Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. https://estta.uspto.gov
`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA1205304
`
`Filing date:
`
`04/26/2022
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding no.
`
`92078346
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`address
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`Plaintiff
`Shanti Wines, LLC
`
`STUART J. WEST
`WEST & ASSOCIATES, A PC
`3050 CITRUS CIRCLE, STE. 207
`WALNUT CREEK, CA 94598
`UNITED STATES
`Primary email: trademark@westpatentlaw.com
`925-262-2220
`
`Motion to Suspend for Civil Action
`
`Stuart J. West
`
`court@westpatentlaw.com, trademark@westpatentlaw.com
`
`/Stuart J. West/
`
`04/26/2022
`
`Attachments
`
`20220426-CompleteMotionToSuspend-SHANT-41001K.pdf(1884471 bytes )
`
`

`

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`In re Registration No. 6351329
`
`For the mark: Shanti Elixirs
`
`Registered: May 18, 2021
`
`
`
`– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – X
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Cancellation No. 92078346
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Shanti Wines, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Shanti Elixirs, L.L.C.,
`
`
`
`Petitioner,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` –
`
`:
`Registrant.
` – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –X
`
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MOTION TO SUSPEND PROCEEDINGS PENDING DISPOSITION OF DISTRICT
`COURT ACTION
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 2.117(a) and TBMP § 510.02(a), Petitioner, through its counsel,
`
`hereby moves the Board to suspend the above-referenced proceeding (the “TTAB Proceeding”)
`
`pending final disposition of Federal district court case No. 4:22-cv-02511-SK, filed April 25,
`
`2022, in the Northern District Court of California. Copies of the complaint and civil cover sheet
`
`are attached as Exhibit 1 to allow the Board to determine if the outcome of the civil action will
`
`have a bearing on the issues before the Board.
`
`

`

`
`
`The civil action involves issues in common with those in the above-referenced
`
`proceeding before the Board and the decision in the Federal Court will be binding upon the
`
`Board, while the Board’s decision may not be binding upon the Court. Petitioner is the sole
`
`Plaintiff and Registrant is a Defendant in the civil action. In the civil action, Petitioner brought
`
`Federal Trademark Infringement claims against Registrant under the Lanham Act in addition to a
`
`Request for Refusal to Register, Federal Unfair Competition, CA Trademark Infringement, CA
`
`Unfair Competition, Defamation, Public Disclosure of Private Facts. One of the marks at issue
`
`in the civil action is the same mark at issue in this cancellation. When parties are involved in a
`
`civil action concerning the same marks and issues, the standard procedure of the Board is to
`
`suspend its administrative proceedings pending the outcome of the civil action. New Orleans
`
`Louisiana Saints LLC v. Who dat? Inc., 99 USPQ2d 1550, 1552 (TTAB 2011)(quoting 6
`
`McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 32:47 (5th ed. Updated September 2017)).
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s counsel contacted Registrant’s counsel regarding this motion to suspend
`
`pending the outcome of the civil action. As of the filing of this motion Registrant’s counsel has
`
`not yet responded to Petitioner’s counsel.
`
`
`
`For the reasons mentioned above, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board suspend
`
`the above-referenced proceeding pending the outcome of the civil action referenced above.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`West & Associates, A PC
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Stuart J. West
`Stuart J. West
`3050 Citrus Circle, Ste. 207
`Walnut Creek, CA 94598
`Tel 925-262-2220
`Email: court@westpatentlaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and complete copy of the foregoing Motion to Suspend
`
`Proceedings Pending Disposition of District Court Action was served this 26th day of April
`
`2022, by sending it via e-mail to counsel for Registrant at RCrandall@mwblawyers.com,
`
`swinkler@mwblawyers.com.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Dawn Callender
`Dawn Callender
`
`
`
`

`

`Exhibit 1
`Exhibit 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-02511 Document 1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 1 of 32
`
`
`
`Stuart J. West
`SBN 202041
`West & Associates, A PC
`3050 Citrus Circle, Ste. 207
`Walnut Creek, CA 94598
`Attorney for Plaintiff
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`
`Shanti Wines, LLC,
`
`10
`
`11
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`12
`
`Shanti Elixirs, L.L.C.
