, swr@mg-ip.com, rgan@mg-ip.com, cemond@mg-ip.com
`
`/rgan/
`
`02/08/2023
`
`Motion to Substitute Party Set Aside Notice of Default and Reopen Tim e to File
`Answer-92081010.pdf(671164 bytes )
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`EDGE GAMES, INC.
`
`
`Petitioner,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`THE GIVING BACK FUND, INC.,
`
`
`Respondent.
`
`
`
`
`Cancellation No. 92081010
`
`Registration No.: 5944855
`
`Mark: SHADOW'S EDGE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE PARTY, SET ASIDE NOTICE OF DEFAULT, AND
`MOTION FOR LEAVE TO REOPEN TIME TO FILE ANSWER
`
`
`Pursuant to TBMP § 512.01 (2022), The Giving Back Fund, Inc. (“Respondent”), through
`
`counsel, in the above-referenced cancellation proceeding, hereby moves the Trademark Trial and
`
`Appeal Board (“Board”) to substitute the assignee as the cancellation Respondent.
`
`Respondent attaches herewith at Exhibit A proof of recordation of the assignment (to The
`
`Giving Back Fund, Inc.), which was filed in the USPTO on February 8, 2023.
`
`Further, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c), and TBMP §§§ 312.02, 508, and 509.01(b)(1)
`
`(2022), Respondent, through counsel, hereby moves the Board to set aside the Notice of Default
`
`dated January 25, 2023, and further moves the Board for leave to reopen the time to file an answer
`
`to the Petition for Cancellation.
`
`A Notice of Default may be set aside upon a showing of good cause. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
`
`55(c), and TBMP §§ 312.02 and 508 (2022).
`
`Good cause why default judgment should not be entered against a defendant for failure to
`
`file a timely answer to the complaint, is usually found when the defendant shows that: (1) the delay
`
`Cancellation No. 92081010
`Page 1 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in filing an answer was not the result of willful conduct or gross neglect on the part of the
`
`defendant; (2) the plaintiff will not be substantially prejudiced by the delay; and (3) the defendant
`
`has a meritorious defense to the action. Id. In practice, the Board “is lenient in accepting late-
`
`filed answers” when the delay is not excessive. See, Mattel, Inc. v. Henson, 88 Fed.401 Appx.
`
`401, n.1. (Fed. Cir. 2004), n.1. In the case at bar, the Board has ample reason to employ its leniency
`
`and authorize the late filing of an answer, upon only the showing of good cause. See TBMP §§
`
`312.02 and 508 (2022).
`
`Respondent is the assignee of Community Initiatives. Respondent did not receive timely
`
`notice of the Petition for Cancellation from its predecessor in interest, and required legal assistance
`
`to record the assignment and prepare an answer to the Petition.
`
`This motion is made for good cause and not made simply for purposes of delay.
`
`Respondent believes that good cause exists, because delays occasioned by the assignment of
`
`interest and lack of timely notice from Respondent’s predecessor in interest are extraordinary
`
`circumstances that warrant setting aside the Notice of Default and reopening the time to file an
`
`answer to the Petition for Cancellation, and Respondent does not believe that EDGE Games, Inc.
`
`(“Petitioner”) would be prejudiced by setting aside the Notice of Default.
`
`Respondent further asserts that the length of the delay is not significant, and there is no
`
`impact on other pending judicial proceedings. The reason for the delay is fairly characterized as
`
`inadvertent, due to delay occasioned by the transfer of interest in the subject registration and the
`
`attendant updating of USPTO contact information. Similarly, there is no issue of willful conduct,
`
`gross neglect, or bad faith. DeLorme Publishing Co v. Eartha’s Inc., 60 USPQ2d 1222, 1224
`
`(TTAB 2000) (willful conduct shown where although applicant may not have intended that
`
`proceedings be resolved by default, applicant admittedly intended not to answer for six months);
`
`Cancellation No. 92081010
`Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paolo’s Associates L.P. v. Bodo, 21 USPQ2d 1899, 1903-04 (Comm’r 1990) (where no evidence
`
`that failure was willful, leave for late answer should be granted); Fred Hayman Beverly Hills, Inc.
`
`v. Jacques Bernier, Inc., 21 USPQ2d 1556, 1557 (TTAB 1991) (failure to answer due to
`
`inadvertence on part of applicant’s counsel; minimal delay would cause minimal prejudice by
`
`submission of answer which was not frivolous, and thus, meritorious defense was shown).
`
`Default judgment is an extreme sanction, and “a weapon of last, not first, resort.” Martin
`
`v. Coughlin, 895 F. Supp. 39 (N.D.N.Y. 1995). Ultimately, there is no reason in this situation to
`
`depart from the well-known preference in the federal courts that litigation disputes be resolved on
`
`their merits. See, Richardson v. Nassau County, 184 F.R.D. 497, 501 (E.D.N.Y. 1999).
`
`Respondent further understands that “The determination of whether default judgment should be
`
`entered against a party lies within the sound discretion of the Board. In exercising that discretion,
`
`the Board must be mindful of the fact that it is the policy of the law to decide cases on their merits.
`
`Accordingly, the Board is very reluctant to enter a default judgment for failure to file a timely
`
`answer and tends to resolve any doubt on the matter in favor of the defendant.” See TBMP §
`
`312.02 (2022).
`
`Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, Respondent respectfully moves that the assignee
`
`be substituted as the Respondent, that default judgment not be entered in this proceeding, and that
`
`leave be granted to file a late answer.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cancellation No. 92081010
`Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: February 8, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mary Fran Love, Esquire
`Rebeccah Gan, Esquire
`Counsel for Respondent
`
`MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.
