`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA1196075
`
`Filing date:
`
`03/11/2022
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding no.
`
`92078700
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`address
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Defendant
`Jam City, Inc.
`
`JAM CITY, INC.
`3562 EASTHAM DRIVE
`CULVER CITY, CA 90232
`UNITED STATES
`Primary email: tmclients@cooley.com
`No phone number provided
`
`Other Motions/Submissions
`
`Andrea Anderson
`
`AAnderson@hollandhart.com, TKHawkes@hollandhart.com, dock-
`et@hollandhart.com, ceradoci@hollandhart.com
`
`/Andrea Anderson/
`
`03/11/2022
`
`Attachments
`
`Motion to Set Aside Default.pdf(109966 bytes )
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Petitioner,
`
`
`
`HASBRO, INC.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`JAM CITY, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Respondent.
`
`
`Cancellation No.: 92078700
`
`
`
`Mark: WORLD WAR DOH
`
`
`
`Registration No.: 6037670
`
`
`
`MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT
`
`Respondent Jam City, Inc., by and through its counsel, submits this motion in response to
`
`the Board’s Notice of Default of February 10, 2022. Because Respondent’s delay in answering
`
`was unintentional, Respondent respectfully requests that the Board set aside its Notice of
`
`Default, accept Respondent’s Answer, and reset the proceeding schedule accordingly.
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c) and TMBP § 312.02, good cause for
`
`discharging default is generally found if: (1) the delay in answering is not the result of willful
`
`conduct or gross neglect; (2) the delay will not result in substantial prejudice to the opposing
`
`party; and (3) the defendant has a meritorious defense. Fred Hayman Beverly Hills, Inc. v.
`
`Jacques Bernier, Inc., 21 USPQ2d 1556, 1557 (TTAB 1991).
`
`Here, the relevant facts establish good cause for discharging default. Respondent’s delay
`
`was entirely unintentional. It appears that the Petition for Cancellation and the Board’s Order
`
`instituting proceedings were sent only by email to the “Correspondent email” address for one of
`
`Respondent’s outside counsel. Due to a miscommunication between Respondent and this
`
`counsel, Respondent was unaware of the filing of the Petition or the Board’s Order setting a
`
`response deadline. The first Respondent heard of this action was the Notice of Default, which its
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`counsel forwarded. There was no intent to disregard the Board’s Order, rules, or deadlines;
`
`Respondent was simply not aware of the proceedings due to a miscommunication with counsel.
`
`Respondent’s slight delay will work no substantial prejudice on Petitioner’s ability to
`
`prosecute its case, and significantly, Respondent has a meritorious defense. Among other facts
`
`rendering confusion unlikely, the parties’ respective marks PLAY DOH and WORLD WAR
`
`DOH differ significantly in appearance, pronunciation, and meaning, and Respondent’s mobile
`
`game software differs significantly from Petitioner’s modeling compound and related products.
`
`DeLorme Publ’g Co. v. Eartha’s Inc., 60 USPQ2d 1222, 1224 (TTAB 2000) (all that is
`
`necessary to establish a meritorious defense are plausible responses to the allegations in the
`
`petition). Finally, because it is the policy of the law to decide cases on their merits, default
`
`judgments for failure to timely answer are disfavored by the Board. See TMBP § 312.02
`
`(“[T]he Board must be mindful of the fact that it is the policy of the law to decide cases on their
`
`merits. Accordingly, the Board is very reluctant to enter a default judgment for failure to file a
`
`timely answer, and tends to resolve any doubt on the matter in favor of the defendant.”)
`
`For all these reasons, Respondent respectfully submits that good cause exists for setting
`
`aside default and requests that the Board accept the Answer filed concurrently with this motion
`
`and reset the proceeding schedule accordingly.
`
`Dated: March 11, 2022.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Andrea Anderson
`Andrea Anderson
`Tara Hawkes
`HOLLAND & HART LLP
`P.O. Box 8749
`Denver, Colorado 80201
`Phone: (303) 473-2861
`AAnderson@hollandhart.com
`TKHawkes@hollandhart.com
`docket@hollandhart.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT
`ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT
`JAM CITY, INC.
`JAM CITY, INC.
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
` I
`
`
`
`
`
` certify that on March 11, 2022, I served a copy of the above Motion to Set Aside
`Default to the Petitioner’s representative as identified in the correspondence address of record
`via email to:
`
`Catherine M.C. Farrelly
`Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
`28 Liberty Street
`New York, NY 10005
`pto@fkks.com, alaroui@fkks.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Craig Radoci
`Craig Radoci
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`18332967_v1
`
`
`
`4
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site