`
`ESTTA Tracking number:
`
`ESTTA1099453
`
`Filing date:
`
`12/03/2020
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Proceeding
`
`92075511
`
`Party
`
`Correspondence
`Address
`
`Plaintiff
`VIP Products L.L.C.
`
`MARVIN A. GLAZER
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`525 UNIVERSITY AVE, SUITE 400
`PALO ALTO, CA 94301-1918
`UNITED STATES
`Primary Email: IPDocketing@haynesboone.com
`Secondary Email(s): marvin.glazer@haynesboone.com, di-
`ana.obradovich@haynesboone.com, lori.lapidario@haynesboone.com
`6506878826
`
`Submission
`
`Filer's Name
`
`Filer's email
`
`Motion for Default Judgment
`
`Marvin A. Glazer
`
`IPDocketing@haynesboone.com, marvin.glazer@haynesboone.com,
`Lori.Lapidario@haynesboone.com, Diana.Obradovich@haynesboone.com
`
`Signature
`
`Date
`
`/Marvin A. Glazer/
`
`12/03/2020
`
`Attachments
`
`Motion_for_Entry_of_Default_Judgment.pdf(100543 bytes )
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`In re Registration of Chunfen Wang (Assignee)
`
`+
`
`Mark: Pantablok
`
`Reg. No.: 5,812,825
`
`
`
`VIP PRODUCTS L.L.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CHUNFEN WANG
`
`Petitioner,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Registrant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`: CANCELLATION NO. 92075511
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR RESPONDENT’S FAILURE
`
`TO ANSWER PETITION FOR CANCELLATION
`
`Petitioner VIP Products L.L.C. (“Petitioner”) respectfully submits this Motion for Entry
`
`.
`
`of Default Judgment based upon Respondent-Registrant Chunfen Wang’s failure to file and serve
`
`its Answer to Petitioner’s Petition for Cancellation of the above-identified U.S. trademark
`
`registration.
`
`The facts are as follows:
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`1.
`
`On October 16, 2020, Petitioner filed its Petition to Cancel Registration No. 5,812,825
`
`for the mark “Pantablok”.
`
`2.
`
`On October 19, 2020, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board”) issued its
`
`Notice of Institution of Cancellation Proceeding No. 92075511 and served a copy thereof upon
`
`Registrant Chunfen Wang (“Registrant”). Service of such Notice of Institution constituted
`
`service of the Petition to Cancel on Registrant.
`
`3.
`
`The October 19, 2020 Notice of Institution included an Order by the Board directing
`
`Registrant to file an Answer to the Petition for Cancellation on or before November 28, 2020;
`
`that day fell on a Saturday, and the next business day was Monday, November 30, 2020.
`
`4.
`
`As of today, December 3, 2020, Registrant has not filed an Answer to the Petition for
`
`Cancellation in this proceeding.
`
`5.
`
` In accordance with Trademark Office Rule 37 CFR §2.114(a), if no answer is filed
`
`within the time initially set, or as may later be reset by the Board, the petition may be decided as
`
`in case of default.
`
`6.
`
`Accordingly, Petitioner respectfully requests the Board to enter judgment by default
`
`against the Registrant, cancelling Registration No. 5,812,825 for the mark “Pantablok”.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[Continued on next page]
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`By: /Marvin A. Glazer/
`Marvin A. Glazer, AZ Bar No. 005885
`Haynes And Boone, LLP
`525 University Ave., #400
`Palo Alto, CA 94301
`Telephone: (650) 687-8826
`Fax: (650) 687-8726
`Email: marvin.glazer@haynesboone.com
`USPTO Reg. No. 28,801
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner,
`VIP Products L.L.C.
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and complete copy of the foregoing Motion For Entry
`
`Of Default Judgment For Respondent’s Failure To Answer Petition For Cancellation has
`been served on Registrant Chunfen Wang by mailing said copy by first class mail on
`December 3, 2020, to Chunfen Wang, No. 332 Chuyou North Road, Chumen Town,
`Yuhuan County Taizhou City, Zhejiang Province, 317600 China.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Signature: _/Marvin A. Glazer/__
`
`Date:___December 3, 2020
`
`3
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ ChargeStill Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site