`125 S. Royal St.
`Alexandria, VA 22314
`Telephone: 703-621-7140
`Emails: maryfran@mg-ip.com, swr@mg-ip.com,
`rgan@mg-ip.com, cemond@mg-ip.com
`
`Cancellation No. 92081010
`Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Rebeccah Gan, hereby certify that on this 8th day of February 2023, a true and complete
`
`copy of the foregoing Motion to Substitute Party, Set Aside Notice of Default, and Motion for
`
`Leave to Reopen Time to File Answer, has been served on Petitioner, Tim Langdell of EDGE
`
`Games, Inc., via electronic mail (as prescribed by law), addressed as follows:
`
`edgegames@gmail.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Rebeccah Gan, Esq.
`
`Cancellation No. 92081010
`Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`USPTO Pay - Choose Checkout Method
`
`https://fees.uspto.gov/pay/?auth=true
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Home | Site Index | Search | Guides | Contacts | eBusiness | eBiz alerts | News | Help
`
`Electronic Trademark Assignment System
`
`Confirmation Receipt
`
`Your assignment has been received by the USPTO.
`The coversheet of the assignment is displayed below:
`
`TRADEMARK ASSIGNMENT COVER SHEET
`
`Electronic Version v1.1
`Stylesheet Version v1.2
`
`SUBMISSION TYPE:
`
`NEW ASSIGNMENT
`
`NATURE OF CONVEYANCE:
`
`ASSIGNMENT OF THE ENTIRE INTEREST AND THE
`GOODWILL
`
`CONVEYING PARTY DATA
`
`Name
`
`Formerly
`
`Community Initiatives
`
`RECEIVING PARTY DATA
`
`Execution
`Date
`03/01/2022 Non-Profit Corporation:
`
`Entity Type
`
`The Giving Back Fund, Inc.
`
`5757 West Century Blvd.
`
`Name:
`Street
`Address:
`Internal
`Address:
`Los Angeles
`City:
`State/Country: CALIFORNIA
`90045
`Postal Code:
`Non-Profit Corporation: MASSACHUSETTS
`Entity Type:
`
`Suite 410
`
`PROPERTY NUMBERS Total: 2
`
`Property Type
`
`Number
`
`Word Mark
`
`Registration
`Number:
`
`Registration
`Number:
`
`5944855
`
`SHADOW'S EDGE
`
`5837239
`
`DIGGING DEEP
`
`CORRESPONDENCE DATA
`swr@mg-ip.com
`Email:
`Correspondence will be sent to the e-mail address first; if that is unsuccessful, it will be
`sent using a fax number, if provided; if that is unsuccessful, it will be sent via US Mail.
`Muncy Geissler Olds & Lowe P.C.
`Correspondent Name:
`125 S. Royal St.
`Address Line 1:
`Alexandria, VIRGINIA 22314
`Address Line 4:
`
`NAME OF SUBMITTER:
`
`Sherri Weisbeck-Raslich
`
`1 of 2
`
`2/8/2023, 11:25 AM
`
`
`
`USPTO Pay - Choose Checkout Method
`
`https://fees.uspto.gov/pay/?auth=true
`
`Signature:
`
`Date:
`
`/Sherri Weisbeck-Raslich/
`
`02/08/2023
`
`Total Attachments: 2
`source=Digging Deep Trademark Assignment 2.23#page1.tif
`source=Digging Deep Trademark Assignment 2.23#page2.tif
`
`RECEIPT INFORMATION
`
`ETAS ID:
`Receipt Date:
`Fee Amount:
`
`TM785441
`02/08/2023
`$65
`
`Return to ETAS home page
`
`| .HOME | INDEX| SEARCH | eBUSINESS | CONTACT US | PRIVACY STATEMENT
`
`2 of 2
`
`2/8/2023, 11:25 AM
`
`
`
`dッ」オsゥァョ@eョカ・ャッー・@idZ@RfVbVYRWMVbQWMTTXVMYfdPMeXbWbbPSQbVP
`
`TRADEMARK ASSIGNMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, Community Initiatives (“Assignor”), a California non-profit public benefit
`
`corporation located at 1000 Broadway, Suite 480, Oakland, California 94607 is the owner of the US
`
`trademark registrations identified on the attached Appendix (“the trademarks”).
`
`
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, The Giving Back Fund, Inc. (“Assignee”), a Massachusetts non-profit
`
`corporation located at 5757 West Century Blvd., Suite 410, Los Angeles, California 90045 acquired
`
`the trademark registrations identified below on March 1, 2022 along with the goodwill of the
`
`business associated therewith.
`
`
`
`
`
`NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt is hereby acknowledged by the
`
`parties, the Assignor hereby transfers and assigns to Assignee the entire right, title and interest in and
`
`to the trademarks together with the goodwill of the business associated with the mark effective March
`
`1, 2022. Assignor hereby authorizes the Assignee to record the transfer of the trademarks with the
`
`Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Community Initiatives
`
`By________________________________
`
`ROWORPRS
`Date: _____________________________
`
`rオエィ@wゥャャゥ。ュウ
`Name: ____________________________
`
`pイ・ウゥ、・ョエ@。ョ、@ceo
`Title: _____________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dッ」オsゥァョ@eョカ・ャッー・@idZ@RfVbVYRWMVbQWMTTXVMYfdPMeXbWbbPSQbVP
`
`APPENDIX
`
`
`Owner:
`Mark:
`Reg. No.:
`
`
`
`Owner:
`Mark:
`Reg. No.:
`
`
`Community Initiatives
`Shadow’s Edge
`5,944,855
`
`Community Initiatives
`Digging Deep
`5,837,239
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-2-
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site