`
`13
`
`and
`
`14
`
`Shanti Volpe
`
`15
`
` Defendants and
`
`16
`
` DOES 1-100
`
`Case No.:
`
`
`Complaint for Federal Trademark
`Infringement, Request for Refusal to
`Register, Federal Unfair Competition, CA
`Trademark Infringement, CA Unfair
`Competition, Defamation, Public Disclosure
`of Private Facts
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Plaintiff Shanti Wines, LLC ("Plaintiff"), by and through its attorneys, West &
`
`Associates, A PC, for its Complaint against Defendant Shanti Elixirs, L.L.C. ("Shanti Elixirs"),
`and Shanti Volpe (“Volpe”) alleges, on knowledge as to its own actions, and otherwise upon
`
`information and belief, as follows:
`
`PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
`
`1. This is an action for infringement of Plaintiff's federally-registered trademarks for Shanti
`
`under Section 32(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1), for unfair competition and
`
`false designation of origin under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a),
`
`all arising from the Defendant Shanti Elixirs unauthorized uses of the marks Shanti-Jun,
`
`Shanti Elixirs, and
`
` in connection with the manufacture,
`
`Complaint - 1
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-02511 Document 1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 2 of 32
`
`
`
`distribution, marketing, advertising, promotion, offering for sale, and/or sale of
`
`Defendant's kombucha tea; tea; tea-based beverages; jun; honey; honey infused with green
`
`tea; mixes in the nature of concentrates, syrups or powders to be used in the preparation of
`
`tea based beverages; tea extracts; tea for infusions; tea substitutes; tea-based beverages
`
`with fruit flavoring; tea-based iced beverages; beverages made of tea; beverages with a tea
`
`base; chamomile tea; ginger tea; green tea; herbal tea; mixes for making tea; mixes for
`
`making kombucha and honey based green tea.
`
`2. This action also requests refusal to register Defendant’s Shanti Junery mark (US
`
`Application Serial No. 88685322) for Café; Taproom services featuring non-alcoholic
`
`beverages; Taproom services featuring jun; Tea bars; Tea rooms.
`
`3. This is also an action for Federal Unfair Competition, CA Trademark Infringement, CA
`
`Unfair Competition, Defamation and Public Disclosure of Private Fact.
`
`4. Plaintiff seeks injunctive and monetary relief.
`
`JURISDICTION
`
`5. This court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1121, 28 U.S.C. §§
`
`1331, 1332(a), and pursuant to the principles of supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
`
`§ 1367.
`
`6. Personal jurisdiction over Defendant Shanti Elixirs is proper in this District because it has
`
`availed itself of the rights and benefits of the laws of California, it has derived revenue
`
`from the sales of products in California, and it has systematic and continuous business
`
`contacts with California.
`
`Complaint - 2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-02511 Document 1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 3 of 32
`
`
`
`7. Personal jurisdiction over Defendant Volpe is proper in this District because she has
`
`directed communications into the Northern District of California.
`
`VENUE
`
`8. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2), in that a substantial part of
`
`the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this district, and 28 U.S.C. §
`
`1391(b)(3), in that Defendant is subject to personal jurisdiction in this district with respect
`
`to this action, and there is no other district in which the action may otherwise be brought.
`
`PARTIES
`
`9. Plaintiff Shanti Wines, LLC is a limited liability company formed under the laws of the
`
`state of California and has a business address of 2551 San Ramon Valley Blvd. #107-A,
`
`San Ramon, CA 94583.
`
`10. Upon information and belief, Defendant Shanti Elixirs, L.L.C. is a limited liability
`
`company formed under the laws of the state of North Carolina and has an address of 92
`
`Dorothy Lille Ln, Weaverville, NC, 28787-9772.
`
`11. Upon information and belief, Defendant Shanti Volpe is an individual with an address of
`
`92 Dorothy Lille Ln, Weaverville, NC, 28787-9772.
`
`FACTS
`
`A. Plaintiff and its Shanti Marks
`
`12. Plaintiff is a producer and seller of various types of beverages and food products.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Complaint - 3
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-02511 Document 1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 4 of 32
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`13. Plaintiff is the owner of multiple valid and subsisting United States Trademark
`
`Registrations on the Principal Register in the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`for the trademark “Shanti”.
`
`14. Plaintiff is the owner of valid and subsisting United States Trademark Registration No.
`
`5116089 on the Principal Register in the United States Patent and Trademark Office for
`
`the trademark Shanti for wine. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the
`
`registration certificate for Plaintiff's United States Trademark Registration No. 5116089,
`
`which was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on January 3, 2017.
`
`15. Plaintiff is the owner of valid and subsisting United States Trademark Registration No.
`
`5303219 on the Principal Register in the United States Patent and Trademark Office for
`
`the trademark Shanti for beer and bottled water. Attached as Exhibit 2 is a true and
`
`correct copy of the registration certificate for Plaintiff’s United States Trademark
`
`Registration No. 5303219, which was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark
`
`Office on October 3, 2017.
`
`16. Plaintiff is the owner of valid and subsisting United States Trademark Registration No.
`
`5795344 on the Principal Register in the United States Patent and Trademark Office for
`
`the trademark Shanti for cooking oil. Attached as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of
`the registration certificate for Plaintiff’s United States Trademark Registration No.
`
`5795344, which was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on July 2,
`
`2019.
`
`17. Plaintiff is the owner of valid and subsisting United States Trademark Registration No.
`
`6171197 on the Principal Register in the United States Patent and Trademark Office for
`
`the trademark Shanti for liquor. Attached as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of the
`registration certificate for Plaintiff’s United States Trademark Registration No. 6171197,
`
`which was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on October 6, 2020.
`
`Complaint - 4
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-02511 Document 1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 5 of 32
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`18. Plaintiff has used the Shanti mark in interstate commerce in the United States
`
`continuously since September 21, 2016, in connection with the manufacture, distribution,
`
`offering for sale, sale, marketing, advertising, and promotion of wine.
`
`19. Plaintiff has used the Shanti mark in interstate commerce in the United States
`
`continuously since July 27, 2017, in connection with the manufacture, distribution,
`
`offering for sale, sale, marketing, advertising, and promotion of beer and bottled water.
`
`20. Plaintiff has used the Shanti mark in interstate commerce in the United States
`
`continuously since May 8, 2019, in connection with the manufacture, distribution, offering
`
`for sale, sale, marketing, advertising, and promotion of cooking oil.
`
`21. Plaintiff has used the Shanti mark in interstate commerce in the United States
`
`continuously since July 1, 2020, in connection with the manufacture, distribution, offering
`
`for sale, sale, marketing, advertising, and promotion of liquor.
`
`22. Registration right for Plaintiff’s Registration no. 5116089 for wine is perfected back to the
`
`filing date of the application, April 11, 2016.
`
`23. Registration right for Plaintiff’s Registration no. 5303219 for beer and bottled water is
`
`perfected back to the filing date of the application, October 12, 2016.
`
`24. As a result of its widespread, continuous, and exclusive use of the Shanti registrations to
`
`identify its wine, beer, bottled water, cooking oil, and liquor and Plaintiff as their source,
`
`Plaintiff owns valid and subsisting federal statutory and common law rights to the Shanti
`
`marks.
`
`25. Plaintiff's Shanti marks are distinctive to both the consuming public and Plaintiff's trade.
`
`Complaint - 5
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-02511 Document 1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 6 of 32
`
`
`
`26. Plaintiff has expended substantial time, money, and resources marketing, advertising, and
`
`promoting the wine, beer, bottled water, cooking oil, and liquor sold under the Shanti
`
`marks.
`
`27. The wine, beer, bottled water, cooking oil, and liquor Plaintiff offers under the Shanti
`
`marks are of high quality.
`
`28. As a result of Plaintiff's expenditures and efforts, the Shanti marks have come to signify
`
`the high quality of the goods designated by the Shanti marks, and acquired incalculable
`
`distinction, reputation, and goodwill belonging exclusively to Plaintiff.
`
`
`
`29. Plaintiff has scrupulously and successfully enforced and protected its Shanti marks against
`
`past infringements.
`
`
`30. On June 10, 2021, Plaintiff filed a notice of opposition of Defendant’s Shanti Junery
`
`trademark application (Application Serial No. 88685322) which was assigned opposition
`
`proceeding no. 91269822 by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
`
`
`31. On October 29, 2021, Plaintiff filed a petition to cancel Defendant’s Shanti-Jun trademark
`
`registration (Registration No. 5602065) which was assigned cancellation proceeding no.
`
`92078353 by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
`
`
`32. On October 29, 2021, Plaintiff filed a petition to cancel Defendant’s Shanti Elixirs
`
`trademark registration (Registration No. 6351329) which was assigned cancellation
`
`proceeding no. 92078346 by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Complaint - 6
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-02511 Document 1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 7 of 32
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`33. On October 29, 2021, Plaintiff filed a petition to cancel Defendant’s Shanti Elixirs stylized
`
`trademark registration (Registration No. 6351330) which was assigned cancellation
`
`proceeding no. 92078354 by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
`
`B. Defendant’s Unlawful Activities
`
`34. Upon information and belief, Defendant Shanti Elixirs is engaged in the production and
`
`sales of various types of beverages and beverage mixes.
`
`35. Without Plaintiff's authorization, and upon information and belief, beginning after
`
`Plaintiff acquired protectable exclusive rights in its Shanti marks, Defendant Shanti Elixirs
`
`adopted and began using Shanti Elixirs, Shanti Elixirs in a stylized form, and Shanti-Jun
`
`(hereinafter, the "Infringing Marks") in US commerce.
`
`36. The Infringing Marks adopted and used by Defendant Shanti Elixirs are confusingly
`
`similar to Plaintiff's Shanti marks in part because the dominant portion of the Infringing
`
`Marks are identical to Plaintiff’s Shanti marks.
`
`37. Defendant Shanti Elixirs has been engaged in the manufacture, distribution, advertising,
`
`promotion, offering for sale, and sale of kombucha tea; tea; tea-based beverages; jun using
`
`the word and stylized Shanti Elixirs marks throughout the United States, including into the
`
`Northern District of California.
`
`38. Upon information and belief, Defendant Shanti Elixirs has been engaged in the
`
`manufacture, distribution, advertising, promotion, offering for sale, and sale of honey;
`
`Honey infused with green tea; Kombucha tea; Mixes in the nature of concentrates, syrups
`
`or powders used in the preparation of tea based beverages; Tea; Tea extracts; Tea for
`
`infusions; Tea substitutes; Tea-based beverages; Tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring;
`
`Complaint - 7
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-02511 Document 1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 8 of 32
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Tea-based iced beverages; Beverages made of tea; Beverages with a tea base; Chamomile
`
`tea; Ginger tea; Green tea; Herbal tea; Mixes for making tea; Mixes for making kombucha
`
`and honey based green tea using Shanti-Jun mark throughout the United States.
`
`39. Upon information and belief, the goods Defendant Shanti Elixirs has manufactured,
`
`distributed, provided, marketed, advertised, promoted, offered for sale, and sold under the
`
`Infringing Marks are highly related to the goods sold by Plaintiff as the goods are
`
`beverages or items related to beverages.
`
`40. Upon information and belief, Defendant Shanti Elixirs has manufactured, distributed,
`
`provided, marketed, advertised, promoted, offered for sale, and sold its goods under the
`
`Infringing Marks through the same trade channels as Plaintiff’s goods are sold.
`
`41. Upon information and belief, Defendant Shanti Elixirs offers and sells its goods under the
`
`Infringing Marks to the same types of consumers as those that purchase Plaintiff’s goods
`
`in that the consumers are purchasers of beverages and food items.
`
`42. Defendant Shanti Elixir’s infringing acts as alleged herein have caused and are likely to
`
`cause confusion, mistake, and deception among the relevant consuming public as to the
`
`source or origin of the Defendant Shanti Elixir’s goods and have and are likely to deceive
`
`the relevant consuming public into believing, mistakenly, that Defendant Shanti Elixir’s
`
`goods originate from, are associated or affiliated with, or otherwise authorized by
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`43. Defendant Shanti Elixirs has been aware of Plaintiff’s marks at least as early as June 10,
`
`2021, when Plaintiff filed the notice of opposition of Defendant Shanti Elixir’s Shanti
`
`Junery mark.
`
`Complaint - 8
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-02511 Document 1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 9 of 32
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`44. Upon information and belief, Defendant Shanti Elixirs has been aware of Plaintiff’s Shanti
`
`marks since before Defendant Shanti Elixirs filed its trademark applications.
`
`45. Defendant Shanti Elixirs has continued to use the Infringing Marks even after Defendant
`
`Shanti Elixirs was aware of Plaintiff’s Shanti marks.
`
`46. Upon information and belief, Defendant Shanti Elixir’s acts are willful with the deliberate
`
`intent to trade on the goodwill of Plaintiff's Shanti marks, cause confusion and deception
`
`in the marketplace, and divert potential sales of Plaintiff's goods to Defendant Shanti
`
`Elixirs.
`
`47. Defendant Shanti Elixir’s acts are causing, and unless restrained, will continue to cause
`
`damage and immediate irreparable harm to Plaintiff and to its valuable reputation and
`
`goodwill with the consuming public for which Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.
`
`48. Defendant Shanti Elixirs filed an intent-to-use application for Shanti Junery (U.S.
`
`Application Serial No. 88685322) in connection with café; Taproom services featuring
`
`non-alcoholic beverages; Taproom services featuring jun; Tea bars; Tea rooms.
`
`49. Plaintiff has opposed Defendant Shanti Elixir’s Shanti Junery application as its
`
`registration would likely cause confusion with Plaintiff’s Shanti marks due to the
`
`similarity of the marks and the goods/services listed in the application and those provided
`
`by Plaintiff.
`
`50. Defendant Shanti Elixirs is the owner of US Registration No. 5602065 for Shanti-Jun for
`
`Honey; Honey infused with green tea; Kombucha tea; Mixes in the nature of concentrates,
`
`syrups or powders used in the preparation of tea based beverages; Tea; Tea extracts; Tea
`
`Complaint - 9
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-02511 Document 1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 10 of 32
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`for infusions; Tea substitutes; Tea-based beverages; Tea-based beverages with fruit
`
`flavoring; Tea-based iced beverages; Beverages made of tea; Beverages with a tea base;
`
`Chamomile tea; Ginger tea; Green tea; Herbal tea; Mixes for making tea; Mixes for
`
`making kombucha and honey based green tea which registered on November 6, 2018.
`
`51. Defendant Shanti Elixirs is the owner of US Registration No. 6351329 for Shanti Elixirs
`
`for Kombucha tea; Tea; Tea-based beverages; Jun which registered on May 18, 2021.
`
`52. Defendant Shanti Elixirs is the owner of US Registration No. 6351330 for
`
` for Kombucha tea; Tea; Tea-based beverages; Jun which
`
`registereted on May 18, 2021.
`
`53. Upon information and belief, Defendant Volpe is a member of Shanti Elixirs, L.L.C.
`
`54. Upon information and belief, Defendant Volpe made a GoFundMe page, on behalf of
`
`Shanti Elixirs, to raise funds for legal proceedings.
`
`55. The GoFundMe page states, “Shanti Elixirs invites you to support us as we navigate the
`
`legal terrain of being “phished” by a larger company looking to take over our footprint.”
`
`See Exhibit 5.
`
`56. The GoFundMe page states, “Is it fair for a well-funded real estate mogul to bully a small-
`
`time entrepreneur whose business has no impact on his winery? We think not.” See
`
`Exhibit 5.
`
`57. On the GoFundMe page there are false statements or purported facts about Plaintiff and
`
`Ray Sharma, president of Plaintiff.
`
`Complaint - 10
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-02511 Document 1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 11 of 32
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`58. The false statements were published via the GoFundMe page by Volpe on behalf of Shanti
`
`Elixirs.
`
`59. The false statements were made negligently, recklessly or intentionally.
`
`60. As a result of the false statements Plaintiff’s reputation was damaged.
`
`61. Defendants publicly disclosed the fact that Plaintiff and Defendant had discussed specific
`
`settlement terms.
`
`62. The GoFundMe page states, “The winery's ‘generous’ offer is for everything to return to
`
`business as usual prior to all this – except that I would have to voluntarily cancel my
`
`registrations and abandon my application, stick to only the products we are currently
`
`offering, and geographically limit our sales to our current footprint. How do you all feel
`
`about that?” See Exhibit 6.
`
`63. Plaintiff’s settlement terms were sent privately to Defendants’ counsel.
`
`64. The contents of Plaintiff’s settlement terms were personal and private.
`
`65. Defendants knew or should have known that Plaintiff’s settlement terms were personal
`
`and private.
`
`66. Defendants knew or should have known that the disclosure of Plaintiff’s specific
`
`settlement terms would be harmful to Plaintiff.
`
`67. Defendants knew or should have known that the publication of Plaintiff’s specific
`
`settlement terms would have no value to anyone other than Defendant.
`
`Complaint - 11
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-02511 Document 1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 12 of 32
`
`
`
`68. Defendants published Plaintiff’s specific settlement terms with the intent to cause harm to
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`69. Defendants’ publication of private facts has harmed Plaintiff.
`
`COUNT ONE (Federal Trademark Infringement)
`
`Against Shanti Elixirs [Registration Number 5602065]
`
`70. Plaintiff repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 69 hereof, as if fully set forth herein.
`
`71. Defendant Shanti Elixir’s unauthorized use in commerce of the Infringing Marks as
`
`alleged herein is likely to deceive consumers as to the origin, source, sponsorship, or
`
`affiliation of Defendant Shanti Elixir’s goods, and is likely to cause consumers to believe,
`
`contrary to fact, that Defendant Shanti Elixir’s goods are sold, authorized, endorsed, or
`
`sponsored by Plaintiff, or that Defendant Shanti Elixirs is in some way affiliated with or
`
`sponsored by Plaintiff. Defendant Shanti Elixir’s conduct therefore constitutes trademark
`
`infringement in violation of Section 32(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1).
`
`72. Upon information and belief, Defendant Shanti Elixirs has committed the foregoing acts
`
`of infringement with full knowledge of Plaintiff's prior rights in the Shanti marks and with
`
`the willful intent to cause confusion and trade on Plaintiff's goodwill.
`
`73. Defendant Shanti Elixir’s conduct is causing immediate and irreparable harm and injury to
`
`Plaintiff, and to its goodwill and reputation, and will continue to both damage Plaintiff and
`
`confuse the public unless enjoined by this court. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Complaint - 12
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-02511 Document 1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 13 of 32
`
`
`
`74. Plaintiff is entitled to, among other relief, injunctive relief and an award of actual
`
`damages, Defendant Shanti Elixir’s profits, enhanced damages and profits, reasonable
`
`attorneys' fees, and costs of the action under Sections 34 and 35 of the Lanham Act, 15
`
`U.S.C. §§ 1116, 1117, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest.
`
`COUNT TWO (Federal Trademark Infringement)
`
` Against Shanti Elixirs [Registration No. 6351329]
`
`75. Plaintiff repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 74 hereof, as if fully set forth herein.
`
`76. Shanti Elixir’s unauthorized use in commerce of the Infringing Marks as alleged herein is
`
`likely to deceive consumers as to the origin, source, sponsorship, or affiliation of
`
`Defendant Shanti Elixir’s goods, and is likely to cause consumers to believe, contrary to
`
`fact, that Defendant Shanti Elixir’s goods are sold, authorized, endorsed, or sponsored by
`
`Plaintiff, or that Defendant Shanti Elixirs is in some way affiliated with or sponsored by
`
`Plaintiff. Defendant Shanti Elixir’s conduct therefore constitutes trademark infringement
`
`in violation of Section 32(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1).
`
`77. Upon information and belief, Defendant Shanti Elixirs has committed the foregoing acts
`
`of infringement with full knowledge of Plaintiff's prior rights in the Shanti marks and with
`
`the willful intent to cause confusion and trade on Plaintiff's goodwill.
`
`78. Defendant Shanti Elixir’s conduct is causing immediate and irreparable harm and injury to
`
`Plaintiff, and to its goodwill and reputation, and will continue to both damage Plaintiff and
`
`confuse the public unless enjoined by this court. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Complaint - 13
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-02511 Document 1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 14 of 32
`
`
`
`79. Plaintiff is entitled to, among other relief, injunctive relief and an award of actual
`
`damages, Defendant Shanti Elixir’s profits, enhanced damages and profits, reasonable
`
`attorneys' fees, and costs of the action under Sections 34 and 35 of the Lanham Act, 15
`
`U.S.C. §§ 1116, 1117, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest.
`
`COUNT THREE (Federal Trademark Infringment)
`
`Against Shanti Elixirs [Registration No. 6351330]
`
`80. Plaintiff repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 79 hereof, as if fully set forth herein.
`
`81. Shanti Elixir’s unauthorized use in commerce of the Infringing Marks as alleged herein is
`
`likely to deceive consumers as to the origin, source, sponsorship, or affiliation of
`
`Defendant Shanti Elixir’s goods, and is likely to cause consumers to believe, contrary to
`
`fact, that Defendant Shanti Elixir’s goods are sold, authorized, endorsed, or sponsored by
`
`Plaintiff, or that Defendant Shanti Elixirs is in some way affiliated with or sponsored by
`
`Plaintiff. Defendant Shanti Elixir’s conduct therefore constitutes trademark infringement
`
`in violation of Section 32(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1).
`
`82. Upon information and belief, Defendant Shanti Elixirs has committed the foregoing acts
`
`of infringement with full knowledge of Plaintiff's prior rights in the Shanti marks and with
`
`the willful intent to cause confusion and trade on Plaintiff's goodwill.
`
`83. Defendant Shanti Elixir’s conduct is causing immediate and irreparable harm and injury to
`
`Plaintiff, and to its goodwill and reputation, and will continue to both damage Plaintiff and
`
`confuse the public unless enjoined by this court. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Complaint - 14
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-02511 Document 1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 15 of 32
`
`
`
`84. Plaintiff is entitled to, among other relief, injunctive relief and an award of actual
`
`damages, Defendant Shanti Elixir’s profits, enhanced damages and profits, reasonable
`
`attorneys' fees, and costs of the action under Sections 34 and 35 of the Lanham Act, 15
`
`U.S.C. §§ 1116, 1117, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest.
`
`
`
`COUNT FOUR (Refusal of Registration of US Application Serial No. 88685322
`
`based on likelihood of confusion against Shanti Elixirs)
`
`85. Plaintiff repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 84 hereof, as if fully set forth herein.
`
`86. The registration of Defendant Shanti Elixir’s Application Serial No. 88685322 would
`
`likely deceive consumers as to the origin, source, sponsorship, or affiliation of Defendant
`
`Shanti Elixir’s goods, and is likely to cause consumers to believe, contrary to fact, that
`
`Defendant Shanti Elixir’s goods are sold, authorized, endorsed, or sponsored by Plaintiff,
`
`or that Defendant Shanti Elixirs is in some way affiliated with or sponsored by Plaintiff.
`
`87. The registration of Defendant Shanti Elixir’s Application Serial No. 88685322 would
`
`cause immediate and irreparable harm and injury to Plaintiff, and to its goodwill and
`
`reputation, and would damage Plaintiff and confuse the public.
`
`COUNT FIVE (Federal Unfair Competition) Against Shanti Elixirs
`
`88. Plaintiff repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 87 hereof, as if fully set forth herein.
`
`89. Defendant Shanti Elixir’s unauthorized use in commerce of the Infringing Marks as
`
`alleged herein is likely to deceive consumers as to the origin, source, sponsorship, or
`
`Complaint - 15
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:22-cv-02511 Document 1 Filed 04/25/22 Page 16 of 32
`
`
`
`affiliation of Defendant Shanti Elixir’s goods, and is likely to cause consumers to believe,
`
`contrary to fact, that Defendant Shanti Elixir’s goods are sold, authorized, endorsed, or
`
`sponsored by Plaintiff, or that Defendant Shanti Elixirs is in some way affiliated with or
`
`sponsored by Plaintiff.
`
`90. Defendant Shanti Elixir’s unauthorized use in commerce of the Infringing Marks as
`
`alleged herein constitutes use of a false designation of origin and misleading description
`
`and representation of fact.
`
`91. Upon information and belief, Defendant Shanti Elixir’s conduct as alleged herein is willful
`
`and is intended to and is likely to cause confusion, mistake, or deception as to the
`
`affiliation, connection, or association of Defendant Shanti Elixirs with Plaintiff.
`
`92. Defendant Shanti Elixir’s conduct as alleged herein constitutes unfair competition in
`
`violation of Sect